Current Epidemiology Reports

, Volume 5, Issue 1, pp 18–23 | Cite as

Tuberculosis: a Persistent Health Challenge for India

Infectious Disease Epidemiology (A Reingold, Section Editor)
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Infectious Disease Epidemiology

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Currently, India accounts for more than a quarter of incident TB cases globally. The Indian government recently announced a new national strategic plan to eliminate TB by 2025, but much is still unknown about the epidemic, in part due to a weakly regulated and highly privatized health sector. In this review, we provide an overview of the current landscape of TB in India, focusing on major challenges to elimination.

Recent Findings

Historically, political will and investment in TB care in India have been lacking. To successfully eliminate TB, India will need to broadly improve the quality of care that TB patients receive. Simulated patient studies have shown that the current quality of care is poor, especially in the private sector where drug sales estimate over one million TB patients seek care annually. Cascade of care studies indicate that TB patients are lost at every stage of care-seeking. Access is suboptimal for new diagnostic technologies such as GeneXpert and new drugs such as bedaquiline. Additionally, research in the social determinants of health indicates that factors such as undernutrition, smoking, and diabetes are major driving forces behind the TB epidemic.

Summary

India’s ambitious plan for TB elimination will require strong political and financial commitment to move forward. In order to effectively tackle TB, the Indian government needs to better engage the private sector and focus on quality: quality of care for patients, quality improvement of TB programs, and overall health quality to address social determinants.

Keywords

Tuberculosis India Global health Quality of care Operational research Epidemiology 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    World Health Organization. Global tuberculosis report. 2017 Geneva.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kapoor SK, Raman AV, Sachdeva KS, Satyanarayana S. How did the TB patients reach DOTS services in Delhi? A study of patient treatment seeking behavior. PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e42458.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0042458.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mistry N, Lobo E, Shah S, Rangan S, Dholakia Y. Pulmonary tuberculosis in Patna, India: durations, delays, and health care seeking behaviour among patients identified through household surveys. J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2017;7(4):241–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jegh.2017.08.001.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    • Sreeramareddy CT, Qin ZZ, Satyanarayana S, Subbaraman R, Pai M. Delays in diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis in India: a systematic review. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2014;18(3):255–66. Systematically reviews available literature to show a median patient delay of > 2 weeks and a diagnostic delay of > 1 month for Indian TB patients. Such delays increase transmission and the risk of death.  https://doi.org/10.5588/ijtld.13.0585.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    •• Subbaraman R, Nathavitharana RR, Satyanarayana S, Pai M, Thomas BE, Chadha VK, et al. The tuberculosis cascade of care in India’s public sector: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2016;13(10):e1002149. Systematically reviews available literature to characterize the public sector TB patient care cascade. The results show staggering losses at each step of the cascade with nearly half of patients being lost to follow up before treatment initiation.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002149.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    •• Das J, Kwan A, Daniels B, Satyanarayana S, Subbaraman R, Bergkvist S, et al. Use of standardised patients to assess quality of tuberculosis care: a pilot, cross-sectional study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2015;15(11):1305–13. The first application of the standardised patient (SP) methodology to TB. SPs allow for assessment of the real world care patients receive. This work showed that private physicians were failing to correctly manage the majority of TB cases presented to them.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00077-8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    • Satyanarayana S, Kwan A, Daniels B, Subbaraman R, McDowell A, Bergkvist S, et al. Use of standardised patients to assess antibiotic dispensing for tuberculosis by pharmacies in urban India: a cross-sectional study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16(11):1261–8. The same TB SP methodology was applied to Indian pharmacists. This work showed that TB patients were frequently being prescribed non-specific antibiotics but not anti-TB medication.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30215-8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    World Health Organization. The end TB strategy: global strategy and targets for tuberculosis prevention, care, and control after 2015. 2015 Geneva.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    •• Revised National Tuberculosis Control Programme. National strategic plan for tuberculosis elimination 2017–2025. 2017. https://tbcindia.gov.in/WriteReadData/NSP%20Draft%2020.02.2017%201.pdf. Accessed 21 Jan 2018. This NSP outlines the RNTCP’s ambitious goal of TB elimination by 2025. It outlines many admirable programs and goalposts but the question remains whether this is enough will and funding to fully execute it.
  10. 10.
    Registrar General of India, Centre for Global Health Research. A joint report of the registrar General of India and the Centre for Global Health Research: causes of death statistics 2010–2013. 2015. http://www.cghr.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/COD-India-Report-2010-2013-Dec-19-2015.pdf. Accessed 21 Jan 2018.
  11. 11.
    Wang H, Naghavi M, Allen C, Barber RM, Bhutta ZA, Carter A, et al. Global, regional, and national life expectancy, all-cause mortality, and cause-specific mortality for 249 causes of death, 1980–2015: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2015. Lancet. 2016;388(10053):1459–544.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31012-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pai M, Correa N, Mistry N, Jha P, Piot P, Venkatapuram S. Reducing global tuberculosis deaths-time for India to step up. Lancet. 2017;389(10075):1174–6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30790-0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pai M, Bhaumik S, Bhuyan SS. India’s plan to eliminate tuberculosis by 2025: converting rhetoric into reality. BMJ Glob Heal. 2017;2(2):e000326.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    The Lancet. Health in India, 2017. Lancet. 2017;389(10065):127.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30075-2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fullman N, Barber RM, Abajobir AA, Abate KH, Abbafati C, Abbas KM, et al. Measuring progress and projecting attainment on the basis of past trends of the health-related sustainable development goals in 188 countries: an analysis from the global burden of disease study 2016. Lancet. 2017;390:1423–59.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32336-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Government of India Cabinet. National Health Policy, 2017 approved by cabinet focus on preventive and promotive health care and universal access to good quality health care services [Press release]. 2017.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chang S-H, Cataldo JK. A systematic review of global cultural variations in knowledge, attitudes and health responses. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2014;18(2):168–73.  https://doi.org/10.5588/ijtld.13.0181.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Krishnan V. Women survivors who won over TB—The Hindu. The Hindu. 2017.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sherlal J. Amitabh Bachchan: I suffered from TB in 2000. Time India. 2014.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Krishnan V. India’s refusal to scale up bedaquiline is really the world’s problem. The Hindu. 2017.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Central TB Division, Government of India. TB India 2017. 2017.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Borisov SE, Dheda K, Enwerem M, Romero Leyet R, D’Ambrosio L, Centis R, et al. Effectiveness and safety of bedaquilinecontaining regimens in the treatment of MDR- and XDR-TB: a multicentre study. Eur Respir J. 2017;49(5):1700387.  https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.00387-2017.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mehra M, Kambili C, Potluri R, Rhines A, Singh V, Thomas A. Modeling the impact of bedaquiline treatment strategies on the multidrug-resistant tuberculosis burden in India. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2017;21(8):902–9.  https://doi.org/10.5588/ijtld.16.0717.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pai M, Furin J. Tuberculosis innovations mean little if they cannot save lives. Elife. 2017;6  https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.25956.001.
  25. 25.
    •• Arinaminpathy N, Batra D, Khaparde S, Vualnam T, Maheshwari N, Sharma L, et al. The number of privately treated tuberculosis cases in India: an estimation from drug sales data. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16(11):1255–60. Drug sale data was used, for the first time, to estimate the number of TB patients being treated outside the RNTCP. The estimate caused a large upward revision to the estimated TB burden in India and catalyzed efforts to engage the private sector.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30259-6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    World Health Organization. Global tuberculosis report. Geneva. 2016.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    • Satyanarayana S, Nair SA, Chadha SS, Shivashankar R, Sharma G, Yadav S, et al. From where are tuberculosis patients accessing treatment in India? Results from a cross-sectional community based survey of 30 districts. PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e24160. This large community-based door-to-door survey estimated that 46% of TB patients were receiving care outside the RNTCP.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0024160.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Murrison LB, Ananthakrishnan R, Sukumar S, Augustine S, Krishnan N, Pai M, et al. How do urban Indian private practitioners diagnose and treat tuberculosis? A cross-sectional study in Chennai. PLoS One. 2016;11(2):e0149862.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Satyanarayana S, Subbaraman R, Shete P, Gore G, Das J, Cattamanchi A, et al. Quality of tuberculosis care in India: a systematic review. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2015;19(7):751–63.  https://doi.org/10.5588/ijtld.15.0186.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Achanta S, Jaju J, Kumar AMV, Nagaraja SB, Shamrao SRM, Bandi SK, et al. Tuberculosis management practices by private practitioners in Andhra Pradesh, India. PLoS One. 2013;8(8):e71119.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071119.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    How India is moving the needle on TB. In: Bill Melinda Gates Found. 2015 https://www.impatientoptimists.org/Posts/2015/01/How-India-is-moving-the-needle-on-TB#.WfopqBNSxE4. Accessed 1 Nov 2017.
  32. 32.
    Wells WA, Uplekar M, Pai M. Achieving systemic and scalable private sector engagement in tuberculosis care and prevention in Asia. PLoS Med. 2015;12(6):e1001842.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001842.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    IPAQT Initiative for Promoting Affordable & Quality TB Tests. http://ipaqt.org/. Accessed 1 Apr 2016.
  34. 34.
    •• Clinton Health Access Initiative. Catalyzing India’s private sector market for accurate TB testing. 2016. https://clintonhealthaccess.org/content/uploads/2016/06/Case-Study-India-IPAQT-June-2016.pdf. Accessed 21 Jan 2018. Clinton Health Access Initiative negotiated with private sector labs and diagnostics companies to provide WHO-endorsed TB diagnostics to the private labs at public sector pricing while enforcing a consumer price ceiling. This allowed increased use of high quality diagnostics in the private sector where they have previously been prohibitively expensive.
  35. 35.
    Sharma A, Hill A, Kurbatova E, van der Walt M, Kvasnovsky C, Tupasi TE, et al. Estimating the future burden of multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis in India, the Philippines, Russia, and South Africa: a mathematical modelling study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017;17(7):707–15.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30247-5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sachdeva KS, Raizada N, Sreenivas A, van't Hoog AH, van den Hof S, Dewan PK, et al. Use of Xpert MTB/RIF in decentralized public health settings and its effect on pulmonary TB and DR-TB case finding in India. PLoS One. 2015;10(5):e0126065.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126065.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Cazabon D, Alsdurf H, Satyanarayana S, Nathavitharana R, Subbaraman R, Daftary A, et al. Quality of tuberculosis care in high burden countries: the urgent need to address gaps in the care cascade. Int J Infect Dis. 2017;56:111–6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2016.10.016.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Lönnroth K, Jaramillo E, Williams BG, Dye C, Raviglione M. Drivers of tuberculosis epidemics: the role of risk factors and social determinants. Soc Sci Med. 2009;68(12):2240–6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.03.041.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Lin H-H, Ezzati M, Murray M. Tobacco smoke, indoor air pollution and tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2007;4(1):e20.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0040020.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Jha P, Jacob B, Gajalakshmi V, Gupta PC, Dhingra N, Kumar R, et al. A nationally representative case-control study of smoking and death in India. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(11):1137–47.  https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa0707719.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Mishra S, Joseph RA, Gupta PC, Pezzack B, Ram F, Sinha DN, et al. Trends in bidi and cigarette smoking in India from 1998 to 2015, by age, gender and education. BMJ Glob Heal. 2016;1(1):e000005.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2015-000005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Lönnroth K, Castro KG, Chakaya JM, Chauhan LS, Floyd K, Glaziou P, et al. Tuberculosis control and elimination 2010-50: cure, care, and social development. Lancet. 2010;375(9728):1814–29.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60483-7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Lönnroth K, Williams BG, Cegielski P, Dye C. A consistent log-linear relationship between tuberculosis incidence and body mass index. Int J Epidemiol. 2010;39(1):149–55.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyp308.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Morán-Mendoza O, Marion SA, Elwood K, Patrick D, FitzGerald JM. Risk factors for developing tuberculosis: a 12-year follow-up of contacts of tuberculosis cases. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2010;14(9):1112–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Jubulis J, Kinikar A, Ithape M, Khandave M, Dixit S, Hotalkar S, et al. Modifiable risk factors associated with tuberculosis disease in children in Pune, India. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2014;18(2):198–204.  https://doi.org/10.5588/ijtld.13.0314.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    •• Dandona L, Dandona R, Kumar GA, Shukla DK, Paul VK, Balakrishnan K, et al. Nations within a nation: variations in epidemiological transition across the states of India, 1990–2016 in the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet. 2017;390(10111):2437–60.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32804-0. As a part of the Global Burden of Disease Study, disease burden and risk factor prevelances were estimated for all states in India. This is the first instance of comprehensive, high quality, and granular estimates being available for individual Indian states. The estimates highlight the heterogeneity within India and its progression through the epidemiological transition. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Bhargava A, Benedetti A, Oxlade O, Pai M, Menzies D. Undernutrition and the incidence of tuberculosis in India: national and subnational estimates of the population-attributable fraction related to undernutrition. Natl Med J India. 2014;27(3):128–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    • Oxlade O, Huang CC, Murray M. Estimating the impact of reducing under-nutrition on the tuberculosis epidemic in the central eastern states of India: a dynamic modeling study. PLoS One. 2015;10(6):e0128187. This modelling study highlighted the drastic impact that ameliorating nutritional status could have on TB rates in India.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128187.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Popkin BM, Horton S, Kim S, Mahal A, Shuigao J. Trends in diet, nutritional status, and diet-related noncommunicable diseases in China and India: the economic costs of the nutrition transition. Nutr Rev. 2001;59(12):379–90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Anjana RM, Deepa M, Pradeepa R, Mahanta J, Narain K, Das HK, et al. Prevalence of diabetes and prediabetes in 15 states of India: results from the ICMR–INDIAB population-based cross-sectional study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017;5(8):585–96.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30174-2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Jeon CY, Murray MB. Diabetes mellitus increases the risk of active tuberculosis: a systematic review of 13 observational studies. PLoS Med. 2008;5:1091–101.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Baker MA, Harries AD, Jeon CY, Hart JE, Kapur A, Lönnroth K, et al. The impact of diabetes on tuberculosis treatment outcomes: a systematic review. BMC Med. 2011;9(1):81.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-9-81.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Viswanathan V, Kumpatla S, Aravindalochanan V, Rajan R, Chinnasamy C, Srinivasan R, et al. Prevalence of diabetes and pre-diabetes and associated risk factors among tuberculosis patients in India. PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e41367.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0041367.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Agarwal AK, Gupta G, Marskole P, Agarwal A. A study of the patients suffering from tuberculosis and tuberculosis-diabetes comorbidity in Revised National Tuberculosis Control Program Centers of Northern Madhya Pradesh, India. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2017;21(4):570–6.  https://doi.org/10.4103/ijem.IJEM_89_17.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Siddiqui AN, Khayyam KU, Siddiqui N, Sarin R, Sharma M. Diabetes prevalence and its impact on health-related quality of life in tuberculosis patients. Trop Med Int Heal. 2017;22(11):1394–404.  https://doi.org/10.1111/tmi.12968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Whiting DR, Guariguata L, Weil C, Shaw J. IDF diabetes atlas: global estimates of the prevalence of diabetes for 2011 and 2030. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2011;94(3):311–21.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2011.10.029.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Daftary A, Frick M, Venkatesan N, Pai M. Fighting TB stigma: we need to apply lessons learnt from HIV activism. BMJ Glob Heal. 2017;2(4):e000515.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Zwerling A, Dowdy D, von Delft A, Taylor H, Merritt MW. Incorporating social justice and stigma in cost-effectiveness analysis: drug-resistant tuberculosis treatment. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2017;21(11):69–74.  https://doi.org/10.5588/ijtld.16.0839.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Maleche A, Citro B, Tisile P, Abdullaev T. Measuring TB-related stigma. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2017;21(11):4–5.  https://doi.org/10.5588/ijtld.17.0581.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Rood EJJ, Mergenthaler C, Bakker MI, Redwood L, Mitchell EMH. Using 15 DHS surveys to study epidemiological correlates of TB courtesy stigma and health-seeking behaviour. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2017;21(11):60–8.  https://doi.org/10.5588/ijtld.16.0909.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sophie Huddart
    • 1
    • 2
  • Vaidehi Nafade
    • 1
    • 2
  • Madhukar Pai
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational HealthMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada
  2. 2.McGill International TB CentreMontrealCanada
  3. 3.Manipal McGill Centre for Infectious DiseasesManipal UniversityManipalIndia

Personalised recommendations