Modified utilization of semi-sectioned tubes as filler coated with MWCNTs–TiO2 in TIG arc welding to recover fusion lost mechanical properties of the weldment

  • Muhammad Muzamil
  • Jianjun Wu
  • Muhammad Samiuddin
Technical Paper


The loss of mechanical properties in heat treatable aluminum alloys categories during arc fusion welding processes is a critical issue, which limits the direct application in contrast to different post-treatments methods. This work involved a strategy for the novel and distinctive formation of fillers using 3-mm-diameter (AA6061) tubes having MWCNTs and TiO2 nanoparticles coating on the inner surface. A series of experiments were conducted using TIG welding to evaluate the effect of welding current and composition of inside coating (MWCNTs–TiO2) contents on welding strength. Three gradually increasing current values (160 A, 180 A and 200 A) were selected and tested against three combinations of nanocomposite coatings that include 1 wt% MWCNTs–TiO2, 1.5 wt% MWCNTs–TiO2 and 2 wt% MWCNTs–TiO2. Acceptable qualified bonding between nanocomposite and inside surface is utmost important before conducting the experiments, Tape Test (ASTM-D3359-09e2) was performed for the assessment of bonding conditions and led to qualitatively exceptional bonding conditions after applying vacuum heating cycle. Tensile test results have demonstrated a significant improvement of 34.20–45.65% strength using innovative nanocomposite coated semi-sectioned tube in comparison to tube fillers without coating. Meanwhile, a beneficial gradually forming W-shape microhardness profile in contrast to conventional U and V shape profiles was achieved at 1.5 and 2 wt% of MWCNTs, and the uplift of hardness in the WZ region up to 86.51% subjected to increase high MWCNTs contents in combination with the current. Therefore, it is concluded to be a virtuous strategy for reinforcing mechanism of weldments to encounter some fusion property loss in aluminum alloys.


Mechanical properties Semi-sectioned tubes MWCNTs and TiO2 Tape Test TIG welding Fillers 


  1. 1.
    Maisonnette D, Bardel D, Robin V, Nelias D, Suery M (2017) Mechanical behaviour at high temperature as induced during welding of a 6xxx series aluminium alloy. Int J Press Vessel Pip 149:55–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Agrawal BP, Chauhan AK, Kumar R, Anant R, Kumar S (2017) GTA pulsed current welding of thin sheets of SS304 producing superior quality of joint at high welding speed. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 39(11):4667–4675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dorbane A, Mansoor B, Ayoub G, Shunmugasamy VC, Imad A (2016) Mechanical, microstructural and fracture properties of dissimilar welds produced by friction stir welding of AZ31B and Al6061. Mater Sci Eng A 651:720–733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Woelke PB, Hiriyur BK, Nahshon K, Hutchinson JW (2017) A practical approach to modeling aluminum weld fracture for structural applications. Eng Fract Mech 175:72–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vargas JA, Torres JE, Pacheco JA, Hernandez RJ (2013) Analysis of heat input effect on the mechanical properties of Al-6061-T6 alloy weld joints. Mater Des 52:556–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fadaeifard F, Matori KA, Garavi F, Al-Falahi M, Sarrigani GV (2016) Effect of post weld heat treatment on microstructure and mechanical properties of gas tungsten arc welded AA6061-T6 alloy. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China 26(12):3102–3114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rao KV (2018) Evaluation of welding characteristics using three-dimensional finite element simulation and experimentation for FSW of aluminum 6061. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 40(2):86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ding JK, Wang DP, Ying WANG, Hui DU (2014) Effect of post weld heat treatment on properties of variable polarity TIG welded AA2219 aluminium alloy joints. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China 24(5):307–1316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kissell JR, Ferry RL (2002) Aluminum structures: a guide to their specifications and design. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gómora CM, Ambriz RR, Curiel FF, Jaramillo D (2017) Heat distribution in welds of a 6061-T6 aluminum alloy obtained by modified indirect electric arc. J Mater Process Technol 243:433–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sun Q, Li J, Liu Y, Jiang Y, Kang K, Feng J (2018) Arc characteristics and droplet transfer process in CMT welding with a magnetic field. J Manuf Process 32:48–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yuan T, Luo Z, Kou S (2016) Grain refining of magnesium welds by arc oscillation. Acta Mater 116:166–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sabzi M, Dezfuli SM (2018) Drastic improvement in mechanical properties and weldability of 316L stainless steel weld joints by using electromagnetic vibration during GTAW process. J Manuf Process 33:74–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Liang Y, Shen J, Hu S, Wang H, Pang J (2018) Effect of TIG current on microstructural and mechanical properties of 6061-T6 aluminium alloy joints by TIG–CMT hybrid welding. J Mater Process Technol 255:161–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Junaid M, Baig MN, Shamir M, Khan FN, Rehman K, Haider J (2017) A comparative study of pulsed laser and pulsed TIG welding of Ti–5Al–2.5 Sn titanium alloy sheet. J Mater Process Technol 242:24–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jie YI, Cao SF, Li LX, Guo PC, Liu KY (2015) Effect of welding current on morphology and microstructure of Al alloy T-joint in double-pulsed MIG welding. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China 25(10):3204–3211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Huang Y, Zhao D, Chen H, Yang L, Chen S (2018) Porosity detection in pulsed GTA welding of 5A06 Al alloy through spectral analysis. J Mater Process Technol 259:332–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhu ZY, Deng CY, Wang Y, Yang ZW, Ding JK, Wang DP (2015) Effect of post weld heat treatment on the microstructure and corrosion behavior of AA2219 aluminum alloy joints welded by variable polarity tungsten inert gas welding. Mater Des 65:1075–1082CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ahmad R, Bakar MA (2011) Effect of a post-weld heat treatment on the mechanical and microstructure properties of AA6061 joints welded by the gas metal arc welding cold metal transfer method. Mater Des 32(10):5120–5126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ahmadi E, Ranjkesh M, Mansoori E, Fattahi M, Mojallal RY, Amirkhanlou S (2017) Microstructure and mechanical properties of Al/ZrC/TiC hybrid nanocomposite filler metals of tungsten inert gas welding fabricated by accumulative roll bonding. J Manuf Process 26:173–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sabetghadam-Isfahani A, Abbasi M, Sharifi SMH, Fattahi M, Amirkhanlou S, Fattahi Y (2016) Microstructure and mechanical properties of carbon nanotubes/AZ31 magnesium composite gas tungsten arc welding filler rods fabricated by powder metallurgy. Diam Relat Mater 69:160–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Babu NK, Talari MK, Dayou P, Zheng S, Jun W, Sivaprasad K (2012) Influence of titanium–boron additions on grain refinement of AA6082 gas tungsten arc welds. Mater Des 40:467–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bakshi SR, Agarwal A (2011) An analysis of the factors affecting strengthening in carbon nanotube reinforced aluminum composites. Carbon 49(2):533–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zhou W, Yamaguchi T, Kikuchi K, Nomura N, Kawasaki A (2017) Effectively enhanced load transfer by interfacial reactions in multi-walled carbon nanotube reinforced Al matrix composites. Acta Mater 125:369–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mokdad F, Chen DL, Liu ZY, Xiao BL, Ni DR, Ma ZY (2016) Deformation and strengthening mechanisms of a carbon nanotube reinforced aluminum composite. Carbon 104:64–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yan L, Tan Z, Ji G, Li Z, Fan G, Schryvers D, Shan A, Zhang D (2016) A quantitative method to characterize the Al4C3-formed interfacial reaction: the case study of MWCNT/Al composites. Mater Charact 112:213–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Chen B, Kondoh K, Imai H, Umeda J, Takahashi M (2016) Simultaneously enhancing strength and ductility of carbon nanotube/aluminum composites by improving bonding conditions. Scr Mater 113:158–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Fukuda H, Kondoh K, Umeda J, Fugetsu B (2011) Aging behavior of the matrix of aluminum-magnesium-silicon alloy including carbon nanotubes. Mater Lett 65(11):1723–1725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kondoh K, Fukuda H, Umeda J, Imai H, Fugetsu B (2014) Microstructural and mechanical behavior of multi-walled carbon nanotubes reinforced Al–Mg–Si alloy composites in aging treatment. Carbon 72:15–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Boesl B, Lahiri D, Behdad S, Agarwal A (2014) Direct observation of carbon nanotube induced strengthening in aluminum composite via in situ tensile tests. Carbon 69:79–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Vidyarthy RS, Dwivedi DK (2016) Activating flux tungsten inert gas welding for enhanced weld penetration. J Manuf Process 22:211–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kelly A, Tyson AW (1965) Tensile properties of fibre-reinforced metals: copper/tungsten and copper/molybdenum. J Mech Phys Solids 13(6):329–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Li C, Shi Y, Gu Y, Fan D, Zhu M (2018) Effects of different activating fluxes on the surface tension of molten metal in gas tungsten arc welding. J Manuf Process 32:395–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Pérez-Bustamante R, González-Ibarra MJ, González-Cantú J, Estrada-Guel I, Herrera-Ramírez JM, Miki-Yoshida M, Martínez-Sánchez R (2012) AA2024–CNTs composites by milling process after T6-temper condition. J Alloys Compd 536:S17–S20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Bradbury CR, Gomon JK, Kollo L, Kwon H, Leparoux M (2014) Hardness of multi wall carbon nanotubes reinforced aluminium matrix composites. J Alloys Compd 585:362–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Geng S, Jiang P, Shao X, Mi G, Wu H, Ai Y, Wang C, Han C, Chen R, Liu W (2018) Comparison of solidification cracking susceptibility between Al–Mg and Al–Cu alloys during welding: a phase-field study. Scr Mater 150:120–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Gollnow C, Griesche A, Weidemann J, Kannengiesser T (2017) Influence of external loads on a characteristic angle between grains and solidus line as an indicator for hot cracking susceptibility during GTA welding. J Mater Process Technol 239:172–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Muhammad Muzamil
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jianjun Wu
    • 1
  • Muhammad Samiuddin
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Mechanical EngineeringNorthwestern Polytechnical UniversityXi’anChina
  2. 2.Mechanical Engineering DepartmentNED University of Engineering and TechnologyKarachiPakistan
  3. 3.Metallurgical Engineering DepartmentNED University of Engineering and TechnologyKarachiPakistan

Personalised recommendations