The role of external aetiological factors in dental anomalies in non-syndromic cleft lip and palate patients
- 5 Downloads
The hypothesis tested was whether proper tooth development in cleft lip and palate (CLP) patients is affected by early orthopaedic treatment (EOT), primary surgical interventions and palatal defects after primary palatoplasty.
The prospective study groups comprised 369 CLP children (aged 11.0 ± 4.5 years) and 500 healthy children (aged 11.1 ± 3.8 years) aged > 6 years without any diseases associated with increased risk of dental anomalies. Patients were examined clinically and radiologically. Primary treatment details and outcomes were extracted from the hospital records registry and analysed to evaluate the role of possible external aetiological factors in dental abnormalities.
Selective tooth aplasia was the commonest dental abnormality with upper lateral incisors missing in 33.9% of CLP patients and 3.4% of controls. Central incisor agenesis was restricted to early primary periosteoplasty cases. Lateral incisor aplasia on the cleft side was significantly associated with palatal defect (P = 0.0003) and primary lip surgery type (P = 0.008). The prevalence of developmental enamel defects (DEDs) correlated with primary surgical procedure (P = 0.002), palatal defect and lack of EOT (P = 0.03 and 0.04, respectively).
Surgical trauma during early primary periosteoplasty, reduced blood supply associated with palatal defects and absence of EOT significantly increase the prevalence of frontal tooth anomalies. The prevalence of dental abnormalities in CLP patients depends on treatment protocol.
KeywordsCleft lip and palate Teeth abnormalities Periosteoplasty External factors
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
Authors declare no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
- Dubowik M, Paradowska A, Dubowik I, Szelag J. Comparison of dental age using Demirjian’s method in children with cleft lip, alveolus and palate with non-cleft children. Dent Med Probl. 2011;48:388–92.Google Scholar
- Lehtonen V, Anttonen V, Ylikontiola LP, et al. Dental anomalies associated with cleft lip and palate in Northern Finland. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2015;16(4):327–32.Google Scholar
- Paradowska-Stolarz A, Dubowik M, Szeląg J, Kawala B. Dental anomalies in the incisor-canine region in patients with cleft lip and palate—literature review. Dev Period Med. 2014;18(1):66–9.Google Scholar
- Rullo R, Festa VM, Rullo R, Addabbo F, et al. Prevalence of dental anomalies in children with cleft lip and unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2015;16(3):229–32.Google Scholar
- Sperber G, Sperber S, Guttman G. Craniofacial embryogenetics and development. Raleigh, North Carolina: Peoples Medical Publishing House; 2010.Google Scholar
- Starikova NV, Nadtochiĭ AG, Safronova IuA, Fomina GI, Volkova KN. Tongue structure, position and function in cleft lip and palate children assessed by ultrasound examination. Stomatologiia (Mosk). 2012;91(3):56–60.Google Scholar