Advertisement

European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry

, Volume 18, Issue 5, pp 355–361 | Cite as

The Würzburg MIH concept: the MIH treatment need index (MIH TNI)

A new index to assess and plan treatment in patients with molar incisior hypomineralisation (MIH)
  • R. SteffenEmail author
  • N. Krämer
  • K. Bekes
Original Article

Abstract

Aim

This was to create a new easy-to-use index for the treatment of MIH.

Methods

An international MIH working group developed a new MIH index as an epidemiological screening procedure for assessing MIH treatment needs (MIH-TNI), and also for the screening and monitoring of individuals by dental practitioners.

Results

The MIH TNI assesses in particular the extent of the destruction of tooth structure in combination with any hypersensitivity occurring in MIH. The MIH-TNI is suggested as a basis for individual dental examinations covering all MIH typical problems or treatment planning. In addition, this index shall be the basis for decision-making in any MIH therapy studies already planned.

Conclusion

After the validation of the MIH TNI it may be possible to create a standardised approach for dental treatment for MIH.

Keywords

MIH Molar-Incisor-Hypomineralisation Odontogenic disorders Enamel and dentine hypoplasia Index 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This article is based in parts on: Bekes K, Steffen R. Das Würzburger MIH-Konzept. DOI: 10.3238/OPKZH.2016.0165-0170. By courtesy of the Deutscher Aerzteverlag GmbH.

Compliance with ethical standards

Funding

There was no outside support (funding) in this article.

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that he/she has no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants and/or animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. A Review of the Developmental Defects of Enamel Index (DDE Index): Commission on Oral Health, Research & Epidemiology. Report of an FDI Working Group. Int Dent J 1992; 42:411–426.Google Scholar
  2. Balmer RC, Laskey D, Mahoney E, Toumba KJ. Prevalence of enamel defects and MIH in non-fluoridated and fluoridated communities. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2005;6:209–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bekes K, Hirsch C. What is known about the influence of dentine hypersensitivity on oral health-related quality of life? Clin Oral Investig. 2013;17(Suppl 1):45–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cutress TW, Ainamo J, Sardo-Infirri J. The community periodontal index of treatment needs (CPITN) procedure for population groups and individuals. Int Dent J. 1987;37:222–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Elfrink ME, Ghanim A, Manton DJ, Weerheijm KL. Standardised studies on molar incisor hypomineralisation (MIH) and hypomineralised second primary molars (HSPM): a need. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2015;16:247–55.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Fritsche U, Hetzer G, Strein S, Wetzel WE. Caries frequency in school children. Zahnärztl Mitt. 1991;81:2007–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Jälevik B. Prevalence and diagnosis of molar- incisor-hypomineralisation (MIH): a systematic review. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2010;11:59–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Jälevik B, Klingberg G, Barregard L, Noren JG. The prevalence of demarcated opacities in permanent first molars in a group of Swedish children. Acta Odontol Scand. 2001;59:255–60.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Jasulaityte L, Weerheijm KL, Veerkamp JS. Prevalence of molar-incisor-hypomineralisation among children participating in the Dutch National Epidemiological Survey (2003). Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2008;9:218–23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Lygidakis NA, Dimou G, Briseniou E. Molar- incisor-hypomineralisation (MIH). Retro- spective clinical study in Greek children. I. Prevalence and defect characteristics. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2008;9:200–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Lygidakis NA, Wong F, Jälevik B, et al. Best clinical practice guidance for clinicians dealing with children presenting with molar-incisor-hypomineralisation (MIH): an EAPD policy document. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2010;11:75–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Ogden AR, Pinhasi R, White WJ. Nothing new under the heavens: MIH in the past? Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2008;9:166–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Oliver K, Messer LB, Manton DJ, et al. Distribution and severity of molar hypomineralisation: trial of a new severity index. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2014;24:131–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Soviero V, Haubek D, Trindade C, Da Matta T, Poulsen S. Prevalence and distribution of demarcated opacities and their sequelae in permanent 1st molars and incisors in 7 to 13-year-old Brazilian children. Acta Odontol Scand. 2009;67:170–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Steffen R, van Waes H. Therapy of Molar-Incisor-Hypominerlisation under difficult circumstances. A concept for therapy. Quintessenz. 2011;62:1613–23.Google Scholar
  16. Weerheijm KL, Duggal M, Mejare I, et al. Judgement criteria for molar incisor hypo-mineralisation (MIH) in epidemiologic studies: a summary of the European Meeting on MIH Held in Athens, 2003. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2003;4:110–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Wetzel WE, Reckel U. Dental defects of first permanent molars are they increasing? - A survey. Zahnärztl Mitt. 1991;81:650–1.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Clinic of Orthodontics and Paediatric DentistryCentre for Dental Medicine University of ZürichZurichSwitzerland
  2. 2.Department of Paediatric DentistryUniversity of GießenGießenGermany
  3. 3.Department of Paediatric Dentistry, School of DentistryMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations