Efficacy of external cold and a vibrating device in reducing discomfort of dental injections in children: A split mouth randomised crossover study
To study the discomfort and fear associated with maxillary infiltration injections when using a combination of external cold and a commercially available vibrating device.
A total of 60 children aged 7 years old participated in this split mouth randomised crossover study. The control intervention comprised of the administration of 1.8 ml of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 adrenaline using a 24 mm 30 gauge needle, while the test intervention used external cold and a commercially available vibrating device in addition to the control protocol. The heart rate of the child at the time of injection was used as an objective measure and the Wong–Baker pain scale was used as a subjective measure of the child’s discomfort. The face, limbs, arms, cry and consolability (FLACC) scale was used to record the child’s pain as perceived by the dentist.
Children reported a significantly lower Wong–Baker score and the operators observed a significantly lower heart rate and FLACC scores in the test visit than the control visit.
Combining external cold with vibrating devices might be effective in reducing discomfort and fear in children undergoing infiltration dental analgesia.
Clinical trials Identifier
KeywordsDental anesthesia Fear Behaviour management
The authors would like to acknowledge the Ministry of Health, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia for supporting the lead author during his graduate study period.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors have no potential sources of conflict of interest.
- Ching D, Finkelman M, Loo CY. Effect of the DentalVibe injection system on pain during local anesthesia injections in adolescent patients. Pediatr Dent. 2014;36:51–5.Google Scholar
- Frankl S, Shiere F, Fogels H. Should the parent remain with the child in the dental operatory. J Dent Child. 1962;29:150–62.Google Scholar
- Jalevik B, Klingberg G. Pain sensation and injection techniques in maxillary dento-alveolar surgery procedures in children–a comparison between conventional and computerized injection techniques (The Wand). Swed Dent J. 2014;38:67–75.Google Scholar
- Kilinc G, Akay A, Eden E, Sevinc N, Ellidokuz H. Evaluation of children’s dental anxiety levels at a kindergarten and at a dental clinic. Braz Oral Res. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2016.vol30.0072 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Roeber B, Wallace DP, Rothe V, Salama F, Allen KD. Evaluation of the effects of the VibraJect attachment on pain in children receiving local anesthesia. Pediatr Dent. 2011;33:46–50.Google Scholar
- Voepel-Lewis T, Shayevitz JR, Malviya S. The FLACC: a behavioral scale for scoring postoperative pain in young children. Pediatr Nurs. 1997;23:293–7.Google Scholar
- Wright G. Children’s behavior in the dental office. In: Wright GZ editor. Behavior management in dentistry for children. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co; 1975. p. 55–72.Google Scholar