Advertisement

Investigation of cutting parameters affecting on tool wear and surface roughness in dry turning of Ti-6Al-4V using CVD and PVD coated tools

  • Yahya Hışman Çelik
  • Erol Kilickap
  • Musa Güney
Original Paper

Abstract

There are some problems in the machining of titanium alloys with excellent properties such as high strength, good corrosion resistance, long service life and low weight. The leading problem appears to be the fast tool wear and the bad machining surface. Therefore, in this study, it was investigated whether cutting parameters have effect on tool wear and surface roughness by turning under dry cutting condition of Ti-6Al-4V alloy with excellent properties. CVD (TiCN + Al2O3 + TiN) and PVD (TiAlN) coated WC tools were used in the experiments. Then the Ti-6Al-4V alloy turned with the combinations of the different cutting speed, feed rate, cutting long and depth of cut. We observed that the tools wear in both CVD and PVD coated WC tools increased with increasing the cutting speed, feed rate, depth of cut and cutting length. However, while tools wear increased with increasing cutting speed, the surface roughness reduced to an optimum level. Especially, the surface roughness was worsened above the optimum level changing with increasing the feed rate, cutting length and depth of cut. The tool wear with PVD coated WC tools was observed to be less than the CVD coated WC tools. However, the values of the surface roughness obtained with PVD coated WC tools with increase in depth of cut, feed rate and cutting length has given us higher values when compared to CVD coated WC tools.

Keywords

Wear Roughness Turning Titanium 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Batman University for financial support given by Batman University Scientific Research Projects Unit (BTUBAP) Project Number 2015-4.

References

  1. 1.
    Ezugwu EO, Wang ZM (1997) Titanium alloys and their machinability: a review. J Mater Proc Technol 68:262–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wong FR, Sharif S, Kamdani K, Rahim EA (2008) The effect of drill point geometry and drilling technique on tool life when drilling titanium alloy, Ti-6Al-4V. Proc Int Conf Mech Manuf Eng (ICME2008), 21–23 May 2008, Johor Bahru, MalaysiaGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jawaid A, Che-Haron CH, Abdullah A (1999) Tool wear characteristics in turning of titanium alloy Ti-6246. J Mater Proc Technol 92–93:329–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ramesh S, Karunamoorthy L, Palanikumar K (2008) Surface roughness analysis in machining of titanium alloy. Mater Manuf Process 23:174–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sharman ARC, Aspinwall DK, Dewes RC, Bowen P (2001) Workpiece surface integrity considerations when finish turning gamma titanium aluminide. Wear 249:473–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Che-Haron CH (2001) Tool life and surface integrity in turning titanium alloy. J Mater Proc Technol 118:231–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Armendia M, Osborne P, Garay A, Belloso J, Turner S, Arrazola PJ (2012) Influence of heat treatment on the machinability of titanium alloy. Mater Manuf Process 27:457–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chandler HE (1999) Machining of reactive metals. In: Davis JR (ed) Metal Handbook, vol 16., MachiningASM International, OH, pp 844–857Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Machado AR, Wallbank J (1990) Machining of titanium and its alloys: a review. Proceed Instit Mechan Eng Part B J Eng Manuf 204:53–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Venugopal KA, Paul S, Chattopadhyay AB (2007) Tool wear in cryogenic turning of Ti-6Al-4V alloy. Cryogenics 47:12–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sun S, Brandt M, Mo JPT (2014) Evolution of tool wear and its effect on cutting forces during dry machining of Ti-6Al-4V alloy. J Eng Manuf 228(2):191–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Liang L, Liu X, Li X, Li Y (2015) Wear mechanisms of WC-10Ni3Al carbide tool in dry turning of Ti6Al4V. Int J Refract Metals Hard Mater 48:272–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ezugwu EO, Bonney J, Da Silva RB, Cakır O (2007) Surface integrity of finished turned Ti-6Al-4V alloy with PCD tools using conventional and high pressure coolant supplies. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 47:884–891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ramesh S, Karunamoorthy L, Palanikumar K (2012) Measurement and analysis of surface roughness in turning of aerospace titanium alloy (gr 5). Measurement 45:1266–1276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Upadhyay V, Jain PK, Metha NK (2013) In-process prediction of surface roughness in turning of Ti-6A-4V alloy using cutting parameters and vibration signals. Measurements 46:154–160Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pretorius CJ, Soo SL, Aspinwall DK, Harden PM, ’Saoubi RM, Mantle AL (2015) Tool wear behaviour and workpiece surface integrity when turning Ti– 6Al–2Sn–4Zr–6Mo with polycrystalline diamond tooling. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 64:109–112Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ginting A, Nouari M (2006) Experimental and numerical studies on the performance of alloyed carbide tool in dry milling of aerospace material. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 46:758–768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gorczyca FE (1987) Applications of metal cutting theory. Industrial Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Astakhov VP (2007) Effects of the cutting feed, depth of cut, and workpiece (bore) diameter on the tool wear rate. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 34:631–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sun FJ, Qu SG, Pan YX, Li XQ, Li FL (2015) Effect of cutting parameters on dry machining Ti-6Al-4V alloy with ultra-hard tools. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 79:351–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yan J (2009) Applications of nano and micromachining in industry. In: Davim JP, Jackson MJ (eds) Nano and micro machining. Wiley, London, pp 175–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yahya Hışman Çelik
    • 1
  • Erol Kilickap
    • 2
  • Musa Güney
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering-ArchitectureBatman UniversityBatmanTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringDicle UniversityDiyarbakirTurkey

Personalised recommendations