Detection and monitoring of early caries lesions: a review
- 1k Downloads
To review the current evidence base of detecting and monitoring early carious lesions in children and adolescents and a rationale proposed to ensure that such lesions are identified and appropriately managed.
The systematic literature search identified initially a review by Gomez and co-workers from 2013 and this still represents the current state of the science in relation to caries detection and monitoring. The review described among others, visible detection systems, image-based detection systems and point-measurement approaches.
The current evidence base suggests that while there are numerous devices or technology-enabled detection systems, the use of a careful, methodical visual inspection of clean, dry teeth, supplemented where indicated by radiographic views, remains the standard of care in caries detection and diagnostics. Further, it is possible by means of existing visible and radiographical systems to monitor lesions over time. Using low-cost intra-oral cameras facilitates the recording of lesion appearance in the patient record and may be of significant benefit in monitoring early lesions over time following their detection. This benefit extends to the clinician and the patient for whom it may be a useful educational and motivational tool.
Recommendations are presented that can be adopted and adapted to local circumstances and that are both substantiated by evidence and promote a clear, simple and consistent approach to caries detection, diagnosis and monitoring in children and adolescents. The diagnoses (initial, active; moderate, active and extensive, active) are linked to appropriate management options within primary care.
KeywordsCaries Detection Diagnosis Early lesions Management
- Bjørndal L, Kidd EA. The treatment of deep dentine caries lesions. Dent Update. 2005;32:402–4, 407–10, 413.Google Scholar
- Boye U, Willasey A, Walsh T, Tickle M, Pretty IA. Comparison of an intra-oral photographic caries assessment with an established visual caries assessment method for use in dental epidemiological studies of children. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2013;41(6):526–33. doi: 10.1111/cdoe.12049.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ekstrand KR. How to maintain sound teeth: an individualized population strategy for children and adolescents. In: Meyer-Lückel H, Paris S, Ekstrand KR, editors. Caries Management—science and clinical practice. Stuttgart: Thieme; 2013. p. 306–10.Google Scholar
- Ekstrand KR, Qvist V. The impact of a national caries strategy in Greenland after 4 years. Int J Paediatr Dent 2014. doi: 10.1111/ipd.12138 [Epub ahead of print].
- Goodwin M, Sanders C, Davies G, Walsh T, Pretty IA. BMC Oral Health. 2015;15:3. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-15-3.
- Guedes RS, Piovesan C, Floriano I, et al. Risk of initial and moderate caries lesions in primary teeth to progress to dentine cavitation: a 2-year cohort study. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2015. doi: 10.1111/ipd.12166.
- Kassebaum NJ, Bernabé E, Dahiya M, et al. Global burden of untreated caries: a systematic review and metaregression. J Dent Res. 2015. doi: 10.1177/0022034515573272.
- Keyes PH. The infectious and transmissible nature of experimental dental caries: findings and implications. Arch Oral Biol. 1960;1:304.Google Scholar
- Mejáre I. Bitewing examination to detect caries in children and adolescents—when and how often? Dent Update. 2005;32:588–90, 593–4, 596–7.Google Scholar
- Mejàre I, Källestål C, Stenlund H, Johansson H. Caries development from 11 to 22 years of age: a prospective radiographic study. Prevalence and distribution. Caries Res. 1998;33:93–100.Google Scholar
- Miller WD. The microorganisms of the human mouth. Philadelphia, PA: S.S. White Dental Mfg. Co. 1890.Google Scholar
- Miller WD. The human mouth as a focus of infection. Dent Cosmos. 1891;33:689, 789, 913.Google Scholar
- Monaghan N, Davies GM, Jones CM, Neville JS, Pitts NB. The caries experience of 5-year-old children in Scotland, Wales and England in 2011–2012: reports of cross-sectional surveys using BASCD criteria. Community Dent Health. 2014a;2:105–10.Google Scholar
- Pitts NB, Stamm JW. International consensus workshop on Caries Clinical Trials (ICW-CCT)—final consensus statements: agreeing where the evidence leads. J Dent Res. 2004;83 Spec No C:C125–8.Google Scholar
- Pitts NB, Ismail AI, Martignon S, et al. ICCMS™ guide for practitioners and educators, 2014—see https://www.icdas.org/uploads/ICCMS-Guide_Full_Guide_UK.pdf.
- Yin W, Hu DY, Li X, et al. The anti-caries efficacy of a dentifrice containing 1.5% arginine and 1450 ppm fluoride as sodium monofluorophosphate assessed using quantitative light-induced fluorescence (QLF). J Dent. 2013;41(Suppl 2):S22–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.04.004.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar