Evidence of pulpotomy in primary teeth comparing MTA, calcium hydroxide, ferric sulphate, and electrosurgery with formocresol
- 1.4k Downloads
The aim of this study was to evaluate the scientific evidence of pulpotomy in primary teeth comparing mineral troxide aggregate (MTA), calcium hydroxide, ferric sulphate, and electrosurgery with formocresol.
A systematic search using key words was conducted using seven databases up to December 10, 2013. Clinical articles in English, Portuguese and Spanish were selected, which were in accordance with the inclusion and exclusion criteria and the research objective of comparing whether pulpotomy performed with formocresol in primary teeth is more effective than other medicaments or techniques.
Out of the 12,515 publication initially identified, 30 clinical articles were included in the systematic review and analysed by four meta-analyses. The success rate of MTA (94.6 %) was higher than that of formocresol (87.4 %), with a statistically significant difference (OR = 0.39; 95 % CI = 0.25–0.62). Formocresol pulpotomy success was not statistically different from ferric sulphate or electrosurgery.
MTA was clinically and radiographically superior to formocresol for pulpotomy of primary teeth. The other alternatives to formocresol such as electrosurgery and ferric sulphate can be used instead of formocresol since they showed success similar to formocresol. In addition, there is no evidence to support calcium hydroxide for pulpotomies in primary teeth.
KeywordsPulpotomy Primary tooth Systematic review Meta-analysis Endodontic treatment
- Agell RS. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of primary molars with necrotic pulp treated with two formocresol concentrations. Acta Odontol Venez. 1989;27:3–9.Google Scholar
- American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (AAPD). Guideline on pulp therapy for primary and immature permanent tooth. Clinical guidelines—reference manual 2012–2013. Pediatr Dent. 2012;34:222–9.Google Scholar
- Bowen JL, Math-Muju K, Nash DA, et al. Pediatric and general dentists’ attitudes toward pulp therapy for primary teeth. Pediatric Dent. 2012;34:210–5.Google Scholar
- Fornetti APC, Lourenço Neto N, Moretti ABS, et al. Clinical and radiographic study on 1/5 dilution of Buckley’s formocresol and Portland cement used for pulpotomies of human primary teeth. Rev Odontol UNESP. 2009;38:161–8.Google Scholar
- Ghajari MF, Kermani NM, Fard MJK, Vantanpour M. Comparison of formocresol and ferric sulfate pulpotomy in primary molars: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Den (Tehran). 2009;6:29–36.Google Scholar
- Golpayegani MV, Ansari G, Tadayon N, Shams SH, Mir M. Low-level laser therapy for pulpotomy treatment of primary molars. J Den (Tehran). 2009;6:168–74.Google Scholar
- Jabbarifar SE, Khademi AA, Ghasemi D. Success rate of formocresol pulpotomy versus mineral trioxide aggregate in human primary molar tooth. J Res Med Sci. 2004;9:304–7.Google Scholar
- Mickenautsch S, Yengopal JV, Bonecker M, et al. Minimum intervention: a new approach in dentistry. 1st ed. Houghton: Midentistry corp; 2006.Google Scholar
- Neamatollahi H, Tajik A. Comparison of clinical and radiographic success rates of pulpotomy in primary molars using formocresol, ferric sulfate and mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA). J Den (Tehran). 2006;3:6–14.Google Scholar
- Rivera N, Reyes E, Mazzaoui S, Morón A. Pulpal therapy for primary teeth: formocresol vs electrosurgery: a clinical study. J Dent Child (Chic). 2003;70:71–3.Google Scholar
- Sano JT, Valdivieso MVM. Estudio comparativo, clínico radiográfico del sulfato férrico (15.5 %) y formocresol (Fórmula de Buckley) en pulpotomías de molares deciduas: resultados a 12 meses. Odont Pediatr. 2002;1:17–22.Google Scholar
- Sushynski JM, Zealand CM, Botero TM, Boynton JR, Majewski RF, Shelburne CE, Hu JC. Comparison of gray mineral trioxide aggregate and diluted formocresol in pulpotomized primary molars: a 6- to 24-month observation. Pediatric Dent. 2012;34:120e–128e.Google Scholar
- Zealand CM, Briskie DM, Botero TM, Boynton JR, Hu JC. Comparing gray mineral trioxide aggregate and diluted formocresol in pulpotomized human primary molars. Pediatr Dent. 2010;32:393-9.Google Scholar