Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

In vitro comparison of microleakge between preformed metal crowns and aesthetic crowns of primary molars using different adhesive luting cements

  • Original Scientific Article
  • Published:
European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim

To assess and compare the microleakage extent between preformed metal crowns (PMCs), preveneered PMCs and zirconia crowns using different adhesive luting cements.

Methods

Thirty-six primary first molars were divided into three groups (n = 12) each prepared to receive different crowns (PMCs, preveneered PMCs, or zirconia crowns). Each group was further sub-grouped (n = 4) according to the luting cement (resin cement, resin modified glass ionomer cement, or glass ionomer cement). After cementation, the teeth were thermocycled, placed in 0.5% basic fuchsin, and sectioned to assess dye penetration. The results were analysed using ANOVA and Bonferroni statistical tests. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05.

Results

The microleakage recorded in zirconia crowns was significantly worse than that in preveneered PMCs and PMCs (p < 0.001). Regardless of the crown type, resin cement resulted in the least microleakage with statistically significant differences from glass ionomer cement (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

As far as microleakage is concerned, preveneered PMCs seem to be an aesthetic and suitable alternative to PMCs. In addition, resin cement stands to be the most optimum luting cement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blatz MB, Sadan A, Martin J, Lang B. In vitro evaluation of shear bond strengths of resin to densely-sintered high-purity zirconium-oxide ceramic after long-term storage and thermal cycling. J Prosthet Dent. 2004;91:356–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Clinical relevance of laboratory fatigue studies. J Dent. 1994;22(2):97–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen L, Suh BI. Bonding of resin materials to all-ceramics: a review. Curr Res Dent. 2012;3:7–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erdemci ZY, Cehreli SB, Tirali RE. Hall versus conventional stainless steel crown techniques: in vitro investigation of marginal fit and microleakage using three different luting agents. Pediatr Dent. 2011;36(4):286–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ettinger RL, Kambhu PP, Asmussen CM, Damiano PC. An in vitro evaluation of the integrity of stainless steel crown margins cemented with differentluting agents. Spec Care Dent. 1998;18(2):78–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Innes NPT, Ricketts D, Chong LY et al. Preformed crowns for decayed primary molar teeth (review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;12:CD005512. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kindelan SA, Day P, Nichol R, Willmott N, Fayle SA, British Society of Pediatric Dentistry. UK National Clinical Guidelines in Pediatric Dentistry: stainless steel preformed crowns for primary molars. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2008;1:20–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kratunova E, O’Connell AC. A randomized clinical trial investigating the performance of two commercially available posterior pediatric preveneered stainless steel crowns: a continuation study. Pediatr Dent. 2014;36:494–98.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leith R, O’Connell AC. A clinical study evaluating success of 2 commercially available preveneered primary molar stainless steel crowns. Pediatr Dent. 2011;33:300–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig KH, Fontana M, Vinson LA, Platt JA, Dean JA. The success of stainless steel crowns placed with the Hall technique: a retrospective study. J Am Dent Assoc. 2014;145(12):1248–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Memarpour M, Mesbahi M, Rezvani G, Rahimi M. Microleakage of adhesive and nonadhesive luting cements for stainless steel crowns. Pediatr Dent. 2011;33(7):501–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mjör IA. Dentin permeability: the basis for understanding pulp reactions and adhesive technology. Braz Dent J. 2009;20(1):3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noda Y, Nakajima M, Takahashi M, et al. The effect of five kinds of surface treatment agents on the bond strength to various ceramics with thermocycle aging. Dent Mater J. 2017. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2016-383.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pashley DH. Clinical considerations of microleakage. J Endod. 1990;16(2):70–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piwowarczyk A, Lauer HC, Sorensen JA. Microleakage of various cementing agents for full cast crowns. Dent Mater J. 2005;21(5):445–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raskin A, D’Hoore W, Gonthier S, Degrange M, Déjou J. Reliability of in vitro microleakage tests: a literature review. J Adhes Dent. 2001;3(4):295–308.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ruyter EI, Vajeeston N, Knarvang T, Kvam K. A novel etching technique for surface treatment of zirconia ceramics to improve adhesion of resin-based luting cements. Acta Biomater Odontol Scand. 2017;3(1):36–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sener I, Turker B, Valandro LF, Ozcan M. Marginal gap, cement thickness, and microleakage of 2 zirconia crown systems luted with glass ionomer and MDP-based cements. Gen Dent. 2014:67–70.

  • Seraj B, Shahrabi M, Motahari P, et al. Microleakage of stainless steel crowns placed on intact and extensively destroyed primary first molars: an in vitro study. Pediatr Dent. 2011;33:525–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shiflett K, White SN. Microleakage of cements for stainless steel crowns. Pediatr Dent. 1997;19(4):262–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka T, Kamada K, Matsumura H, Atsuta M. A comparison of water temperatures for thermocycling of metal-bonded resin specimens. J Prosthet Dent. 1995;74(4):345–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor MJ, Lynch E. Microleakage. J Dent. 1992;20(1):3–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uo M, Sjgren G, Sundh A et al. Cytotoxicity and bonding property of dental ceramics. Dent Mater J. 2003;19:487–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uo M, Sjögren G, Sundh A et al. Effect of surface condition of dental zirconia ceramic (Denzir) on bonding. Dent Mater J. 2006;25(3):626–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waggoner WF. Restoring primary anterior teeth. Pediatr Dent. 2002;24(5):511–16.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz Y, Dalmis A, Gurbuz T, Simsek S. Retentive force and microleakage of stainless steel crowns cemented with three different luting agents. Dent Mater J. 2004;23(4):577–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz Y, Gurbuz T, Eyuboglu O, Belduz N. The repair of preveneered posterior stainless steel crowns. Pediatr Dent. 2008;30(5):429–35.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge Qassim University, represented by the Deanship of Scientific Research, on the material support for this research under the Number “Dent-2016-1-12-s-1504” during the academic year 2016.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthodontics and Paediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Qassim University, PO Box 6700, Qassim, 51452, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

    S. N. Al-Haj Ali

  2. Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Qassim University, Qassim, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

    R. I. Farah

Authors
  1. S. N. Al-Haj Ali
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R. I. Farah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. N. Al-Haj Ali.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Al-Haj Ali, S.N., Farah, R.I. In vitro comparison of microleakge between preformed metal crowns and aesthetic crowns of primary molars using different adhesive luting cements. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 19, 387–392 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-018-0369-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-018-0369-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation