Clinical comparison of Kedo-S paediatric rotary files vs manual instrumentation for root canal preparation in primary molars: a double blinded randomised clinical trial
- 63 Downloads
This was to compare and evaluate the instrumentation time and quality of obturation between paediatric rotary file (Kedo-S) and manual instrumentation techniques in primary molars.
A double blinded randomised control trial was performed that included mandibular primary molars in children of age 4–7 years with pulp necrosis. Sixty primary mandibular molars were randomly divided into two groups: 30 were instrumented with paediatric rotary files Kedo-S (experimental group) and 30 with hand K-files (control group). During the preparation of the primary root canals the instrumentation time was recorded in seconds. The quality of obturation was recorded as optimal, under filled or over filled using immediate post-operative radiographs. The instrumentation time and quality of obturation were analysed using independent t-test and Chi-square test.
Mean instrumentation time with paediatric rotary files Kedo-S (78.53 s) was significantly less than K-files (95.46 s) (p < 0.05). There was a significant improvement in the quality of obturation (p < 0.05) with paediatric rotary files (Kedo-S).
Clinical use of paediatric rotary files Kedo-S was effective during root canal preparation of primary teeth with reduction in instrumentation time and better quality of obturation.
KeywordsKedo-S files K-files Primary molars Pulpectomy
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Finn SB. Morphology of primary teeth. In: Finn SB. Clinical Pedodontics. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders Co; 1973. pp. 59–70.Google Scholar
- Kuo C, Wang Y, Chang H, et al. Application of Ni–Ti rotary files for pulpectomy in primary molars. J Dent Sci. 2006;1:10–5.Google Scholar
- Pinkham JR, Casamassimo PS. Pediatric dentistry. Infancy through adolescence. 4th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co.; 2005. p. 390.Google Scholar
- Silva LA, Leonardo MR, Nelson-Filho P, Tanomaru JM. Comparison of rotary and manual instrumentation techniques on cleaning capacity and instrumentation time in deciduous molars. J Dent Child. 2004;71:45–7.Google Scholar
- Vieyra JP, Enriquez FJJ. Instrumentation time efficiency of rotary and hand instrumentation performed on vital and necrotic human primary teeth: a randomized clinical trial. Dentistry. 2014;4:1–5.Google Scholar