Patient and parent satisfaction following autotransplantation and associated orthodontic treatment delivered by an interdisciplinary team
- 200 Downloads
To survey patient and parent satisfaction with premolar transplantation and the associated orthodontic treatment.
A postal service evaluation questionnaire was used to survey patient and parent satisfaction for children who had completed treatment involving premolar transplantation and the associated orthodontics. Patients and parents each completed separate questionnaires. For some questions a Likert scale from 1 to 10 was used.
Questionnaires were sent to 41 patients and their parents who had premolar transplants and orthodontic treatment. Following repeat mailing of the questionnaires: 20 of the patient and 25 parent questionnaires were completed and returned. Patients and parents felt there was a large improvement in dental appearance (median scores 8 and 10) and were highly satisfied with the final appearance (median scores 8 and 9). Both groups felt that treatment transition between departments was very good (median scores 9 and 9). Patients experienced moderate discomfort during their premolar transplant surgery and during their orthodontic treatment (scores 6 and 5, respectively). Most patients and parents would recommend this type of treatment (92 and 88 %, respectively).
Overall, patients and parents report high levels of satisfaction with all aspects of their premolar transplant and their associated orthodontic treatment.
KeywordsAutotransplant Orthodontic Dental trauma Multidisciplinary
- Andreasen JO, Andersson L, Tsukiboshi M. Auto-transplantation of teeth to the anterior region. In: Andreasen JO, Andreasen FM, Andersson L, editors. Textbook and color Atlas of traumatic injuries to the teeth. 4th ed. Copenhagan: Blackwell Munksgaard; 2007. p. 740–61.Google Scholar
- Barber SK, Hikmat N,Houghton N, Duggal MS, Day PF. Tooth autotransplantation provision in the UK. Congress of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry—Strasbourg poster presentation. May 24–27 2012a.Google Scholar
- Barber SK, Houghton N, Spencer RJ, Day PF, Duggal MS. Establishing a special interest group for clinicians involved in tooth autotransplantation in the UK. British Orthodontic Conference poster presentation, Bournemouth, 2012b.Google Scholar
- Darzi A. High quality care for all: NHS next stage review. Department of Health, The stationary Office, London, 2008.Google Scholar
- Hasson D, Arnetz DD. Validation and findings comparing VAS vs. Likert Scales for psychosocial measurements. Int Electron J Health Educ. 2005;8:178–92.Google Scholar
- Kafourou V, Day PF, Spencer RJ et al. A retrospective analysis of tooth transplantation in a paediatric population at Leeds Dental Institute. Int J Pediatr Dent. 2011;21(Suppl. 1):179.Google Scholar
- O’Brien M. Children’s dental health in United Kingdom. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office; 2003.Google Scholar
- Petersson EE, Andersson L, Sorensen S. Oral injuries in relation to non oral injuries. Swed Dent J. 1997;21:55–68.Google Scholar
- Turk DC, Melzack R. Handbook of pain assessment. New York: The Guilford Press; 1992.Google Scholar