Advertisement

Semi-analytical investigation on dynamic response of viscoelastic single-walled carbon nanotube in nanoparticle delivery

  • B. Rezapour
  • M. A. Fariborzi AraghiEmail author
Technical Paper
  • 9 Downloads

Abstract

Dynamic response of simply supported single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) with moving nanoparticle is studied based on nonlocal continuum mechanics formulations. The new differential equation of motion is proposed by considering the effect of inertia and Coriolis forces due to nanoparticle movement. The viscoelastic behavior of the SWCNTs is established by Kelvin–Voigt viscoelastic model. The governing differential equation obtained from Newton’s second law is discretized using the Galerkin method, and then, the effect of various parameters on dynamic response of the system is evaluated. Results show that the proposed moving mass model considering interaction and friction force effects between nanoparticle and SWCNTs reveals significant influence on dynamic response of the system. The dynamic amplitude obtained from moving mass model is almost 30% higher than the corresponding value obtained from moving load model. Moreover, the viscoelastic behavior eliminates the oscillations caused by natural vibrations, from the transient response of the SWCNTs. In addition, the friction between nanoparticle and SWCNTs has significant effect on dynamic response of the system, especially the steady-state response.

Keywords

SWCNTs Moving nanoparticle Viscoelastic behavior Dynamic response Galerkin method 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their careful reading and constructive comments to improve the quality of this work. Also, we thank the Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch, for their support during this research.

References

  1. 1.
    Arani AG, Kolahchi R, Mosayyebi M, Jamali M (2016) Pulsating fluid induced dynamic instability of visco-double-walled carbon nano-tubes based on sinusoidal strain gradient theory using DQM and Bolotin method. Int J Mech Mater Des 12(1):17–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aydogdu M, Arda M (2016) Torsional vibration analysis of double walled carbon nanotubes using nonlocal elasticity. Int J Mech Mater Des 12(1):71–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Eltaher M, Agwa M, Mahmoud F (2016) Nanobeam sensor for measuring a zeptogram mass. Int J Mech Mater Des 12(2):211–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shu Y, Lu J, Mao Q-X, Song R-S, Wang X-Y, Chen X-W, Wang J-H (2017) Ionic liquid mediated organophilic carbon dots for drug delivery and bioimaging. Carbon 114:324–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Li Z, de Barros ALB, Soares DCF, Moss SN, Alisaraie L (2017) Functionalized single-walled carbon nanotubes: cellular uptake, biodistribution and applications in drug delivery. Int J Pharm 524(1):41–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yayli MÖ (2018) On the torsional vibrations of restrained nanotubes embedded in an elastic medium. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 40(9):419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lv Z, Liu H (2018) Uncertainty modeling for vibration and buckling behaviors of functionally graded nanobeams in thermal environment. Compos Struct 184:1165–1176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yayli MÖ (2017) Buckling analysis of a cantilever single-walled carbon nanotube embedded in an elastic medium with an attached spring. IET Micro Nano Lett 12(4):255–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lv Z, Liu H (2017) Nonlinear bending response of functionally graded nanobeams with material uncertainties. Int J Mech Sci 134:123–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yayli MÖ (2014) On the axial vibration of carbon nanotubes with different boundary conditions. IET Micro Nano Lett 9(11):807–811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Arani AT, Ghorbanpour Arani A, Kolahchi R (2015) Non-Newtonian pulsating blood flow-induced dynamic instability of visco-carotid artery within soft surrounding visco-tissue using differential cubature method. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C J Mech Eng Sci 229(16):3002–3012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rezaee M, Maleki VA (2015) An analytical solution for vibration analysis of carbon nanotube conveying viscose fluid embedded in visco-elastic medium. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C J Mech Eng Sci 229(4):644–650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zhang DP, Lei Y, Shen ZB (2016) Free transverse vibration of double-walled carbon nanotubes embedded in viscoelastic medium. Acta Mech 227(12):3657–3670MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ansari R, Rouhi H, Sahmani S (2016) Studying the vibrational behavior of single-walled carbon nanotubes under different boundary conditions using the Rayleigh–Ritz technique. Int J Eng Appl Sci 8:51–67Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhang DP, Lei Y, Shen ZB (2017) Effect of longitudinal magnetic field on vibration characteristics of single-walled carbon nanotubes in a viscoelastic medium. Braz J Phys 47(6):640–656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhang D-P, Lei Y-J, Wang C-Y, Shen ZB (2017) Vibration analysis of viscoelastic single-walled carbon nanotubes resting on a viscoelastic foundation. J Mech Sci Technol 31(1):87–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yayli MÖ (2018) Free longitudinal vibration of a nanorod with elastic spring boundary conditions made of functionally graded material. IET Micro Nano Lett 13(7):1031–1035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yayli MÖ (2018) Torsional vibration analysis of nanorods with elastic torsional restraints using non-local elasticity theory. IET Micro Nano Lett 13(5):595–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Liu H, Lv Z (2018) Vibration and instability analysis of flow-conveying carbon nanotubes in the presence of material uncertainties. Physica A 511:85–103MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lü L, Hu Y, Wang X (2015) Forced vibration of two coupled carbon nanotubes conveying lagged moving nano-particles. Physica E 68(Supplement C):72–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pirmohammadi A, Pourseifi M, Rahmani O, Hoseini S (2014) Modeling and active vibration suppression of a single-walled carbon nanotube subjected to a moving harmonic load based on a nonlocal elasticity theory. Appl Phys A 117(3):1547–1555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Arani AG, Roudbari M (2013) Nonlocal piezoelastic surface effect on the vibration of visco-Pasternak coupled boron nitride nanotube system under a moving nanoparticle. Thin Solid Films 542:232–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Salamat D, Sedighi HM (2017) The effect of small scale on the vibrational behavior of single-walled carbon nanotubes with a moving nanoparticle. J Appl Comput Mech 3(3):208–217Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lee H-L, Chang W-J (2011) Dynamic modelling of a single-walled carbon nanotube for nanoparticle delivery. In: Proceedings of the royal society of London a: mathematical, physical and engineering sciences. vol 2127. The Royal Society, pp 860–868Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Şimşek M (2010) Vibration analysis of a single-walled carbon nanotube under action of a moving harmonic load based on nonlocal elasticity theory. Physica E 43(1):182–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kiani K (2011) Application of nonlocal beam models to double-walled carbon nanotubes under a moving nanoparticle. Part I: Theoretical formulations. Acta Mech 216(1):165–195zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kiani K (2011) Application of nonlocal beam models to double-walled carbon nanotubes under a moving nanoparticle. Part II: parametric study. Acta Mech 216(1):197–206zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rahmani O, Norouzi S, Golmohammadi H, Hosseini S (2017) Dynamic response of a double, single-walled carbon nanotube under a moving nanoparticle based on modified nonlocal elasticity theory considering surface effects. Mech Adv Mater Struct 56(5):1–18Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Eringen AC (1983) On differential equations of nonlocal elasticity and solutions of screw dislocation and surface waves. J Appl Phys 54(9):4703–4710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Zhang Y, Pang M, Fan L (2016) Analyses of transverse vibrations of axially pretensioned viscoelastic nanobeams with small size and surface effects. Phys Lett A 380(29):2294–2299MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Eldred LB, Baker WP, Palazotto AN (1995) Kelvin–Voigt versus fractional derivative model as constitutive relations for viscoelastic materials. AIAA J 33(3):547–550zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Arani AG, Roudbari M, Amir S (2012) Nonlocal vibration of SWBNNT embedded in bundle of CNTs under a moving nanoparticle. Physica B 407(17):3646–3653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Şimşek M (2010) Dynamic analysis of an embedded microbeam carrying a moving microparticle based on the modified couple stress theory. Int J Eng Sci 48(12):1721–1732zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ram M, Davim JP (2018) Advanced mathematical techniques in engineering sciences. CRC Press, Boca RatonzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Cox BJ, Thamwattana N, Hill JM Mechanics of atoms and fullerenes in single-walled carbon nanotubes. I. Acceptance and suction energies. In: Proceedings of the royal society of london a: mathematical, physical and engineering sciences, 2007. vol 2078. The Royal Society, pp 461–477Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wang Q (2005) Wave propagation in carbon nanotubes via nonlocal continuum mechanics. J Appl Phys 98(12):124–145Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Wang L, Hu H (2005) Flexural wave propagation in single-walled carbon nanotubes. Phys Rev B 71(19):195–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MathematicsCentral Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad UniversityTehranIran

Personalised recommendations