Lost in Translation? On the Need for Convergence in Animal and Human Studies on the Role of Dopamine in Diet-Induced Obesity
Purpose of Review
Animal and human studies suggest that diet-induced obesity and plasticity in the central dopaminergic system are linked. However, it is unclear whether observed changes depend on diet or obesity, and whether they are specific to brain regions and cognitive functions. Here, we focus on neural and cognitive changes in frontostriatal circuits.
Both diet and obesity affect dopaminergic transmission. However, site and direction of effects are inconsistent across species and studies. Non-specific changes are observed spanning all frontostriatal loops, from sensory input to motivated behaviour. Given the impact of peripheral signals on central dopaminergic signalling and the interaction between the frontostriatal loops, modulation of dopamine likely propagates through all loops and, thus, affects behaviour on various levels of complexity.
To improve convergence between animal and human studies on diet-induced obesity, animal studies should include sophisticated cognitive measures and diets resembling human obesogenic diets, and human studies should adopt diet interventions and longitudinal designs.
KeywordsObesity Dopamine Diet Frontostriatal loops
Obesity has been associated with prominent changes in dopamine transmission [1, 2, 3] and cognitive domains that are crucial for adaptive behaviour, such as motivation, decision-making, reinforcement learning and working memory [4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]. Importantly, food-related but also general non-food-related cognitive differences have been recently highlighted in obesity [10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16]. However, animal studies contributed to the understanding that obesogenic diet, rather than adiposity itself, actually causes observed differences in dopamine transmission [17, 18••, 19, 20, 21].
Excellent obesity-related reviews have focused on either DA transmission , or cognition with little or no emphasis on the relation with dopamine [7, 11, 15]. Others have argued for dopamine-mediated cognitive changes in obesity [1, 2, 3, 8, 9, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27] paralleling findings from addiction research, with controversial opinions towards the existence of food addiction [22, 23, 28, 29, 30, 31]. Here, we argue for a more detailed assessment on the relationship between dopamine and the variety of possibly dopamine-mediated cognitive changes in obesity.
Some reviews suggested a major role of reward function in obesity, which resonates well with abundant evidence for striatal dopamine alterations in both animals and humans. Others have argued for a deficit that is predominantly mediated by the prefrontal cortex (PFC) (e.g. [10, 32]), which is not well investigated regarding a direct link to the dopaminergic system yet. Both perspectives might mirror different angles of the same changes as dense anatomical connections exist between frontal and striatal regions. These connections are organised in functionally relevant frontostriatal loops that are strongly modulated by dopamine. This makes it important to examine the cognitive literature in obesity in the light of these frontostriatal loops.
Here, we will address the following open questions: First, do findings from animal and human studies on dopamine changes converge, given the different methodologies available to study the dopaminergic system in these species? Second, does a comprehensive picture emerge regarding major obesity-related cognitive differences and their possible association with frontostriatal loops? Third, can these differences be regarded as global, i.e. affecting several cognitive domains, or are they specific to, e.g. the food context? Fourth, to what extent are diet-induced dopamine differences responsible for the observed differences in cognitive domains? And fifth, what are candidate mechanistic links between diet and central dopamine?
In this review, we will summarise recent findings of obesity and diet-related differences in dopamine transmission, in particular in the striatum, from human and animal studies. We will then describe the different frontostriatal loops, followed by an evaluation of obesity-related differences in the sensory input to this circuit. Finally, we will discuss the neurocognitive profile of obesity within the theoretical framework of frontostriatal loops. We will point out major gaps in the literature, as well as challenges that need to be overcome in order to get at the heart of the role of dopamine in diet-induced obesity.
Obesity and Diet-Related Dopamine Differences
In humans, structural changes in the dopamine system can be imaged most directly with positron emission tomography (PET) using radioactively labeled ligands that bind to a specific substrate. Such studies have revealed obesity-related differences, in particular related to D2-receptor (D2R) (Appendix Table 1). D2R binding has been found to correlate positively to BMI in normal-weight to obese individuals in several studies [49, 52, 94], but not in others [57, 59, 71]. In the latter study, dopamine release did correlate positively with BMI in putamen and substantia nigra . Another PET study revealed a positive relationship with BMI in the dorsal and lateral striatum, whereas a negative relationship was observed in the ventral striatum . These, together with other inconsistent results concerning D2R binding in human obesity, have been proposed to reflect a quadratic relationship between severity of obesity and striatal D2R availability, or rather a U-shaped relationship with dopamine tone . The idea of lower tone in overweight to mildly obese individuals is supported by a recent [18F] DOPA PET study [62•]. However, striatal dopamine transporter (DAT) binding as measured with single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) did not relate to BMI in a sample of normal-weight to severely obese participants , nor to self-reported ad libitum food intake in normal-weight participants [90•]. Importantly, due to the cross-sectional design of most human studies, it is debated whether or not the observed differences in dopamine transmission in humans are cause or consequence of obesity.
Rodent models allow for the investigation of more causal links between obesity and dopamine transmission and have begun to disentangle the effects of an obesogenic diet from adiposity. Short-term and chronic high fat diets (HFDs) as well as diet-induced obesity were shown to reduce D2R-mRNA and protein expression levels ([96, 97, 98, 99], but see ) (Table 2). An elegant study suggests that diet-induced obesity may be the cause rather than the result of reduced D2R availability [18••]. The authors found decreased striatal D2R binding after a chronic HFD, despite unchanged D2R-mRNA or protein levels, which could be explained by receptor internalisation. D2R binding also did not predict weight gain, nor did deletion of D2Rs in striatal neurons increase risk for obesity. Overexpression of striatal D2Rs in development has been shown to causally relate to diet-induced obesity through its effect on energy expenditure and thermogenesis . Effects of sugar on the dopamine system have also been observed, although the findings diverge. One study showed increased D2R-mRNA expression and decreased D2R-protein levels in the nucleus accumbens , whereas others found the opposite for the striatum as a whole . This may be due to the specific striatal regions under study or the diet composition (for more details on diet composition and duration, see Appendix Table 2). Moreover, chronic HFD may also lead to reduced D1R-mRNA in the rat striatum ([97, 101], but see [18••, 105]) depending on diet composition . One study showed reduced D1R signalling when a diet high in saturated, but not monounsaturated fats (palm oil vs. olive oil), was administered . Finally, diet-related changes in dopamine synthesis , release [59, 102, 105] and uptake (DAT) [98, 99] have been observed.
In sum, excessive weight and chronic exposure to an obesogenic diet has been associated with changes in striatal dopamine transmission in humans and rodents, in particular related to D2Rs. The wide variety of observed diet-induced dopamine changes described above suggests a complex interplay between obesogenic diet and the different parts of the dopamine pathway. Future research is required to get a clearer picture of diet-induced dopamine changes in both obese and non-obese individuals and to unravel the mechanisms through which an obesogenic diet exerts its action on the dopamine system (see Box 1 for potential mechanistic links). To translate findings from animal studies to human studies, it is crucial to increase convergence between the two fields. First, human studies with dietary interventions and dopamine measurements are needed. Second, diets in animal intervention studies should be more carefully designed in terms of composition and duration to mimic human obesogenic diets. Finally, a recent review emphasises the importance of the element of dietary choice in modelling the characteristics of human diet-induced obesity .
Dopamine-dependent plasticity is thought to underlie reward-based learning in all loops , although dopamine has also been proposed as the interface between the loops through the striato-nigro-striatal connections . As reviewed above, obesity- and diet-related changes in dopamine have been consistently shown in the ventral and dorsal striatum. However, dopamine is suggested to not only modulate learning and motivated behaviour through its effect on striatal output, but also by its effect on input coming from the PFC or sensory regions, as discussed next. Evidence of obesity-related dopamine changes in PFC is scarce, due to difficulty imaging prefrontal dopamine (but see a new PET development by [144, 145•]) and due to the ongoing debate on what are the rodent homologues of the prefrontal cortex .
Dopamine Modulation of Sensory Inputs
Dopamine modulates sensory perception and processing [43••, 91, 92]. Since sensory perception, in particular visual, gustatory and olfactory perception, influences when, how much and what we eat [147, 148], dopamine might play a key role in influencing food choice via this route as well.
There is solid evidence that obesity is accompanied with alterations in especially the gustatory and olfactory systems. However, as the results are contradictory, the direction and interpretation of this relationship remains unclear. For instance, some researchers show higher gustatory sensitivity [38, 149]; others lower gustatory sensitivity or no difference in obese when compared to normal-weight individuals [39, 150, 151]. Similarly, it has been shown that obese participants had higher  or lower olfactory sensitivity [36, 37].
Of note, the olfactory and dopamine systems are highly interconnected and are therefore of particular interest in the context of eating behaviour and obesity. It has been shown that food odour perception activates dopaminergic brain regions in a human fMRI study . Moreover, dopamine neurons have been detected in the olfactory bulb  and a reduction of dopamine neurons induced olfactory impairment in an animal model . Greater availability of DATs in the caudate nucleus and putamen, as measured with SPECT in healthy human individuals, has been associated with higher olfactory performance . Interestingly, one study found evidence of decreased dopamine uptake in the caudate nucleus in Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients with and without olfactory impairments . Although PD patients constitute a particular clinical group, the results support the link between dopamine function and olfactory perception.
Beyond affecting perceptual aspects in sensory systems, dopamine modulation of sensory signals may also serve as adjusting the sensory input for the affective frontostriatal loop. As such, dopamine can affect higher-order processing of sensory input, such as hedonic value of, and cue reactivity to visual, gustatory and olfactory input. It has been shown that obese compared to normal-weight individuals perceive food odours as more pleasant  and have a higher food cue reactivity in response to food pictures  and odours . There is solid evidence that increased physiological (e.g. salivation, skin conductance, neural activation) and craving responses to food-related stimuli are associated with both food consumption and body weight . Such food stimuli also potently activate the brain’s reward system, i.e. the striatum and PFC value areas [23, 25, 26, 93].
In conclusion, dopamine can modulate sensory input and the subsequent processing of sensory information. While enhanced reactivity of the limbic system to visual and olfactory food cues, which is likely mediated by dopamine, is quite well established in obesity, general differences in sensory sensitivity require further investigation. Whether a diet high in fat and sugar leads to similar changes through its effects on dopamine, independent of obesity or only as a result of excessive adiposity and the associated metabolic changes (Box 1), is an open question for future investigation.
Neurocognitive Profile of Obesity
Apart from distinct reactions to food and food cues, obesity has been associated with a wide variety of higher-order neurocognitive differences that crucially rely on dopamine action in all parts of the frontostriatal loops [1, 9] (Table 1). In specific tasks, impairments in executive skills including attention, (working) memory and learning [10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16] are consistently shown in obesity. In addition, reductions in cognitive flexibility  and increases in several types of impulsivity [156, 157, 158, 159] seem to characterise obesity. Such general cognitive features are likely the roots that feed maladaptive decision-making in a food context.
Food Reward Responses and General Reinforcement Learning
When it comes to reward processing of food and non-food stimuli, brain regions associated with the affective loop, i.e. NAc and mPFC/OFC, are particularly involved , and activation patterns in these regions can depend on metabolic state . As discussed above, enhanced reactivity to sensory food cues is typically observed in obesity. In simple reaction tasks where (often hypothetical) food rewards are anticipated, enhanced activation in the affective loop is observed in obesity , which may be mediated by decreases in leptin and insulin sensitivity (see also Box 1). When a food reward is received, however, hypoactivation is often reported (e.g. [8, 25]). Interestingly, Kroemer and Small  elegantly show how obesity-related hypoactivation of reward regions in response to reward receipt may be explained by impairments in general reinforcement learning, similar as proposed for substance addiction .
Reward-related learning within the frontostriatal loops critically relies on dopamine-dependent plasticity , which may go beyond reward learning and extends to associative learning (, preprint). The reinterpretation of the findings in a learning framework supports the idea that obesity is related to general rather than food-specific differences, and dovetails with the widespread role of dopamine in motivation, cognition and behaviour. General reinforcement learning differences in obesity, be it impairments [5, 6, 58, 61, 74] or improvements (, Kube et al., under revision), are indeed suggested based on evidence from non-food and food-related reinforcement learning tasks. Difficulties with integrating negative feedback may be central to observed impairments [5, 6, 58], which could result in insensitivity to the negative consequences associated with obesity.
Food-Related Attentional Bias and Craving
What happens once food-related stimuli have been registered and led to initially enhanced responses in terms of activation of affective frontostriatal regions, invoking craving, or attracting attention? In case no food is actually available or you are trying to break a habit of giving into temptations, disengaging your attention or regulation of craving may be necessary. Obese individuals show an enhanced attentional bias to food cues across different experimental paradigms and measures ([6, 58, 61, 74], but see ), which may be due to difficulty disengaging from such stimuli. Food attentional bias has been linked to striatal DAT binding, although no relationship was observed between DAT binding and craving or ad libitum food intake [90•]. Furthermore, glucose intake enhanced attentional food bias in obesity  and intra-individual variability in a similar bias measure was stronger in obesity , supporting the dynamic nature of attentional bias [164•]. Food attentional bias can be attenuated by cognitive factors such as a healthy mindset , which emphasises the importance of cross-talk between the frontostriatal loops. Regulation of craving has been associated with differential activation in the putamen and functional connectivity between the putamen and dlPFC , also spanning the loops.
Self-Control and Cost–Benefit Decision-Making
What if food is available? Then self-control may be needed, which again requires cross-talk between the affective and cognitive loops. Exercising self-control in a food choice task involved dlPFC activity in dieting human participants, which correlated with vmPFC activity . In a similar task, Medic and colleagues  found no evidence for a difference in vmPFC activity for overweight to severely obese participants, whereas vmPFC activity did predict subsequent consumption of, particularly, unhealthy foods at a buffet. At the level of the striatum, reduced NAc food cue reactivity was also associated with successful self-control of eating behaviour in daily life in dieting female students, as measured with experience sampling . Experience sampling is a promising method that can be used in obesity research to link neurocognitive findings to maladaptive decisions in daily life. The right food choice always depends on your current state and situation, but also on possibly conflicting internal goals. Decreased goal-directed control of behaviour in a food context has also been associated with obesity [54, 55].
Food often comes at a cost, which requires weighing your options. Obese individuals may be less willing to, first, pay money for plain than highly palatable food items ; second, exert effort to obtain food or monetary rewards [66, 166]; and third, wait for a larger reward if a smaller immediate reward is offered simultaneously, as consistently observed in delay discounting tasks ([167, 168, 169, 170], but see [51•]). Willingness to exert effort relies on regions in the affective loop and is particularly interesting because of its link to dopamine [171, 172] as well as low-grade systemic inflammation , which is highly prevalent in obesity (see Box 1). A recent PET study using a highly specific D2 tracer [51•] together with measures of insulin sensitivity revealed no difference in willingness to wait (nor striatal D2R -binding) in obese relative to non-obese participants. However, greater D2R availability in obese was associated with less willingness to wait and reduced insulin sensitivity. This raises the questions whether and how striatal D2R binding and metabolic factors interact to affect temporal discounting in obesity. In another study, lower willingness to wait (i.e. steeper temporal discounting) was associated with reduced dlPFC–vmPFC connectivity in obesity  and may thus rely on cross-talk between the affective and cognitive loop. Interestingly, thinking about how the larger later rewards can be used (i.e. future thinking) has been effective in reducing temporal discounting and food intake in obesity [174, 175, 176, 177, 178, 179] and involves cognitive control areas ACC and dlPFC, as well as mPFC–hippocampus interaction [180, 181]. Of note, diet effects have been consistently shown in the hippocampus .
Behavioural Control and Action Inhibition
It can also occur that an action has already been initiated upon perceiving a palatable food stimulus. The decision to stop such a response can happen at the level of behavioural control in the cognitive loop, or gating of motor responses. Investigations of response inhibition, tapping into the latter, revealed small obesity-related differences . However, in a resting state fMRI study, disruption was observed in motorcortico-striatal networks in obesity consistent with habit formation theories . More evident results have been observed using the go/no-go task, which indicated impaired performance in obesity . A behavioural intervention that trained no-go responding to high-calorie food cues led to devaluation of those items in normal-weight [184, 185] and in morbidly obese participants [34, 186], as well as impulsive food choices in normal-weight individuals [184, 185]. The authors have proposed that training acts bottom-up by creating associations between no-go food items and stopping responses and reducing valuation of no-go food items (in the affective loop) . A similar mechanism may explain a reduction of food intake in uncontrolled eaters after inhibitory control training  and of approach bias to unhealthy food cues in obesity after training automated action tendencies [42, 188].
In sum, obesity-related differences are predominantly observed in the affective and cognitive frontostriatal loops. A simple explanation could be that studies on motor gating or learning are lacking. Many of the neurocognitive constructs investigated in obesity rely on cross-talk between the loops. Studies implementing tasks that specifically investigate the interplay between the different loops may help us further. Also, more convergence in the use of experimental stimuli and task parameters in food-related neuroimaging is needed (as argued by ), and there is a need of inclusion of a wider BMI range in obesity studies (see Table 1). However, a more mechanistic explanation is also plausible. That is, the more ventral and medial parts of the frontostriatal circuits may be particularly vulnerable for the effects of diet and adiposity-related metabolic factors in the bloodstream. It is important to better understand the mechanism of the cross-talk between loops. That is, where in the loops can interaction occur (e.g. is the motivational signal from the affective loop to higher-order cognitive loop, or can the cognitive loop affect the state of the affective loop?) and at what point in the process can maladaptive decisions be prevented from being made?
Both diet and obesity affect dopaminergic transmission. However, site and direction of effects are inconsistent across species and studies. Non-specific changes are observed spanning all frontostriatal loops, from sensory input to motivated behaviour. Given the impact of peripheral signals on central dopaminergic signalling and the interaction between the frontostriatal loops, modulation of dopamine likely propagates through all loops and, thus, affects behaviour on various levels of complexity. In line with , we highlight in Box 1 that homeostatic factors have direct access to hedonic systems via dopaminergic modulation, indicating that these can be highly interdependent, going against the historical, dichotomous concept of homeostatic vs. hedonic control over eating behaviour. However, in this review, we mostly focused on the hedonic system. Interactions between the hypothalamus and the frontostriatal circuits require further investigation.
Despite the wealth of literature, it has proven difficult to evaluate the degree of convergence of findings between animal and human studies on the role of dopamine in diet-induced obesity. The main reason is the lack of studies utilising overlapping measures of dopamine and cognition in both species. Human studies are largely observational in nature and lack direct measures of dopaminergic transmission. As such, there is a great need for diet intervention studies, more longitudinal studies  and mechanistic studies on the relationship between dopamine and the observed neurocognitive differences, preferably linked to metabolic factors as discussed in Box 1. Further, although some attempts have been made , the usage of animal diets that do not closely resemble human obesogenic diets limits comparability of the effects of diet exposure, and higher-order cognition is often not studied in relation to diet-induced dopamine changes.
Due to the narrow scope of the current review, some aspects should be highlighted that were not directly addressed but are likely of high relevance for understanding diet-induced obesity. First, this review dealt with the relationship between diet-induced obesity, cognition and dopamine transmission. Although playing a central role in motivation and cognition, dopamine is not the only neurotransmitter involved. In fact, dopamine interacts closely with other systems such as the opioid, serotonin and noradrenergic system [57, 71, 189, 190]. A relationship to obesity has been demonstrated for all of them. Second, most human research is cross-sectional in nature. In addiction, the existence of subsequent behavioural phases has been proposed, leading from incentive-guided towards compulsive behaviour with accompanying central changes that indicate a transition of changes from ventromedial to dorsolateral frontostriatal loops . Here, we cannot tell whether group differences similarly relate to a transition-in-progress or resemble an endpoint (although a vicious cycle model has been proposed by ). We do not even know whether or not overweight people are prone to obesity or represent a special “subpopulation”. This transitional aspect could be addressed in animal studies that longitudinally monitor changes following diet exposure or obesity induction. It would also be of interest to take into account the severity of obesity and the individual history of being obese in human studies. Moreover, inconsistent results in the literature could be related to not assessing important latent variables such as the genetic background or possible epigenetic edits induced by lifestyle or family history. Although common variation in dopaminergic genes seems not to have a direct relationship to obesity , its relation to cognition is well established. Thus, ignoring this information may lead to either false positives or negatives assigned to the obesity factor.
Finally, an intriguing open question that deserves attention in future research is whether or not the changes that are observed in diet-induced obesity are really maladaptive in nature. Whereas physiological, behavioural and neural differences are often interpreted as maladaptive, it may be that some actually reflect functional adaptations that could be beneficial either at the individual or population level. This would call for a more nuanced interpretation of any obesity-related differences.
The authors would like to thank Maria Kobel, Eileen Lashani, Suse Prejawa and Robert Scholz for valuable input to the manuscript.
Open access funding provided by Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences. This work was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, SFB1052: A5 (to AH, FR, HH) and the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), Germany, in the framework of the Integrated Research and Treatment Center Adiposity Diseases at the University of Leipzig FKZ: 01E01501 (to AH, FR, KW, LKJ, MW, NB, NH). MP is funded by a project grant by the Roland Ernst Stiftung.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
- 11.Yeomans MR. Adverse effects of consuming high fat–sugar diets on cognition: implications for understanding obesity. Proc Nutr Soc. 2017. Cambridge University Press;2017:1–11.Google Scholar
- 15.Jansen A, Houben K, Roefs A. A cognitive profile of obesity and its translation into new interventions. Front Psychol Frontiers. 2015;6:1807.Google Scholar
- 18.•• Friend DM, Devarakonda K, O’Neal TJ, Skirzewski M, Papazoglou I, Kaplan AR, et al. Basal ganglia dysfunction contributes to physical inactivity in obesity. Cell Metab. 2017;25:312–21 This study shows that diet-induced obesity can cause reductions in striatal D2Rs in mice, rather than vice versa. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Vucetic Z, Carlin JL, Totoki K, Reyes TM. Epigenetic dysregulation of the dopamine system in diet-induced obesity. J Neurochem Wiley Online Library. 2012;120:891–8.Google Scholar
- 24.Benton D, Young HA. A meta-analysis of the relationship between brain dopamine receptors and obesity: a matter of changes in behavior rather than food addiction [quest]. Int J Obes. Macmillan Publishers Limited. 2016. 40:S12–21.Google Scholar
- 31.Avena NM, Gold JA, Kroll C, Gold MS. Further developments in the neurobiology of food and addiction: update on the state of the science. Nutrition Elsevier. 2017;28:341–3.Google Scholar
- 33.Bongers P, van de Giessen E, Roefs A, Nederkoorn C, Booij J, van den Brink W, et al. Being impulsive and obese increases susceptibility to speeded detection of highcalorie foods. Heal Psychol. 2015; p. 677–85.Google Scholar
- 34.Chen Z, Veling H, de Vries SP, Bijvank BO, Janssen IMC, Dijksterhuis A, et al. Go/no-go training changes food evaluation in both morbidly obese and normal-weight individuals. J Consult Clin Psychol Am Psychol Assoc. 2018;86:980–90.Google Scholar
- 35.Contreras-Rodríguez O, Martín-Pérez C, Vilar-López R, Verdejo-Garcia A. ventral and dorsal striatum networks in obesity: link to food craving and weight gain. Biol Psychiatry. 2017;81.Google Scholar
- 36.Fernández-Aranda F, Agüera Z, Fernández-García JC, Garrido-Sanchez L, Alcaide-Torres J, Tinahones FJ, et al. Smell–taste dysfunctions in extreme weight/eating conditions: analysis of hormonal and psychological interactions. Endocrine. 2016;51:256–67.Google Scholar
- 37.Fernandez-Garcia JC, Alcaide J, Santiago-Fernandez C, Roca-Rodriguez M, Aguera Z, Baños R, et al. Correction: an increase in visceral fat is associated with a decrease in the taste and olfactory capacity. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0173588.Google Scholar
- 38.Hardikar S, Höchenberger R, Villringer A, Ohla K. Higher sensitivity to sweet and salty taste in obese compared to lean individuals. Appetite. 2017;111:158–65.Google Scholar
- 39.Hardikar S, Wallroth R, Villringer A, Ohla K. Shorter-lived neural taste representations in obese compared to lean individuals. Sci Rep. 2018;8:11027.Google Scholar
- 40.ter Horst KW, Lammers NM, Trinko R, Opland DM, Figee M, Ackermans MT, et al. Striatal dopamine regulates systemic glucose metabolism in humans and mice. Sci Transl Med. 2018;10:eaar3752.Google Scholar
- 41.Mason AE, Jhaveri K, Schleicher S, Almeida C, Hartman A, Wackerly A, et al. Sweet cognition: the differential effects of glucose consumption on attentional food bias in individuals of lean and obese status. Physiol Behav. 2019;206:264–73.Google Scholar
- 42.Mehl N, Mueller-Wieland L, Mathar D, Horstmann A. Retraining automatic action tendencies in obesity. Physiol Behav. 2018;192:50–8.Google Scholar
- 43.•• Pepino MY, Eisenstein SA, Bischoff AN, Klein S, Moerlein SM, Perlmutter JS, et al. Sweet dopamine: sucrose preferences relate differentially to striatal D2-receptor binding and age in obesity. Diabetes. 2016;65:2618–23 This is the first study to show that sucrose preference relates to direct measures of dopamine in human obesity. Google Scholar
- 44.Proserpio C, Invitti C, Boesveldt S, Pasqualinotto L, Laureati M, Cattaneo C, et al. Ambient odor exposure affects food intake and sensory specific appetite in obese women. Front Psychol. 2019;10:7.Google Scholar
- 45.Voon V, Irvine MA, Derbyshire K, Worbe Y, Lange I, Abbott S, et al. Measuring “waiting” impulsivity in substance addictions and binge eating disorder in a novel analogue of rodent serial reaction time task. Biol Psychiatry Elsevier. 2014;75:148–55.Google Scholar
- 46.Voon V, Derbyshire K, Ruck C, Irvine MA, Worbe Y, Enander J, et al. Disorders of compulsivity: a common bias towards learning habits. Mol Psychiatry. 2015;20:345–52.Google Scholar
- 47.Balodis IM, Kober H, Worhunsky PD, White MA, Stevens MC, Pearlson GD, et al. Monetary reward processing in obese individuals with and without binge eating disorder. Biol Psychiatry. 2013;73:877–86.Google Scholar
- 48.Caravaggio F, Borlido C, Hahn M, Feng Z, Fervaha G, Gerretsen P, et al. Reduced insulin sensitivity is related to less endogenous dopamine at D2/3 receptors in the ventral striatum of healthy nonobese humans. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2015;18:pyv014.Google Scholar
- 49.Cosgrove KP, Veldhuizen MG, Sandiego CM, Morris ED, Small DM. Opposing relationships of BMI with BOLD and dopamine D2/3 receptor binding potential in the dorsal striatum. Synapse. 2015;69:195–202.Google Scholar
- 50.Dietrich A, Hollmann M, Mathar D, Villringer A, Horstmann A. Brain regulation of food craving: relationships with weight status & eating behavior. Int J Obes. 2016;40:982–9.Google Scholar
- 51.• Eisenstein SA, Gredysa DM, Antenor-Dorsey JA, Green L, Arbeláez AM, Koller JM, et al. Insulin, central dopamine D2 receptors, and monetary reward discounting in obesity. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0133621 Public Library of Science. This study combines a direct measure of central dopamine (D2R-binding, using PET) with insulin measurements and a behaviorally relevant performance measure in human obesity and, thus, bridges a large gap in the literature. Google Scholar
- 52.Gaiser EC, Gallezot J-D, Worhunsky PD, Jastreboff AM, Pittman B, Kantrovitz L, et al. Elevated dopamine D 2/3 receptor availability in obese individuals: a PET imaging study with [11 C](+) PHNO. Neuropsychopharmacology. Nat Publ Group. 2016;41:3042.Google Scholar
- 53.Guo J, Simmons WK, Herscovitch P, Martin A, Hall KD. Striatal dopamine D2-like receptor correlation patterns with human obesity and opportunistic eating behavior. Mol Psychiatry. 2014/09/09. 2014;19:1078–84.Google Scholar
- 54.Horstmann A, Dietrich A, Mathar D, Pössel M, Villringer A, Neumann J. Slave to habit? Obesity is associated with decreased behavioural sensitivity to reward devaluation. Appetite. 2015;87:175–83.Google Scholar
- 55.Janssen LK, Duif I, van Loon I, Wegman J, de Vries JHM, Cools R, et al. Loss of lateral prefrontal cortex control in food-directed attention and goal-directed food choice in obesity. Neuroimage. 2017;146:148–56.Google Scholar
- 56.Jonker NC, Glashouwer KA, Ostafin BD, van Hemel-Ruiter ME, Smink FRE, Hoek HW, et al. Attentional bias for reward and punishment in overweight and obesity: the TRAILS study. PLoS One Public Libr Sci. 2016;11:e0157573.Google Scholar
- 57.Karlsson HK, Tuominen L, Tuulari JJ, Hirvonen J, Parkkola R, Helin S, et al. Obesity is associated with decreased μ-opioid but unaltered dopamine D2 receptor availability in the brain. J Neurosci Soc Neuroscience. 2015;35:3959–65.Google Scholar
- 58.Kastner L, Kube J, Villringer A, Neumann J. Cardiac concomitants of feedback and prediction error processing in reinforcement learning. Front Neurosci. 2017;11:598.Google Scholar
- 59.Kessler RM, Zald DH, Ansari MS, Li R, Cowan RL. Changes in dopamine release and dopamine D2/3 receptor levels with the development of mild obesity. Synapse Wiley Online Library. 2014;68:317–20.Google Scholar
- 60.Kube J, Schrimpf A, García-García I, Villringer A, Neumann J, Horstmann A. Differential heart rate responses to social and monetary reinforcement in women with obesity. Psychophysiology. 2016;53:868–79.Google Scholar
- 61.Kube J, Mathar D, Horstmann A, Kotz SA, Villringer A, Neumann J. Altered monetary loss processing and reinforcement-based learning in individuals with obesity. Brain Imaging Behav. 2018;12:1431–49.Google Scholar
- 62.• Lee Y, Kroemer NB, Oehme L, Beuthien-Baumann B, Goschke T, Smolka MN. Lower dopamine tone in the striatum is associated with higher body mass index. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2018;28:719–31 A particularly interesting PET-method is used to quantify dopamine tone specifically in relationship to BMI, instead of using a D2R-binding ligand that is sensitive to D2R-availabitility as well as dopamine tone. Google Scholar
- 63.Lehner R, Balsters JH, Bürgler A, Hare TA, Wenderoth N. Food-rredicting stimuli differentially influence eye movements and goal-directed behavior in normal-weight, overweight, and obese individuals. Front psychiatry. 2017;8:230.Google Scholar
- 64.Liu Y, Roefs A, Werthmann J, Nederkoorn C. Dynamics of attentional bias for food in adults, children, and restrained eaters. Appetite. 2019;135:86–92.Google Scholar
- 65.Lopez RB, Milyavskaya M, Hofmann W, Heatherton TF. Motivational and neural correlates of self-control of eating: a combined neuroimaging and experience sampling study in dieting female college students. Appetite. 2016.Google Scholar
- 66.Mata F, Treadway M, Kwok A, Truby H, Yücel M, Stout JC, et al. Reduced willingness to expend effort for reward in obesity: link to adherence to a 3-month weight loss intervention. Obesity. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 2017;25:1676–81.Google Scholar
- 67.Medic N, Ziauddeen H, Forwood SE, Davies KM, Ahern AL, Jebb SA, et al. The presence of real food usurps hypothetical health value judgment in overweight people. Eneuro. 2016;3:ENEURO.0025-16.2016.Google Scholar
- 68.Morys F, Bode S, Horstmann A. Dorsolateral and medial prefrontal cortex mediate the influence of incidental priming on economic decision making in obesity. Sci Rep. 2018;8:17595.Google Scholar
- 69.Mühlberg C, Mathar D, Villringer A, Horstmann A, Neumann J. Stopping at the sight of food – how gender and obesity impact on response inhibition. Appetite. 2016;107:663–76.Google Scholar
- 70.Simon JJ, Skunde M, Hamze Sinno M, Brockmeyer T, Herpertz SC, Bendszus M, et al. Impaired cross-talk between mesolimbic food reward processing and metabolic signaling predicts body mass index. Front Behav Neurosci. 2014;8:359.Google Scholar
- 71.Tuominen L, Tuulari J, Karlsson H, Hirvonen J, Helin S, Salminen P, et al. Aberrant mesolimbic dopamine–opiate interaction in obesity. Neuroimage. Elsevier. 2015;122:80–6.Google Scholar
- 72.Vainik U, Baker TE, Dadar M, Zeighami Y, Michaud A, Zhang Y, et al. Neurobehavioral correlates of obesity are largely heritable. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2018;115:93127.Google Scholar
- 73.Verdejo-Román J, Vilar-López R, Navas JF, Soriano-Mas C, Verdejo-García A. Brain reward system’s alterations in response to food and monetary stimuli in overweight and obese individuals. Hum Brain Mapp. 2017;38:666–77.Google Scholar
- 74.Zhang Z, Manson KF, Schiller D, Levy I. Impaired associative learning with food rewards in obese women. Curr Biol. 2014;24:1731–6.Google Scholar
- 75.Navas JF, Barrós-Loscertales A, Costumero-Ramos V, Verdejo-Román J, Vilar-López R, Verdejo-García A. Excessive body fat linked to blunted somatosensory cortex response to general reward in adolescents. Int J Obes. Macmillan Publishers Limited, part of Springer Nature, 2018;42:88.Google Scholar
- 76.Manasse SM, Flack D, Dochat C, Zhang F, Butryn ML, Forman EM. Not so fast: the impact of impulsivity on weight loss varies by treatment type. Appetite. 2017;113:193–9.Google Scholar
- 77.Simon JJ, Becker A, Sinno MH, Skunde M, Bendszus M, Preissl H, et al. Neural food reward processing in successful and unsuccessful weight maintenance. Obesity. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2018;26:895–902.Google Scholar
- 78.van Ens W, Schmidt U, Campbell IC, Roefs A, Werthmann J. Test-retest reliability of attention bias for food: robust eye-tracking and reaction time indices. Appetite. 2019;136:86–92.Google Scholar
- 79.Manasse SM, Goldstein SP, Wyckoff E, Forman EM, Juarascio AS, Butryn ML, et al. Slowing down and taking a second look: Inhibitory deficits associated with binge eating are not food-specific. Appetite. 2016;96:555–9.Google Scholar
- 80.Franken IHA, Nijs IMT, Toes A, van der Veen FM. Food addiction is associated with impaired performance monitoring. Biol Psychol. 2018;131:49–53.Google Scholar
- 81.van Dillen LF, van Steenbergen H. Tuning down the hedonic brain: cognitive load reduces neural responses to high-calorie food pictures in the nucleus accumbens. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2018;18:447–59.Google Scholar
- 82.Oomen D, Grol M, Spronk D, Booth C, Fox E. Beating uncontrolled eating: training inhibitory control to reduce food intake and food cue sensitivity. Appetite. Elsevier. 2018;131:73–83.Google Scholar
- 83.Hare TA, Malmaud J, Rangel A. Focusing attention on the health aspects of foods changes value signals in vmPFC and improves dietary choice. J Neurosci. 2011;31:11077–87.Google Scholar
- 84.Mehl N, Morys F, Villringer A, Horstmann A. Unhealthy yet avoidable—how cognitive bias modification alters behavioral and brain responses to food cues in individuals with obesity. Nutr Multidiscip Dig Publ Inst. 2019;11:874.Google Scholar
- 85.Gillan CM, Kosinski M, Whelan R, Phelps EA, Daw ND. Characterizing a psychiatric symptom dimension related to deficits in goal-directed control. Elife. 2016;5:e11305.Google Scholar
- 86.Hare TA, Camerer CF, Rangel A. Self-control in decision-making involves modulation of the vmPFC valuation system. Sci. 2009;324:646–8.Google Scholar
- 87.Werthmann J, Jansen A, Roefs A. Make up your mind about food: a healthy mindset attenuates attention for high-calorie food in restrained eaters. Appetite. 2016;105:53–9.Google Scholar
- 88.Donofry SD, van Zoest W, Moonen A, Sacchetti S, Nederkoorn C, Roefs A. Effect of dietary restraint and mood state on attentional processing of food cues. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2019;62:117–24.Google Scholar
- 89.Oh Y-S, Kim J-S, Hwang E-J, Lyoo CH. Striatal dopamine uptake and olfactory dysfunction in patients with early Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2018;56:47–51.Google Scholar
- 90.• Koopman KE, Roefs A, Elbers DCE, Fliers E, Booij J, Serlie MJ, et al. Brain dopamine and serotonin transporter binding are associated with visual attention bias for food in lean men. Psychol Med. 2016;46:1707–17 Cambridge University Press. This is one of the few studies that combined a direct measure of dopamine (and serotonin) using PET with food-related performance measure and food intake in healthy human participants. Google Scholar
- 91.Beste C, Adelhöfer N, Gohil K, Passow S, Roessner V, Li S-C. Dopamine modulates the efficiency of sensory evidence accumulation during perceptual decision making. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2018;21:649–55.Google Scholar
- 92.Pak K, Kim K, Lee MJ, Lee JM, Kim BS, Kim S-J, et al. Correlation between the availability of dopamine transporter and olfactory function in healthy subjects. Eur Radiol. 2018;28:1756–60.Google Scholar
- 93.Sorokowska A, Schoen K, Hummel C, Han P, Warr J, Hummel T. Food-related odors activate dopaminergic brain areas. Front Hum Neurosci. 2017;11.Google Scholar
- 94.Caravaggio F, Raitsin S, Gerretsen P, Nakajima S, Wilson A, Graff-Guerrero A. Ventral striatum binding of a dopamine D2/3 receptor agonist but not antagonist predicts normal body mass index. Biol Psychiatry. 2015;77(2):196–202.Google Scholar
- 95.Thomsen G, Ziebell M, Jensen PS, da Cuhna-Bang S, Knudsen GM, Pinborg LH. No correlation between body mass index and striatal dopamine transporter availability in healthy volunteers using SPECT and [123I]PE2I. Obesity. 2013;21:1803–6.Google Scholar
- 96.Adams WK, Sussman JL, Kaur S, D’souza AM, Kieffer TJ, Winstanley CA. Long-term, calorie-restricted intake of a high-fat diet in rats reduces impulse control and ventral striatal D2 receptor signalling—two markers of addiction vulnerability. Eur J Neurosci. 2015;42:3095–104.Google Scholar
- 97.Zhang C, Wei N-L, Wang Y, Wang X, Zhang J-G, Zhang K. Deep brain stimulation of the nucleus accumbens shell induces anti-obesity effects in obese rats with alteration of dopamine neurotransmission. Neurosci Lett. 2015;589:1–6.Google Scholar
- 98.Jones KT, Woods C, Zhen J, Antonio T, Carr KD, Reith MEA. Effects of diet and insulin on dopamine transporter activity and expression in rat caudate-putamen, nucleus accumbens, and midbrain. J Neurochem. 2017;140:728–40.Google Scholar
- 99.Barry RL, Byun NE, Williams JM, Siuta MA, Tantawy MN, Speed NK, et al. Brief exposure to obesogenic diet disrupts brain dopamine networks. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0191299.Google Scholar
- 100.Rospond B, Sadakierska-Chudy A, Kazek G, Krośniak M, Bystrowska B, Filip M. Assessment of metabolic and hormonal profiles and striatal dopamine D2 receptor expression following continuous or scheduled high-fat or high-sucrose diet in rats. Pharmacol Rep. 2018.Google Scholar
- 101.Hryhorczuk C, Florea M, Rodaros D, Poirier I, Daneault C, Des Rosiers C, et al. Dampened mesolimbic dopamine function and signaling by saturated but not monounsaturated dietary lipids. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2016;41:811.Google Scholar
- 102.Ducrocq F, Hyde A, Fanet H, Oummadi A, Walle R, De Smedt-Peyrusse V, et al. Decrease in operant responding under obesogenic diet exposure is not related to deficits in incentive or hedonic processes. Obesity. Wiley Online Library. 2019;27:255–63.Google Scholar
- 103.Labouesse MA, Sartori AM, Weinmann O, Simpson EH, Kellendonk C, Weber-Stadlbauer U. Striatal dopamine 2 receptor upregulation during development predisposes to diet-induced obesity by reducing energy output in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2018;115:10493–LP – 10498.Google Scholar
- 104.Hakim JD, Keay KA. Prolonged ad libitum access to low-concentration sucrose changes the neurochemistry of the nucleus accumbens in male Sprague-Dawley rats. Physiol Behav. Elsevier. 2019;201:95–103.Google Scholar
- 105.Patel JC, Stouffer MA, Mancini M, Nicholson C, Carr KD, Rice ME. Interactions between insulin and diet on striatal dopamine uptake kinetics in rodent brain slices. Eur J Neurosci. 2019;49:794–804.Google Scholar
- 106.Robinson MJF, Burghardt PR, Patterson CM, Nobile CW, Akil H, Watson SJ, et al. Individual differences in cue-induced motivation and striatal systems in rats susceptible to diet-induced obesity. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2015;40:2113–23.Google Scholar
- 107.Sharpe MJ, Batchelor HM, Mueller LE, Chang CY, Maes EJP, Niv Y, et al. Dopamine transients delivered in learning contexts do not act as model-free prediction errors. bioRxiv. 2019;574541.Google Scholar
- 108.Li Y, South T, Han M, Chen J, Wang R, Huang X-F. High-fat diet decreases tyrosine hydroxylase mRNA expression irrespective of obesity susceptibility in mice. Brain Res. 2009;1268:181–9.Google Scholar
- 109.Slomp M, Belegri E, Blancas-Velazquez AS, Diepenbroek C, Eggels L, Gumbs MCR, et al. Stressing the importance of choice: validity of a preclinical free-choice high-caloric diet paradigm to model behavioural, physiological and molecular adaptations during human diet-induced obesity and metabolic dysfunction. J Neuroendocrinol. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd (10.1111). 2019;0:e12718.Google Scholar
- 110.Berland C, Cansell C, Hnasko TS, Magnan C, Luquet S. Dietary triglycerides as signaling molecules that influence reward and motivation. Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2016;9:126–35.Google Scholar
- 111.Cansell C, Luquet S. Triglyceride sensing in the reward circuitry: a new insight in feeding behaviour regulation. Biochimie. 2016;120:75–80.Google Scholar
- 112.Berthoud H-R, Münzberg H, Morrison CD. Blaming the brain for obesity: integration of hedonic and homeostatic mechanisms. Gastroenterology. 2017;152:1728–38.Google Scholar
- 113.Wensveen FM, Valentić S, Šestan M, Turk Wensveen T, Polić B. The “Big Bang” in obese fat: events initiating obesity-induced adipose tissue inflammation. Eur J Immunol. 2015;45:2446–56.Google Scholar
- 114.Lee M-J, Wang Y, Ricci MR, Sullivan S, Russell CD, Fried SK. Acute and chronic regulation of leptin synthesis, storage, and secretion by insulin and dexamethasone in human adipose tissue. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2007;292:E858–64.Google Scholar
- 115.Ramos-Lobo AM, Donato J. The role of leptin in health and disease. Temp Multidiscip Biomed J. 2017;4:258–91.Google Scholar
- 116.Dunn JP, Kessler RM, Feurer ID, Volkow ND, Patterson BW, Ansari MS, et al. Relationship of dopamine type 2 receptor binding potential with fasting neuroendocrine hormones and insulin sensitivity in human obesity. Diabetes Care. 2012;35:1105–11.Google Scholar
- 117.Edwards A, Abizaid A. Clarifying the ghrelin system’s ability to regulate feeding behaviours despite enigmatic spatial separation of the GHSR and its endogenous ligand. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18:E859.Google Scholar
- 118.Le Roux CW, Patterson M, Vincent RP, Hunt C, Ghatei MA, Bloom SR. Postprandial plasma ghrelin is suppressed proportional to meal calorie content in normal-weight but not obese subjects. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90:1068–71.Google Scholar
- 119.Hernandez D, Mehta N, Geliebter A. Meal-related acyl and des-acyl ghrelin and other appetite-related hormones in people with obesity and binge eating. Obesity. 2019;27:629–35.Google Scholar
- 120.Dardzińska JA, Małgorzewicz S, Kaska Ł, Proczko M, Stefaniak T, Stankiewicz M, et al. Fasting and postprandial acyl and desacyl ghrelin levels in obese and non-obese subjects. Endokrynol Pol. 2014;65:377–81.Google Scholar
- 121.McLaughlin T, Abbasi F, Lamendola C, Frayo RS, Cummings DE. Plasma ghrelin concentrations are decreased in insulin-resistant obese adults relative to equally obese insulin-sensitive controls. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89:1630–5.Google Scholar
- 122.Julliard A-K, Al Koborssy D, Fadool DA, Palouzier-Paulignan B. Nutrient sensing: another chemosensitivity of the olfactory system. Front Physiol. 2017;8:468.Google Scholar
- 123.Figlewicz DP. Expression of receptors for insulin and leptin in the ventral tegmental area/substantia nigra (VTA/SN) of the rat: historical perspective. Brain Res. 2016;1645:68–70.Google Scholar
- 124.Ferrini F, Salio C, Lossi L, Merighi A. Ghrelin in central neurons. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2009;7:37–49.Google Scholar
- 125.Naef L, Seabrook L, Hsiao J, Li C, Borgland SL. Insulin in the ventral tegmental area reduces cocaine-evoked dopamine in the nucleus accumbens in vivo. Eur J Neurosci.; 2018Google Scholar
- 126.Stouffer MA, Woods CA, Patel JC, Lee CR, Witkovsky P, Bao L, et al. Insulin enhances striatal dopamine release by activating cholinergic interneurons and thereby signals reward. Nat Commun. 2015;6:8543.Google Scholar
- 127.Kullmann S, Heni M, Fritsche A, Preissl H. Insulin action in the human brain: evidence from neuroimaging studies. J Neuroendocrinol. 2015;27:419–23.Google Scholar
- 128.van der Plasse G, van Zessen R, Luijendijk MCM, Erkan H, Stuber GD, Ramakers GMJ, et al. Modulation of cue-induced firing of ventral tegmental area dopamine neurons by leptin and ghrelin. Int J Obes. 2015;39:1742–9.Google Scholar
- 129.• Liu J-J, Bello NT, Pang ZP. Presynaptic regulation of leptin in a defined lateral hypothalamus–ventral tegmental area neurocircuitry depends on energy state. J Neurosci. 2017;37:11854–66 In this diet-intervention study in rats, leptin regulation was investigated in both hypothalamus and the dopaminergic VTA and could be related to behavioral performance on a conditioned place preference test. Google Scholar
- 130.Galic S, Oakhill JS, Steinberg GR. Adipose tissue as an endocrine organ. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2010;316:129–39.Google Scholar
- 131.Smitka K, Marešová D. Adipose tissue as an endocrine organ: an update on pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory microenvironment. Prague Med Rep. 2015;116:87–111.Google Scholar
- 132.Treadway MT, Admon R, Arulpragasam AR, Mehta M, Douglas S, Vitaliano G, et al. Association between interleukin-6 and striatal prediction-error signals following acute stress in healthy female participants. Biol Psychiatry. 2017;82:570–7.Google Scholar
- 133.Harrison NA, Voon V, Cercignani M, Cooper EA, Pessiglione M, Critchley HD. A neurocomputational account of how inflammation enhances sensitivity to punishments versus rewards. Biol Psychiatry. 2016;80:73–81.Google Scholar
- 134.Petrulli JR, Kalish B, Nabulsi NB, Huang Y, Hannestad J, Morris ED. Systemic inflammation enhances stimulant-induced striatal dopamine elevation. Transl Psychiatry. 2017;7:e1076.Google Scholar
- 135.Felger JC, Treadway MT. Inflammation effects on motivation and motor activity: role of dopamine. Neuropsychopharmacol Am Coll Neuropsychopharmacol. 2016;42:216.Google Scholar
- 136.Dixit VD, Schaffer EM, Pyle RS, Collins G, Sakthivel SK, Palaniappan R, et al. Ghrelin inhibits leptin- and activation-induced proinflammatory cytokine expression by human monocytes and T cells. J Clin Invest. 2004;114:57–66.Google Scholar
- 137.Wang X, van Villar A, Tiu A, Upadhyay KK, Cuevas S. Dopamine D2 receptor upregulates leptin and IL-6 in adipocytes. J Lipid Res. 2018;59:607–14.Google Scholar
- 138.Ezrokhi M, Luo S, Trubitsyna Y, Cincotta AH. Neuroendocrine and metabolic components of dopamine agonist amelioration of metabolic syndrome in SHR rats. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2014;6:104.Google Scholar
- 139.Alexander GE, DeLong MR, Strick PL. Parallel organization of functionally segregated circuits linking basal ganglia and cortex. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1986;9:357–81.Google Scholar
- 140.Haber SN, Knutson B. The reward circuit: linking primate anatomy and human imaging. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2010;35:4–26.Google Scholar
- 141.Draganski B, Kherif F, Klöppel S, Cook PA, Alexander DC, Parker GJM, et al. Evidence for segregated and integrative connectivity patterns in the human basal ganglia. J Neurosci. 2008;28:7143–52.Google Scholar
- 142.Aarts E, van Holstein M, Cools R. Striatal dopamine and the interface between motivation and cognition. Front Psychol. 2011;2.Google Scholar
- 143.Choi EY, Ding S-L, Haber SN. Combinatorial inputs to the ventral striatum from the temporal cortex, frontal cortex, and amygdala: implications for segmenting the striatum. Eneuro. 2017;4:ENEURO.0392–17.2017.Google Scholar
- 144.Lippert RN, Cremer AL, Edwin Thanarajah S, Korn C, Jahans-Price T, Burgeno LM, et al. Time-dependent assessment of stimulus-evoked regional dopamine release. Nat Commun. 2019;10:336.Google Scholar
- 145.• Thanarajah SE, Backes H, DiFeliceantonio AG, Albus K, Cremer AL, Hanssen R, et al. Food intake recruits orosensory and post-ingestive dopaminergic circuits to affect eating desire in humans. Cell Metab. 2019;29:695–706 This is the first study that could show dopamine responses in striatal and frontal regions in response to food intake in humans using their newly developed PET-method. Google Scholar
- 146.Laubach M, Amarante LM, Swanson K, White SR. What, if anything, is rodent prefrontal cortex? eNeuro Soc Neurosci. 2018;5:ENEURO.0315-18.Google Scholar
- 147.Stroebele N, De Castro JM. Effect of ambience on food intake and food choice. Nutrition. 2004;20:821–38.Google Scholar
- 148.Gaillet-Torrent M, Sulmont-Rossé C, Issanchou S, Chabanet C, Chambaron S. Impact of a non-attentively perceived odour on subsequent food choices. Appetite. 2014;76:17–22.Google Scholar
- 149.Overberg J, Hummel T, Krude H, Wiegand S. Differences in taste sensitivity between obese and non-obese children and adolescents. Arch Dis Child. 2012;97:1048–52.Google Scholar
- 150.Proserpio C, Laureati M, Invitti C, Pagliarini E. Reduced taste responsiveness and increased food neophobia characterize obese adults. Food Qual Prefer. 2018;63:73–9.Google Scholar
- 151.Martinez-Cordero E, Malacara-Hernandez JM, Martinez-Cordero C. Taste perception in normal and overweight Mexican adults. Appetite. 2015;89:192–5.Google Scholar
- 152.Stafford LD, Whittle A. Obese individuals have higher preference and sensitivity to odor of chocolate. Chem Senses. 2015;40:279–84.Google Scholar
- 153.Pignatelli A, Belluzzi O. Dopaminergic neurones in the main olfactory bulb: an overview from an electrophysiological perspective. Front Neuroanat. 2017;11:7.Google Scholar
- 154.Ilkiw JL, Kmita LC, Targa ADS, Noseda ACD, Rodrigues LS, Dorieux FWC, et al. Dopaminergic lesion in the olfactory bulb restores olfaction and induces depressive-like behaviors in a 6-OHDA model of Parkinson’s disease. Mol Neurobiol. 2019;56:1082–95.Google Scholar
- 155.Boswell RG, Kober H. Food cue reactivity and craving predict eating and weight gain: a meta-analytic review. Obes Rev. 2016;17:159–77.Google Scholar
- 156.van den Akker K, Stewart K, Antoniou EE, Palmberg A, Jansen A. Food cue reactivity, obesity, and impulsivity: are they associated? Curr Addict Reports. 2014;1:301–8.Google Scholar
- 157.Michaud A, Vainik U, Garcia-Garcia I, Dagher A. Overlapping neural endophenotypes in addiction and obesity. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Front Media S.A. 2017;8:127.Google Scholar
- 158.Giel EK, Teufel M, Junne F, Zipfel S, Schag K. Food-related impulsivity in obesity and binge eating disorder—a systematic update of the evidence. Nutr. 2017:1170.Google Scholar
- 159.Loxton NJ. The role of reward sensitivity and impulsivity in overeating and food addiction. Curr Addict Reports. 2018;5:212–22.Google Scholar
- 160.Sescousse G, Caldú X, Segura B, Dreher J-C. Processing of primary and secondary rewards: a quantitative meta-analysis and review of human functional neuroimaging studies. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013;37:681–96.Google Scholar
- 161.Yousuf M, Heldmann M, Göttlich M, Münte TF, Doñamayor N. Neural processing of food and monetary rewards is modulated by metabolic state. Brain Imaging Behav. 2018;12:1379–92.Google Scholar
- 162.Luijten M, Schellekens AF, Kühn S, Machielse MJ, Sescousse G. Disruption of reward processing in addiction: an image-based meta-analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging studies. JAMA Psychiatry. 2017;74:387–98.Google Scholar
- 163.Hendrikse JJ, Cachia RL, Kothe EJ, McPhie S, Skouteris H, Hayden MJ. Attentional biases for food cues in overweight and individuals with obesity: a systematic review of the literature. Obes Rev. Wiley Online Library. 2015;16:424–32.Google Scholar
- 164.• Roefs A, Franssen S, Jansen A. The dynamic nature of food reward processing in the brain. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care LWW. 2018;21:444–8 Interesting review that provides a compelling explanation for the inconsistent results with regard to food attentional bias and reward processing in obesity and eating disorders and encourages researchers to take into account the dynamic nature of these processes. Google Scholar
- 165.Lopez RB, Hofmann W, Wagner DD, Kelley WM, Heatherton TF. Neural predictors of giving in to temptation in daily life. Psychol Sci. 2014;25:1337–44.Google Scholar
- 166.Mathar D, Horstmann A, Pleger B, Villringer A, Neumann J. Is it worth the effort? Novel insights into obesity-associated alterations in cost-benefit decision-making. Front Behav Neurosci. 2016;9:360.Google Scholar
- 167.Amlung M, Petker T, Jackson J, Balodis I, MacKillop J. Steep discounting of delayed monetary and food rewards in obesity: a meta-analysis. Psychol Med. 2016;46:2423–34.Google Scholar
- 168.Barlow P, Reeves A, McKee M, Galea G, Stuckler D. Unhealthy diets, obesity and time discounting: a systematic literature review and network analysis. Obes Rev. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd (10.1111). 2016;17:810–9.Google Scholar
- 169.McClelland J, Dalton B, Kekic M, Bartholdy S, Campbell IC, Schmidt U. A systematic review of temporal discounting in eating disorders and obesity: behavioural and neuroimaging findings. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016;71:506–28.Google Scholar
- 170.Tang J, Chrzanowski-Smith OJ, Hutchinson G, Kee F, Hunter RF. Relationship between monetary delay discounting and obesity: a systematic review and meta-regression. Int J Obes. 2018;43:1135–46.Google Scholar
- 171.Correa M, Carlson BB, Wisniecki A, Salamone JD. Nucleus accumbens dopamine and work requirements on interval schedules. Behav Brain Res. 2002;137:179–87.Google Scholar
- 172.Salamone JD, Correa M, Farrar A, Mingote SM. Effort-related functions of nucleus accumbens dopamine and associated forebrain circuits. Psychopharmacology. 2007;191:461–82.Google Scholar
- 173.Draper A, Koch RM, van der Meer JWM, AJ Apps M, Pickkers P, Husain M, et al. Effort but not reward sensitivity is altered by acute sickness induced by experimental endotoxemia in humans. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2017;43:1107.Google Scholar
- 174.Stein JS, Sze YY, Athamneh L, Koffarnus MN, Epstein LH, Bickel WK. Think fast: rapid assessment of the effects of episodic future thinking on delay discounting in overweight/obese participants. J Behav Med. 2017;40:832–8.Google Scholar
- 175.Sze YY, Stein JS, Bickel WK, Paluch RA, Epstein LH. Bleak present, bright future: online episodic future thinking, scarcity, delay discounting, and food demand. Clin Psychol Sci :A J Assoc Psychol Sci. 2017;5:683–97.Google Scholar
- 176.Dassen FCM, Jansen A, Nederkoorn C, Houben K. Focus on the future: episodic future thinking reduces discount rate and snacking. Appetite. 2016;96:327–32.Google Scholar
- 177.Daniel TO, Stanton CM, Epstein LH. The future is now: reducing impulsivity and energy intake using episodic future thinking. Psychol Sci. 2013;24:2339–42.Google Scholar
- 178.Daniel TO, Stanton CM, Epstein LH. The future is now: comparing the effect of episodic future thinking on impulsivity in lean and obese individuals. Appetite. 2013;71:120–5.Google Scholar
- 179.Daniel TO, Said M, Stanton CM, Epstein LH. Episodic future thinking reduces delay discounting and energy intake in children. Eat Behav. 2015;18:20–4.Google Scholar
- 180.Peters J, Büchel C. Episodic future thinking reduces reward delay discounting through an enhancement of prefrontal-mediotemporal interactions. Neuron. 2010;66:138–48.Google Scholar
- 181.Schacter DL, Benoit RG, Szpunar KK. Episodic future thinking: mechanisms and functions. Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2017;17:41–50.Google Scholar
- 182.Baek K, Morris LS, Kundu P, Voon V. Disrupted resting-state brain network properties in obesity: decreased global and putaminal cortico-striatal network efficiency. Psychol Med. 2017;47:585–96.Google Scholar
- 183.Lavagnino L, Arnone D, Cao B, Soares JC, Selvaraj S. Inhibitory control in obesity and binge eating disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of neurocognitive and neuroimaging studies. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016;68:714–26.Google Scholar
- 184.Veling H, Aarts H, Stroebe W. Using stop signals to reduce impulsive choices for palatable unhealthy foods. Br J Health Psychol. Wiley Online Library. 2013;18:354–68.Google Scholar
- 185.Veling H, Aarts H, Stroebe W. Stop signals decrease choices for palatable foods through decreased food evaluation. Front Psychol Front. 2013;4:875.Google Scholar
- 186.Stice E, Lawrence NS, Kemps E, Veling H. Training motor responses to food: a novel treatment for obesity targeting implicit processes. Clin Psychol Rev Elsevier. 2016;49:16–27.Google Scholar
- 187.Veling H, Lawrence NS, Chen Z, van Koningsbruggen GM, Holland RW. What is trained during food go/no-go training? A review focusing on mechanisms and a research agenda. Curr Addict Reports. 2017;4:35–41.Google Scholar
- 188.Mehl N, Morys F, Villringer A, Horstmann A. Unhealthy yet avoidable—how cognitive bias modification alters behavioral and brain responses to food cues in individuals with obesity. Nutr Multidiscip Dig Publ Inst. 2019;11:874.Google Scholar
- 189.Nam SB, Kim K, Kim BS, Im H-J, Lee SH, Kim S-J, et al. The effect of obesity on the availabilities of dopamine and serotonin transporters. Sci Rep Nat Publ Group. 2018;8:4924.Google Scholar
- 190.Hesse S, van de Giessen E, Zientek F, Petroff D, Winter K, Dickson JC, et al. Association of central serotonin transporter availability and body mass index in healthy Europeans. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. Elsevier. 2014;24:1240–7.Google Scholar
- 191.Koob GF, Volkow ND. Neurocircuitry of addiction. Neuropsychopharmacology Nat Publ Group. 2010;35:217–38.Google Scholar
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.