Evaluation of the mechanical performance of the creep behavior of a fiberglass repair after aging in oil

  • João Ricardo Lourenço Monteiro
  • José Roberto Moraes d’Almeida
Technical Paper


The mechanical behavior of a glass fiber/epoxy matrix composite used to repair steel pipes was evaluated after its exposure to oil under temperature at atmospheric pressure and at 17 bar. The effect of pressure was found to affect on a different way short-term and long-term properties of the composite. Under atmospheric pressure, more oil was absorbed by the composite than at 17 bar. This behavior was attributed to the effect of the hydrostatic pressure upon the polymeric matrix-free volume. The set of mechanical properties evaluated by tree-point bending test (flexural strength, elastic modulus, toughness, and deformation at maximum load) was also more affected when aging was conducted under atmospheric pressure. However, the steady state creep rate of the composite aged under 17 bar was higher than that of the material aged at atmospheric pressure, reducing the expected service life of the repair joint when both temperature and pressure are applied together.


Fiberglass repair Aging Oil absorption Creep 



The authors acknowledge the financial support from the Brazilian Agency Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento e Pesquisa (CNPq).


  1. 1.
    Hsu TM, Skogsberg J, Karayaka M (2001) Composites utilization on a spar platform—potential economic impact and technical gaps. In: Wang SS, Willians JG, Lo KH (eds) Composite materials for offshore operations, vol 3. University of Houston, CEAC Publishing, Houston, pp 19–43Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hota G, Liang R (2011) Advanced fiber reinforced polymer composites for sustainable civil infrastructures. In: International symposium on innovation & sustainability of structures in civil engineering, Xiamen University, China, 28–30 OctGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shamsuddoha M, Mainul Islam M, Aravinthan T, Manalo A, Lau K-T (2013) Effectiveness of using fibre-reinforced polymer composites for underwater steel pipeline repairs. Comp Struct 100:40–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Faraz MI, Besseling NAM, Korobko AV, Picken SJ (2015) Characterization and modeling of creep behavior of a thermoset nanocomposite. Polym Comp 36:322–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Abdel-Magid B, Lopez-Anido R, Smith G, Trofka S (2003) Flexure creep properties of E-glass reinforced polymers. Comp Struct 62:247–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Guedes RM (2009) Relationship between lifetime under creep and constant stress rate for polymer-matrix composites. Comp Sci Technol 69:1200–1205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sullivan JL (1990) Creep and physical aging of composites. Comp Sci Technol 39:207–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Papanicolaou GC, Xepapadaki AG, Zarouchas D (2009) Effect of water uptake on creep behaviour of glass–epoxy composites. Plast Rubber Comp 38:72–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Law ACK (2007) Creep deformation and thermal aging of random glass-mat polypropylene composite. Master thesis, University of Waterloo, Ontario, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    de Souza LR, Marques AT, d’Almeida JRM (2017) Effects of aging on water and lubricating oil on the creep behavior of a GFRP matrix composite. Comp Struct 168:285–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hoppel CRP, Bogetti TA, Gillespie JW Jr. (1995) Effects of hydrostatic pressure on the mechanical behavior of composite materials. ARL-TR-727 Report, U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, USAGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sigley RH, Wronski AS, Parry TV (1992) Tensile failure of pultruded glass–polyester composites under superimposed hydrostatic pressure. Comp Sci Technol 41:395–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tucker WC, Brown R (1989) Moisture absorption of graphite/polymer composites under 2000 feet of seawater. J Comp Mater 23:787–797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Avena A, Bunsell AR (1988) Effect of hydrostatic pressure on the water absorption of glass fibre-reinforced epoxy resin. Composites 19:355–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Harper BD, Staab GH, Chen RS (1987) A note on the effects of voids upon the hygral and mechanical properties of AS4/3502 graphite/epoxy. J Comp Mater 21:280–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Humeau C, Davies P, Jacquemin F (2016) Moisture diffusion under hydrostatic pressure in composites. Mater Des 96:90–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Grogan DM, Flanagan M, Walls M, Leen SB, Doyle A, Harrison NH, Mamalis D, Goggins J (2018) Influence of microstructural defects and hydrostatic pressure on water absorption in composite materials for tidal energy. J Comp Mater. Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cheng J, Li J, Zhang JY (2009) Curing behavior and thermal properties of trifunctional epoxy resin cured by 4,4′-diaminodiphenyl sulfone. eXPRESS Polym Lett 3:501–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ma S, Liu W, Zhao Y, Yan Z, Gao N (2012) Curing behavior and thermal properties of autocatalytic cycloaliphatic epoxy. J Macromol Sci Part A 49:81–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Alizadeh F, Sutherland LS, Guedes Soares C (2016) Effect of vacuum bag pressure on the flexural properties of GFRP composite laminates. In: Guedes Soares C, Santos TA (eds) Maritime technology and engineering 3, vol 1. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 429–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Stern S, Dierdorf D (2005) Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) of various epoxy composite formulations. Air Force Research Laboratory, Report 2005-4585, Tyndall AFB, FLGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    May CA (1987) Epoxy resins. In: Reinhart TJ (ed) Engineered materials handbook, vol 1. Composites. ASM International, Materials Park, pp 66–77Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Valliappan M, Roux JA, Vaughan JG, Arafat ES (1996) Die and post-die temperature and cure in graphite/epoxy composites. Comp Part B 27:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Carbas RJC, da Silva LFM, Marques EAS, Lopes AM (2013) Effect of post-cure on the glass transition temperature and mechanical properties of epoxy adhesives. J Adhes Sci Technol 27:2542–2557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Odegard GM, Bandyopadhyay A (2011) Physical aging of epoxy polymers and their composites. J Polym Sci Part B Polym Phys 49:1695–1716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Klopffer MH, Flaconnèche B (2001) Transport properties of gases in polymers: bibliographic review. Oil Gas Sci Technol 56(3):223–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Shaito A, Fairbrother D, Sterling J, D’Souza NA (2010) Ethylene maleated amorphous propylene compatibilized polyethylene nanocomposites: stress and temperature effects on nonlinear creep. Polym Eng Sci 50:1633–1645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Eaton MJ, Pullin R, Holford KM (2012) Acoustic emission source location in composite materials using Delta T Mapping. Comp Part A 43:856–863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Chacón YG, Paciornik S, d’Almeida JRM (2010) Microstructural evaluation and flexural mechanical behavior of pultruded glass fiber composites. Mater Sci Eng A 528:172–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mechanical Engineering DepartmentUniversidade do Estado do Rio de JaneiroRio de JaneiroBrazil
  2. 2.Chemical and Material Engineering DepartmentPontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de JaneiroRio de JaneiroBrazil

Personalised recommendations