Skip to main content
Log in

Development, validation and application of a newly developed rig facility for investigation of jet aeroacoustics

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Over the last decades, significant improvements have been achieved in terms of noise reduction for jet engine aircraft. Nevertheless, jet noise remains one of the major sound sources from commercial aircraft, particularly during take-off. To develop strategies for jet noise reduction, it becomes paramount to understand the mechanisms of sound production and radiation from the experimental point of view. For this reason, researchers need high-quality noise data, obtained under proper conditions for both the acoustic and flow fields of scaled jets. This paper reports the development, validation and application of a new jet rig facility built at Federal University of Santa Catarina for investigations of jet noise. Issues relating to limited budget, deadline fulfillment and inner space restrictions, made the design and construction of the facility particularly difficult. Such drawbacks were overcome by designing carefully every system making up the whole facility, some of them based on CFD analyses, as well as by employing tailored solutions to some systems. Throughout the paper, the infrastructure of facility and its main systems are presented as well as major design requirements are discussed. Subsequently, the free-field qualification and the determination of acoustic far-field for the jet source, concerning the anechoic chamber, are described. With the aim of evaluating the acoustic performance of the facility, noise data were acquired for jet flows with Mach numbers from 0.3 to 0.9 and observer locations from 60 to 150 degrees. Additionally, hot-wire anemometry measurements were performed at different axial positions along the jet to illustrate the turbulent character of flows generated. Results of flow and noise measurements revealed an acoustically clean signature as well as turbulence properties in good agreement with data from other facilities. Finally, the paper outlines the underway research works at the mentioned facility and new directions for further work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Casalino D, Diozzi F, Sannino R, Paonessa A (2008) Aircraft noise reduction technologies: a bibliographic review. Aerosp Sci Technol 12:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2007.10.004

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Powell CA, Fields JM (1995) Human response to aircraft noise. In: Hubbard HH (ed) Aeroacoustics of flight vehicles theory and practice, vol 2. Noise control. Aeroacoustic Society of America, Woodbury, pp 1–48

    Google Scholar 

  3. Finkle AL, Poppen JR (1948) Clinical effects of noise and mechanical vibrations of a turbojet engine on man. J Appl Physiol 1(3):183–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Barbot B, Lavandier C, Chemineé P (2008) Perceptual representation of aircraft sounds. Appl Acoust 69:1003–1016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2007.07.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Callender WB (2004) An investigation of innovative technologies for reduction of jet noise in medium and high bypass turbofan engines. PhD Dissertation, University of Cincinnati

  6. Astley RJ (2014) Can technology deliver acceptable levels of aircraft noise? In: Proceedings of internoise 2014, Melbourne, Australia

  7. Campos LMBC (2006) On some recent advances in aeroacoustics. Int J Acoust Vib 11:27–45. https://doi.org/10.20855/ijav.2006.11.1190

    Google Scholar 

  8. Omais M et al (2008) Jet noise prediction using RANS CFD input. AIAA Paper 2008-2938

  9. Karabasov SA et al (2008) Using large eddy simulation within an acoustic analogy approach for jet noise modelling. AIAA Paper 2008-2985

  10. Ladeinde F et al. (2011) An integrated RANS-PSE-wave packet tool for the prediction of subsonic and supersonic jet noise. AIAA Paper 2011-2704

  11. Massey SJ et al (2003) Computational and experimental flow field analyses of separate flow chevron nozzles and pylon interaction. AIAA Paper 2003-3212

  12. Tanna HK, Dean PD, Burrin RH (1976) The generation and radiation of supersonic jet noise, part III, Turbulent mixing noise data. AFAPL-TR-76-65

  13. Brown C, Bridges J (2006) Small hot jet acoustic rig validation. NASA/TM-214234

  14. Colonius T, Lele SK (2004) Computational aeroacoustics: progress on nonlinear problems of sound generation. Prog Aerosp Sci 40:345–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2004.09.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dowling AP, Hynes TP (2004) Sound generation by turbulence. Eur J Mech B Fluids 23:491–500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euromechflu.2003.10.014

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Jansson D, Mathew J, Hubner JP, Sheplak M, Cattafesta L (2002) Design and validation of an aeroacoustic anechoic test facility. AIAA Paper 2002-2466

  17. Tinney CE, Hall A, Glauser MN, Ukeiley LS, Coughlin T (2004) Designing an anechoic chamber for the experimental study of high speed heated jets. AIAA Paper 2004-0010

  18. Ponton MK, Seiner JM, Ukeiley LS, Jansen BJ (2001) A new anechoic chamber design for testing high-temperature jet flows. AIAA Paper 2001-2190

  19. Ahuja KK (2003) Designing clean jet noise facilities and making accurate jet noise measurements. AIAA Paper 2003-0706

  20. Hahn CB (2011) Design and validation of the new jet facility and anechoic chamber. MSc Dissertation, Ohio State University

  21. Mathew J (2006) Design, fabrication, and characterization of an anechoic wind tunnel facility. PhD Dissertation, University of Florida

  22. Duell E, Walter J, Arnette S, Yen J (2002) Recent advances in large-scale aeroacoustic wind tunnels. AIAA Paper 2002-2503

  23. Joslin RD et al (2005) Synergism of flow and noise control technologies. Prog Aerosp Sci 41:363–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2005.07.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Martens S (2002) Jet noise reduction technology development at GE aircraft engines. In: 22nd Congress of international council of the aeronautical sciences, UK

  25. Herkes WH, Olsen RF, Uellenberg S (2006) The quiet technology demonstrator program: flight validation of airplane noise-reduction concepts. AIAA Paper 2006-2720

  26. Nesbitt E, Mengle VG, Callender B, Czech M, Thomas R (2006) Flight test results for uniquely tailored propulsion-airframe aeroacoustic chevrons: community noise. AIAA Paper 2006-2438

  27. Bennett GJ et al (2015) Aeroacoustics research in Europe: the CEAS-ASC report on 2013 highlights. J Sound Vib 340:39–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2014.12.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Detandt Y (2015) Aeroacoustics research in Europe: the CEAS-ASC report on 2014 highlights. J Sound Vib 357:107–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2015.07.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Saiyed NH, Mikkelsen KL, Bridges JE (2000) Acoustics and thrust of separate-flow exhaust nozzles with mixing devices for high-bypass-ratio engines. NASA TM-209948, Ohio, United States

  30. Bastos LP (2016) Development and employment of a jet test rig facility for the analysis of installation effects on jets from serrated nozzles. PhD Dissertation, in Portuguese, Federal University of Santa Catarina

  31. Tam CKW (2004) Computational aeroacoustics: an overview of computational challenges and applications. Int J Comput Fluid Dyn 18:547–567. https://doi.org/10.1080/10618560410001673551

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Pinker RA (2004) The enhancement of the QinetiQ Noise Test Facility for larger-scale exhaust systems. AIAA Paper 2004-3019

  33. Bridges J, Brown CA (2004) Parametric testing of chevrons on single flow hot jets. AIAA Paper 2004-2824

  34. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 3745 (2003) Acoustics—determination of sound power levels of noise sources using sound pressure—precision methods for anechoic and hemi-anechoic rooms

  35. Zaman KBMQ (2011) Effect of nozzle exit conditions on subsonic jet noise. AIAA Paper 2011-2704

  36. Viswanathan K (2003) Jet aeroacoustic testing: issues and implications. AIAA J 41:1674–1689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Bridges J, Wernet MP (2010) Establishing consensus turbulence statistics for hot subsonic jets. In: Proceedings of the 16th AIAA/CEAS aeroacoustics conference, Sweden, 2010

  38. Bridges J, Brown C, Bozak R (2014) Experiments on exhaust noise of tightly integrated propulsion systems. AIAA Paper 2014-2904

  39. Sirotto JRLN et al (2016) Validation of cold jet noise rig at Laboratory of Acoustic and Vibration (LVA), Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC). In: Proceedings of the 22th international congress on acoustics, Buenos Aires, 2016

  40. Khavaran A, Bridges J (2009) Development of jet noise power spectral laws using SHJAR data. AIAA Paper 2009-3378

  41. Tam CKW, Viswanathan K, Ahuja KK, Panda J (2008) The sources of jet noise: experimental evidence. J Fluid Mech 615:253–292. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022112008003704

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. Callender B, Gutmark E, Dimicco R (2002) The design and validation of a coaxial nozzle acoustic test facility. AIAA Paper 2002-0369

  43. Callender B, Gutmark EJ, Martens S (2010) Flow field characterization of coaxial conical and serrated (chevron) nozzles. Exp Fluids 48:637–649. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-009-0751-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Nikam SR, Sharma SD (2014) Aero-acoustic characteristics of compressible jets from chevron nozzle. AIAA Paper 2014-2623. http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/6.2014-2623

  45. Gutmark EJ, Callender B, Martens S (2006) Aeroacoustics of turbulent jets: flow structure, noise sources, and control. Int J Jpn Soc Mech Eng Ser B Fluids Therm Eng 49:1078–1085. https://doi.org/10.1299/jsmeb.49.1078

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study forms part of a joint technical–scientific program of the Federal University of Santa Catarina and EMBRAER. The authors would like to thank Mr. Igor A. Maia for the support to the flow measurements. The financial support from FINEP (Federal Agency of Research and Projects Financing), CNPq (Brazilian Research Council) and CAPES (Coordination for the Improvement of High-Level Personnel) is also acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leopoldo Pacheco Bastos.

Additional information

Technical Editor: André Cavalieri.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bastos, L.P., Deschamps, C.J., da Silva, A.R. et al. Development, validation and application of a newly developed rig facility for investigation of jet aeroacoustics. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 40, 171 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-018-1122-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-018-1122-8

Keywords

Navigation