Advertisement

Effect of several try-in attempts of crimped preformed metal crowns on their circumference

  • A. Heidari
  • M. Shahrabi
  • M. S. ShahrabiEmail author
  • P. Daeeyan
  • M. Meskin
Original Scientific Article
  • 4 Downloads

Abstract

Aim

To assess whether several try-in attempts change the circumference of preformed metal crowns (PMCs).

Methods

This in vitro, experimental study was performed on 68 PMCs of maxillary and mandibular molars that required crimping. First, a photograph was obtained of the gingival margin of each crown using a digital camera (fixed at a specific distance). Crown margins were then crimped using 114 pliers. The second photograph was obtained under the same conditions as the first one. After crimping, the crowns were removed using an excavator to assess the amount of crimping. This was repeated for the second time and a photograph was obtained after each time of PMC removal. The crown was crimped again and tried on the tooth and a photograph was obtained after completion of each phase. Photographs were saved in a computer and the circumference of the crowns was calculated using AutoCAD software.

Results

The reduction in circumference of the crowns following the first crimping was greater for the primary second molars than for the primary first molars and was on average 0.87%. After trying the crowns on teeth, the circumference of the crowns increased on average by 0.33%. This increase was 0.53% after trying the crowns for the second time. The reduction in circumference after the second crimping was 0.51%. There was an increase in circumference after re-trying of 0.35%. Changes in circumference of the crowns after the first (p = 0.037) and second (p = 0.00) try-in attempts were statistically significant.

Conclusions

Re-crimping is necessary after trying the crown on tooth and prior to cementation.

Keywords

Preformed Metal Crowns Circumference Thickness Marginal Fit Crimp 

Notes

Acknowledgements

No funding has been received for the conduct of this study and /or preparation of this manuscript.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

There is no conflict of interest to declare.

Research involving Human Participants and/or Animals

This Study was approved in the ethic committee of our university (Code: 6166).

Informed consent

Parent signed informed consent forms.

References

  1. Afshar H, Mozafari Kojidi M. Evaluation of marginal circumference and marginal thickness changes in precrimped stainless steel crowns, after recrimping. Journal of Dental Medicine. 2006;19(2):57–62.Google Scholar
  2. Afshar H, Ghandehari M, Soleimani B. Comparison of Marginal Circumference of Two Different Pre-Crimped Stainless Steel Crowns for Primary Molars After Re-Crimping. J Dent (Tehran). 2015;12(12):926–31.Google Scholar
  3. AlShaibah WMB, El-Shehaby FA, El-Dokky NA, Ala’a RR. Comparative study on the microbial adhesion to preveneered and stainless steel crowns. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2012;30(3):206–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Croll TP, Killian CM. Zinc oxide-eugenol pulpotomy and stainless steel crown restoration of a primary molar. Quintessence Int. 1992;23(6):383–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Croll TP, Epstein DW, Castaldi CR. Marginal adaptation of stainless steel crowns. Pediatr Dent. 2003;25(3):249–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Dawson LR, Simon JF Jr, Taylor PP. Use of amalgam and stainless steel restorations for primary molars. ASDC J Dent Child. 1981;48(6):420–2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Full CA, Walker JD, Pinkham JR. Stainless steel crowns for deciduous molars. J Am Dent Assoc. 1974;89(2):360–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Henderson HZ. Evaluation of the preformed stainless steel crown. ASDC J Dent Child. 1973;40(5):353–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Kowolik J, Kozlowski D, Jones JE. Utilization of stainless steel crowns by general dentists and pediatric dental specialists in Indiana. J Indiana Dent Assoc. 2007;86(2):16–21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Kramer N, Frankenberger R. Compomers in restorative therapy of children: a literature review. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2007;17(1):2–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Martens LC, Dermaut LR. The marginal polishing of Ion Ni-Chro crowns: a preliminary report. ASDC J Dent Child. 1983;50(6):417–21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Mathewson RJ, Primosch RE, Robertson D. Fundamentals of pediatric dentistry. Quintessence; 1995.Google Scholar
  13. McDonald RE, Avery DR. Dentistry for the child and adolescent. 7th ed. Mosby; 1999.Google Scholar
  14. Pinkham J. Pediatric Dentistry-Infancy through Adolescence, Elseveir, a division of Reed Elsevier India Pvt. Ltd; 2005.Google Scholar
  15. Pour FF, Ghafournia M. A review of the efficacy of stainless steel crowns in the restoration of primary molars. Journal of Isfahan Dental School. 2012;8(2).Google Scholar
  16. Rapp R. A simplified yet precise technic for the placement of stainless steel crowns on primary teeth. J Dent Child. 1966;33(2):101–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Soxman JA. Stainless steel crown and pulpotomy: procedure and technique for primary molars. Gen Dent. 2000;48(3):294–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Stewart RE. Pediatric dentistry: Scientific foundations and clinical practice. CV Mosby Company; 1982.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Heidari
    • 1
  • M. Shahrabi
    • 1
  • M. S. Shahrabi
    • 1
    Email author
  • P. Daeeyan
    • 2
  • M. Meskin
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Pediatric DentistryTehran University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
  2. 2.Dentist, Private PracticeTehranIran

Personalised recommendations