Advertisement

An experimental study on the effect of inlet diesel fuel temperature on mass flow choking, flame penetration, temperature, radiative characteristics and NOx pollutant emission of an oil burner

  • S. H. PourhoseiniEmail author
  • R. Nikzad
Technical Paper
  • 80 Downloads

Abstract

The aim of the present work is to investigate the effect of inlet diesel fuel temperature of an oil burner on mass flow choking, flame penetration, temperature, radiative characteristics and NOx pollutant emission. Diesel fuel was heated up, in an insulated reservoir tank containing a thermostat, to the selected temperatures of 15, 45 and 75 °C, and then, flame characteristics were measured. SBG01 water cooled heat flux sensor and TES-1332A digital luminance meter were used to determine the total and luminous radiations of the flame. Furthermore, a KIGAS 310 gas analyzer measured the concentrations of pollutant emissions. It was found that increase in inlet fuel temperature resulted in no mass flow choking, no cavitation and insignificant change in the effective area of the oil burner nozzle. However, increase in fuel temperature increased the droplets injection velocity and the flame penetration length. Furthermore, increase in fuel temperature reduced the droplets size, improved the spray atomization and accelerated the droplets evaporation and, consequently, increased the flame temperature. Also, when the fuel temperature increased from 15 to 75 °C, the average flame radiation heat flux was enhanced as much as 44.5%, and NOx emission decreased significantly from 33 to 13 ppm.

Keywords

Inlet diesel fuel temperature Mass flow choking Flame penetration Radiation NOX emission 

List of symbols

NOx

Nitrogen oxides

ID

Internal diameter

CO

Carbon monoxide

WR

Total uncertainty

R

The function uncertainty

x1, x2, xn

Independent variables

\(W_{{x_{1} }} ,W_{{x_{2} }} ,W_{{x_{n} }}\)

The uncertainties of the independent variables

K

Coverage factor

\(\dot{m}\)

Mass flow rate

V

Velocity

ρ

Density

A

Area

CO2

Carbon dioxide

H2O

Water vapor

O2

Oxygen

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Stephenson M (2018) Chapter 1—The carbon cycle, fossil fuels and climate change. Energy and Climate Change. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 1–26Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lenferna GA (2018) Can we equitably manage the end of the fossil fuel era? Energy Res Soc Sci 35:217–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yildiz I (2018) 1.12 Fossil fuels. Comprehensive energy systems, vol 1. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 521–567Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ağbulut U, Bakir H (2019) The investigation on economic and ecological impacts of tendency to electric vehicles instead of internal combustion engines. Düzce Univ J Sci Technol 7(1):25–36Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ağbulut U (2019) Turkey’s electricity generation problem and nuclear energy policy. Energy Sources Part A Recov Util Environ Effects 41(18):2281–2298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chokri B, Ridha E (2012) Experimental study of a diesel engine performance running on vegetable oil biodiesel blend. ASME J Energy Resour Technol 134:032202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sequers AJ, Parthasarathy RN, Gollahalli SR (2012) Effects of fuel injection timing in the combustion of biofuels in a diesel engine at partial loads. ASME J Energy Resour Technol 133:022203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pirouzfar V, Moghaddam A, Mirza B (2012) Physicochemical properties and combustion performance of gas oil fuel additives. ASME J Energy Resour Technol 134:041101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cebrucean D, Cebrucean V, Ionel I (2014) CO2 capture and storage from fossil fuel power plants. Energy Procedia 63:18–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hileman B (1997) Fossil fuels in a greenhouse world. Chem Eng News Arch 75:34–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ağbulut U, Sarıdemir S (2019) A general view to converting fossil fuels to cleaner energy source by adding nanoparticles. Int J Ambient Energy.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01430750.2018.1563822 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pourhoseini SH, Asadi R (2017) An experimental study of optimum angle of air swirler vanes in liquid fuel burners. J Energy Resour Technol 139:032202-1-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rodriguez-Anton LM, Casanova-Kindelan J, Tardajos G (2000) High pressure physical properties of fluids used in diesel injection systems. SAE Tech Pap 109:2155–2165Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Payri R, Salvador FJ, Gimeno J, Morena J (2009) Effects of nozzle geometry on direct injection diesel engine combustion process. Appl Therm Eng 29:2051–2060CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Payri R, Salvador FJ, Gimeno J, Morena J (2011) Influence of injector technology on injection and combustion development-Part 2: combustion analysis. Appl Energy 88:1130–1139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Payri R, Salvador FJ, Gimeno J, Bracho G (2011) The effect of temperature and pressure on thermodynamic properties of diesel and biodiesel fuels. Fuel 90:1172–1180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sun ZY, Li GX, Chen C, Song YuY, Xi Gao G (2015) Numerical investigation on effects of nozzle’s geometric parameters on the flow and the cavitation characteristics within injector’s nozzle for a high-pressure common-rail DI diesel engine. Energy Convers Manag 89:843–861CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hsu B (2002) Practical diesel engine combustion analysis. Society of Automotive Engineers, WarrendaleCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hsu BD, Hoffman JG (1985) The effect of diesel fuel properties on the combustion of a medium speed diesel engine. ASME paper 85-DGP-14Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Maeda Y, Murayama T, Fukazawa S (1975) Influence of fuel properties on the injection characteristics of fuel injection system in diesel engines. Bull JSME 18:411–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chen G (2009) Study of Fuel Temperature Effects on Fuel Injection, Combustion, and Emissions of Direct-Injection Diesel Engines. J Eng Gas Turbines Power 131:1–8Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chen H, Guo Q, Zhao XY, Xu ML, Ma Y (2016) Influence of fuel temperature on combustion and emission of biodiesel. J Energy Inst 89:231–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Chen Z, Yao A, Yao C, Yin Z, Xu H, Geng P, Dou Z, Hu J, Wu T, Ma M (2017) Effect of fuel temperature on the methanol spray and nozzle internal flow. Appl Therm Eng 114:673–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Park SH, Kim HJ, Lee CS (2011) Study on the Dimethyl Ether spray characteristics according to the diesel blending ratio and the variations in the ambient pressure, energizing duration, and fuel temperature. Energy Fuels 25:1772–1780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Park Y, Hwang J, Bae C, Kim K, Lee J, Pyo S (2015) Effects of diesel fuel temperature on fuel flow and spray characteristics. Fuel 162:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Park J, Jang JH, Park SW (2015) Effect of fuel temperature on heavy fuel oil spray characteristics in a common-rail fuel injection system for marine engines. Ocean Eng 104:580–589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yoon SH, Park SH, Lee CS (2008) Experimental investigation on the fuel properties of biodiesel and its blends at various temperatures. Energy Fuels 22:652–656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Uluer O, Aktaş M, Karaağaç I, Durmuş G, Khanlari A, Ağbulut U, Çelik DN (2018) Mathematical calculation and experimental investigation of expanded perlite based heat insulation materials’ thermal conductivity values. J Therm Eng 4(5):2274–2286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Özdemir MB, Aktaş M, Şevik S, Khanlari A (2017) Modeling of a convective-infrared kiwifruit drying process. Int J Hydrogen Energy 42(28):18005–18013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Salvador FJ, Gimeno J, Carreres M, Crialesi-Esposito M (2016) Fuel temperature influence on the performance of a last generation common-rail diesel ballistic injector. Part I: Experimental mass flow rate measurements and discussion. Energy Convers Manag 114:364–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Payri R, Salvador FJ, Gimeno J, Zapata LD (2008) Diesel nozzle geometry influence on spray liquid-phase fuel penetration in evaporative conditions. Fuel 87:1165–1176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Soteriou C, Andrews R, Smith M (1999) Further studies of cavitation and atomization in diesel injection. SAE paper 1999-01-1486Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Zhang X, He Z, Wang Q, Tao X, Zhou Z, Xia X, Zhang W (2018) Effect of fuel temperature on cavitation flow inside vertical multi-hole nozzles and spray characteristics with different nozzle geometries. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci 91:374–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Mishra C, Peles Y (2005) Size scale effects on cavitating flows through microorifices entrenched in rectangular microchannels. J Microelectromech Syst 14:987–999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Gruenberger TM, Moghiman M, Bowen PJ, Syred N (2002) Dynamic of soot formation by turbulent combustion and thermal decomposition of natural gas. J Combust Sci Technol 174:67–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Farias TL, Carvalho MG (1998) Radiative heat transfer in soot containing combustion systems with aggregation. Int J Heat Mass Transf 41:2581–2587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Paul SC, Paul MC (2010) Radiative heat transfer during turbulent combustion process. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf 37:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Bressloff NW, Moss JB, Rubini PA (1997) Differential total absorptivity solution to the radiative transfer equation for mixture of combustion gases and soot. Numer Heat Transf 31:43–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Pourhoseini SH, Moghiman M (2015) Effect of pulverized anthracite coal particles injection on thermal and radiative characteristics of natural gas flame: an experimental study. Fuel 140:44–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Pourhoseini SH (2017) A novel configuration of natural gas diffusion burners to enhance optical, thermal and radiative characteristics of flame and reduce NOx emission. Energy 132:41–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Pourhoseini SH, Asadi R (2017) An experimental study on thermal and radiative characteristics of natural gas flame in different equivalence ratios by chemiluminescence and IR photography methods. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 139(3):1–6Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringUniversity of GonabadGonabadIran

Personalised recommendations