Investigation of wear behavior of aged and non-aged SiC-reinforced AlSi7Mg2 metal matrix composites in dry sliding conditions

  • Yahya Hışman Çelik
  • Mehmet Emin DemirEmail author
  • Erol Kilickap
  • Ali Kalkanli
Technical Paper


Metal matrix composites (MMCs) with their splendid mechanical properties have been specifically designed for use in fields such as aerospace and aviation. The presence of hard ceramic particles in MMC increases the hardness of the matrix product and decreases its coefficient of friction. Therefore, the wear resistance is improved. Moreover, the mechanical properties of these composite materials can be improved by applying heat treatments. In this study, AlSi7Mg2 MMCs with 15 wt% SiC reinforcement were produced by squeeze casting technique. Some of the composites were aged by heat treatment. Hardness values of aged and non-aged composites were compared. In addition, abrasive wear behaviors of these composites were investigated on pin-on-disk device, depending on the load (7, 12 and 17 N), the sliding speed (0.2, 0.3 and 0.4 m/s) and the sliding distance (700, 1000 and 1300 m). Worn surfaces were also analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). As a result of the analyses, it was determined that both the hardness values and the wear resistance were higher in the composites subjected to aging treatment. Furthermore, it was observed that the increase in the applied load led up to the weight loss. The increase in the sliding distance increased both friction coefficient and weight loss. The increase in sliding speed also made way for the friction coefficient but ensured less weight loss. When SEM images were examined, it was ascertained that deformation and tribo-surface formation had a significant effect on weight losses.


Aging Composite SiC Squeeze casting Wear 



  1. 1.
    Gavgali M, Totik Y, Sadeler R (2003) The effects of artificial aging on wear properties of AA 6063 alloy. Mater Lett 57:3713–3721. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kala H, Mer KKS, Kumar S (2014) A review on mechanical and tribological behaviors of stir cast Aluminum matrix composites. Procedia Mater Sci 6:1951–1960. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Basavarajappa S, Chandramohan G, Mahadevan A et al (2007) Influence of sliding speed on the dry sliding wear behaviour and the subsurface deformation on hybrid metal matrix composite. Wear 262:1007–1012. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Odabaş D, Su Ş (1997) A comparison of the reciprocating and continuous two-body abrasive wear behavior of solution-treated and age-hardened 2014 Al alloy. Wear 208:25–35. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zheng MY, Wu K, Kamado S, Kojima Y (2003) Aging behavior of squeeze cast SiC/AZ91 magnesium matrix composite. Mater Sci Eng A 348:67–75. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kaushik NC, Rao RN (2016) Effect of applied load and grit size on wear coefficients of Al6082–SiC–Gr hybrid composites under two body abrasion. Tribol Int 103:298–308. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Umanath K, Palanikumar K, Selvamani ST (2013) Analysis of dry sliding wear behaviour of Al6061/SiC/Al2O3 hybrid metal matrix composites. Compos Part B Eng 53:159–168. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jinfeng L, Longtao J, Gaohui W, Shoufu T, Guoqin C (2009) Effect of graphite particle reinforcement on dry sliding wear of SiC/Gr/Al composites. Rare Met Mater Eng 38(11):1894–1898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rao RN, Das S (2011) Effect of SiC content and sliding speed on the wear behaviour of aluminium matrix composites. Mater Des 32:1066–1071. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hekner B, Myalski J, Valle N et al (2017) Friction and wear behavior of Al–SiC(n) hybrid composites with carbon addition. Compos Part B Eng 108:291–300. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Veeresh Kumar GB, Rao CSP, Selvaraj N (2012) Studies on mechanical and dry sliding wear of Al6061–SiC composites. Compos Part B Eng 43:1185–1191. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shorowordi KM, Haseeb ASMA, Celis JP (2006) Tribo-surface characteristics of Al–B4C and Al–SiC composites worn under different contact pressures. Wear 261:634–641. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Padmavathi KR, Ramakrishnan R (2014) Tribological behaviour of aluminium hybrid metal matrix composite. Procedia Eng 97:660–667. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Uvaraja VC (2012) Tribological characterization of stir-cast hybrid composite aluminium 6061 reinforced with SiC and B4C particulates. Eur J Sci Res 76:539–552Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Uthayakumar M, Aravindan S, Rajkumar K (2013) Wear performance of Al–SiC–B4C hybrid composites under dry sliding conditions. Mater Des 47:456–464. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Erturun V, Karamış MB (2016) The effects of a reciprocating extrusion process on the friction and wear behaviors of AA 6061/SiC composites. J Mater Res 31:388–395. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Karamış MB, Sarı FN, Erturun V (2012) Technology friction and wear behaviors of reciprocatingly extruded Al–SiC composite. J Mater Process 212:2578–2585. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bekheet NE, Galderab RM, Salah MF, Abd El-Azim AN (2002) The effects of aging on the hardness and fatigue behavior of 2024 Al alloy/SiC composites. Mater Des 23:153–159. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Das D, Pattanaik S, Routara BC et al (2017) Dry sliding wear behaviour of SiCp reinforced Zn–Mg–Cu based aluminium matrix composite. Mater Today Proc 4:2965–2974. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lin S, Liu K (1988) Effect of aging on abrasion rate in an Al–Zn–Mg–SiC composite. Wear 121:1–14. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Meyveci A, Karacan I, Çaligülü U, Durmuş H (2010) Pin-on-disc characterization of 2xxx and 6xxx aluminium alloys aged by precipitation age hardening. J Alloys Compd 491:278–283. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ozben T, Kilickap E, Cakir O (2008) Investigation of mechanical and machinability properties of SiC particle reinforced Al-MMC. J Mater Process Technol 198:220–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Naidich JV, Chuvashov JN (1983) Wettability and contact interaction of gallium-containing melts with non-metallic solids. J Mater Sci 18:2071–2080. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mitra R, Mahajan YR (1995) Interfaces in discontinuously reinforced metal matrix composites. Bull Mater Sci 18:405–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ravindran P, Manisekar K, Rathika P, Narayanasamy P (2013) Tribological properties of powder metallurgy—processed aluminium self lubricating hybrid composites with SiC additions. Mater Des 45:561–570. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Uvaraja VC, Natarajan N (2012) Optimization of friction and wear behaviour in hybrid metal matrix composites using Taguchi technique. J Miner Mater Charact Eng 11:757–768Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Moazami-Goudarzi M, Akhlaghi F (2016) Wear behavior of Al5252 alloy reinforced with micrometric and nanometric SiC particles. Tribol Int 102:28–37. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rao RN, Das S (2010) Effect of matrix alloy and influence of SiC particle on the sliding wear characteristics of aluminium alloy composites. Mater Des 31:1200–1207. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lakshmipathy J, Kulendran B (2014) Reciprocating wear behavior of 7075Al/SiC in comparison with 6061Al/Al2O3 composites. Int J Refract Met Hard Mater 46:137–144. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rana RS, Purohit R, Sharma AK, Rana S (2014) Optimization of wear performance of AA5083/10 wt.% SiCp composites using Taguchi method. Procedia Mater Sci 6:503–511. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rao RN, Das S, Mondal DP, Dixit G (2012) Mechanism of material removal during tribological behaviour of aluminium matrix (Al–Zn–Mg–Cu) composites. Tribol Int 53:179–184. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Chowdhury MA, Khalil MK, Nuruzzaman DM, Rahaman ML (2011) The effect of sliding speed and normal load on friction and wear property of aluminum. Int J Mech Mech Eng 11:53–57Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ravindran P, Manisekar K, Narayanasamy P et al (2012) Application of factorial techniques to study the wear of Al hybrid composites with graphite addition. Mater Des 39:42–54. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Çelik YH, Kilickap E (2019) Hardness and wear behaviours of Al matrix composites and hybrid composites reinforced with B4C and SiC. Powder Metall Met Ceram 57:613–622. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Çelik YH, Seçilmiş K (2017) Investigation of wear behaviours of Al matrix composites reinforced with different B4C rate produced by powder metallurgy method. Adv Powder Technol 28:2218–2224. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sawla S, Das S (2004) Combined effect of reinforcement and heat treatment on the two body abrasive wear of aluminum alloy and aluminum particle composites. Wear 257:555–561. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Rao RN, Das S, Mondal DP, Dixit G (2009) Dry sliding wear behaviour of cast high strength aluminium alloy (Al–Zn–Mg) and hard particle composites. Wear 267:1688–1695. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yahya Hışman Çelik
    • 1
  • Mehmet Emin Demir
    • 1
    Email author
  • Erol Kilickap
    • 2
  • Ali Kalkanli
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringBatman UniversityBatmanTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringDicle UniversityDiyarbakirTurkey
  3. 3.Department of Metallurgical and Materials EngineeringMiddle East Technical University (METU)AnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations