Advertisement

Effect of blade profile with different thickness distribution on the pressure characteristics of novel self-priming pump

  • Hao Chang
  • Wei Li
  • Weidong Shi
  • Jianrui Liu
Technical Paper

Abstract

As the conventional self-priming pump cannot satisfy the requirement of quick aerofluxus, a novel self-priming pump with distinct structure and the extraordinary self-priming mechanism was designed to afford promising opportunities for emergency water delivery. Meanwhile, to obtain the optimal profile of the blade, nine blades with different thickness distribution were systematically investigated based on computational fluid dynamics, and in order to benchmark the numerical calculation, the relevant external characteristic test was conducted. According to the results, spatial structure of boundary-layer separation bubble (BLSB) was displayed clearly by employing the new space coordinate system, which can not only trigger the hydraulic loss, but also give rise to the blockage of the passage. Additionally, the amplitude of pressure fluctuation on the blades initially decreases and subsequently rises with the flow rate increases, and the minimum amplitude was obtained under design flow rate. Furthermore, compared with the pressure fluctuation, induced noise and hydraulic characteristic of the blades with different thickness distribution, the blades with thickness distribution of 3-6-6 from inlet to the outlet are superior to the other blades obviously. Therefore, it reflects that the thickness distribution of the blade exerts vital influences on the performance of the self-priming pump, and this research could provide reference for designing the thickness distribution of the blades.

Keywords

Thickness distribution Self-priming pump Pressure fluctuation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support from the Six Talents Peak Project of Jiangsu Province JNHB-CXTD-005, Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BE2016163, BRA2017353 and No. BK20161472), Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51679111, No. 51409127 and No. 51579118) and National Key R&D Program Project (No. 2017YFC0403703).

References

  1. 1.
    Zhou P (2016) Study on effects of blade number on stall characteristics for centrifugal pump impeller. J Mech Eng 52(10):207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wang Y, Liu H, Liu D et al (2013) Effects of vane wrap angle on flow induced vibration and noise of centrifugal pumps. Trans Chin Soc Agric Eng 29(1):72–77(6)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Xiang Z (2010) Relationship between wrap angle of impeller and performance of pump. Trans Chin Soc Agric Mach 41(11):38–42Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tan L, Yu Z, Xu Y et al (2017) Role of blade rotational angle on energy performance and pressure fluctuation of a mixed-flow pump. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part A J Power Energy 231(3):095765091768994Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Derakhshan S, Kasaeian N (2014) Optimization, numerical, and experimental study of a propeller pump as turbine. J Energy Res Technol 136(1):012005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Derakhshan S, Mohammadi B, Nourbakhsh A (2010) The comparison of incomplete sensitivities and Genetic algorithms applications in 3D radial turbomachinery blade optimization. Comput Fluids 39(10):2022–2029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jeon SY, Kim CK, Lee SM et al (2017) Performance enhancement of a pump impeller using optimal design method. J Therm Sci 26(2):119–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Li W, Zhao X, Li W et al (2017) Numerical prediction and Performance experiment in an engine cooling water pump with different blade outlet widths. Math Probl Eng 2017(6):1–11Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Korkmaz E, Gölcü M, Kurbanoğlu C (2017) Effects of blade discharge angle, blade number and splitter blade length on deep well pump performance. J Appl Fluid Mech 10(2):529–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Myers KJ, Pandit AK, Janz E E et al (2016) Impeller diameter and submergence effects in solids drawdown with up-pumping impellers. Can J Chem EngGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mohammadi N, Fakharzadeh M (2017) Analysis of effect of impeller geometry including blade outlet angle on the performance of multi-pressure pumps: simulation and experiment. Mechanika 23(1)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wang T, Kong F, Xia B et al (2017) The method for determining blade inlet angle of special impeller using in turbine mode of centrifugal pump as turbine. Renew Energy 109:518–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Xu Y, Tan L, Cao S et al (2016) Multiparameter and multi-objective optimization design of centrifugal pump based on orthogonal method. ARCHIVE Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C J Mech Eng Sci 1989–1996 231(14):2569–2579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Liu Y, Tan L, Hao Y et al (2017) Energy performance and flow patterns of a mixed-flow pump with different tip clearance sizes. Energies 10(2):191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hao Y, Tan L, Liu Y et al (2017) Energy performance and radial force of a mixed-flow pump with symmetrical and unsymmetrical tip clearances. Energies 10(1):57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Li W, Shi W, Xu Y et al (2013) Effects of guide vane thickness on pressure pulsation of mixed-flow pump in pumped-storage power station. J VibroEng 15(3):1177–1185Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wang C (2012) Effect and experiment of different blade thickness on stainless steel stamping well pump performance. Trans Chin Soc Agric MachGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sha Y, Hou L (2012) Effects of blade thickness on performance of axial flow pump and analysis of internal flow field. Trans Chin Soc Agric Eng 28(18):75–81Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pinto RN, Afzal A, D’Souza LV et al (2017) Computational fluid dynamics in turbomachinery: a review of state of the art. Arch Comput Methods Eng 24(3):1–13MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wang C, Shi W, Wang X et al (2017) Optimal design of multistage centrifugal pump based on the combined energy loss model and computational fluid dynamics. Appl Energy 187:10–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tan L, Zhu BS, Cao SL et al (2014) Numerical simulation of unsteady cavitation flow in a centrifugal pump at off-design conditions. ARCHIVE Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C J Mech Eng Sci 1989–1996 228(11):1994–2006Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tan L, Zhu B, Wang Y et al (2015) Numerical study on characteristics of unsteady flow in a centrifugal pump volute at partial load condition. Eng Comput Int J Comput Aided Eng 32(6):1549–1566Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tao Y, Yuan S, Liu J et al (2016) Influence of blade thickness on transient flow characteristics of centrifugal slurry pump with semi-open impeller. Chin J Mech Eng 29(6):1209–1217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zhai J, Zhu B, Li K et al (2106) Internal pressure fluctuation characteristic of low specific speed mixed flow pump. Trans Chin Soc Agric MachGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Proudman I (1952) The generation of noise by isotropic turbulence. Proc R Soc A 214(1116):119–132MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zhang L, Wang S, Kong C (2013) Flow characteristics in a centrifugal fan with air blowing for controlling the rotating stall. Proc CseeGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Chen M, Han DF (2009) Research of evaluating the circulation of large passenger ships. Ship Ocean EngGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tan L, Xie Z, Liu Y et al (2017) Influence of T-shape tip clearance on performance of a mixed-flow pump. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part A J Power Energy 232(4):095765091773312Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research Center of Fluid Machinery Engineering and Technology, Jiangsu UniversityZhenjiangChina
  2. 2.School of Mechanical EngineeringNantong UniversityNantongChina

Personalised recommendations