Advertisement

Magnetic abrasive finishing of AZ91 magnesium alloy using electromagnet

  • Ankur Chaurasia
  • Nav Rattan
  • Rahul S. Mulik
Technical Paper
  • 27 Downloads

Abstract

The magnesium alloy is widely used in the industry owing to its lightweight and high specific strength applications. In the present work, the effect of different process parameters of magnetic abrasive finishing process (MAF) on surface roughness (Ra) has been studied along with the various forces acting on AZ91 magnesium alloy plate during finishing operation. The average surface roughness ‘Ra’ of AZ91 magnesium alloy was examined, and various cutting forces were also measured during finishing with MAF process. Permanent magnet was used on the opposite side of the workpiece and electromagnet in order to improve the strength of magnetic field in this process. In the present study, effects of various process parameters such as working gap, rotational speed and supplied current have been studied on the percentage change in ‘Ra’ and various cutting forces during finishing of AZ91 magnesium alloy. Improvement in surface texture and finishing mechanism during MAF process was also observed with the help of SEM and AFM images.

Keywords

Magnetic abrasive finishing (MAF) Magnesium wheel (MAG wheel) Analysis of variance Flexible magnetic abrasive brush (FMAB) 

References

  1. 1.
    Jain VK (2007) Advanced machining process. Allied Publisher Pvt.Ltd., New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ahmada S, Gangwara S, Yadav PC, Singh DK (2016) Optimization of process parameters affecting surface roughness in magnetic abrasive finishing process. Mater Manuf Process.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2017.1279307 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cizec L, Greger M, Dobrzanski LA, Juricka I, Kocich R, Pawlica L, Tanski T (2006) Mechanical properties of magnesium alloy AZ91 at elevated temperatures. J Achiev Mater Manuf Eng 18:203-206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Buldum BB, Sik A, Ozkul I (2012) Investigation of magnesium alloys machinability. Int J Electron (Mech Mechatron Eng) 2(3):261–268Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Heng L, Yang GE, Wang R, Kim MS, Mun SD (2015) Effect of carbon nano tube (CNT) particles in magnetic abrasive finishing of Mg alloy bars. J Mech Sci Technol 29(12):5325–5333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kim TW, Kwak JS (2010) A Study on deburring of magnesium alloy plate by magnetic abrasive polishing. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 11(2):189–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mulik RS, Srivastava V, Pandey PM (2012) Experimental investigations and modeling of temperature in the work-brush interface during ultrasonic assisted magnetic abrasive finishing process. Mater Manuf Process 27:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mishra V, Goel H, Mulik RS, Pandey PM (2014) Determining work-brush interface temperature in magnetic abrasive finishing process. J Manuf Process 16(2):248–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yin S, Shinmura T (2004) Vertical vibration-assisted magnetic abrasive finishing and deburring for magnesium alloy. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 44:1297–1303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kim TW, Kang DM, Kwak JS (2010) Application of magnetic abrasive polishing to composite materials. J Mech Sci Technol 24(5):1029–1034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Givi M, Tehrani AF, Mohammadi A (2012) Polishing of the aluminum sheets with magnetic abrasive finishing method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 61:989–998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Choopani Y, Razfar MR, Saraeian P, Farahnakian M (2016) Experimental investigation of external surface finishing of AISI 440C stainless steel cylinders using the magnetic abrasive finishing process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 83(9):1811–1821​CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pashmforoush F, Rahimi A (2015) Nano-finishing of BK7 optical glass using magnetic abrasive finishing process. Appl Opt 54(9):2199–2200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Heng L, Yang GE, Wang R, Kim MS, Mun SD (2015) Effect of carbon nano tube (CNT) particles in magnetic abrasive finishing of Mg alloy bars. J Mech Sci Technol.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-015-1134-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Saraeian P, Mehr HS, Moradi B, Tavakoli H, Alrahmani OK (2016) Study of magnetic abrasive finishing for AISI321 stainless steel. Mater Manuf Process 31:2023–2029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chang GW, Yan BH, Hsu RT (2002) Study on cylindrical magnetic abrasive finishing using unbonded magnetic abrasives. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 42(5):575–583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Verma GC, Kala P, Pandey PM (2016) Experimental investigations into internal magnetic abrasive finishing of pipes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-8881-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mulik RS, Pandey PM (2011) Magnetic abrasive finishing of hardened AISI 52100 steel. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 55(5-8):501–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mulik RS, Pandey PM (2013) Experimental investigations into the finishing force and torque in magnetic abrasive finishing process. In: ASME 2013 international mechanical engineering congress and exposition. American Society of Mechanical EngineersGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Singh DK, Jain VK, Raghuram V, Komanduri R (2005) Analysis of surface texture generated by a flexible magnetic abrasive brush. Wear 259(7):1254–1261CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringPDPUGandhinagarIndia
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical and Industrial EngineeringIIT RoorkeeRoorkeeIndia

Personalised recommendations