Tensile and impact characterization of S-glass/epoxy composite laminates containing microscale borax, perlite, and sewage sludge ash particles

Technical Paper
  • 34 Downloads

Abstract

In this study, influences of microscale particles (borax, perlite, and sewage sludge ash) on tensile and impact resistances of S-glass/epoxy composite laminates were experimentally investigated. During the production of test samples, epoxy resin was modified incorporating them it inorganic and waste fillers at different weight ratios (0, 5, 10, 15, and 20% for borax, and 1, 2, 5, and 10% except for perlite). Damage mechanisms and impact properties of particle-modified composites were characterized by charpy impact tests. Results showed that incorporation of particulate fillers in the S-glass/epoxy composites resulted in the significant increases of the tensile and impact resistances up to the critical particle loading, followed by the decreasing trend due to the decreasing interfacial strength between matrix–particle–fiber interactions.

Keywords

Glass fiber Fillers Composite Impact 

References

  1. 1.
    Balan R, Arumugam V, Rauf KA, Sidharth AAP, Santulli C (2015) Estimation of residual flexural strength of unidirectional glass fiber reinforced plastic composite laminates under repeated impact load. J Compos Mater 49:713–722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sawpan MA, Mamun AA, Holdsworth PG, Renshaw P (2013) Quasi-static and dynamic mechanical elasticmoduli of alkaline aged pultruded fiber reinforced polymer composite rebar. Mater Des 46:277–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jefferson AJ, Arumugam V, Saravanakumar K, Dhakal HN, Santulli C (2015) Compression after impact strength of repaired GFRP composite laminates under repeated impact loading. Compos Struct 133:911–920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bibo GA, Hogg PJ (1996) The role of reinforcement architecture on impact damage mechanisms and post-impact compression behavior. J Mater Sci 31:1115–1137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pukanszky B (1995) Particulate filled polypropylene: structure and properties. In: Karger-Kocsis J (ed) Polypropylene: structure, blends and compos. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 1–70Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Acosta JL, Morales E, Ojeda MC, Linares A (1986) Effect of addition of sepiolite on the mechanical properties of glass fiber reinforced polypropylene. Angew Makromol Chem 138:103–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rothon RN (1999) Mineral fillers in thermoplastics: filler manufacture and characterisation. Adv Polym Sci Springer Berlin/Heidelberg 139:67–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rothon RN (1997) Particulate-Filled Polym Compos, Adhesion, vol 64. Addison Wesley® Longman Limited, London, pp 87Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Igarza E, Pardo SG, Abad MJ, Cano J, Galante MJ, Pettarin V, Bernal C (2014) Structure–fracture properties relationship for polypropylene reinforced with fly ash with and without maleic anhydride functionalized isotactic polypropylene as coupling agent. Mater Des 55:85–92.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2013.09.055 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sengupta S, Pal K, Ray D, Mukhopadhyay A (2011) Furfuryl palmitate coated fly ash used as filler in recycled polypropylene matrix composites. Compos Part B 42:1834–1839.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.06.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yao XF, Xiong TC, Xu W, Yeh HY (2006) Experimental investigations on deformation and fracture behavior of glass sphere filled epoxy functionally graded materials. Appl Compos Mater 13:407–420.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10443-006-9026-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Adachi T, Osaki M, Araki W, Kwon SC (2008) Fracture toughness of nano- and micro-spherical silica-particle-filled epoxy composites. Acta Mater 56:2101–2109.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2008.01.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Roulin-Moloney AC, Cantwell WJ, Kausch HH (1987) Parameters determining the strength and toughness of particulate-filled epoxy resins. Polym Compos 8:314–323.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.750080506 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dangtungee R, Rattanapan A, Siengchin S (2015) The effect of surface modifiers on the mechanical and morphological properties of waste silicon carbide filled high-density polyethylene. Int J Chem Molec Nuc Mater Metallur Eng 9:1Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Aysel E, Ayten K (2011) Electrical properties of polyurethane-based composites. In: International conference on advanced power system automation and protection (APAP), IEEE, Beijing, 16–20 Oct 2011.  https://doi.org/10.1109/APAP.2011.6180549
  16. 16.
    Cheeseman CR, Virdi GS (2005) Properties and microstructure of lightweight aggregate produced from sintered sewage sludge ash. Resour Conserv Recycl 45:18–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kavas T (2006) Use of boron waste as a fluxing agent in production of red mud brick. Build Environ 41:1779–1783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Geffen N, Semiat R, Eisen M, Balazs Y, Katz I, Dosoretz CG (2006) Boron removal from water by complexation to polyol compounds. J Membr Sci 286:45–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rıza P, Ramazan D, Waleed HK (2015) Effects of nano and micro size of CaO and MgO, nano-clay and expanded perlite aggregate on the autogenous shrinkage of mortar. Const Build Mater 81:268–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zeyu L, Biwan X, Jinrui Z, Yu Z, Guoxing S, Zongjin L (2014) Preparation and characterization of expanded perlite/paraffin composite as form-stable phase change material. Sol Energy 108:460–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Erklig A, Bulut M (2016) The influence of borax filler addition on damping and vibration response of s-glass/epoxy composite laminates. In: International conference on the world congress on civil, structural, and environmental engineering.  https://doi.org/10.11159/icsenm16.113
  22. 22.
    ASTM D 638-10:2010. Standard test method for tensile properties of plasticsGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    ISO 179-1:2010. Plastics—determination of charpy impact properties—Part 1: non-instrumented impact testGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hussain M, Nakahira A, Niihara K (1996) Mechanical property improvement of carbon fiber reinforced epoxy composites by Al2O3 filler dispersion. Mater Lett 26:185–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Akın ÖG, Tinçer T (1994) Preparation and characterization of perlite filled high density polyethylenes. Part I. Mechanical properties. J Appl Polym Sci 54:1103–1114Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wang Z, Huang X, Bai L, Du R, Liu Y, Zhang Y, Zaho G (2016) Effect of micro-Al2O3 contents on mechanical property of carbon fiber reinforced epoxy matrix composites. Compos Part B Eng 91:392–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Alsaadi M, Ugla AA, Erklig A (2017) A comparative study on the interlaminar shear strength of carbon, glass, and Kevlar fabric/epoxy laminates filled with SiC particles. J Compos Mater 27:0021998317701559Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Fu SY, Feng XQ, Lauke B, Mai YW (2008) Effects of particle size, particle/matrix interface adhesion and particle loading on mechanical properties of particulate–polymer composites. Compos B Eng 39(6):933–961CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Erkliğ A, Alsaadi M, Bulut M (2016) A comparative study on industrial waste fillers affecting mechanical properties of polymer-matrix composites. Mater Res Express 3(10):105302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ayrilmis N, Akbulut T, Dundar T, Robert HW, Mengeloglu F, Buyuksari U, Candan Z, Avci E (2012) Effect of boron and phosphate compounds on physical, mechanical, and fire properties of wood–polypropylene composites. Constr Build Mater 33:1263–1269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Cavdar AD, Mengeloglu F, Karakus K (2015) Effect of boric acid and borax on mechanical, fire and thermal properties of wood flour filled high density polyethylene composites. Measurement 60:6–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sahraeian R, Esfandeh M, Hashemi SA (2013) Rheological, thermal and dynamic mechanical studies of the LDPE/perlite nanocomposites. Polym Polym Compos 21:243–249Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Liang JZ (2002) Toughening and reinforcing in rigid inorganic particulate filled polypropylene: a review. J Appl Polym Sci 83:1547–1555CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mechanical Engineering Department, Faculty of EngineeringHakkari UniversityHakkariTurkey
  2. 2.Materials Engineering DepartmentUniversity of TechnologyBaghdadIraq
  3. 3.Mechanical Engineering Department, Faculty of EngineeringGaziantep UniversityGaziantepTurkey

Personalised recommendations