Research on error tracing method of five-axis CNC machine tool linkage error

  • Zhong Jiang
  • Jiexiong Ding
  • Jing Zhang
  • Li Du
  • Wei Wang
Technical Paper
  • 21 Downloads

Abstract

Since their ability to machine complex curved surface, five-axis CNC machine tools have been widely used in the machining field. To guarantee the accuracy of the complex surface machining, multi-axis linkage performance detection of five-axis machine tools is necessary. RTCP (rotation tool center point) is one of the basic essential functions for five-axis machine tools, which could effectively reduce the nonlinear errors caused by rotation axes when five axes move synchronously. On the basis of RTCP function, a way to detect multi-axes linkage performance of five-axis machine tools is introduced in this paper. Some simulations that exhibit the relationship between the tool center error trajectories and the factors influencing the linkage performance of the machine tool are established based on the linkage error model. Analyzing the rule of tool center error trajectories, a linkage error tracing method is proposed based on feature extraction and trajectory similarity. The experiments based on RTCP are carried out, and the tool center point error variation is shown to be consistent with the simulation result. Furthermore, the error of the error tracing method is less than 5%, which means the error tracing method could find the mismatch parameters effectively. This attempt provides a theoretical support for linkage performance detection and error tracing of five-axis CNC machine tools.

Keywords

Five-axis CNC machine tools RTCP function Linkage performance Error tracing 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by 04 National Science and Technology Major Projects of China (2014ZX04014-031).

References

  1. 1.
    Ye T, Xiong CH (2008) Geometric parameter optimization in multi-axis machining. CAD Comput Aided Des 40:879–890.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2008.05.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Andolfatto L, Lavernhe S, Mayer JRR (2011) Evaluation of servo, geometric and dynamic error sources on five-axis high-speed machine tool. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 51:787–796.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2011.07.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Younkin GW (1991) Modeling machine tool feed servo drives using simulation techniques to predict performance. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 27:268–274.  https://doi.org/10.1109/28.73610 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Su Z, Wang L (2015) Latest development of a new standard for the testing of five-axis machine tools using an S-shaped test piece. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B J Eng Manuf 229:1221–1228.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0954405414560780 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wang W, Jiang Z, Li Q, Tao W (2015) A new test part to identify performance of five-axis machine tool-Part II validation of S part. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 79:739–756.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-6869-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wang W, Jiang Z, Li Q, Tao W (2015) A new test part to identify performance of five-axis machine tool-Part II validation of S part. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 79:739–756.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-6869-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jiang Z, Ding J, Song Z et al (2016) Modeling and simulation of surface morphology abnormality of “S” test piece machined by five-axis CNC machine tool. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 85:2745–2759.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-8079-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Li J, Xie F, Liu XJ et al (2016) Geometric error identification and compensation of linear axes based on a novel 13-line method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 87:2269–2283.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-8580-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chen G, Yuan J, Ni J (2001) A displacement measurement approach for machine geometric error assessment. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 41:149–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bryan JB (1982) A simple method for testing measuring machines and machine tools. Precis Eng 4(2):61–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tsutsumi M, Saito A (2004) Identification of angular and positional deviations inherent to 5-axis machining centers with a tilting-rotary table by simultaneous four-axis control movements. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 44:1333–1342.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2004.04.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kato N, Sato R, Tsutsumi M (2012) 3D circular interpolation motion equivalent to cone-frustum cutting in five-axis machining centers and its sensitivity analysis. Proc CIRP 1:530–535.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2012.04.094 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lei WT, Sung MP, Liu WL, Chuang YC (2007) Double ballbar test for the rotary axes of five-axis CNC machine tools. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 47:273–285.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2006.03.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lei WT, Wang WC, Fang TC (2014) Ballbar dynamic tests for rotary axes of five-axis CNC machine tools. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 82–83:29–41.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2014.03.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Weikert S, Knapp W (2004) R-test, a new device for accuracy measurements on five axis machine tools. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 53:429–432.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)60732-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Florussen GHJ, Spaan HAM (2012) Dynamic R-test for rotary tables on 5-axes machine tools. Procedia CIRP 1:536–539.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2012.04.095 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kakino Y, Ihara Y, Nakatsu Y, Okamura K (1987) The measurement of motion errors of NC machine tools and diagnosis of their origins by using telescoping magnetic ball bar method. CIRP Ann - Manuf Technol 36:377–380.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)62626-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bringmann B, Knapp W (2006) Model-based chase-the-ball calibration of 5-axes machining center. Ann CIRP 55:531–534.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)60475-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lin MT, Wu SK (2013) Modeling and improvement of dynamic contour errors for five-axis machine tools under synchronous measuring paths. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 72:58–72.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2013.06.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jiang Z, Wang W, Li Q, et al (2015) evaluation of the dynamic performance for five-axis CNC machine tools based on RTCP. In: ASME 2015 International mechanical engineering congress and exposition, IMECE 2015. p 14Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ding W, Zhu X, Huang X (2016) Effect of servo and geometric errors of tilting-rotary tables on volumetric errors in five-axis machine tools. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 104:37–44.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2016.02.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ismail A, Ramadan MA, El Danaf TS, Samak AH (2011) An efficient offline signature identification method based on Fourier descriptor and chain codes. Int J Biomed Eng Technol 5:1.  https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBET.2011.038469 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gonzalez RC, Wintz P (2010) Digital image processing. Publishing House of Electronics industryGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zhong Jiang
    • 1
  • Jiexiong Ding
    • 1
  • Jing Zhang
    • 1
  • Li Du
    • 1
  • Wei Wang
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Mechanical and Electrical EngineeringUniversity of Electronic Science and Technology of ChinaChengduChina

Personalised recommendations