Development of an orthopedic system for physiotherapy and rehabilitation of the leg

  • Marcos Antônio Abdalla JúniorEmail author
  • Carlos Alberto Cimini Júnior
  • Estevam Barbosa de Las Casas
  • Márcio Falcão Santos Barroso
Technical Paper


The conception of a device to be used by doctors and physical therapists in patients undergoing knee surgery is described. One of the major problems of surgery in joints is associated with the loss of range of motion (ROM). A technique used to prevent the loss of ROM and to accelerate the healing process is the continuous passive motion (CPM). CPM causes a sinusoidal variation of the internal pressure of the joint, acting as a pump and expelling blood and other liquids. Currently, the market offers a variety of CPM equipment. Such devices are able to flex and extend the knee at angles from 0° to 120°, with varying speeds and predetermined number of repetitions. The proposed apparatus will be able to operate in a similar way as the others, but it will be able to also follow the patient during the stages of rehabilitation. The patient will be able to perform assisted flexion and extension of the leg and also, at a later time, the work of strengthening and stiffening the muscles around the knee joints.


Continuous passive motion (CPM) Range of motion (RM) Rehabilitation Knee joint 



Financial support of this work was provided by Corrdenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES), Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG) and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq).


  1. 1.
    Aguirre LA (2004) Introdução à Identificação de Sistemas, 2nd edn. Editora UFMG, Belo Horizonte (in Portuguese) Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Basmajian JV, De Luca CJ (1985) Muscles alive: their functions revealed by electromyography, 5th edn. Williams & Wilkins, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Calil AM, Sallum EA, Domingues CA, Nogueira LS (2009) Mapeamento das lesões em vítimas de acidentes de trânsito: revisão sistemática da literatura. Revista Latino-americana de Enfermagem 17(1):120–125 (in Portuguese) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fu Y, Meng Q (2006) Development of an embedded control platform of a continuous passive motion machine. In: Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, pp 1617–1622Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ho HJ, Chen TC (2006) Hybrid cpm/cam physiotherapy device by use of active feedback control loop. In: Proceedings of the first international conference on innovative computing, information and controlGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jorge MHPM, Koizumi MS (2008) Acidentes de trânsito no brasil: um atlas de sua distribuição. Associação Brasileira de Medicina de Tráfego 26(1):52–58 (in Portuguese) Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Koizumi MS (1992) Padrão das lesões nas vítimas de acidentes de motocicleta. Revista Saúde Pública S. Paulo 26(5):306–315 (in Portuguese) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Maniar RN, Baviskar JV, Singhi T, Rathi SS (2012) To use or not to use continuous passive motion post-total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 27(1):193-200.e1Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mikkelsen C, Werner S, Eriksson E (2000) Closed kinetic chain alone compared to combined open and closed kinetic chain exercises for quadriceps strengthening after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with respect to return to sports: a prospective matched follow-up study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 8:337–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Morris J (1995) The value of continuous passive motion in rehabilitation following total knee replacement. Physiotherapy 81(8):557–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    O’Driscoll SW, Giori NJ (2000) Continuous passive motion (CPM): theory and principles of clinical application. Rehabilit Res Dev 37(2):179–188Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Onderko LL, Rehman S (2013) Treatment of articular fractures with continuous passive motion. Orthop Clin N Am 44:345–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Reis GL, Abdalla Jr MA, Nolasco JD, Barroso MFS, Pereira EB (2014) Controle de posição de um manipulador robótico utilizando sensores inerciais e eletromiografia, XX Congresso Brasileiro de Automática (in Portuguese)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Salter RB, Bell SR, Keeley FW (1981) The protective effect of continuous passive motion on living articular cartilage in acute septic arthritis: an experimental investigation in the rabbit. Clin Orthop Relat Res 159:223–247Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Salter RB, Simmonds DF, Malcolm BW, Rumble EJ, MacMichael D, Clements MD (1980) The biological effect of continuous passive motion on the healing of full thickness defect in articular cartilage: an experimental investigation in the rabbit. J Bone Jt Surg 62A(8):1232–1251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    van Boxtel A (2001) Optimal signal bandwidth for the recording of surface EMG activity of facial, jaw, oral, and neck muscles. Psychophysiology 38:22–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marcos Antônio Abdalla Júnior
    • 1
    Email author
  • Carlos Alberto Cimini Júnior
    • 1
  • Estevam Barbosa de Las Casas
    • 1
  • Márcio Falcão Santos Barroso
    • 2
  1. 1.Universidade Federal de Minas GeraisBelo HorizonteBrazil
  2. 2.Universidade Federal de São João del ReiSão João del ReiBrazil

Personalised recommendations