The present work attempts to determine the optimal engine load, fuel injection pressure (FIP), start of injection timing (SOI) and pilot-main injection intervals (PMII) regarding the performance and emissions of a diesel engine fueled with J20 biodiesel (20 vol% Jatropha curcas biodiesel + 80 vol% 0# diesel). A four-factor and three-level full factorial design and response surface methodology (RSM) were employed in the design of experiments and in the analysis of test results. All the models developed using RSM for measured responses like NOX, Soot, HC, CO emissions, brake specific fuel consumption (BSFC) and brake thermal efficiency (BTE) were determined to be statistically significant by analysis of variance. Interactive effects between load, FIP, SOI and PMII were analyzed using tri-dimensional response surface plots that were fitted using developed multiple regression models. The multi-objective optimization was carried out using the desirability-based approach of the RSM for minimum emissions and BSFC and maximum BTE. The best condition of engine parameters with J20 was load of 65.71%, FIP of 160 MPa, SOI of 4.02 CA and PMII of 4.40 CA. And the optimal values with a high desirability of 0.866 were 1172 ppm, 0.0061 FSN, 2.78 ppm, 17.53 ppm, 203.818 g/kW h and 40.96% for NOX, Soot, HC, CO emissions, BSFC and BTE, respectively.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
This study is supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, China (Grant No. BK20150520); the Graduate student innovation fund project of Jiangsu province (KYLX16_0890); the projects of ‘Six talent peak’ (Grant number 2014-ZBZZ-014); the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD); senior professionals’ scientific research fund project of Jiangsu University (13JDG104);China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2014M560400).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Bora BJ, Saha UK (2016) Experimental evaluation of a rice bran biodiesel–biogas run dual fuel diesel engine at varying compression ratios. Renew Energy 87(4):782–790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang Q, Ogren RM, Kong SC (2016) A comparative study of biodiesel engine performance optimization using enhanced hybrid PSO–GA and basic GA. Appl Energy 165:676–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaharin MSM, Abdullah NR, Najafi G et al (2017) Effects of physicochemical properties of biodiesel fuel blends with alcohol on diesel engine performance and exhaust emissions: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 79:475–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agarwal AK, Singh AP, Agarwal A et al (2016) Spatial combustion analysis of biodiesel fueled engine using combustion chamber endoscopy and modeling. Renew Energy 98:292–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deep A, Sandhu SS, Chander S (2017) Experimental investigations on the influence of fuel injection timing and pressure on single cylinder C.I. engine fueled with 20% blend of castor biodiesel in diesel. Fuel 210:15–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Özener O, Yüksek L, Ergenç AT et al (2014) Effects of soybean biodiesel on a DI diesel engine performance, emission and combustion characteristics. Fuel 115(1):875–883CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shameer PM, Ramesh K, Sakthivel R et al (2017) Effects of fuel injection parameters on emission characteristics of diesel engines operating on various biodiesel: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 67:1267–1281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gnanasekaran S, Saravanan N, Ilangkumaran M (2016) Influence of injection timing on performance, emission and combustion characteristics of a DI diesel engine running on fish oil biodiesel. Energy 116:1218–1229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kannan GR, Anand R (2012) Effect of injection pressure and injection timing on DI diesel engine fuelled with biodiesel from waste cooking oil. Biomass Bioenergy 46(46):343–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aalam CS, Saravanan CG, Anand BP (2016) Impact of high fuel injection pressure on the characteristics of CRDI diesel engine powered by mahua methyl ester blend. Appl Therm Eng 106:702–711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeon J, Park S (2015) Effects of pilot injection strategies on the flame temperature and soot distributions in an optical CI engine fueled with biodiesel and conventional diesel. Appl Energy 160:581–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khoobbakht G, Najafi G, Karimi M (2016) Optimization of operating factors and blended levels of diesel, biodiesel and ethanol fuels to minimize exhaust emissions of diesel engine using response surface methodology. Appl Therm Eng 99:1006–1017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu ZQ, Xu J, Han S et al (2013) A coupling method of response surfaces (CRSM) for cutting parameters optimization in machining titanium alloy under minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) condition. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 14(5):693–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu ZQ, Wang CD, Cheng M et al (2014) A coupling response surfaces methodology of multiple constraints (CRSMMC) for parameters optimization of broach tool in broaching of heat-resistant steel X12CrMoWVNb N-10-1-1. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 74(9–12):1719–1732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirkude JB, Padalkar AS (2014) Performance optimization of CI engine fuelled with waste fried oil methyl ester-diesel blend using response surface methodology. Fuel 119(119):266–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar BR, Saravanan S, Rana D et al (2016) Combined effect of injection timing and exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) on performance and emissions of a DI diesel engine fuelled with next-generation advanced biofuel–diesel blends using response surface methodology. Energy Convers Manag 123:470–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu H, Yin B, Liu S et al (2017) Performance optimization of diesel engine fueled with diesel–Jatropha curcas biodiesel blend using response surface methodology. J Mech Sci Technol 31(8):4051–4059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yusri IM, Mamat R, Azmi WH et al (2017) Application of response surface methodology in optimization of performance and exhaust emissions of secondary butyl alcohol-gasoline blends in SI engine. Energy Convers Manag 133:178–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atmanlı A, Yüksel B, Ileri E et al (2015) Response surface methodology based optimization of diesel-n-butanol-cotton oil ternary blend ratios to improve engine performance and exhaust emission characteristics. Energy Convers Manag 90(90):383–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montgomery DC (1996) Design and analysis of experiments. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
Dhole AE, Yarasu RB, Lata DB et al (2014) Mathematical modeling for the performance and emission parameters of dual fuel diesel engine using hydrogen as secondary fuel. Int J Hydrog Energy 39(24):12991–13001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Omar I, Mamat R, Obed M et al (2017) Response surface methodology (RSM) based multi-objective optimization of fusel oil-gasoline blends at different water content in SI engine. Energy Convers Manag 150:222–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sayin C, Ilhan M, Canakci M et al (2009) Effect of injection timing on the exhaust emissions of a diesel engine using diesel–methanol blends. Renew Energy 34(5):1261–1269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu H, Liang X, Shu G et al (2018) Numerical investigation of the effect of two-stage injection strategy on combustion and emission characteristics of a diesel engine. Appl Energy 227:634–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar