Advertisement

Current Addiction Reports

, Volume 3, Issue 4, pp 343–348 | Cite as

The Influence of Social Media on Addictive Behaviors in College Students

  • Mai-Ly N. SteersEmail author
  • Megan A. Moreno
  • Clayton Neighbors
Addiction and College Students (D Foster, Section Editor)
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Addiction and College Students

Abstract

Background

Social media has become a primary way for college students to communicate aspects of their daily lives to those within their social network. Such communications often include substance use displays (e.g., selfies of college students drinking). Furthermore, students’ substance use displays have been found to robustly predict not only the poster(s)’ substance use-related outcomes (e.g., consumption, problems) but also that of their social networking peers.

Purpose of Review

The current review summarizes findings of recent literature exploring the intersection between social media and substance use.

Recent Findings

Specifically, we examine how and why such substance use displays might shape college students’ internalized norms surrounding substance use and how they impact their substance use-related behaviors.

Summary

Additional social media-related interventions are needed in order to target reduction of consumption among this at-risk group. We discuss the technological and methodological challenges inherent to conducting this type of research and devising interventions in this domain.

Keywords

Alcohol Marijuana Tobacco Social networking sites University students 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Mai-Ly N. Steers, Megan A. Moreno, and Clayton Neighbors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    Perrin A. Social media usage: 2005–2015. Pew Research Center. October 2015. http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/10/08/2015/Social-Networking-Usage-2005-2015/
  2. 2.•
    Moreno MA, Arseniev-Koehler A, Litt D, Christakis D. Evaluating college students’ displayed alcohol references on Facebook and Twitter. J Adolesc Health. 2016;58(5):527–32. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.01.005. This article examines alcohol-related displays to two popular social networking sites (Twitter and Facebook).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.•
    Boyle SC, LaBrie JW, Froidevaux NM, Witkovic YD. Different digital paths to the keg? How exposure to peers’ alcohol-related social media content influences drinking among male and female first-year college students. Addict Behav. 2016;57:21–9. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.01.011. This article examines alcohol-related content across three popular social media platforms (Facebook, Instagram, and Snapchat) and discusses why students might favor posting on certain platforms above others.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    van Hoof JJ, Bekkers J, van Vuuren M. Son, you’re smoking on Facebook! College students’ disclosures on social networking sites as indicators of real-life risk behaviors. Comput Hum Behav. 2014;34:249–57. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.02.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.••
    Moreno MA, Whitehill JM. #Wasted: the intersection of substance use behaviors and social media in adolescents and young adults. Curr Opin Psychol. 2016;9:72–6. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.10.022. This review article summarizes important trends within this domain and provides important future directions not discussed in the current review.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ridout B, Campbell A, Ellis L. ‘Off your face(book)’: alcohol in online social identity construction and its relation to problem drinking in university students. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2012;31(1):20–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-3362.2010.00277.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Westgate EC, Neighbors C, Heppner H, Jahn S, Lindgren KP. ‘I will take a shot for every ‘Like’ I get on this status’: posting alcohol-related Facebook content is linked to drinking outcomes. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2014;75(3):390–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Moreno MA, Cox ED, Young HN, Haaland W. Underage college students’ alcohol displays on Facebook and real-time alcohol behaviors. J Adolesc Health. 2015;56(6):646–51. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.02.020.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cabrera-Nguyen EP, Cavazos-Rehg P, Krauss M, Bierut LJ, Moreno MA. Young Adults’ exposure to alcohol- and marijuana-related content on twitter. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2016;77(2):349–53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cavazos-Rehg PA, Krauss MJ, Sowles SJ, Bierut LJ. “Hey Everyone, I’m Drunk”. An evaluation of drinking-related Twitter chatter. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2015;76(4):635–43.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Thompson L, Rivara FP, Whitehill JM. Prevalence of marijuana-related traffic on Twitter, 2012–2013: a content analysis. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2015;18(6):311–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Beullens K, Schepers A. Display of alcohol use on Facebook: a content analysis. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2013;16(7):497–503. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2013.0044.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lyons AC, Goodwin I, McCreanor T, Griffin C. Social networking and young adults’ drinking practices: innovative qualitative methods for health behavior research. Health Psychol. 2015;34(4):293–302. doi: 10.1037/hea0000168.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cavazos-Rehg PA, Krauss M, Fisher SL, Salyer P, Grucza RA, Bierut LJ. Twitter chatter about marijuana. J Adolesc Health. 2015;56(2):139–45. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.10.270.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cavazos-Rehg P, Krauss M, Grucza R, Bierut L. Characterizing the followers and tweets of a marijuana-focused Twitter handle. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(6):251–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Myslín M, Zhu S-H, Chapman W, Conway M. Using Twitter to examine smoking behavior and perceptions of emerging tobacco products. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(8):387–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Morgan EM, Snelson C, Elison-Bowers P. Image and video disclosure of substance use on social media websites. Comput Hum Behav. 2010;26(6):1405–11. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.04.017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Moreno MA, D’Angelo J, Kacvinsky LE, Kerr B, Zhang C, Eickhoff J. Emergence and predictors of alcohol reference displays on Facebook during the first year of college. Comput Hum Behav. 2014;30:87–94. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Moreno MA, Briner LR, Williams A, Brockman L, Walker L, Christakis DA. A content analysis of displayed alcohol references on a social networking web site. J Adolesc Health. 2010;47(2):168–75. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.01.001.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Schlenker BR, Dlugolecki DW, Doherty K. The impact of self-presentations on self-appraisals and behavior: the power of public commitment. Personal Soc Psychol Bull. 1994;20(1):20–33. doi: 10.1177/0146167294201002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Miller DT, McFarland C. When social comparison goes awry: the case of pluralistic ignorance. In: Suls J, Wills TA, editors. Social comparison: contemporary theory and research. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc; 1991. p. 287–313.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Prentice DA, Miller DT. Pluralistic ignorance and alcohol use on campus: some consequences of misperceiving the social norm. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1993;64(2):243–56.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Toch H, Klofas J. Pluralistic ignorance, revisited. Prog Appl Soc Psychol. 1984;2:129–59.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Marks G, Miller N. Ten years of research on the false-consensus effect: an empirical and theoretical review. Psychol Bull. 1987;102(1):72–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ross L, Greene D, House P. The false consensus effect: an egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes. J Exp Soc Psychol. 1977;13(3):279–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Fournier AK, Hall E, Ricke P, Storey B. Alcohol and the social network: online social networking sites and college students’ perceived drinking norms. Psychol Pop Media Cult. 2013;2(2):86–95. doi: 10.1037/a0032097.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Litt DM, Stock ML. Adolescent alcohol-related risk cognitions: the roles of social norms and social networking sites. Psychol Addict Behav. 2011;25(4):708–13. doi: 10.1037/a0024226.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Osberg TM, Billingsley K, Eggert M, Insana M. From Animal House to Old School: a multiple mediation analysis of the association between college drinking movie exposure and freshman drinking and its consequences. Addict Behav. 2012;37(8):922–30. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2012.03.030.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Setodji CM, Martino SC, Scharf DM, Shadel WG. Quantifying the persistence of pro-smoking media effects on college students’ smoking risk. J Adolesc Health. 2014;54(4):474–80. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.09.011.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Neighbors C, Larimer ME, Lewis MA. Targeting misperceptions of descriptive drinking norms: efficacy of a computer-delivered personalized normative feedback intervention. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2004;72(3):434–47. doi: 10.1037/0022-006x.72.3.434.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Festinger L. A theory of social comparison processes. Hum Relat. 1954;7:117–40. doi: 10.1177/001872675400700202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Depue JB, Southwell BG, Betzner AE, Walsh BM. Encoded exposure to tobacco use in social media predicts subsequent smoking behavior. Am J Health Promot. 2015;29(4):259–61. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.130214-ARB-69.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Knight JR, Wechsler H, Kuo M, Seibring M, Weitzman ER, Schuckit MA. Alcohol abuse and dependence among US college students. J Stud Alcohol. 2002;63(3):263–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lewis MA, Neighbors C. Optimizing personalized normative feedback: the use of gender-specific referents. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2007;68(2):228–37.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Neighbors C, Lewis MA, Bergstrom RL, Larimer ME. Being controlled by normative influences: self-determination as a moderator of a normative feedback alcohol intervention. Health Psychol. 2006;25(5):571–9. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.25.5.571.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Baer JS, Marlatt GA, Kivlahan DR, Fromme K, Larimer ME, Williams E. An experimental test of three methods of alcohol risk reduction with young adults. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1992;60(6):974.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Marlatt GA, Baer JS, Kivlahan DR, Dimeff LA, Larimer ME, Quigley LA, et al. Screening and brief intervention for high-risk college student drinkers: results from a 2-year follow-up assessment. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1998;66(4):604.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Miller MB, Leffingwell T, Claborn K, Meier E, Walters S, Neighbors C. Personalized feedback interventions for college alcohol misuse: an update of Walters & neighbors (2005). Psychol Addict Behav. 2013;27(4):909.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Neighbors C, Lewis MA, Atkins DC, Jensen MM, Walter T, Fossos N, et al. Efficacy of web-based personalized normative feedback: a two-year randomized controlled trial. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2010. doi: 10.1037/a0020766.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Madden M, Lenhart A, Cortesi S, Gasser U, Duggan M, Smith A et al. Teens, social media, and privacy. Pew Res Center. 2013;21.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Lenhart A. Teen, social media and technology overview 2015. Pew Research Center. April 2015. http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/04/09/teens-social-media-technology-2015/
  42. 42.
    Mahler J. Who spewed that abuse? Anonymous Yik Yak app isn’t telling. The New York Times. 2015 March 9, 2015; p. A1.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Duggan M. Mobile messaging and social media—2015. Pew Research Center. 2015. http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/08/19/mobile-messaging-and-social-media-2015/. August 2015.
  44. 44.••
    Moreno MA, Egan KG, Brockman L. Development of a researcher codebook for use in evaluating social networking site profiles. J Adolesc Health. 2011;49(1):29–35. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.04.015. This article provides important guidelines for coding of substance use displays on social media.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mai-Ly N. Steers
    • 1
    Email author
  • Megan A. Moreno
    • 2
    • 3
  • Clayton Neighbors
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of HoustonHoustonUSA
  2. 2.Seattle Children’s Research InstituteSeattleUSA
  3. 3.Department of PediatricsUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations