An in vitro comparison of three delivery techniques for obturation of root canals in primary molars
- 456 Downloads
This in vitro study evaluated the efficacy of three different obturation techniques with regards to quality of two filling pastes—Ca(OH)2/iodoform syringe paste and zinc oxide eugenol paste in primary molars.
Root canals of 45 extracted primary molars were prepared and randomly divided into three groups of 15 teeth each. Group A—canals were filled with Ca(OH)2/iodoform syringe paste, Group B—zinc oxide eugenol paste with handheld lentulo spiral and Group C—zinc oxide eugenol paste with rotary lentulo spiral. The quality of filled root canals was evaluated with conventional radiography in antero-posterior and lateral dimensions.
There were significant differences between all groups in the presence of voids (p = 0.03) and length of filling (p = 0.002). Half of the sampled teeth in handheld lentulo spiral group had voids in the filled canals, while 80% of the teeth filled with Ca(OH)2/iodoform syringe resulted in overfilling of the paste.
All three delivery methods for the obturation of primary molars' root canals showed inherent limitations in terms of voids and quality of filling. Voids are inevitable and were present in all the techniques. Overfilling was more frequently seen with the syringe method, while the lentulo spiral technique, both handheld and rotary, showed a better quality of filling.
KeywordsCalcium hydroxide Obturation Primary molars Pulpectomy Zinc oxide eugenol
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
Author 1 declares that he has no conflict of interest. Author 2 declares that she has no conflict of interest. Author 3 declares that she has no conflict of interest. Author 4 declares that she has no conflict of interest
Research involving human participants
All procedures performed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Asokan S, Sooriaprakas C, Raghu V, et al. Volumetric analysis of root canal fillings in primary teeth using spiral computed tomography: an in vitro study. J Dent Child. 2012;79(2):46–8.Google Scholar
- Aylard SR, Johnson R. Assessment of filling techniques for primary teeth. Paediatr Dent. 1987;9:195–8.Google Scholar
- Barja-Fidalgo F, Moutinho-Ribeiro M, Oliveira MAA, et al. A systematic review of root canal filling materials for deciduous teeth: is there an alternative for Zinc oxide—Eugenol? ISRN Dent 2011:367318.Google Scholar
- Barr ES, Flaitz CM, Hicks JM. A retrospective radiographic evaluation of primary molar pulpectomies. Paediatr Dent. 1991;13(1):4–9.Google Scholar
- Bawazir OA, Salama FS. Clinical evaluation of root canal obturation methods in primary teeth. Paediatr Dent. 2006;28(1):39–47.Google Scholar
- Dandashi MB, Nazif MM, Zullo T. An in vitro comparison of three endodontic techniques for primary incisors. Paediatr Dent. 1993;15:254–6.Google Scholar
- Esterla C, Neto IM, Lopes HP, et al. Root canal filling with calcium hydroxide using different techniques. Braz Dent J. 2002;13(1):53–6.Google Scholar
- Memarpour M, Shahidi S, Meshki R. Comparison of Different obturation techniques for primary molars by digital radiography. Paediatr Dent. 2013;35:236–40.Google Scholar
- Payne RG, Kenny DJ, Johnston DH, et al. Two-year outcome study of zinc oxide-eugenol root canal treatment for vital primary teeth. J Can Den Assoc. 1993;59:528–36.Google Scholar
- Pinkham JR, Casamassimo PS, Mctigue DJ, et al. Pediatric dentistry: infancy through adolescence. 4th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co; 2005. p. 375–90.Google Scholar
- Salama FS, Anderson RW, Hanes MC, et al. Anatomy of primary incisor and molar root canals. Paediatr Dent. 1992;14:117–8.Google Scholar
- Subba Reddy W, Shakunthala B. Comparative assessment of three obturating techniques in primary molars: an in vivo study. Endodont. 1997;9:13–6.Google Scholar
- Ugur I, Hikmet A, Tamer T. Leakage evaluation of three different root canal obturation techniques using electrochemical evaluation and dye penetration evaluation methods. Aust Endod J. 2007;33:18–22.Google Scholar