Advertisement

European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry

, Volume 14, Issue 4, pp 267–270 | Cite as

Primary failure of eruption or severe infra-occlusion: a misdiagnosis?

  • R. P. AnthonappaEmail author
  • N. M. King
Case Report
  • 395 Downloads

Abstract

Background

The literature considers primary failure of eruption (PFE) and infra-occlusion as two separate clinical entities and there are no clearly identified signs and symptoms that aid to facilitate a definitive diagnosis between these two conditions. Therefore, it is the purpose of this report to illustrate a case to emphasise the potential for misdiagnosis when categorising these conditions as two separate clinical entities.

Case report

A 5-year-old Chinese boy was referred for the management of an unerupted primary mandibular left second molar tooth (75). Intra-oral examination revealed a primary dentition, with a PFE of tooth 75. He was scheduled for surgical removal of tooth 75 and placement of a space maintainer. Following improvements in the position of tooth 75 in the subsequent visits, the surgical option was disregarded and eventually tooth 75 erupted and exfoliated despite apparent mechanical obstructions.

Follow-up

During the 6-year follow-up period, tooth 75 moved mesially resorbing the distal root of tooth 74 which was later extracted to facilitate the eruption of tooth 75; which then underwent normal exfoliation.

Conclusion

While the present case could indicate the unpredictability of infra-occluded teeth, it is postulated that infra-occluded teeth erupt to the occlusal plane and then remain static due to mechanical obstructions, while the adjacent teeth accompany the growing alveolar bone. Conversely, teeth with PFE do not erupt and the mechanical obstructions are secondary factors. Therefore, the patient’s age, at the time of diagnosis, may lead to the diagnosis of infra-occlusion; but it could have been PFE.

Keywords

Primary failure of eruption PFE Infra-occlusion Primary molars Misdiagnosis 

References

  1. Andlaw RJ. Submerged deciduous molars. A review, with special reference to the rationale of treatment. J Int Assoc Dent Child. 1974;5:59–66.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Baccetti T. Tooth anomalies associated with failure of eruption of first and second permanent molars. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000;118:608–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bjerklin K, Kurol J, Valentin J. Ectopic eruption of maxillary first permanent molars and association with other tooth and developmental disturbances. Eur J Orthod. 1992;14:369–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bryan RA, Welbury RR. Infra-occlusion: a case report with an unexpected outcome. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2002;3:97–100.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Decker E, Stellzig-Eisenhauer A, Fiebig BS, et al. PTHR1 loss-of-function mutations in familial, nonsyndromic primary failure of tooth eruption. Am J Hum Genet. 2008;83:781–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ekim SL, Hatibovic-Kofman S. A treatment decision-making model for infraoccluded primary molars. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2001;11:340–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Inoue K, Inui M, Nakamura S, Yanase S, Yamada M, Tagawa T. Two cases of totally submerging buried primary molars: characterization of clinical behaviour and discussion of cause. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2001;25:127–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Jenkins FR, Nichol RE. Atypical retention of infraoccluded primary molars with permanent successor teeth. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2008;9:51–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kurol J. Infra-occlusion of primary molars: an epidemiologic and familial study. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1981;9:94–102.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kurol J, Olson L. Ankylosis of primary molars—a future periodontal threat to the first permanent molars? Eur J Orthod. 1991;13:404–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kurol J. Early treatment of tooth-eruption disturbances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002;121:588–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Moyers RE, Riolo ML. Early treatment. In: Moyers RE, editor. Handbook of Orthodontics. 4th ed. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers, Inc; 1988. p. 388–391.Google Scholar
  13. Ponduri S, Birnie DJ, Sandy JR. Infra-occlusion of secondary deciduous molars-an unusual outcome. J Orthod. 2009;36:186–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Proffit WR, Vig KW. Primary failure of eruption: a possible cause of posterior open-bite. Am J Orthod. 1981;80:173–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Raghoebar GM, Boering G, Jansen HW, Vissink A. Secondary retention of permanent molars: a histologic study. J Oral Pathol Med. 1989;18:427–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Smith CP, Al-Awadhi EA, Garvey MT. An atypical presentation of mechanical failure of eruption of a mandibular permanent molar: diagnosis and treatment. A case report. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2012;13:152–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry, and Health Sciences, Oral Health Centre of Western Australia, School of DentistryThe University of Western AustraliaPerthAustralia

Personalised recommendations