Advertisement

Performance evaluation of textured carbide tools under environment-friendly minimum quantity lubrication turning strategies

  • Rupinder SinghEmail author
  • J. S. Dureja
  • Manu Dogra
Technical Paper
  • 45 Downloads

Abstract

Present investigation is focused to study the impact of different lubricating environments using pure canola oil and graphene mixed in canola oil, on the performance of uncoated carbide textured tools in minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) turning of AISI 4340 hardened steel. The influence of using twin jet and single jet was also studied under MQL. The turning performance was evaluated in terms of flank wear (VBmax), cutting forces, cutting temperature, and chip morphology. The results showed that MQL mist supplied simultaneously on rake and flank face of the textured tool by twin-jet nozzle performed better than MQL mist supplied on the rake face of textured tool by the single-jet nozzle. Out of all the tested lubricating environments, best tool life was achieved with nanoparticle minimum quantity lubrication (NMQL) using the twin jet followed by only oil using twin jet as compared to all other conditions tested in this study. The outcome of the study illustrates that MQL mist of graphene which is mixed in canola oil on a textured tool with the twin-jet nozzle can be successfully applied for finish turning of hardened steel.

Keywords

MQL NMQL Textured tools Twin jet Single jet Graphene 

References

  1. 1.
    Lawal SA, Choudhury IA, Nukman Y (2013) A case for minimum quantity lubrication using vegetable oil-based lubricant. J Clean Prod 41:210–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Carou D, Rubio EM, Davim JP (2015) A note on the use of the minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) system in turning. Ind Lub Tribol 67(3):256–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Makhesana MA et al (2016) Investigation to study the applicability of solid lubricants in machining for green manufacturing. Ind Lub Tribol 68(5):591–596.  https://doi.org/10.1108/ilt-03-2015-0037 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sharma VS, Dogra M, Suri NM (2009) Cooling techniques for improved productivity in turning. Int J Mach Tools 49(6):435–453.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2008.12.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chetan J, Narasimhulu A, Ghosh S, Rao PV (2014) Study of tool wear mechanisms and mathematical modeling of flank wear during machining of Ti Alloy (Ti6Al4V). J Inst Eng India Ser C 96(3):279–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wójcik R, Nadolny K (2017) Effects of a variety of cutting fluids administered using the minimum quantity lubrication method on the surface grinding process for nickel-based alloys. J Zhejiang Univ Sci A 18(9):728–740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Khan MMA, Dhar NR (2006) Performance evaluation of minimum quantity lubrication by vegetable oil in terms of cutting force, cutting zone temperature, tool wear, job dimension and surface finish in turning AISI-1060 steel. J Zhejiang Univ Sci A 7:1790–1799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chetan J, Behera BC, Ghosh S, Rao PV (2016) Application of nanofluids during minimum quantity lubrication: a case study in turning process. Tribol Int 101:234–246.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2016.04.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Srikant R, Prasad M, Amrita M et al (2014) Nanofluids as a potential solution for minimum quantity lubrication: a review. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B J Eng Manuf 228(1):3–20.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0954405413497939 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hadad M, Sadeghi B (2013) Minimum quantity lubrication-MQL turning of AISI 4140 steel alloy. J Clean Prod 54:332–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mia M, Dhar NR (2018) Effects of duplex jets high-pressure coolant on machining temperature and machinability of Ti–6Al–4V superalloy. J Mater Process Technol 252:688–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sharma V, Pandey PM (2016) Recent advances in turning with textured cutting tools: a review. J Clean Prod 137:701–715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Arslan A, Masjuki HH, Kalam MA et al (2016) Surface texture manufacturing techniques and tribological effect of surface texturing on cutting tool performance: a review. Crit Rev Solid State Mater Sci 8436:1–35Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lei Shuting, Devarajan Sasikumar, Chang Zenghu (2009) A comparative study on the machining performance of textured cutting tools with lubrication. Int J Mechatron Manuf Syst 2(4):401–413Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kawasegi N, Sugimori H, Morimoto H, Morita N, Hori I (2009) Development of cutting tools with microscale and nanoscale textures to improve frictional behavior. Precis Eng 33(3):248–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kiyota H, Itoigawa F, Nakamura T (2014) Mechanism of reduction in cutting force with micro textured tool. Key Eng Mater 612:489–490Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Obikawa T, Kamio A, Takaoka H, Osada A (2011) Micro-texture at the coated tool face for high performance cutting. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 51(12):966–972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Orra K, Sounak C (2018) Tribological aspects of various geometrically shaped micro-textures on cutting insert to improve tool life in hard turning process. J Manuf Proc 31:502–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Su Y, Gong L, Li B et al (2016) Performance evaluation of nanofluid MQL with vegetable-based oil and ester oil as base fluids in turning. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 83(9–12):2083–2089.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7730-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Singh RK, Sharma AK, Dixit AR et al (2017) Performance evaluation of alumina-graphene hybrid nano-cutting fluid in hard turning. J Clean Prod 162:830–845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sharma V, Pandey PM (2016) Geometrical design optimization of hybrid textured self-lubricating cutting inserts for turning 4340 hardened steel. Int Adv Manuf Technol 89:1575–1589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bagchi SN, Parkash Kuldip (1979) Industrial steel reference book. Wiley, Calcutta, pp 145–146Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    WIDIA (2017) Master catalogue. https://www.widia.com/en/featured/widia-master-catalog-2017. Accessed 28 Mar 2018
  24. 24.
    Yu H, Deng H, Huang W, Wang X (2011) The effect of dimple shapes on friction of parallel surfaces. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part J J Eng Tribol 225:693–703.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1350650111406045 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Stoeterau RL, Janssen A, Mallmann G (2016) Friction analyses of dimple-structured surface. J Mech Eng Autom 6:269–276.  https://doi.org/10.17265/2159-5275/2016.06.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sharma V, Pandey PM (2016) Comparative study of turning of 4340 hardened steel with hybrid textured self-lubricating cutting inserts. Mater Manuf Proc 31(14):1904–1916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Singh T, Singh P, Dureja JS (2016) A review of near dry machining/minimum quantity lubrication machining of difficult to machine alloys. Int J Mach Mach Mater 18(3):213–251Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kuram E, Ozcelik B, Demirbas E (2012) Environmentally friendly machining: vegetable based cutting fluids. In: Davim J (ed) Green manufacturing processes and systems. Materials forming, machining and tribology. Springer, Berlin, pp 23–47.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33792-5_2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Whitener KE, Sheehan PE (2014) Graphene synthesis. Diam Relat Mater 46:25–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Zhong Y, Zhen Z, Zhu H (2017) Graphene: fundamental research and potential applications solution phase methods. Flat Chem 4:20–32.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flatc.2017.06.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lee Gwan, Hyoung Cooper, Ryan C et al (2013) High strength chemical-vapor-deposited graphene and grain boundaries. Science 340:1073–1076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kim H, Seo K, Kim D (2016) Investigation of mechanical behavior of single- and multi-layer graphene by using molecular dynamics simulation. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 17(12):1693–1701.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-016-0196-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kumar P, Wani MF (2017) Synthesis and tribological properties of graphene: a review. J Tribol Malays Tribol Soc 13:36–71Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Berman D, Erdemir A, Sumant AV (2014) A new emerging lubricant. Mater Today 17(1):31–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wu L, Gu L, Xie Z, Zhang C, Song B (2017) Improved tribological properties of Si 3N 4/GCr15 sliding pairs with few layer graphene as oil additives. Ceram Int 43(16):14218–14224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Arao Y, Kubouchi M (2015) High-rate production of few-layer graphene by high-power probe sonication. Carbon 95:802–808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Chu B, Singh E, Koratkar N, Samuel J (2013) Graphene-enhanced environmentally-benign cutting fluids for high-performance micro-machining applications. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 13(8):5500–5504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Przybylski R, Mag T, Eskin NAM, McDonald BE (2015) Canola oil. Bailey’s Ind Oil Fat Prod 6:61–121Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Johnson DW, Dobson BP, Coleman KS (2015) A manufacturing perspective on graphene dispersions. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci 20(5–6):367–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Dogra M, Sharma VS, Dureja J (2011) Effect of tool geometry variation on finish turning—a review. J Eng Sci Technol Rev 4(1):1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    International Organization for Standardization. Tool-life testing with single point turning tools, ISO 3685–1993 (E), 2nd edn. Geneva 20, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    ASTM International (2014) Standard test method for calibration and accuracy verification of wideband infrared thermometers. ASTM International, West Conshohocken (ASTM E2847-14) Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Chinchanikar S, Choudhury SK (2014) Hard turning using HiPIMS-coated carbide tools: wear behavior under dry and minimum quantity lubrication (MQL). J Int Meas Confed 55:536–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Wu Z, Deng J, Su C et al (2014) Performance of the micro-texture self-lubricating and pulsating heat pipe self-cooling tools in dry cutting process. Int J Ref Met Hard Mater 45:238–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Roy S, Ghosh A (2013) High speed turning of AISI 4140 steel using nanofluid through twin jet SQL system. In: ASME, conference on systems; micro and nano technologies, sustainable manufacturing, USA, 2.  https://doi.org/10.1115/msec2013-1067
  46. 46.
    Berman D, Erdemir A, Sumant AV (2013) Reduced wear and friction enabled by graphene layers on sliding steel surfaces in dry nitrogen. Carbon 59:167–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Groover MP (2002) Fundamentals of modern manufacturing, 2nd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Stoeterau Rodrigo L, Andreas Janssen, Guilherme Mallmann (2016) Analysis of dimple textured surfaces on cutting tools. DOI, J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-016-0692-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Williams J, Tabor D (1977) The role of lubricants in machining. Wear 43(3):275–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Uysal Alper (2016) Investigation of flank wear in MQL milling of ferritic stainless steel by using nano graphene reinforced vegetable cutting fluid. Ind Lub Tribol 68(4):446–451MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Berman D, Erdemir A, Sumant AV (2013) Few layer graphene to reduce wear and friction on sliding steel surfaces. Carbon 54:454–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical Engineering, University School of Engineering and TechnologyRayat Bahra UniversityMohaliIndia
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringPunjabi UniversityPatialaIndia
  3. 3.Department of Mechanical EngineeringPanjab University SSG Regional CentreHoshiarpurIndia

Personalised recommendations