Advertisement

European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry

, Volume 17, Issue 2, pp 131–136 | Cite as

A multidisciplinary management of a type III dens invaginatus in a maxillary permanent canine

  • P. Clarke
  • N. Longridge
  • L. GartshoreEmail author
Case Report

Abstract

Background

Dens invaginatus affects 0.3–10 % of the population; however, few reports document its occurrence in maxillary canines. Management of associated periradicular infections is often challenging. The benefits of computed tomography are well documented in these situations, providing greater clinical information for diagnosis, prognosis and practical management. Many previous reports in the literature utilise this technology but often focus on an endodontic management approach.

Case Report

Details of the treatment of a complex type III invagination affecting a maxillary canine, combined with hypodontia and malocclusion is described. Endodontic treatment was deemed inappropriate resulting in extraction of the invaginated canine. The multidisciplinary planning and approach, highlighted the need for close teamwork, shared care and a patient-centred approach.

Follow-up

A 5-year follow-up and review recorded a successful outcome.

Conclusions

This case reinforces the importance of careful investigation and planning in ensuring an optimal outcome when addressing multiple dental anomalies. Extensive consideration of the initial treatment strategy is required, coupled with evaluation of the outcome and longevity of any potential treatment modality to be employed. The consideration of inevitable future restorative treatment is fundamental, highlighting the importance of multidisciplinary planning at diagnosis. Moreover, orthodontic, aesthetic, behavioural and/or social factors may further complicate management in adolescents.

Keywords

Cone beam-computed tomography Dental anomaly Dens invaginatus Multidisciplinary Hypodontia Dens in dente 

References

  1. Alani A, Bishop K. Dens invaginatus. Part 1: classification, prevalence and aetiology. Int Endod J. 2008;41(12):1123–36.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bishop K, Alani A. Dens invaginatus. Part 2: clinical, radiographic features and management options. Int Endod J. 2008;41(12):1137–54.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Brooks JK, Ribera MJ. Successful nonsurgical endodontic outcome of a severely affected permanent maxillary canine with dens invaginatus Oehlers Type 3. J Endod. 2014;40(10):1702–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Ekim SL, Hatibovic-Kofman S. A treatment decision-making model for infraoccluded primary molars. Int J Paediat. 2001;11(5):340–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gill DS, Barker CS. The multidisciplinary management of hypodontia: a team approach. Br Dent J. 2015;218(3):143–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Grahnen H. Dens invaginatus. I. A clinical, roentgenological and genetical study of permanent upper lateral incisors. Odontol Revy. 1959;10:115–37.Google Scholar
  7. Innes NP, Evans DJ, Stirrups DR. Sealing caries in primary molars: randomized control trial, 5-year results. J Dent Res. 2011;90(12):1405–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Johnson J, Whaites EJ, Sheehy EC. The use of multidirectional cross-sectional tomography for localizing an odontome. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2007;17(2):129–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Kusgoz A, Yıldırım T, Kayıpmaz S, Sarıcaoglu S. Nonsurgical endodontic treatment of type III dens invaginatus in maxillary canine: an 18-month follow-up. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;107(3):e103–6. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.11.011.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Lewis BR, Gahan MJ, Hodge TM, Moore D. The orthodontic-restorative interface: 2. Compensating for variations in tooth number and shape. Dent Update. 2010;37(3):138–48.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Oehlers FA. Dens invaginatus (dilated composite odontome). I. Variations of the invagination process and associated anterior crown forms. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1957;10(11):1204–18.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Teague A, Barton P, Parry W. Management of the submerged deciduous tooth: 1. Aetiology, diagnosis and potential consequences. Dent Update. 1999a;27(7):292–6.Google Scholar
  13. Teague A, Barton P, Parry W. Management of the submerged deciduous tooth: 2. Treatment. Dent Update. 1999b;26(8):350–2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Teixidó M, Abella F, Duran-Sindreu F, Moscoso S, Roig M. The use of cone-beam computed tomography in the preservation of pulp vitality in a maxillary canine with Type 3 dens invaginatus and an associated periradicular lesion. J Endod. 2014;40(9):1501–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Vaidyanathan M, Whatling R, Fearne JM. An overview of the dens invaginatus with case examples. Dent Update. 2008;35(10):655–63.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Restorative Dentistry DepartmentLiverpool University Dental HospitalLiverpoolUK
  2. 2.Oral Surgery DepartmentLiverpool University Dental HospitalLiverpoolUK
  3. 3.Paediatric Dentistry DepartmentLiverpool University Dental HospitalLiverpoolUK

Personalised recommendations