Advertisement

European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry

, Volume 14, Issue 1, pp 29–34 | Cite as

Registration of dental erosive wear on study models and intra-oral photographs

  • L. H. HoveEmail author
  • A. Mulic
  • A. B. Tveit
  • K. R. Stenhagen
  • A. B. Skaare
  • I. Espelid
Original Scientific Article

Abstract

Background

Clinical photographs and study models may provide permanent records of dental erosion and be useful supplements to clinical registration.

Aim

To assess the reliability and validity of registrations on clinical photographs and study models performed by a group of examiners.

Methods

Thirty tooth surfaces were selected and assessed clinically, using the visual erosion dental examination system. The chosen surfaces provided the whole range of dental erosions including sound surfaces. The tooth surfaces were photographed and impressions were obtained for preparation of study models. Thirty-three dentists examined and scored the selected surfaces both on photographs and study models.

Results

The quality of diagnosis (AUC, area under curve) was slightly higher using photographs as compared to study models. The difference was statistically significant when the validation criterion was erosion, assuming dentine exposure. The inter-method agreement on photographs and study models versus the clinical evaluation were approximately in the same range with a mean κw of 0.48 and 0.43, respectively. When comparing study models with photographs the mean κw was 0.52. The intra-examiner agreement was strong/substantial for both (photographs mean κw = 0.63 and study models mean κw = 0.60).

Statistics

Linear weighted Cohen’s kappa (κw) was used to evaluate inter-method and intra-examiner agreement. Receiver operating characteristic and area under the curves were used to express diagnostic quality according to a clinical examination.

Conclusion

The results indicated that photographs were as good as study models for recording erosive lesions.

Keywords

Dental erosion Diagnosis Index Enamel Dentine 

References

  1. Al-Malik MI, Holt RD, Bedi R. Clinical and photographic assessment of erosion in 2-5-year-old children in Saudi Arabia. Community Dent Health. 2001;18:232–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnadottir IB, Holbrook WP, Eggertsson H, et al. Prevalence of dental erosion in children: a national survey. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2010;38:521–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berg-Beckhoff G, Kutschmann M, Bardehle D. Methodological considerations concerning the development of oral dental erosion indexes: literature survey, validity and reliability. Clin Oral Investig. 2008;12(Suppl 1):S51–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. El Aidi H, Bronkhorst EM, Truin GJ. A longitudinal study of tooth erosion in adolescents. J Dent Res. 2008;87:731–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ganss C, Klimek J, Giese K. Dental erosion in children and adolescents—a cross-sectional and longitudinal investigation using study models. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2001;29:264–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ganss C, Lussi A. Diagnosis of erosive tooth wear. Monogr Oral Sci. 2006;20:32–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ganss C, Klimek J, Lussi A. Accuracy and consistency of the visual diagnosis of exposed dentine on worn occlusal/incisal surfaces. Caries Res. 2006;40:208–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hasselkvist A, Johansson A, Johansson AK. Dental erosion and soft drink consumption in Swedish children and adolescents and the development of a simplified erosion partial recording system. Swed Dent J. 2010;34:187–95.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Hintze H, Frydenberg M, Wenzel A. Influence of number of surfaces and observers on statistical power in a multiobserver ROC radiographic caries detection study. Caries Res. 2003;37:200–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Holbrook WP, Ganss C. Is diagnosing exposed dentine a suitable tool for grading erosive loss? Clin Oral Investig. 2008;12(Suppl 1):S33–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jaeggi T, Lussi A. Prevalence, incidence and distribution of erosion. Monogr Oral Sci. 2006;20:44–65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Johansson AK, Johansson A, Birkhed D, et al. Dental erosion associated with soft-drink consumption in young Saudi men. Acta Odontol Scand. 1997;55:390–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kreulen CM, Van‘t SA, Rodriguez JM, et al. Systematic review of the prevalence of tooth wear in children and adolescents. Caries Res. 2010;44:151–159.Google Scholar
  14. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Larsen IB, Westergaard J, Stoltze K, et al. A clinical index for evaluating and monitoring dental erosion. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2000;28:211–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Larsen MJ, Poulsen S, Hansen I. Erosion of the teeth: prevalence and distribution in a group of Danish school children. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2005;6:44–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Lussi A, Hellwig E. Risk assessment and preventive measures. Monogr Oral Sci. 2006;20:190–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mulic A, Tveit AB, Hove LH, Skaare AB. Dental erosive wear among Norwegian wine tasters. Acta Odontol Scand. 2010a;69:21–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mulic A, Tveit AB, Wang NJ, et al. Reliability of two clinical scoring systems for dental erosive wear. Caries Res. 2010b;44:294–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nunn JH, Gordon PH, Morris AJ, Pine CM, Walker A. Dental erosion—changing prevalence? A review of British National childrens’ surveys. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2003;13:98–105.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. van Rijkom HM, Truin GJ, Frencken JE, et al. Prevalence, distribution and background variables of smooth-bordered tooth wear in teenagers in the Hague, the Netherlands. Caries Res. 2002;36:147–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. H. Hove
    • 1
    Email author
  • A. Mulic
    • 1
  • A. B. Tveit
    • 1
  • K. R. Stenhagen
    • 1
  • A. B. Skaare
    • 2
  • I. Espelid
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Cariology and Gerodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Institute of Clinical DentistryUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
  2. 2.Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Behavioural Science, Faculty of DentistryUniversity of OsloOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations