Advertisement

Some generalized results for Maxwell fluid flow over porous oscillatory surface with modified Fourier and Fick’s theories

  • Sami Ullah Khan
  • S. A. Shehzad
  • N. Ali
  • M. N. Bashir
Technical Paper
  • 22 Downloads

Abstract

This study intends to elaborate heat and mass transportation characteristics in unsteady flow of non-Newtonian fluid caused by oscillatory surface. The rheological behavior of non-Newtonian fluid is addressed by using Maxwell model. Further, heat transportation is characterized through consideration of Cattaneo–Christov theory of heat diffusion. Secondly, the generalized Fick’s law is implemented for investigation of mass transfer. The independent variables in the governing expressions are decreased with suitable transformations. The homotopic procedure is adopted for the solutions of well-defined problem. The validity of obtained solution is verified in limiting case. The graphical explanations for both linear and oscillatory stretching surface are presented. The comparison of \(f^{{\prime \prime }} (0,\tau )\) with proposed results for linear stretching surface is recovered. Furthermore, the numerical values of flow feature parameters on local Nusselt and local Sherwood numbers are also highlighted and expressed in tabular form.

Keywords

Maxwell fluid Fourier’s law Fick’s law Cattaneo–Christov Oscillatory stretching surface 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the editor and reviewers for their useful comments to improve the earlier version of the paper.

Funding

There are no funders to report for this submission.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Harris J (1977) Rheology and non-Newtonian flow. Longman Inc., New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jamil M, Rauf A, Zafar AA, Khan NA (2011) New exact analytical solutions for Stokes’ first problem of Maxwell fluid with fractional derivative approach. Comput Math Appl 62:1013–1023MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Palade LI, Attané P, Huilgol RR, Mena B (1999) Anomalous stability behavior of a properly invariant constitutive equation which generalize fractional derivative models. Int J Eng Sci 37:315–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Vieru D, Akhtar W, Fetecau C, Fetecau C (2007) Starting solutions for the oscillating motion of a Maxwell fluid in cylindrical domains. Meccanica 42:573–583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sakiadis BC (1961) Boundary layer behavior on continuous solid surfaces: I Boundary layer equations for two dimensional and axisymmetric flow. AIChE J 7:26–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vajravelu K, Rollins D (1992) Heat transfer in electrically conducting fluid over a stretching surface. Int J Nonlinear Mech 27:265–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Vajravelu K, Nayfeh J (1993) Convective heat transfer at a stretching sheet. Acta Mech 96:47–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cortell R (2006) Effects of viscous dissipation and work done by deformation on the MHD flow and heat transfer of a viscoelastic fluid over a stretching sheet. Phys Lett A 357:298–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dandapat BS, Santra B, Vajravelu K (2007) The effects of variable fluid properties and thermocapillarity on the flow of a thin film on an unsteady stretching sheet. Int J Heat Mass Transf 50:991–996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hayat T, Mustafa M, Pop I (2010) Heat and mass transfer for Soret and Dufour’s effect on mixed convection boundary layer flow over a stretching vertical surface in a porous medium filled with a viscoelastic fluid. Commun Nonlinear Sci 15:1183–1196MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Turkyilmazoglu M (2013) The analytical solution of mixed convection heat transfer and fluid flow of a MHD viscoelastic fluid over a permeable stretching surface. Int J Mech Sci 77:263–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sajid M, Ali N, Abbas Z, Javed T, Imran M (2012) Some two-dimensional flows with couple stresses. J Eng Phys Thermophys 85:649–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rehman S, Haq R, Lee C, Nadeem S (2017) Numerical study of non-Newtonian fluid flow over an exponentially stretching surface: an optimal HAM validation. J Braz Soc Mech Sci 39:1589–1596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Afsar A, Bukhari SR, Ellahi R (2018) Effects of chemical reaction on third grade MHD fluid flow under the influence of heat and mass transfer with variable reactive index. Heat Transf Res.  https://doi.org/10.1615/HeatTransRes.2018025553 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fourier JBJ (1822) Théorie Analytique De La Chaleur, Paris, Chez Firmin Didot, père et filsGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cattaneo C (1948) Sulla conduzioned elcalore. Atti Semin Mat Fis Univ Modena Reggio Emilia 3:83–101Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Christov CI (2009) On frame indifferent formulation of the Maxwell-Cattaneo model of finite- speed heat conduction. Mech Res Commun 36:481–486MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Straughan B (2010) Thermal convection with the Cattaneo–Christov model. Int J Heat Mass Transf 53:95–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Li J, Zheng L, Liu L (2016) MHD viscoelastic flow and heat transfer over a vertical stretching sheet with Cattaneo–Christov heat flux effects. J Mol Liq 221:19–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Liu L, Zheng L, Liu F, Zhang X (2016) An improved heat conduction model with Riesz fractional Cattaneo–Christov flux. Int J Heat Mass Transf 103:1191–1197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Meraj MA, Shehzad SA, Hayat T, Abbasi FM, Alsaedi A (2017) Darcy-Forchheimer flow of variable conductivity Jeffrey liquid with Cattaneo–Christov heat flux theory. Appl Math Mech 38:557–566MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Shehzad SA, Hayat T, Alsaedi A, Meraj MA (2017) Cattaneo–Christov heat and mass fluxes model for 3D hydrodynamic flow of chemically reactive Maxwell liquid. Appl Math Mech 38:1347–1356MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nagendramma V, Raju CSK, Mallikarjun B, Shehzad SA, Leelarathnam A (2018) 3D Casson nanofluid over slendering sheet in a suspension of gyro-tactic microorganisms with Cattaneo–Christov heat flux. Appl Math Mech 39:623–638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rauf A, Abbas Z, Shehzad SA, Alsaedi A, Hayat T (2018) Numerically simulation of chemically reactive Powell-Eyring liquid with heat and mass flux relaxation times. Appl Math Mech 39:467–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Darcy HRP (1856) Les Fontaines Publiques de la volle de Dijon. Vector Dalmont, ParisGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Khaled ARA, Vafai K (2003) The role of porous media in modeling flow and heat transfer in biological tissues. Int J Heat Mass Transf 46:4989–5003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Attia HA (2010) Asymptotic solution for rotating disk flow in porous medium. Mech Mech Eng 14:119–136Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mukhopadhyay S, De PR, Layek GC (2013) Heat transfer characteristics for the Maxwell fluid flow past an unsteady stretching permeable surface embedded in a porous medium with thermal radiation. J Appl Mech Tech Phys 54:385–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mabood F, Ibrahim SM, Rashidi MM, Shadloo MS, Lorenzini G (2016) Non-uniform heat source/sink and Soret effects on MHD non-Darcian convective flow past a stretching sheet in a micropolar fluid with radiation. Int J Heat Mass Transf 93:674–682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wang CY (1988) Nonlinear streaming due to the oscillatory stretching of a sheet in a viscous fluid. Acta Mech 72:261–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Abbas Z, Wang Y, Hayat T, Oberlack M (2008) Hydromagnetic flow in a viscoelastic fluid due to the oscillatory stretching surface. Int J Nonlinear Mech 43:783–797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Zheng LC, Jin X, Zhang X, Zhang J (2013) Unsteady heat and mass transfer in MHD flow over an oscillatory stretching surface with Soret and Dufour effects. Acta Mech Sin 29:667–675MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Khan SU, Ali N, Abbas Z (2015) MHD flow and heat transfer over a porous oscillating stretching surface in a viscoelastic fluid with porous medium. PLoS ONE 10:e0144299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ali N, Khan SU, Abbas Z, Sajid M (2016) Soret and Dufour effects on hydromagnetic flow of viscoelastic fluid over porous oscillatory stretching sheet with thermal radiation. J Braz Soc Mech Sci 38:2533–2546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Liao SJ (2003) On the analytic solution of magnetohydrodynamic flows of non-Newtonian fluids over a stretching sheet. J Fluid Mech 488:189–212MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Turkyilmazoglu M (2010) Analytic approximate solutions of rotating disk boundary layer flow subject to a uniform suction or injection. Int J Mech Sci 52:1735–1744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sui J, Zheng L, Zhang X (2016) Boundary layer heat and mass transfer with Cattaneo–Christov double-diffusion in upper-convected Maxwell nanofluid past a stretching sheet with slip velocity. Int J Therm Sci 104:461–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Rashidi MM, Mohimanian SAP, Abbasbandy S (2011) Analytic approximate solutions for heat transfer of a micropolar fluid through a porous medium with radiation. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul 16:1874–1889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Abbasbandy S (2007) Homotopy analysis method for heat radiation equations. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf 34:380–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Raftari B, Vajravelu K (2012) Homotopy analysis method for MHD viscoelastic fluid flow and heat transfer in a channel with a stretching wall. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul 17:4149–4162MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sami Ullah Khan
    • 1
  • S. A. Shehzad
    • 1
  • N. Ali
    • 2
  • M. N. Bashir
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of MathematicsCOMSATS University IslamabadSahiwalPakistan
  2. 2.Department of Mathematics and StatisticsInternational Islamic UniversityIslamabadPakistan

Personalised recommendations