Advertisement

Experimental investigation of tool wear in cryogenically treated insert during end milling of hard Ti alloy

  • Vinothkumar SivalingamEmail author
  • Jie SunEmail author
  • Baskaran Selvam
  • Pradeep Kumar Murugasen
  • Bin Yang
  • Saad Waqar
Technical Paper
  • 33 Downloads

Abstract

The present study aims to investigate the tool wear mechanism of TiAlN-/NbN-coated tungsten carbide insert during end milling of hard Ti alloy under cryogenic treatment at 24 h and 48 h. The output responses are examined by looking at the flank wear, tool wear mechanism, elemental composition analysis, cutting force and vibration acceleration signal. A 12–23% and 4–11% reduction in the flank wear was noted at 48-h and 24-h cryogenically treated inserts (CTI) when compared with untreated insert. The reduction in the cutting force and vibration was also observed in the CTI when compared with untreated insert. The results showed better machinability and enhanced tool life for CTI, which is better than untreated insert under the same set of working conditions.

Keywords

Cryogenic treatment Ti–6Al–4V alloy Tool wear End milling 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The Postdoctoral Innovation Special Fund (2017), Shandong Province, China (No. 201702012), supports this work.

References

  1. 1.
    Ezugwu EO, Bonney J, Yamane Y (2003) An overview of the machinability of aeroengine alloys. J Mater Process Technol 134(2):233–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nath C, Kapoor SG, Srivastava AK, Iverson J (2014) Study of droplet spray behavior of an atomization-based cutting fluid spray system for machining titanium alloys. J Manuf Sci Eng 136(2):021004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chetan, Ghosh S, Rao PV (2016) Environment friendly machining of Ni–Cr–Co based super alloy using different sustainable techniques. Mater Manuf Process 31(7):852–859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Özbek NA, Çiçek A, Gülesin M, Özbek O (2014) Investigation of the effects of cryogenic treatment applied at different holding times to cemented carbide inserts on tool wear. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 86:34–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hong SY (2006) Lubrication mechanisms of LN2 in ecological cryogenic machining. Mach Sci Technol 10(1):133–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chetan, Ghosh S, Rao PV (2015) Application of sustainable techniques in metal cutting for enhanced machinability: a review. J Clean Prod 100:17–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yong AYL, Seah KHW, Rahman M (2007) Performance of cryogenically treated tungsten carbide tools in milling operations. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 32(7–8):638–643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yong AYL, Seah KHW, Rahman M (2006) Performance evaluation of cryogenically treated tungsten carbide tools in turning. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 46(15):2051–2056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sreerama Reddy TV, Sornakumar T, VenkataramaReddy M, Venkatram R (2009) Machinability of C45 steel with deep cryogenic treated tungsten carbide cutting tool inserts. Int J Refract Met Hard Mater 27(1):181–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Thakur D, Ramamoorthy B, Vijayaraghavan L (2008) Influence of different post treatments on tungsten carbide–cobalt inserts. Mater Lett 62(28):4403–4406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vadivel K, Rudramoorthy R (2009) Performance analysis of cryogenically treated coated carbide inserts. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 42(3–4):222–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Özbek NA, Çiçek A, Gülesin M, Özbek O (2016) Effect of cutting conditions on wear performance of cryogenically treated tungsten carbide inserts in dry turning of stainless steel. Tribol Int 94:223–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chetan, Ghosh S, Rao PV (2017) Performance evaluation of deep cryogenic processed carbide inserts during dry turning of Nimonic 90 aerospace grade alloy. Tribol Int 115:397–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ahmed MI, Ismail AF, Abakr YA, Amin AN (2007) Effectiveness of cryogenic machining with modified tool holder. J Mater Process Technol 185(1–3):91–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Safari H, Sharif S, Izman S, Jafari H, Kurniawan D (2014) Cutting force and surface roughness characterization in cryogenic high-speed end milling of Ti–6Al–4 V ELI. Mater Manuf Process 29(3):350–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jawaid A, Sharif S, Koksal S (2000) Evaluation of wear mechanisms of coated carbide tools when face milling titanium alloy. J Mater Process Technol 99(1–3):266–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Celik ON, Sert A, Gasan H, Ulutan M (2018) Effect of cryogenic treatment on the microstructure and the wear behavior of WC-Co end mills for machining of Ti6Al4 V titanium alloy. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 95(5–8):2989–2999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shokrani A, Dhokia V, Newman ST (2016) Investigation of the effects of cryogenic machining on surface integrity in CNC end milling of Ti–6Al–4 V titanium alloy. J Manuf Process 21:172–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sun S, Brandt M, Palanisamy S, Dargusch MS (2015) Effect of cryogenic compressed air on the evolution of cutting force and tool wear during machining of Ti–6Al–4 V alloy. J Mater Process Technol 221:243–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Antonialli AIS, Diniz AE, Pederiva R (2010) Vibration analysis of cutting force in titanium alloy milling. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 50(1):65–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sun Z, Shuang F, Ma W (2018) Investigations of vibration cutting mechanisms of Ti6Al4 V alloy. Int J Mech Sci 148:510–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yong J, Ding C (2011) Effect of cryogenic treatment on WC–Co cemented carbides. Mater Sci Eng, A 528(3):1735–1739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gill SS, Singh J, Singh H, Singh R (2012) Metallurgical and mechanical characteristics of cryogenically treated tungsten carbide (WC–Co). Int J Adv Manuf Technol 58(1–4):119–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gill SS, Singh H, Singh R, Singh J (2011) Flank wear and machining performance of cryogenically treated tungsten carbide inserts. Mater Manuf Process 26(11):1430–1441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Strano M, Albertelli P, Chiappini E, Tirelli S (2015) Wear behaviour of PVD coated and cryogenically treated tools for Ti–6Al–4 V turning. Int J Mater Form 8(4):601–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Garcia U, Ribeiro MV (2016) Ti6Al4 V titanium alloy end milling with minimum quantity of fluid technique use. Mater Manuf Process 31(7):905–918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ravi S, Kumar MP (2011) Experimental investigations on cryogenic cooling by liquid nitrogen in the end milling of hardened steel. Cryogenics 51(9):509–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ghani JA, Choudhury IA, Masjuki HH (2004) Performance of P10 TiN coated carbide tools when end milling AISI H13 tool steel at high cutting speed. J Mater Process Technol 153:1062–1066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Liu ZQ, Ai X, Zhang H, Wang ZT, Wan Y (2002) Wear patterns and mechanisms of cutting tools in high-speed face milling. J Mater Process Technol 129(1–3):222–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Akhtar W, Sun J, Chen W (2016) Effect of machining parameters on surface integrity in high speed milling of super alloy GH4169/Inconel 718. Mater Manuf Process 31(5):620–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vinothkumar Sivalingam
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Jie Sun
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Baskaran Selvam
    • 3
  • Pradeep Kumar Murugasen
    • 4
  • Bin Yang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Saad Waqar
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Mechanical EngineeringShandong UniversityJinanChina
  2. 2.Research Centre for Aeronautical Component Manufacturing Technology and EquipmentJinanChina
  3. 3.Department of Mechanical EngineeringMadanapalle Institute of Technology and ScienceAngalluIndia
  4. 4.Department of Mechanical EngineeringAnna UniversityChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations