Responses in gross primary production of Stipa krylovii and Allium polyrhizum to a temporal rainfall in a temperate grassland of Inner Mongolia, China

  • Xiaoxing Hu
  • Mitsuru Hirota
  • Wuyunna
  • Kiyokazu Kawada
  • Hao Li
  • Shikang Meng
  • Kenji Tamura
  • Takashi KamijoEmail author


In the arid and semi-arid areas of China, rainfall and drought affect the growth and photosynthetic activities of plants. Gross primary productivity (GPP) is one of the most important indices that measure the photosynthetic ability of plants. This paper focused on the GPP of two representative grassland species (Stipa krylovii and Allium polyrhizum) to demonstrate the effect of a temporal rainfall on the two species. Our research was conducted in a temperate grassland in New Barag Right Banner, Hulun Buir City, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region of China, in a dry year 2015. We measured net ecosystem productivity (NEP) and ecosystem respiration flux (ER) using a transparent chamber system and monitored the photosynthetically active radiation (PAR), air and soil temperature and humidity simultaneously. Based on the measured values of NEP and ER, we calculated the GPP of the two species before and after the rainfall. The saturated GPP per aboveground biomass (GPPAGB) of A. polyrhizum remarkably increased from 0.033 (±0.018) to 0.185 (±0.055) µmol CO2/(gdw·s) by 5.6-fold and that of S. krylovii decreased from 0.068 (±0.021) to 0.034 (±0.011) µmol CO2(gdw·s) by 0.5-fold on the 1st and 2nd d after a 9.1 mm rainfall event compared to the values before the rainfall at low temperatures below 35°C. However, on the 1st and 2nd d after the rainfall, both of the saturated GPPAGB values of S. krylovii and A. polyrhizum were significantly lower at high temperatures above 35°C (0.018 (±0.007) and 0.110 (±0.061) µmol CO2/(gdw·s), respectively) than at low temperatures below 35°C (0.034 (±0.011) and 0.185 (±0.055) µmol CO2/(gdw·s), respectively). The results showed that the GPP responses to the temporal rainfall differed between S. krylovii and A. polyrhizum and strongly negative influenced by temperature. The temporal rainfall seems to be more effective on the GPP of A. polyrhizum than S. krylovii. These differences might be related to the different physiological and structural features, the coexistence of the species and their species-specific survival strategies.


temperate grassland gross primary productivity temporal rainfall survival strategy dry year drought 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



This research was jointly supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31470504, 31670455), the Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (grant 23405001) and the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFC0500908). We thank Mr. MA Xuping and Mr. ZHANG Xiulong for their kind assistance with field work and valuable suggestions.


  1. Adams J M, Faure H, Faure-Denard L, et al. 1990. Increases in terrestrial carbon storage from the last glacial maximum to the present. Nature, 348: 711–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berry J A, Björkman O. 1980. Photosynthetic response and adaptation to temperature in higher plants. Annual Review of Plant Physiology, 31: 491–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen L P, Zhao N X, Zhang L H, et al. 2013. Responses of two dominant plant species to drought stress and defoliation in the Inner Mongolia Steppe of China. Plant Ecology, 214(2): 221–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen S H, Zhang H, Wang L Q, et al. 2001. Grassland Plant Roots in Northern China. Jilin: Jilin University Press, 81–83, 470–471. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  5. Chen S P, Lin G H, Huang J H, et al. 2009. Dependence of carbon sequestration on the differential responses of ecosystem photosynthesis and respiration to rain pulses in a semiarid steppe. Global Change Biology, 15(10): 2450–2461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cheng Y X, Kamijo T, Tsubo M, et al. 2013. Phytosociology of Hulunbeier grassland vegetation in Inner Mongolia, China. Phytocoenologia, 43(1–2): 41–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ciais P, Reichstein M, Viovy N, et al. 2005. Europe-wide reduction in primary productivity caused by the heat and drought in 2003. Nature, 437: 529–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Falge E, Baldocchi D, Olson R, et al. 2001. Gap filling strategies for defensible annual sums of net ecosystem exchange. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 107(1): 43–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gao Q, Reynolds J F. 2003. Historical shrub-grass transitions in the northern Chihuahuan Desert: Modeling the effects of shifting rainfall seasonality and event size over a landscape gradient. Global Change Biology, 9(10): 1475–1493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Granier A, Reichstein M, Bréda N, et al. 2007. Evidence for soil water control on carbon and water dynamics in European forests during the extremely dry year: 2003. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 143(1–2): 123–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gunin P D, Bazha S N, Danzhalova E V, et al. 2015. Regional features of desertification processes of ecosystems on the border of the Baikal Basin and Central Asian internal drainage basin. Arid Ecosystems, 5(3): 117–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Guo Q, Hu Z M, Li S G, et al. 2012. Spatial variations in aboveground net primary productivity along a climate gradient in Eurasian temperate grassland: Effects of mean annual precipitation and its seasonal distribution. Global Change Biology, 18(12): 3624–3631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Guo Q, Hu Z M, Li S G, et al. 2016. Exogenous N addition enhances the responses of gross primary productivity to individual precipitation events in a temperate grassland. Scientific Reports, 6: 26901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Han D M, Wang G Q, Xue B L, et al. 2018. Evaluation of semiarid grassland degradation in North China from multiple perspectives. Ecological Engineering, 112: 41–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hao Y B, Wang Y F, Mei X R. 2010. The response of ecosystem CO2 exchange to small precipitation pulses over a temperate steppe. Plant Ecology, 209(2): 335–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Harpole W S, Potts D L, Suding K N. 2007. Ecosystem responses to water and nitrogen amendment in a California grassland. Global Change Biology, 13(11): 2341–2348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hirota M, Tang Y H, Hu Q W, et al. 2006. Carbon dioxide dynamics and controls in a deep-water wetland on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Ecosystems, 9(4): 673–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hirota M, Zhang P C, Gu S, et al. 2009. Altitudinal variation of ecosystem CO2 fluxes in an alpine grassland from 3600 to 4200 m. Journal of Plant Ecology, 2(4): 197–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hirota M, Zhang P C, Gu S, et al. 2010. Small-scale variation in ecosystem CO2 fluxes in an alpine meadow depends on plant biomass and species richness. Journal of Plant Research, 123(4): 531–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hodson M J, Bryant J A. 2012. Functional Biology of Plants. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 166–188.Google Scholar
  21. Hooper D U, Johnson L. 1999. Nitrogen limitation in dryland ecosystems: Responses to geographical and temporal variation in precipitation. Biogeochemistry, 46(1–3): 247–293.Google Scholar
  22. Hunt J E, Kelliher F M, Mcseveny T M, et al. 2004. Long-term carbon exchange in a sparse, seasonally dry tussock grassland. Global Change Biology, 10(10): 1785–1800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Huxman T E, Snyder K A, Tissue D, et al. 2004. Precipitation pulses and carbon fluxes in semiarid and arid ecosystems. Oecologia, 141(2): 254–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ivanov L A, Ivanova L A, Ronzhina D A, et al. 2004. Structural and functional grounds for Ephedra sinica expansion in Mongolian steppe ecosystems. Russian Journal of Plant Physiology, 51(4): 469–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kawada K, Wuyunna, Nakamura T. 2011. Land degradation of abandoned croplands in the Xilingol steppe region, Inner Mongolia, China. Japanese Society of Grassland Science, 57(1): 58–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Knapp A K, Smith M D. 2001. Variation among biomes in temporal dynamics of aboveground primary production. Science, 291(5503): 481–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Li F, Zhao W Z, Liu H. 2013. The response of aboveground net primary productivity of desert vegetation to rainfall pulse in the temperate desert region of Northwest China. PLoS ONE, 8(9): e73003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Li S G, Asanuma J, Eugster W, et al. 2005. Net ecosystem carbon dioxide exchange over grazed steppe in Central Mongolia. Global Change Biology, 11(11): 1941–1955.Google Scholar
  29. Li Z L, Zhang Y T, Yu D F, et al. 2014. The influence of precipitation regimes and elevated CO2 on photosynthesis and biomass accumulation and partitioning in seedlings of the rhizomatous perennial grass Leymus chinensis. PloS ONE, 9(8): e103633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lin L, Wuyunna, Tamura K, et al. 2013. Variation of soil physicochemical and microbial properties in degraded steppes in Hulunbeir of China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 24(12): 3407–3414. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  31. Liu Y S, Pan Q M, Zhang S X, et al. 2012. Intra-seasonal precipitation amount and pattern differentially affect primary production of two dominant species of Inner Mongolia grassland. Acta Oecologica, 44: 2–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ma S Y, Baldocchi D D, Xu L K, et al. 2007. Inter-annual variability in carbon dioxide exchange of an oak/grass savanna and open grassland in California. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 147(3–4): 157–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nakano T, Nemoto M, Shinoda M. 2008. Environmental controls on photosynthetic production and ecosystem respiration in semi-arid grasslands of Mongolia. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 148(10): 1456–1466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Novick K A, Stoy P C, Katul G G, et al. 2004. Carbon dioxide and water vapor exchange in a warm temperate grassland. Oecologia, 138(2): 259–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pereira J S, Chaves M M, Caldeira M C, et al. 2006. Water availability and productivity. In: Morison J I, Morecroft M D. Plant Growth and Climate Change. London: Blackwell Publishers, 118–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Reynolds S, Batello C, Baas S, et al. 2005. Grassland and forage to improve livelihoods and reduce poverty. In: McGilloway D A. Grassland: A Global Resource. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers, 323–338.Google Scholar
  37. Robertson T R, Bell C W, Zak J C, et al. 2009. Precipitation timing and magnitude differentially affect aboveground annual net primary productivity in three perennial species in a Chihuahuan Desert grassland. New Phytologist, 181: 230–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sala O E, Parton W J, Joyce L A, et al. 1988. Primary production of the central grassland region of the United States. Ecology, 69(1): 40–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schwinning S, Davis K, Richardson L, et al. 2002. Deuterium enriched irrigation indicates different forms of rain use in shrub/grass species of the Colorado Plateau. Oecologia, 130(3): 345–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Shi Z, Thomey M L, Mowll W, et al. 2014. Differential effects of extreme drought on production and respiration: Synthesis and modeling analysis. Biogeosciences, 11(3): 621–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sun J, Liu M, Li S G, et al. 2011. Survival strategy of Stipa krylovii and Agropyron cristatum in typical steppe of Inner Mongolia. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 31(8): 2148–2158. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  42. Sun J, Du W P. 2017. Effects of precipitation and temperature on net primary productivity and precipitation use efficiency across China’s grasslands. GIScience & Remote Sensing, 54(6): 881–897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Thomey M L, Collins S L, Friggens M T, et al. 2014. Effects of monsoon precipitation variability on the physiological response of two dominant C4 grasses across a semiarid ecotone. Oecologia, 176(3): 751–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wang T, Xue X, Zhou L, et al. 2015. Combating aeolian desertification in northern China. Land Degradation & Development, 26(2): 118–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wuyunna, Zhang F J, Ran C Q. 2009. Analysis of climatic change in Basin of Kherlen River of Mongolia Plateau for the past 50 years. Journal of Dalian Nationalities University, 11(3): 193–195. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  46. Xiong P F, Shu J L, Zhang H, et al. 2017. Small rainfall pulses affected leaf photosynthesis rather than biomass production of dominant species in semiarid grassland community on Loess Plateau of China. Functional Plant Biology, 44(12): 1229–1242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Xu L K, Baldocchi D D. 2004. Seasonal variation in carbon dioxide exchange over a Mediterranean annual grassland in California. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 123(1–2): 79–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Zhang P C, Hirota M, Shen H H, et al. 2009. Characterization of CO2 flux in three Kobresia meadows differing in dominant species. Journal of Plant Ecology, 2(4): 187–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zhao N X, Gao Y B, Wang J L, et al. 2006. Genetic diversity and population differentiation of the dominant species Stipa krylovii in the Inner Mongolia steppe. Biochemical Genetics, 44(11–12): 504–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Science Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xiaoxing Hu
    • 1
  • Mitsuru Hirota
    • 2
  • Wuyunna
    • 3
  • Kiyokazu Kawada
    • 2
  • Hao Li
    • 1
  • Shikang Meng
    • 1
  • Kenji Tamura
    • 2
  • Takashi Kamijo
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Graduate School of Life and Environmental SciencesUniversity of TsukubaTsukubaJapan
  2. 2.Faculty of Life and Environmental SciencesUniversity of TsukubaTsukubaJapan
  3. 3.College of Environment and ResourcesDalian Minzu UniversityDalianChina

Personalised recommendations