Advertisement

European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry

, Volume 15, Issue 3, pp 191–195 | Cite as

Success of root fillings with zinc oxide-ozonated oil in primary molars: preliminary results

  • S. P. Chandra
  • R. Chandrasekhar
  • K. S. Uloopi
  • C. VinayEmail author
  • N. M. Kumar
Original Scientific Article

Abstract

Aim

To evaluate the success rate of mixture of ozonated oil and zinc oxide as a primary teeth root filling material.

Study design

Prospective randomised clinical study.

Methods

The study included 60 infected primary mandibular molars which were equally divided into study group (ozonated oil-ZnO) and control group (zinc oxide-eugenol). Pulpectomy procedure was performed and the children were followed at regular intervals. All the children were available for evaluation at the end of 12 months. The teeth were evaluated for success or failure based on clinical and radiographic criteria by a blinded investigator.

Statistics

The proportional values were compared using χ 2 test.

Results

Clinical and radiographic evaluation suggested that teeth obturated with ozonated oil-zinc oxide demonstrated good success rate (93.3 %) as compared to zinc oxide eugenol (63.3 %). However, no statistically significant variation (p = 0.408) was observed between the groups.

Conclusion

Ozonated oil-ZnO demonstrated a good clinical and radiographic success at 12 months follow-up and it can be considered as an alternative obturating material in infected primary teeth.

Keywords

Zinc oxide Ozonated oil Pulpectomy 

References

  1. AAPD. Guideline on pulp therapy for primary and young permanent teeth. Reference manual 2006–07. Pediatr Dent. 2007;28:l44–8.Google Scholar
  2. Barr ES, Flaitz CM, Hicks MJ. A retrospective radiographic evaluation of primary molar pulpectomies. Pediatr Dent. 1991;13:4–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bawazir OA, Salama FS. Clinical evaluation of root canal obturation methods in primary teeth. Pediatr Dent. 2006;28:39–47.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Cardoso MG, De Oliveira LD, Koga-Ito CY, Jorge AO. Effectiveness of ozonated water on Candida albicans, Enterococcus faecalis, and endotoxins in root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontol. 2008;105:85–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chawla HS, Mani SA, Tewari A, Goyal A. Calcium hydroxide as a root canal filling material in primary teeth-A pilot study. J Indian Soc Pedo Prev Dent. 1998;16:90–2.Google Scholar
  6. Coll JA, Josell S, Casper JS. Evaluation of a one-appointment formocresol pulpectomy technique for primary molars. Pediatr Dent. 1985;7:123–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Davis JM. Endodontic therapy in primary dentition. Dent Clin North Am. 1979;23:663–71.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Erausquin J, Muruzabal M. Root canal fillings with zinc oxide eugenol in rat molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1967;24:547–58.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Flaitz CM, Barr ES, Hicks JM. Radiographic evaluation of Pulpal therapy for primary anterior teeth. J Dent Child. 1989;56:182–5.Google Scholar
  10. Foreman PC, Barnes I. A review of calcium hydroxide. Int Endod J. 1990;23:283–97.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fuks A, Eidelman E, Pauker N. Root fillings with endofloss in primary teeth-A retrospective study. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2002;27:41–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Goerig AC, Camp JH. Root canal treatment in primary teeth-A review. Pediatr Dent. 1983;5:33–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Gould JM. Root canal therapy for infected primary molar teeth-A preliminary report. J Dent Child. 1972;39:269–73.Google Scholar
  14. Guinesi AS, Andolfatto C, Filho IB, et al. Ozonized oils-A qualitative and quantitative analysis. Braz Dent J. 2011;22:37–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Holan G, Fuks AB. A comparison of pulpectomies using ZOE and KRI in primary molars: a retrospective study. Pediatr Dent. 1993;15:403–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Holland A (2010) Ozone in endodontics. Endod Pract 6–10.Google Scholar
  17. Huth KC, Jakob FM, Saugel B, et al. Effect of ozone on oral cells compared with established antimicrobials. Eur J Oral Sci. 2006;114:435–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Huth KC, Quirling M, Maier S, et al. Effectiveness of ozone against endodontopathogenic microorganisms in a root canal biofilm model. Int Endod J. 2009;42:3–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kielbassa AM, Attin T, Schaller HG, Hellwig E. Endodontic therapy in a post-irradiated child: review of literature and report of a case. Quintessence Int. 1995;26:405–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Mani SA, Chawla HS, Tewari A, Goyal A. Evaluation of calcium hydroxide and zinc oxide as a root canal filling material in primary teeth. ASDC J Dent Child. 2000;67:142–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Martin DM, Crabb HS. Calcium hydroxide in root canal therapy: a review. Br Dent J. 1977;142:277–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nadkarni U, Damle SG. Comparative evaluation of calcium hydroxide and ZOE as root canal filling materials for primary molars: a clinical and radiographic study. J Indian Soc Pedo Prev Dent. 2000;18:1–10.Google Scholar
  23. Nagayoshi M, Kitamura C, Fukuizumi T, Nishihara T, Terashita M. Antimicrobial effect of ozonated water on bacteria invading dentinal tubules. J Endod. 2004;30:778–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Noetzel J, Nonhoff J, Bitter K, et al. Efficacy of calcium hydroxide, Er:YAG laser or gaseous ozone against Enterococcus faecalis in root canals. Am J Dent. 2009;22:14–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Oizumi M, Suzuki T, Uchida M, Furuya J, Okamoto Y. In vitro testing of a denture cleaning method using ozone. J Med Dent Sci. 1998;45:135–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Peter D, Philip S, Kahler WA, George R, Walsh J. Treatment of root canal biofilms of Enterococcus Faecalis with ozone gas and passive ultrasound activation. J Endod. 2012;38:523–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rabinowitch BZ. Pulp management in primary teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1953;6(542–50):671–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ranly DM. Pulp therapy in primary teeth: A review and prospectus. Acta Odont Pediatr. 1982;3:63–8.Google Scholar
  29. Rolling E, Lambjerg-Hansen H. Pulp condition of successfully formocresol: treated primary molars. Scand J Dent Res. 1978;86:267–72.Google Scholar
  30. Rosendahl R, Weinert-Groda A. Root canal treatment of primary molars with infected pulps using calcium hydroxide as a root canal filling. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 1995;19:255–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Saritha S, Uloopi KS, Vinay C, Sekhar RC, Rao VV. Clinical evaluation of root ZX II electronic apex locator in primary teeth. Eur Arch Pediatr Dent. 2012;13:32–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Silveira AM, Lopes HP, Siqueira JF Jr, Macedo SB, Consolaro A. Periradicular repair after two-visit endodontic treatment using two different intracanal medications compared to single-visit endodontic treatment. Braz Dent J. 2007;18:299–304.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Spedding RH. Root canal treatment for primary teeth. Dent Clin North Am. 1973;17:105–25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Stoll R, Venne L, Momeni AJ, Mutters R, Satchniss V. The disinfecting effect of ozonized oxygen in an infected root canal: an in vitro study. Quintessence Int. 2008;39:231–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Trairatvorakul C, Chunlasikaiwan S. Success of pulpectomy with zinc oxide-eugenol vs calcium hydroxide/Iodoform paste in primary molars: a clinical study. Pediatr Dent. 2008;30:303–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Tronstad L. Recent development in endodontic research. Scand J Dent Res. 1985;16:161–71.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. P. Chandra
    • 1
  • R. Chandrasekhar
    • 1
  • K. S. Uloopi
    • 1
  • C. Vinay
    • 1
    Email author
  • N. M. Kumar
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Pediatric DentistryVishnu Dental CollegeBhimavaramIndia

Personalised recommendations