Advertisement

Do preschoolers with adverse birth outcomes have more distress during dental examination?

  • Ana Paula Mundim
  • Patrícia Corrêa-Faria
  • Luciane Rezende CostaEmail author
Original Scientific Article
  • 12 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

Studies assessing the influence of neonatal complications on children’s dental behaviour are lacking. We aimed to investigate whether prematurity, birth weight, and history of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) hospitalisation are associated with distress during dental examination in children.

Methods

This preliminary longitudinal, retrospective study included 42 5- and 6-year-old children. Distress during dental examination was assessed using the observational FLACC Pain Assessment Tool through video files. Children self-reported their pain (Faces Pain Scale-Revised) at the end of the session. Information about neonatal complications was obtained through medical records. Bivariate analysis was performed (P < 0.05).

Results

Children with low birth weight (P = 0.047) and toothache history (P = 0.005) had higher frequency of distress during dental examination. There was no association between distress, prematurity and history of NICU hospitalisation (P > 0.05).

Conclusions

Health professionals can help to disseminate the knowledge that children with history of low birth weight are more prone to perceive distress with apparently painless procedures.

Keywords

Intensive care neonatal Infant low birth weight Child preschool Pain measurement Dental care for children 

Notes

Funding

APM received Master of Science scholarship from the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Goiás (FAPEG). PCF receives Post-doctoral fellowship scholarship from the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (Capes). LRC receives Research Productivity scholarship from the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq). These funding agencies have not interfered in any stage of the preparation of this study and this manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All the procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments, as well as with the Brazilian national guidelines.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from the adults responsible for all individual participants included in this study.

References

  1. Babl FE, Crellin D, Cheng J, et al. The use of the faces, legs, activity, cry and consolability scale to assess procedural pain and distress in young children. Pediatri Emerg Care. 2012;28:1281–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bieri D, Reeve RA, Champion GD, Addicoat L, Ziegler JB. The Faces Pain Scale for the self-assessment of the severity of pain experienced by children: development, initial validation, and preliminary investigation for ratio scale properties. Pain. 1990;41:139–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blencowe H, Cousens S, Oestergaard MZ, et al. National, regional, and worldwide estimates of preterm birth rates in the year 2010 with time trends since 1990 for selected countries: a systematic analysis and implications. Lancet. 2012;379:2162–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bouza H. The impact of pain in the immature brain. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009;22:722–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brogårdh-Roth S, Stjernqvist K, Matsson L. Dental behavioural management problems and dental caries prevalence in 3- to 6-year-old Swedish children born preterm. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2008;18:341–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burnett AC, Scratch SE, Lee KJ, et al. Victorian Infant Collaborative Study Group. Executive function in adolescents born %3c 1000 g or %3c 28 weeks: a prospective cohort study. Pediatrics. 2015;135:e826–e834834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carbajal R, Rousset A, Danan C, et al. Epidemiology and treatment of painful procedures in neonates in intensive care units. JAMA. 2008;300:60–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Charry CLE, Piola JS, Linhares MBM, Silva JA. Validity and reliability assessment of the Brazilian version of the Faces Pain Scale-Revised. Psychol Neurosci. 2014;7:55–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Conrad AL, Richman L, Lindgren S, Nopoulos P. Biological and environmental predictors of behavioral sequelae in children born preterm. Pediatrics. 2010;125:e83–e8989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Delobel-Ayoub M, Arnaud C, White-Koning M, et al. Behavioral problems and cognitive performance at 5 years of age after very preterm birth: the EPIPAGE study. Pediatrics. 2009;123:1485–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Farooqi A, Hägglöf B, Sedin G, Gothefors L, Serenius F. Mental health and social competencies of 10-to 12-year-old children born at 23 to 25 weeks of gestation in the 1990s: a Swedish national prospective follow-up study. Pediatrics. 2007;120:118–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gaspardo CM, Cassiano RGM, Gracioli SMA, Furini GCB, Linhares MBM. Effects of neonatal pain and temperament on attention problems in toddlers born preterm. J Pediatr Psychol. 2001;43:342–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gomes HS, Vieira LA, Costa PS, Batista AC, Costa LR. Professional dental prophylaxis increases salivary cortisol in children with dental behavioural management problems: a longitudinal study. BMC Oral Health. 2016;16:74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hack M, Taylor HG, Schluchter M, et al. Behavioral outcomes of extremely low birth weight children at age 8 years. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2009;30:122–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hicks CL, von Baeyer CL, Spafford PA, van Korlaar I, Goodenough B. The Faces Pain Scale-Revised: toward a common metric in pediatric pain measurement. Pain. 2001;93:173–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Johnson S, Marlow N. Preterm birth and childhood psychiatric disorders. Pediatr Res. 2011;69:11R–8R.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Johnston C, Barrington KJ, Taddio A, Carbajal R, Filion F. Pain in Canadian NICUs: have we improved over the past 12 years? Clin J Pain. 2011;27:225–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Klein VC, Gaspardo CM, Martinez FE, Grunau RE, Linhares MB. Pain and distress reactivity and recovery as early predictors of temperament in toddlers born preterm. Early Hum Dev. 2009;85:569–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Latimer K, Wilson P, Kemp J, et al. Disruptive behaviour disorders: a systematic review of environmental antenatal and early years risk factors. Child Care Health Dev. 2012;38:611–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Merkel SI, Voepel-Lewis T, Shayevitz JR, Malviya S. The FLACC: a behavioral scale for scoring postoperative pain in young children. Pediatr Nurs. 1997;23:293–7.Google Scholar
  21. Puffer RR, Serrano C. Patterns of birth weight. Washington, DC: PAHO; 1987.Google Scholar
  22. Ramos-Jorge ML, Marques LS, Paiva SM, Serra-Negra JM, Pordeus IA. Predictive factors for child behaviour in the dental environment. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2006;7:253–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Schwaller F, Fitzgerald M. The consequences of pain in early life: injury-induced plasticity in developing pain pathways. Eur J Neurosci. 2014;39:344–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Scott MN, Taylor HG, Fristad MA, et al. Behavior disorders in extremely preterm/extremely low birth weight children in kindergarten. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2012;33:202–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tomlinson D, von Baeyer CL, Stinson JN, Sung L. A systematic review of faces scales for the self-report of pain intensity in children. Pediatrics. 2010;126:e1168–e1198198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tsang AK. The special needs of preterm children—an oral health perspective. Dent Clin North Am. 2016;60:737–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. WHO. Recommended definitions, terminology and format for statistical tables related to the perinatal period and use of a new certificate for cause perinatal period and use of a new certificate for cause perinatal deaths. Modifications recommended by FIGO as amended October 14, 1976. Acta Obastet Gynecol Scand. 1977;56:247–53.Google Scholar
  28. World Health Organization. Oral health surveys: basic methods. 3rd ed. Geneva: ORH/EPID; 1987.Google Scholar
  29. Xia B, Wang CL, Ge LH. Factors associated with dental behaviour management problems in children aged 2–8 years in Beijing, China. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2011;21:200–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Zhou Y, Humphris GM. Reassurance and distress behavior in preschool children undergoing dental preventive care procedures in a community setting: a multilevel observational study. Ann Behav Med. 2014;48:100–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Hospital DentistryHospital Geral de Palmas Dr. Francisco AyresPalmasBrazil
  2. 2.Dentistry Graduate Program, Faculdade de OdontologiaUniversidade Federal de GoiásGoiâniaBrazil
  3. 3.Dentistry Graduate Program, Department of Oral Health, Faculdade de OdontologiaUniversidade Federal de GoiásGoiâniaBrazil

Personalised recommendations