Morphological changes and antioxidative capacity of jute (Corchorus capsularis, Malvaceae) under different color light-emitting diodes

  • Muhammad Hamzah SaleemEmail author
  • Muzammal Rehman
  • Muhammad Zahid
  • Muhammad Imran
  • Wei Xiang
  • Lijun LiuEmail author
Original Article


Light quality is an important environmental factor controlling plant growth and development. On the other hand, jute (Corchorus capsularis L.) (jute) is sensitive to light quality and the factory production of C. capsularis for vegetable use and for transplanting in the field requires an investigation of the responses of C. capsularis to light quality. For this purpose, a pot experiment was conducted to investigate the effect of different color light-emitting diodes (LED) on growth, chlorophyll contents, reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and antioxidative defense system in C. capsularis under glasshouse environment. Different light-emitting diodes were used in this study: white light (WL), red light (RL), dark red light (DL), mixed dark red light (ML), blue light (BL) and orange light (OL). Results showed that RL, DL and ML significantly (P ≤ 0.05) increased plant height, crown length and plant biomass as compared with control (WL). All red-light spectrum, i.e., RL, DL and ML, improved leaf development, but decreased malondialdehyde (MDA) and proline contents as well as activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and peroxidase (POD). Meanwhile, chlorophyll contents were also augmented. In contrast, BL and OL reduced plant growth, biomass, chlorophyll contents and increased activities of SOD, POD, content of proline, MDA, and reduced the total soluble protein which suggested that plants grown under BL and OL undergo high environmental stress. These results depicted that all red lights, i.e., red, dark red, mixed red lights, can be effectively implemented for industrial production of C. capsularis.


Growth Proline White jute 



This research was supported by China Agriculture Research System project (CARS-16-E10) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31571717).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.


  1. Arnon DT (1949) Copper enzyme in isolated chloroplasts polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiol 24:1–15PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bates LS, Waldren RP, Teare ID (1973) Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant Soil 39:205–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bourget CM (2008) An introduction to light-emitting diodes. HortScience 43:1944–1946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cai X, Kang XY (2011) In vitro tetraploid induction from leaf explants of Populus pseudosimonii Kitag. Plant Cell Rep 30:1771–1778PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen CN, Pan SM (1996) Assay of superoxide dismutase activity by combining electrophoresis and densitometry. Bot Bull Acad Sin 37:107–111Google Scholar
  6. Chen XL, Guo WZ, Xue XZ, Wang LC, Qiao XJ (2014) Growth and quality responses of ‘Green Oak Leaf’ lettuce as affected by monochromic or mixed radiation provided by fluorescent lamp(FL) and light-emitting diode (LED). Sci Hortic 172:168–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cope KR, Bugbee B (2013) Spectral effects of three types of white light-emitting diodes on plant growth and development: absolute versus relative amounts of blue light. HortScience 48:504–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Das K, Roychoudhury A (2014) Reactive oxygen species (ROS) and response of antioxidants as ROS-scavengers during environmental stress in plants. Front Environ Sci. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Deng Y, Shao QS, Li CC, Ye XQ, Tang RS (2012) Differential responses of double petal and multi petal jasmine to shading: II. Morphology, anatomy and physiology. Sci Hortic 144:19–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fan XX, Xu ZG, Liu XY, Tang CM, Wang LW, Han XL (2013) Effects of light intensity on the growth and leaf development of young tomato plants grown under a combination of red and blue light. Sci Hortic 153:50–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Faruk O, Bledzki AK, Fink HP, Sain M (2012) Biocomposites reinforced with natural fibers: 2000–2010. Prog Poly Sci 37:1552–1596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fazal H, Abbasi BH, Ahmad N, Ali SS, Akbar F, Kanwal F (2016) Correlation of different spectral lights with biomass accumulation and production of antioxidant secondary metabolites in callus cultures of medicinally important Prunella vulgaris L. Photochem Photobiol. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fukuda N, Fujita M, Ohta Y, Sase S, Nishimura S, Ezura H (2008) Directional blue light irradiation triggers epidermal cell elongation of abaxial side resulting in inhibition of leaf epinasty in geranium under red light condition. SciHortic 115:176–182Google Scholar
  14. Goins GD, Ruffe LM, Cranston NA, Yorio NC, Wheeler RM, Sager JC (2001) Salad crop production under different wavelengths of red light-emitting diodes (LEDs). In: SAE technical paper, 31st international conference on environmental systems, July 9–12, 2001, Orlando, Florida, USA, pp 1–9Google Scholar
  15. Gupta SD, Jatothu B (2013) Fundamentals and applications of light-emitting diodes (LEDs) in in vitro plant growth and morphogenesis. Plant Biotechnol Rep 7:211–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gyula P, Schafer E, Nagy F (2003) Light perception and signaling in higher plants. Curr Opin Plant Boil 6:446–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Haliapas S, Yupsanis TA, Syros TD, Kofidis G, Economou AS (2008) Petunia 9 hybrida during transition to flowering as affected by light intensity and quality treatments. Acta Physiol Plant 30:807–815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Halliwell B, Gutteridge JMC (2007) Free radicals in biology and medicine. Oxford University Press, NewYork, p 888Google Scholar
  19. Heath RL, Packer L (1968) Photoperoxidation in isolated chloroplasts: I. Kinetics and stoichiometry of fatty acid peroxidation. Arch Biochem Biophys 125:189–198PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Hogewoning SW, Trouwborst G, Maljaars H, Poorter H, van Ieperen W, Harbinson J (2010) Blue light dose–responses of leaf photosynthesis, morphology, and chemical composition of Cucumis sativus grown under different combinations of red and blue light. J Exp Bot 61(11):3107–3117PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Islam MM, Rahman MM (2008) Hand book on agricultural technologies of jute, kenaf and mesta crops, vol 1207. Bangladesh Jute Research Institute, Dhaka, pp 5–76Google Scholar
  22. Janda T, Majláth I, Szalai G (2014) Interaction of temperature and light in the development of freezing tolerance in plants. J Plant Growth Regul 30:460–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jiao K, Li X, Guo Y, Guan Y, Guo W, Luo D, Hu Z, Shen Z (2019) Regulation of compound leaf development in mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) by cupshaped Ccotyledon/no apical meristem (CUC/NAM) gene. Planta 249(3):765–774. PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Jishi T, Kimura K, Matsda R, Fujiwara K (2016) Effects of temporally shifted irradiation of blue and red LED light on cos lettuce growth and morphology. Sci Hortic 198:227–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kami C, Lorrain S, Homitschek P, Fankhauser C (2010) Chapter two: light regulated plant growth and development. Plant Dev 91:29–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kavi-Kishor PB, Sangam S, Amrutha RN, Sri Laxmi P, Naidu KR, Rao KRSS, Rao S, Reddy KJ, Theriappan P, Sreenivasulu N (2005) Regulation of proline biosynthesis, degradation, uptake and transport in higher plants: its implications in plant growth and abiotic stress tolerance. Curr Sci 88:424–438Google Scholar
  27. Kim H-H, Goins GD, Wheeler RM, Sager JC (2004) Green-light supplementation for enhanced lettuce growth. PLoS ONE 9:85996Google Scholar
  28. Kobayashi K, Amore T, Lazaro M (2013) Light-emitting diodes (LEDs) for miniature hydroponic lettuce. Opt Photon J 3:74–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kozlowski R, Mieleniak B, Helwig M, Przepiera A (1999) Flame resistant lignocellulosic-mineral composite particleboards. Poly Deg Stabil 64:523–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Li Q, Kubota C (2009) Effects of supplemental light quality on growth and phytochemicals of baby leaf lettuce. Environ Exp Bot 67:59–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lin C (2000) Photoreceptors and regulation of flowering time. Plant Physiol 12:39–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Liu Y, Li X, Liu M, Cao B, Tan H, Wang J, Li X (2012) Responses of three different ecotypes of reed (Phragmites communis Trin.) to their natural habitats: leaf surface micro-morphology, anatomy, chloroplast ultrastructure and physio-chemical characteristics. Plant Physiol Biochem 51:159–167PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Liu Q, Zheng L, Zhao F, Shen Z, Zheng L (2015) Transcriptional and physiological analyses identify a regulatory role for hydrogen peroxide in the lignin biosynthesis of copper-stressed rice roots. Plant Soil 387:323–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ma X, Zhang X, Yang L, Tang M, Wang K, Wang L, Bai L, Song C (2019) Hydrogen peroxide plays an important role in PERK4-mediated abscisic acid regulated root growth in Arabidopsis. J Funct Plant Biol 46(2):165–174. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mastropasqua L, Borraccino G, Bianco L, Paciolla C (2012) Light qualities and dose influence ascorbate pool size in detached oat leaves. Plant Sci 183:57–64PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Maxwell K, Johnson GN (2000) Chlorophyll fluorescence-a practical guide. J Exp Bot 51:659–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Michael A, Huo FS, Ulven CA (2012) Natural fiber reinforced composites. Poly Rev 52:259–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mitchell CA, Both A, Bourget CM, Kuboto C, Lopez RG, Morrow RC, Runkle S (2012) LEDs: the future of greenhouse lighting. Chron Hortic 55:6–12Google Scholar
  39. Mittal S, Kumari N, Sharma V (2012) Differential response of salt stress on Brassica juncea: photosynthetic performance, pigment, proline, D1 and antioxidant enzymes. Plant Physiol Biochem 54:17–26PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Mittler R (2002) Oxidative stress, antioxidants and stress tolerance. Trends Plant Sci 7:405–410PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nanya K, Ishigami Y, Hikosaka S, Goto E (2012) Effects of blue and red light on stem elongation and flowering of tomato seedlings. Acta Hortic 956:261–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nascimento LB, Leal-Costa MV, Coutinho MA, Moreira Ndos S, Lage CL, Barbi Ndos S, Costa SS, Tavares ES (2013) Increased antioxidant activity and changes in phenolic profile of Kalanchoe pinnata (Lamarck) Persoon (Crassulaceae) specimens grown under supplemental blue light. Photochem Photobiol 89:391–399PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Prochazkova D, Sairam RK, Srivastava GC, Singh DV (2001) Oxidative stress and antioxidant activity as the basis of senescence in maize leaves. Plant Sci 161:765–771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rehman M, Ullah S, Bao Y, Wang B, Peng D, Liu L (2017) Light-emitting diodes: Whether an efficient source of light for indoor plants? Envi Sci Poll R. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sæbø A, Krekling T, Appelgren M (1995) Light quality affects photosynthesis and leaf anatomy of birch plantlets in vitro. Plant Cell Tissue Org 41:177–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sakharov IY, Aridilla GB (1999) Variation of peroxidase activity in cacao beans during their ripening, fermentation and drying. Food Chem 65:51–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Shao QS, Wang HZ, Guo HP, Zhou AC, Huang YQ, Sun YL, Li MY (2014) Effects of shade treatments on photosynthetic characteristics, chloroplast ultrastructure, and physiology of Anoectochilus roxburghii. PLoS ONE 9:e85996PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sharma P, Jha AB, Dubey RS, Pessarakli M (2012) Reactive oxygen species, oxidative damage, and antioxidative defense mechanism in plants under stressful conditions. J Bot 26:1–26. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Shimizu H, Saito Y, Nakashima H, Miyasaka J, Ohdoi K (2011) Light environment optimization for lettuce growth in plant factory. In: Proceedings of the 18th IFAC world congress, vol 18, pp 605–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Shohael A, Ali M, Yu K, Hahn E, Islam R, Paek K (2006) Effect of light on oxidative stress, secondary metabolites and induction of antioxidant enzymes in Eleutherococcus senticosus somatic embryos in bioreactor. Process Biochem 41:1179–1185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Simlat M, Slezak P, Mos M, Warchol M, Skrzypek E, Ptak A (2016) The effect of light quality on seed germination, seedling growth and selected biochemical properties of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni. Sci Hortic 211:295–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Singh H, Singh JIP, Singh S, Dhawan V, Tiwari SK (2018) A brief review of jute fibre and its composites. Mater Today 5:28427–28437Google Scholar
  53. Stepien P, Klobus G (2005) Antioxidant defense in the leaves of C3 and C4 plants under salinity stress. Physiol Plant 125:31–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Szabados L, Savoure A (2010) Proline: a multifunctional amino acid. Trends Plant Sci 15:89–97PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  55. Terfa MT, Solhaug KA, Gislerød HR, Olsen JE, Torre S (2013) A high proportion of blue light increases the photosynthesis capacity and leaf formation rate of Rosa × hybrid but does not affect time to flower opening. Physiol Plant 148:146–159PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  56. Thiruchitrambalam M, Athijayamani A, Sathiyamurth S, Thaheer ASA (2010) A review on the natural fiber-reinforced polymer composites for the development of roselle fiber-reinforced polyester composite. J Nat Fib 7:307–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wang YC, Zhang HX, Zhao B, Yuan XF (2001) Improved growth of Artemisia annua L. hairy roots and artemisinin production under red light conditions. Biotech Lett 23:1971–1973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wojciechowska R, Kolton A, Dlugosz-Grochowska O, Knop E (2016) Nitrate content in Valerianella locusta L. plants is affected by supplemental LED lighting. Sci Hortic 211:179–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Xuan Y, Duffy CJ, Rousseau AN, Bhatt G, Pardo A, Charron D (2016) Learning integrated modeling of coupled surface-subsurface flow. Earth Space Sci 3:190–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Yu W, Liu Y, Song L, Jacobs DF, Du X, Ying Y, Shao Q, Wu J (2016) Effect of differential light quality on morphology, photosynthesis, and antioxidant enzyme activity in Camptotheca acuminata seedlings. J Plant Growth Regul. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Zoratti L, Karppinen K, Escobar AL, Häggman H, Jaakola L (2014) Light-controlled flavonoid biosynthesis in fruits. Front Plant Sci 5:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Botanical Society of Sao Paulo 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Muhammad Hamzah Saleem
    • 1
    Email author
  • Muzammal Rehman
    • 2
  • Muhammad Zahid
    • 3
  • Muhammad Imran
    • 4
  • Wei Xiang
    • 1
  • Lijun Liu
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.MOA Key Laboratory of Crop Ecophysiology and Farming System in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River, College of Plant Science and TechnologyHuazhong Agricultural UniversityWuhanChina
  2. 2.School of AgricultureYunnan UniversityKunmingChina
  3. 3.Department of AgronomyUniversity of AgricultureFaisalabadPakistan
  4. 4.Department of Crop Science and Technology, College of AgricultureSouth China Agricultural UniversityGuangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations