Advertisement

Current Addiction Reports

, Volume 6, Issue 1, pp 34–40 | Cite as

Dissociative Experiences in Gambling Disorder

  • Magdalen G. SchluterEmail author
  • David C. Hodgins
Dissociation and Addictive Behaviors (J Billieux and A Schimmenti, Section Editors)
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Dissociation and Addictive Behaviors

Abstract

Purpose of Review

This review provides a summary of the literature (2012–2018) regarding dissociative experiences in Gambling Disorder (GD). We provide an overview of conceptualizations of dissociation, its relationship to GD, dissociation within specific types of gambling, and harm reduction strategies targeting gambling-related dissociative experiences.

Recent Findings

The gambling literature lacks a unified conceptualization of dissociative experiences, and measures different aspects of dissociation across studies. The propensity of some individuals toward general and in-game dissociation appears to be involved in the development and/or maintenance of GD. Several features of gambling may facilitate in-game dissociation, particularly among individuals with GD. As such, tools that disrupt in-game dissociation may be crucial for harm reduction.

Summary

Future research should be aimed at developing a single, operational definition of dissociation in gambling, and this should be systematically examined across gambling modalities. Additionally, ongoing refinement of interventions that effectively interrupt in-game dissociation holds promise for reducing gambling-associated harms.

Keywords

Gambling disorder Dissociative experiences Harm reduction Altered state of awareness Escape motivation 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance

  1. 1.
    McCormick J, Delfabbro P, Denson L. Psychological vulnerability and problem gambling: an application of Durand Jacobs’ general theory of addictions to electronic gaming machine playing in Australia. J Gambl Stud. 2012;28(4):665–90.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-011-9281-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Griffiths M, Wood R, Parke J, Parke A, editors. Dissociative states in problem gambling. Current issues related to dissociation. Melbourne, AU: Australian gaming council; 2006.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    McKeith C, Rock A, Clark G. Trait mindfulness, problem-gambling severity, altered state of awareness and urge to gamble in poker-machine gamblers. J Gambl Stud. 2017;33(2):617–32.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-016-9635-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Murch WS, Chu SWM, Clark L. Measuring the slot machine zone with attentional dual tasks and respiratory sinus arrhythmia. Psychol Addict Behav. 2017;31(3):375–84.  https://doi.org/10.1037/adb0000251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Murch WS, Clark L. Effects of bet size and multi-line play on immersion and respiratory sinus arrhythmia during electronic gaming machine use. Addict Behav. 2019;88:67–72.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.08.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    • Dixon M, Stange M, Larche C, Graydon C, Fugelsang J, Harrigan K. Dark flow, depression and multiline slot machine play. J Gambl Stud. 2018;34(1):73–84.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-017-9695-1 Addresses the propensity for mult-line games to facilitate dissociative experiences while gambling, particularly for individuals with GD. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bernstein ME, Putnam WF. Development, reliability, and validity of a dissociation scale. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1986;174(12):727–35.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00005053-198612000-00004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jacobs D. Evidence for a common dissociative-like reaction among addicts. J Gambling Stud. 1988;4(1):27–37.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01043526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tozman T, Magdas ES, MacDougall HG, Vollmeyer R. Understanding the psychophysiology of flow: a driving simulator experiment to investigate the relationship between flow and heart rate variability. Comput Hum Behav. 2015;52:408–18.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Duschek S, Muckenthaler M, Werner N, Reyes del Paso GA. Relationships between features of autonomic cardiovascular control and cognitive performance. Biol Psychol. 2009;81(2):110–7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2009.03.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Diskin KM, Hodgins DC. Narrowed focus and dissociative experiences in a community sample of experienced video lottery gamblers. Can J Behav Sci. 2001;33(1):58–64.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0087128.
  13. 13.
    Hopley AA, Nicki RM. Predictive factors of excessive online poker playing. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2010;13(4):379–85.  https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2009.0223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    • Blaszczynski A, Cowley E, Anthony C, Hinsley K. Breaks in play: do they achieve intended aims? J Gambl Stud. 2016;32(2):789–800.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-015-9565-7 Examines the effect of breaks in gambling on in-game dissociation and cravings to continue gambling. The article suggests that breaks in play themselves may not reduce dissociation, and highlights the need for developing harm reduction tools that are persoally relevant to the individual gambling. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Carlbring P, Degerman N, Jonsson J, Andersson G. Internet-based treatment of pathological gambling with a three-year follow-up. Cogn Behav Ther. 2012;41(4):1–14.  https://doi.org/10.1080/16506073.2012.689323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cartmill T, Slatter T, Wilkie B. The role of anxiety and dissociation in young australian gamblers. J Gambl Stud. 2015;31(4):1215–26.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-014-9510-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dixon MJ, Graydon C, Harrigan KA, Wojtowicz L, Siu V, Fugelsang JA. The allure of multi-line games in modern slot machines. Addict. 2014;109(11):1920–8.  https://doi.org/10.1111/add.12675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gori A, Craparo G, Caretti V, Giannini M, Iraci-Sareri G, Bruschi A, et al. Impulsivity, alexithymia and dissociation among pathological gamblers in different therapeutic settings: a multisample comparison study. Psychiatry Res. 2016;246:789–95.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2016.10.046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    • Imperatori C, Innamorati M, Bersani FS, Imbimbo F, Pompili M, Contardi A, et al. The association among childhood trauma, pathological dissociation and gambling severity in casino gamblers. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2017;24(1):203–11.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.1997 Provides a potential explanation for the association between general dissociation and GD severity. The article suggests that general dissociation may mediate the relationship between childhood trauma and gambling disorder severity. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Oakes J, Pols R, Battersby M, Lawn S, Pulvirenti M, Smith D. A focus group study of predictors of relapse in electronic gaming machine problem gambling, part 2: factors that ‘pull’ the gambler away from relapse. J Gambl Stud. 2012;28(3):465–79.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-011-9267-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pattinson J. British older adult gambling behaviour; evaluating psychological and physical health as predictive risk for problem gambling. J Gambl Issues. 2016;34(4).  https://doi.org/10.4309/jgi.2016.34.4.
  22. 22.
    Rémond J-J, Romo L. Analysis of gambling in the media related to screens: immersion as a predictor of excessive use? Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(1).  https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15010058.
  23. 23.
    Stewart MJ, Wohl MJA. Pop-up messages, dissociation, and craving: how monetary limit reminders facilitate adherence in a session of slot machine gambling. Psychol Addict Behav. 2013;27(1):268–73.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    • Tricker C, Rock A, Clark G. Cue-reactive altered state of consciousness mediates the relationship between problem-gambling severity and cue-reactive urge in poker-machine gamblers. J Gambl Stud. 2016;32(2):661–74.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-015-9549-7 Examines the role of in-game dissociation as a mediator between gambling severity and cravings to gamble. This is examined within the context of electronic gambling specifically. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wohl MJA, Parush A, Kim HS, Warren K. Building it better: applying human–computer interaction and persuasive system design principles to a monetary limit tool improves responsible gambling. Comput Hum Behav. 2014;37(C):124–32.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Carlson EB, Putnam FW. An update on the dissociative experiences scale. Dissociation: Prog Dissociative Disord. 1993;6(1):16–27.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Waller NG, Ross CA. The prevalence and biometric structure of pathological dissociation in the general population: Taxometric and behavior genetic findings. J Abnorm Psychol. 1997;106(4):499–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Pekala RJ. The Phenomenology of Consciousness Inventory. In: The phenomenology of consciousness inventory. Quantifying consciousness: an empirical approach. Boston, MA: Springer US; 1991. p. 127–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bouchard S, Robillard G, Renaud P. Questionnaire sur la propension à l’immersion. 2002.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1988.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Gupta R, Nower L, Derevensky JL, Blaszczynski A, Faregh N, Temcheff C. Problem gambling in adolescents: an examination of the pathways model. J Gambl Stud. 2013;29(3):575–88.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-012-9322-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Biolcati R, Passini S, Griffiths M. All-in and bad beat: professional poker players and pathological gambling. Int J Ment Health Addiction. 2015;13(1):19–32.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-014-9506-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ledgerwood DM, Petry NM. Psychological experience of gambling and subtypes of pathological gamblers. Psychiatry Res. 2006;144(1):17–27.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2005.08.017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lyssenko L, Schmahl C, Bockhacker L, Vonderlin R, Bohus M, Kleindienst N. Dissociation in psychiatric disorders: a meta-analysis of studies using the dissociative experiences scale. Am J Psychiatry. 2018;175(1):37–46.  https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2017.17010025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Schüll ND. Addiction by design : machine gambling in Las Vegas. Princeton: Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2012.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Finlay K, Marmurek H, Kanetkar V, Londerville J. Effects of slot machine characteristics on problem gambling Behaviour. Final report Guelph: Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre; 2005.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Gainsbury S, Blaszczynski A. Breaks in play: Epowering gamblers through in-game harm minimization features for electronic gaming machines. J Gambl Ind Reg. 2016;4:35–9.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryCanada

Personalised recommendations