Cardiovascular clinical applications of PET/MRI
Cardiac PET imaging is well established as the reference modality for quantitative evaluation of myocardial perfusion and for the detection of ischemic alterations in coronary blood flow using radiolabeled PET tracers such as 13N-ammonia, 82Rb and 15O-labeled water. While these techniques have served as the gold standard for clinical research and advanced evaluation of ischemic disease, the emergence of 18F-labeled perfusion tracers may, in the future, bring cardiac PET imaging into the mainstream of clinical imaging for assessment of coronary artery disease (CAD). FDG PET imaging has also served as a standard for objective assessment of the extent of myocardial viability after myocardial infarction and remains the most accurate technique for predicting recovery of myocardial function after reperfusion and for selecting patients who may benefit from revascularization procedures. Cardiac MRI has concurrently evolved as a technique that provides high-definition dynamic images of the heart and great vessels, surpassing echocardiography for accurate evaluation of cardiac function. Recent developments have also shown its ability to identify areas of reduced myocardial perfusion after gadolinium injection at rest and during pharmacological stress, thus promoting stress cardiac MRI as an alternative modality for detection of CAD. Furthermore, delayed accumulation of contrast media in scar and fibrotic tissue allows for differentiation of viable and non-viable tissue after myocardial infarction. PET and MRI, relying on different biological and physiological mechanisms, are truly complementary in their ability to detect stress-induced myocardial ischemia and tissue viability. This complementary ability of the two modalities opens up new perspectives in the assessment of cardiovascular disease. It is therefore foreseeable that the emergence of hybrid devices combining PET and MR modalities will lead to the development of new diagnostic protocols offering better diagnostic accuracy and allowing more objective assessment of cardiovascular disease. These applications may well extend beyond the scope of CAD and allow the technique to enter other areas: the evaluation of vascular plaques, neurotransmitter alterations and mechanisms of angiogenesis, the differentiation of different gene expression phenotypes, and the follow-up of stem cell therapy.
KeywordsPET/MRI Hybrid imaging Nuclear medicine Molecular imaging
Over the past decade the evolution of PET/CT has gained a certain momentum in clinical applications, oncology in particular. As an immediate consequence of this growth a new generation of PET/CT and now hybrid PET/MR scanners has emerged and been adopted by the medical community at large, allowing the use of this technology to extend well beyond the sphere of the early adopters in academic institutions. The availability of hybrid PET and multi-detector CT scanners that allow high-definition dynamic imaging of the heart and coronary vessels has opened up a new perspective on cardiac imaging, allowing combined anatomical and functional evaluation of coronary disease and cardiac function  (Fig. 1). Concurrently, MRI technology has evolved rapidly, leading to new imaging protocols that allow dynamic acquisition of cardiac images for functional analysis of regional myocardial wall motion and ventricular function. First-pass imaging of gadolinium contrast media through the myocardium was shown to allow differentiation between normal and hypoperfused myocardium . Changes in perfusion pattern between rest and pharmacological stress allow the depiction of areas with stress-induced ischemia caused by underlying hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease (CAD). While stress cardiac MRI has gained wider acceptance in clinical routine, its use for the detection of mild to moderate ischemic alterations may still need to be fully evaluated, in comparison with PET perfusion scans.
Combining PET and MRI can, therefore, probably be expected to offer the added value of the best diagnostic performance of the two modalities used in conjunction. The high temporal resolution of MRI images, allowing superior soft tissue differentiation, exceeds the possibilities offered by multidetector CT. However, in terms of coronary artery visualization and the identification of segmental stenosis and vascular plaques, MRI images remain limited.
The aim of this paper is to review the current state of the art in cardiac PET and cardiac MRI and to report early observations and clinical applications of new hybrid scanners combining these two complementary modalities. It also highlights other potential applications of hybrid PET/MR, beyond the scope of CAD, that may see the technique entering other areas: the evaluation of vascular plaques and, through the development of new radiotracers allowing the assessment of alterations in neurotransmitters, the evaluation of mechanisms of angiogenesis, and even the evaluation of different gene expressions; it could also allow the follow-up of stem cell therapy.
Technical advances in hybrid PET/MR
Different designs combining PET and MR devices are being developed by different vendors. These solutions include systems able to co-register studies obtained from two different devices (where the patient is moved on a shuttle-bed between two separate examination rooms), co-planar devices that combine PET and MR scanners located around the same bed in a single room, and, most recently, the integration of PET and MR devices into a single scanner . Separate co-planar devices require sequential acquisition of images from each modality, while integrated systems have the potential to acquire images from both modalities simultaneously [5, 6]. While simultaneous acquisition has limited advantages for oncology investigations, it may be important in functional imaging applications, for example in pharmacological stress and neurology .
The first generation of integrated PET/MR scanners was designed with avalanche photodiode (APD) technology and, in performance terms, these scanners are comparable to state-of-the-art PET/CT scanners. APDs can be replaced by higher performance solid-state digital detectors providing higher sensitivity and temporal resolution allowing time-of-flight imaging.
PET and MRI in coronary artery disease
The paradigm of CAD detection has changed over the years, with anatomical characterization of stenotic plaques by invasive coronary angiogram making way for interest in the additional evidence provided by stress-induced coronary flow limitation and, more recently, interest in plaque morphology [8, 9].
Modern PET/CT systems used for CAD detection most commonly involve high-end multi-detector CT providing low-dose assessment of the coronary anatomy with excellent negative predictive values as compared to invasive coronary angiograms [10, 11]. Hybrid cardiac imaging with radionuclide perfusion assessment complemented by coronary CT angiography is now clinically adopted for guiding vessel revascularization in cases of ischemia and for differentiating epicardial coronary stenosis from sub-epicardial disease when low hyperemic flow response suggests diffuse CAD . However, the CT technique presents several limitations including the use of iodinated contrast media and ionizing radiation, as well as inconclusive assessment of heavily calcified vessels and irregular heart rate. These limitations prompted efforts to improve MR technology in order to provide a non-invasive alternative for assessment of the coronary anatomy. The diagnostic accuracy of non-contrast coronary MR angiography (CMRA) has increased steadily thanks to the use of navigator-guided whole-heart 3D acquisition pulse sequences with reported sensitivity and specificity of 78–96 % and 68–96 %, respectively, in the detection of ICA luminal narrowing of at least 50 % using 1.5 T systems; 3 T systems are expected to provide further improvements due to increased spatial resolution [12, 13]. Despite some caveats including incomplete assessment of secondary coronary branches and time-consuming acquisitions, the high reliability of CMRA for ruling out left main or thee-vessel disease could undoubtedly benefit future hybrid PET/MR applications, especially bearing in mind the reduced sensitivity of relative perfusion evaluation in potential balanced ischemia and the difficult interpretation of reduced absolute flow (epicardial vs subepicardial disease) in patients with multi-vessel CAD .
There is now convincing evidence that CMRA is reliable in the assessment of hemodynamic consequences of moderate coronary stenosis. While allowing the visualization of late-stage response to ischemia as reversible wall motion abnormalities, first-pass imaging is also proving comparable to SPECT-based evaluation of stress-induced perfusion defects . Although PET has consistently been considered superior to SPECT in this regard and is now widely recognized as the gold standard for perfusion evaluation, only a limited number of correlative studies comparing PET and MRI perfusion have been published [15, 16]. Technical advantages of PET perfusion over CMRA include exquisite signal discrimination and low dependence on plane selection owing to inherently whole-heart 3D acquisition. More importantly, robust absolute flow quantification in ml/g/min is possible owing to near-linear extraction and predictable compartment modeling of perfusion tracers . The possibility of evaluating perfusion defects in a sizable way by PET has been shown to have prognostic value, as it allows estimation of ischemic burden before revascularization and consideration of the implications of reduced coronary flow reserve .
Complementary assessment of wall motion abnormalities and identification of regional and segmental hypokinesis, as well as wall thinning and scar tissue;
Design of stress-only PET perfusion protocol, with rest perfusion evaluated by CMRA:
- Correlation of microcirculation with delayed contrast-enhanced MR and tissue characterization (fibrosis) (Fig. 3).
Assessment of myocardial viability
Imaging vascular plaques
Most acute cardiovascular events are consequences of rupture of atherosclerotic plaques that often do not initially result in significant luminal obstruction [30, 31]. The causes of plaque instability and high rupture risk are believed to be related to inflammatory processes and the accumulation of macrophages in the lipid core of vessel plaques . Most recent studies showed that intraplaque angiogenesis by proliferation of medial vasa vasorum has also been implicated in rapid plaque growth and plaque rupture. Therefore, non-invasive imaging of inflammation and angiogenesis within atherosclerotic lesions may be useful to predict future risk of plaque rupture and allow monitoring of antiatherosclerotic therapies . While recent studies showed that PET imaging with 18F-FDG could provide a non-invasive means of detecting inflammation in atherosclerotic lesions, its use in coronary arteries is limited due to the high glucose uptake of adjacent myocardium. Alternative tracers of plaque inflammation and vulnerability are being explored; they include 18F-galacto-RGD which binds with high specificity to ∝vβ3 integrin, a cell surface glycoprotein receptor that is highly expressed during angiogenesis . While these early studies are promising, further studies are needed to characterize its uptake in plaques with high degrees of inflammation and neovascularization.
An alternative tracer recently evaluated for assessment and characterization of atherosclerotic plaques is 18F-labeled sodium fluoride (18F–NaF). Preliminary studies suggest that 18F–NaF uptake provides different information, relating to metabolically active calcific plaques and developing micro-calcification . Prospective studies to determine the relationship between 18F–NaF uptake, morphological plaque characteristics, and future cardiovascular events are still required in subjects with stable and unstable coronary disease.
While these new tracers still have to make their way into clinical use, several studies have reported the use of FDG PET imaging as a means of characterizing inflammatory activity within atherosclerotic plaques, and thus as a surrogate biomarker for detecting vulnerable plaques .
Future perspectives of cardiac PET/MR imaging
The upcoming generations of integrated hybrid PET/MR scanners offer an ideal combination of the imaging capabilities of MRI and PET for cardiac imaging. While cardiac MRI will continue to expand in cardiology, becoming increasingly widely adopted in clinical routine, the additional metabolic and functional information provided by PET tracers will provide additional value for specific subsets of patients who will benefit from the added diagnostic accuracy that PET can provide. The promising results of new tracers for better identification of ischemic myocardial alterations and viability as well as better assessment of high-risk atherosclerotic plaques will open up new perspectives and diagnostic strategies for cardiovascular diseases.
Furthermore, PET/MR is set to become the imaging modality of choice for the evaluation and follow-up of new therapeutic techniques aimed at tissue regeneration and myocardial repair. Several groups have already reported early results of PET imaging techniques for assessment of the kinetics of stem cell therapy in myocardial infarction. Cell labeling may offer new tools for monitoring the delivery, survival and migration of cells following dual labeling with iron particles, and reporter gene technologies may address cell localization and viability following cell transplantation. However, the specificity of MR and PET signals needs to be validated, in order to provide guidance in cell therapy. PET/MR is expected to play a major role in the validation process allowing longitudinal studies providing comprehensive structural and biological information.
The rapid adoption of hybrid PET/MR in clinical practice is mostly driven by oncology applications, although cardiac imaging applications will benefit greatly from the broader availability of these new hybrid devices. The widespread adoption of cardiac MRI studies in clinical routine has also contributed to the development of specific imaging protocols for a variety of cardiovascular applications and will also facilitate the acceptance of hybrid devices in clinical practice. The added value of metabolic PET imaging will certainly grow further with the availability of new specific PET tracers.
Conflict of interest
- 1.Flotats A, Knuuti J, Gutberlet M et al (2011) Hybrid cardiac imaging: SPECT/CT and PET/CT. A joint position statement by the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM), the European Society of Cardiac Radiology (ESCR) and the European Council of Nuclear Cardiology (ECNC). Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 38(1):201–212PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Schwitter J, Wacker CM, van Rossum AC et al (2008) MR-IMPACT: comparison of perfusion-cardiac magnetic resonance with single-photon emission computed tomography for the detection of coronary artery disease in a multicentre, multivendor, randomized trial. Eur Heart J 29(4):480–489PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Budoff MJ, Dowe D, Jollis JG et al (2008) Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 52(21):1724–1732PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Beanlands RS, Nichol G, Huszti E et al (2007) F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging-assisted management of patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction and suspected coronary disease: a randomized, controlled trial (PARR-2). J Am Coll Cardiol 50(20):2002–2012PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Depre C, Vanoverschelde JL, Gerber B, Borgers M, Melin JA, Dion R (1997) Correlation of functional recovery with myocardial blood flow, glucose uptake, and morphologic features in patients with chronic left ventricular ischemic dysfunction undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 113(2):371–378PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar