Clinical and radiographic outcomes of laser pulpotomy in vital primary teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis
This was to compare clinical and radiographic success rates of laser pulpotomy with those of other pulpotomy techniques in primary teeth.
PubMed, SCOPUS, EMBASE, Cochrane and ISI Web of Knowledge databases were searched electronically without time or language limitations. Clinical trials in which laser pulpotomy was compared with at least one other pulpotomy modality in primary teeth were selected. The bibliographic reference lists of eligible articles were also hand-searched. Odds ratios, risk differences and 95% confidence intervals were calculated with the aid of Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software (Version 2.2.050, Biostat, Englewood, NJ, USA). The methodological quality of articles included in the meta-analysis was determined using the Jadad scale.
Twelve pulpotomy studies were selected for systematic review and underwent data extraction. Of these studies, statistical analysis was conducted on 11. All clinical trials had low to moderate risks of methodological bias. The meta-analysis showed no significant differences in clinical and radiographic pulpotomy outcomes with laser compared with other techniques (p > 0.05). Likewise, no differences were found in the outcomes at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 or ≥ 18 months (all p > 0.05).
For primary molar pulpotomy, the laser technique showed comparable clinical and radiographic results to other conventional pulpotomy medicaments, including formocresol and mineral trioxide aggregate.
KeywordsLasers Meta-analysis Pulpotomy Systematic review Primary teeth Treatment outcome
No funding was received.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
- American Academy of Paediatric Dentistry. Guideline on pulp therapy for primary and immature permanent teeth. Pediatr Dent. 2016;38(6):280–8.Google Scholar
- Celik B, Atac AS, Cehreli ZC, Uysal S. A randomized trial of mineral trioxide aggregate cements in primary tooth pulpotomies. J Dent Child (Chic). 2013;80(3):126–32.Google Scholar
- Furze HA, Furze ME. Pulpotomy with laser in primary and young permanent teeth. J Oral Laser Appl. 2006;6(1):53–8.Google Scholar
- Golpayegani MV, Ansari G, Tadayon N, Shams S, Mir M. Low-level laser therapy for pulpotomy treatment of primary molars. J Dent Tehran Univ Med Sci. 2009;6(4):168–74.Google Scholar
- Mareddy A, Mallikarjun SB, Shetty PV, Rao V, Chandru T. Histological evaluation of diode laser pulpotomy in dogs. J Oral Laser Appl. 2010;10(1):7–16.Google Scholar
- Rivera N, Reyes E, Mazzaoui S, Moron A. Pulpal therapy for primary teeth: formocresol vs electrosurgery: a clinical study. J Dent Child (Chic). 2003;70(1):71–3.Google Scholar
- Saltzman B, Sigal M, Clokie C, et al. Assessment of a novel alternative to conventional formocresol–zinc oxide eugenol pulpotomy for the treatment of pulpally involved human primary teeth: diode laser-mineral trioxide aggregate pulpotomy. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2005;15(6):437–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-263X.2005.00670.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar