Advertisement

Numerical investigation on the relationship of cavitation initiation in bileaflet mechanical heart valves (BMHVs) with the aortic root geometry and valve’s implantation rotation angle

  • 43 Accesses

Abstract

Thromboembolism remains a major concern associated with the use of BMHVs, and one of its leading causes could be cavitation, which has been reported to occur due to rapid closing of BMHV leaflets and consequent pressure drop. The aortic root geometry and the implantation rotation of BMHV significantly affect the leaflet kinematics and associated hemodynamics of BMHV and, consequently, may also initiate cavitation which has been investigated in this study. Two aortic roots, straight and bulged, were modelled, while three implantation rotation angles of BMHV were modelled, differing by 45°. ALE was employed as the FSI method, and blood was modelled as non-Newtonian. The results show that the closing velocity of one of the leaflets of a 0° rotated BMHV was 15% higher in bulged aorta as compared to straight aorta. The maximum closing velocity of fast closing leaflet was found to increase with the increasing implantation rotation of BMHV in bulged aorta, being, respectively, 8% and 19% higher for 45° and 90° rotated BMHV as compared to a 0° rotated BMHV. Consequently, it was observed that the pressure dropped below the vapour pressure for all the modelled implantation rotation angles of BMHV in bulged aorta near the leaflet tip. The maximum pressure drop across BMHV also increased with the increasing implantation rotation of BMHV in bulged aorta, being, respectively, 20% and 44% higher for 45° and 90° rotated BMHV as compared to a 0° rotated BMHV. The leaflet kinematics have been found liable to initiate cavitation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant unlimited access to the full article PDF.

US$ 39.95

Price includes VAT for USA

Subscribe to journal

Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.

US$ 99

This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

References

  1. 1.

    Zakaria MS et al (2017) Review of numerical methods for simulation of mechanical heart valves and the potential for blood clotting. Med Biol Eng Comput 55(9):1519–1548

  2. 2.

    De Tullio M, Pedrizzetti G, Verzicco R (2011) On the effect of aortic root geometry on the coronary entry-flow after a bileaflet mechanical heart valve implant: a numerical study. Acta Mech 216(1):147–163

  3. 3.

    Li C-P, Lu P-C (2012) Numerical comparison of the closing dynamics of a new trileaflet and a bileaflet mechanical aortic heart valve. J Artif Organs 15(4):364–374

  4. 4.

    Mirkhani N, Davoudi MR, Hanafizadeh P, Javidi D, Saffarian N (2016) On-X heart valve prosthesis: numerical simulation of hemodynamic performance in accelerating systole. Cardiovasc Eng Technol 7(3):223–237

  5. 5.

    Takiura K et al (2003) A new approach to detection of the cavitation on mechanical heart valves. ASAIO J 49(3):304–308

  6. 6.

    Graf T, Fischer H, Reul H, Rau G (1991) Cavitation potential of mechanical heart valve prostheses. Int J Artif Organs 14(3):169–174

  7. 7.

    Mohammadi H, Mequanint K (2011) Prosthetic aortic heart valves: modeling and design. Med Eng Phys 33(2):131–147

  8. 8.

    Chandran K, Lee C, Chen L (1994) Pressure field in the vicinity of mechanical valve occluders at the instant of valve closure: correlation with cavitation initiation. J Heart Valve Dis 3:S65–S75 (discussion S75-6)

  9. 9.

    Lai YG, Chandran KB, Lemmon J (2002) A numerical simulation of mechanical heart valve closure fluid dynamics. J Biomech 35(7):881–892

  10. 10.

    Lim W, Chew Y, Low H, Foo W (2003) Cavitation phenomena in mechanical heart valves: the role of squeeze flow velocity and contact area on cavitation initiation between two impinging rods. J Biomech 36(9):1269–1280

  11. 11.

    Chandran KB, Aluri S (1997) Mechanical valve closing dynamics: relationship between velocity of closing, pressure transients, and cavitation initiation. Ann Biomed Eng 25(6):926–938

  12. 12.

    Kini V, Bachmann C, Fontaine A, Deutsch S, Tarbell J (2000) Flow visualization in mechanical heart valves: occluder rebound and cavitation potential. Ann Biomed Eng 28(4):431–441

  13. 13.

    Johansen P (2004) Mechanical heart valve cavitation. Expert Rev Med Devices 1(1):95–104

  14. 14.

    Yoganathan AP, He Z, Casey Jones S (2004) Fluid mechanics of heart valves. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 6:331–362

  15. 15.

    Dexter EU et al (1998) In vivo demonstration of cavitation potential of a mechanical heart valve. Am Soc Artif Internal Organs 45(5):436–441

  16. 16.

    Lee H, Akagawa E, Tatsumi E, Taenaka Y (2008) Characteristics of cavitation intensity in a mechanical heart valve using a pulsatile device: synchronized analysis between visual images and pressure signals. J Artif Organs 11(2):60

  17. 17.

    Borazjani I, Ge L, Sotiropoulos F (2010) High-resolution fluid–structure interaction simulations of flow through a bi-leaflet mechanical heart valve in an anatomic aorta. Ann Biomed Eng 38(2):326–344

  18. 18.

    Annerel S et al (2012) A fast strong coupling algorithm for the partitioned fluid–structure interaction simulation of BMHVs. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 15(12):1281–1312

  19. 19.

    Hong T, Kim CN (2011) A numerical analysis of the blood flow around the bileaflet mechanical heart valves with different rotational implantation angles. J Hydrodyn 23(5):607–614

  20. 20.

    Haya L, Tavoularis S (2016) Effects of bileaflet mechanical heart valve orientation on fluid stresses and coronary flow. J Fluid Mech 806:129–164

  21. 21.

    Borazjani I, Sotiropoulos F (2010) The effect of implantation orientation of a bileaflet mechanical heart valve on kinematics and hemodynamics in an anatomic aorta. J Biomech Eng 132(11):111005

  22. 22.

    Grigioni M et al (2005) Three-dimensional numeric simulation of flow through an aortic bileaflet valve in a realistic model of aortic root. ASAIO J 51(3):176–183

  23. 23.

    Bang JS, Yoo SM, Kim CN (2006) Characteristics of pulsatile blood flow through the curved bileaflet mechanical heart valve installed in two different types of blood vessels: velocity and pressure of blood flow. ASAIO J 52(3):234–242

  24. 24.

    Khalili F, Gamage P, Mansy HA (2018) The influence of the aortic root geometry on flow characteristics of a bileaflet mechanical heart valve. arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.03362

  25. 25.

    Reul H, Vahlbruch A, Giersiepen M, Schmitz-Rode T, Hirtz V, Effert S (1990) The geometry of the aortic root in health, at valve disease and after valve replacement. J Biomech 23(2):181–191

  26. 26.

    Dumont K, Vierendeels J, Kaminsky R, Van Nooten G, Verdonck P, Bluestein D (2007) Comparison of the hemodynamic and thrombogenic performance of two bileaflet mechanical heart valves using a CFD/FSI model. J Biomech Eng 129(4):558–565

  27. 27.

    Hanafizadeh P, Mirkhani N, Davoudi MR, Masouminia M, Sadeghy K (2016) Non-Newtonian blood flow simulation of diastolic phase in bileaflet mechanical heart valve implanted in a realistic aortic root containing coronary arteries. Artif Organs 40(10):E179–E191

  28. 28.

    Weddell JC, Kwack J, Imoukhuede P, Masud A (2015) Hemodynamic analysis in an idealized artery tree: differences in wall shear stress between Newtonian and non-Newtonian blood models. PLoS ONE 10(4):e0124575

  29. 29.

    Gijsen F, Allanic E, Van de Vosse F, Janssen J (1999) The influence of the non-Newtonian properties of blood on the flow in large arteries: unsteady flow in a 90 curved tube. J Biomech 32(7):705–713

  30. 30.

    De Vita F, De Tullio M, Verzicco R (2016) Numerical simulation of the non-Newtonian blood flow through a mechanical aortic valve. Theor Comput Fluid Dyn 30(1–2):129–138

  31. 31.

    Caballero A, Laín S (2015) Numerical simulation of non-Newtonian blood flow dynamics in human thoracic aorta. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 18(11):1200–1216

  32. 32.

    Vlastos G, Lerche D, Koch B (1997) The superposition of steady on oscillatory shear and its effect on the viscoelasticity of human blood and a blood-like model fluid. Biorheology 34(1):19–36

  33. 33.

    Abbas SS, Nasif MS, Al-Waked R, Meor Said MA (2019) Numerical investigation on the effect of bileaflet mechanical heart valve’s implantation tilting angle and aortic root geometry on intermittent regurgitation and platelet activation. Artif Organs. https://doi.org/10.1111/aor.13536

  34. 34.

    Yin W, Gallocher S, Pinchuk L, Schoephoerster RT, Jesty J, Bluestein D (2005) Flow-induced platelet activation in a St. Jude mechanical heart valve, a trileaflet polymeric heart valve, and a St. Jude tissue valve. Artif Organs 29(10):826–831

  35. 35.

    Marom G (2015) Numerical methods for fluid–structure interaction models of aortic valves. Arch Comput Methods Eng 22(4):595–620

  36. 36.

    Yoganathan AP, Chandran K, Sotiropoulos F (2005) Flow in prosthetic heart valves: state-of-the-art and future directions. Ann Biomed Eng 33(12):1689–1694

  37. 37.

    Annerel S, Claessens T, Degroote J, Segers P, Vierendeels J (2014) Validation of a numerical FSI simulation of an aortic BMHV by in vitro PIV experiments. Med Eng Phys 36(8):1014–1023

  38. 38.

    Nobili M et al (2008) Numerical simulation of the dynamics of a bileaflet prosthetic heart valve using a fluid–structure interaction approach. J Biomech 41(11):2539–2550

  39. 39.

    Guivier-Curien C, Deplano V, Bertrand E (2009) Validation of a numerical 3-D fluid–structure interaction model for a prosthetic valve based on experimental PIV measurements. Med Eng Phys 31(8):986–993

  40. 40.

    Piatti F et al (2015) Hemodynamic and thrombogenic analysis of a trileaflet polymeric valve using a fluid–structure interaction approach. J Biomech 48(13):3641–3649

  41. 41.

    Gilmanov A, Stolarski H, Sotiropoulos F (2018) Flow–structure interaction simulations of the aortic heart valve at physiologic conditions: the Role of tissue constitutive model. J Biomech Eng 140(4):041003

  42. 42.

    Kadhim SK, Nasif MS, Al-Kayiem HH, Al-Waked R (2018) Computational fluid dynamics simulation of blood flow profile and shear stresses in bileaflet mechanical heart valve by using monolithic approach. Simulation 94(2):93–104

  43. 43.

    Dahl SK, Vierendeels J, Degroote J, Annerel S, Hellevik LR, Skallerud B (2012) FSI simulation of asymmetric mitral valve dynamics during diastolic filling. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 15(2):121–130

  44. 44.

    Dumont K, Stijnen J, Vierendeels J, Van De Vosse F, Verdonck P (2004) Validation of a fluid–structure interaction model of a heart valve using the dynamic mesh method in fluent. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 7(3):139–146

  45. 45.

    Vierendeels J, Dumont K, Verdonck P (2003) Stabilization of a fluid-structure coupling procedure for rigid body motion. In: 33rd AIAA fluid dynamics conference and exhibit, pp 23–26

  46. 46.

    Choi CR, Kim CN (2009) Numerical analysis on the hemodynamics and leaflet dynamics in a bileaflet mechanical heart valve using a fluid-structure interaction method. ASAIO J 55(5):428–437

  47. 47.

    Dasi L, Ge L, Simon H, Sotiropoulos F, Yoganathan A (2007) Vorticity dynamics of a bileaflet mechanical heart valve in an axisymmetric aorta. Phys Fluids 19(6):067105

  48. 48.

    Lee C, Chandran K, Chen L (1994) Cavitation dynamics of mechanical heart valve prostheses. Artif Organs 18(10):758–767

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS for facilitating this research through its Graduate Assistantship (GA) scheme.

Author information

Correspondence to Mohammad Shakir Nasif.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Technical Editor: Edson José Soares, PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abbas, S.S., Nasif, M.S., Al-Waked, R. et al. Numerical investigation on the relationship of cavitation initiation in bileaflet mechanical heart valves (BMHVs) with the aortic root geometry and valve’s implantation rotation angle. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 42, 23 (2020) doi:10.1007/s40430-019-2108-x

Download citation

Keywords

  • Fluid–structure interaction
  • Closing dynamics of BMHVs
  • Cavitation