Advertisement

Spatial and temporal patterns of drought in Zambia

  • Brigadier LibandaEmail author
  • Mie Zheng
  • Chilekana Ngonga
Article
  • 17 Downloads

Abstract

Drought acutely affects economic sectors, natural habitats and communities. Understanding the past spatial and temporal patterns of drought is crucial because it facilitates the forecasting of future drought occurrences and informs decision-making processes for possible adaptive measures. This is especially important in view of a changing climate. This study employed the World Meteorological Organization (WMO)-recommended standardized precipitation index (SPI) to investigate the spatial and temporal patterns of drought in Zambia from 1960 to 2016. The relationship between the occurrence of consecutive dry days (CDD; consecutive days with less than 1 mm of precipitation) and SPI was also investigated. Horizontal wind vectors at 850 hPa during the core of the rainy season (December–February) were examined to ascertain the patterns of flow during years of extreme and severe drought; and these were contrasted with the patterns of flow in 2007, which was a generally wet year. Pressure vertical velocity was also investigated. Based on the gamma distribution, SPI successfully categorized extremely dry (with a SPI value less than or equal to –2.0) years over Zambia as 1992 and 2015, a severely dry (–1.9 to –1.5) year as 1995, moderately dry (–1.4 to –1.0) years as 1972, 1980, 1987, 1999 and 2005, and 26 near normal years (–0.9 to 0.9). The occurrence of CDD was found to be strongly negatively correlated with SPI with a coefficient of –0.6. Further results suggest that, during wet years, Zambia is influenced by a clockwise circulating low-pressure zone over the south-eastern Angola, a second such zone over the northern and eastern parts, and a third over the Indian Ocean. In stark contrast, years of drought were characterized by an anti-clockwise circulating high-pressure zone over the south-western parts of Zambia, constraining precipitation activities over the country. Further, wet years were characterized by negative pressure vertical velocity anomalies, signifying ascending motion; while drought years were dominated by positive anomalies, signifying descending motion, which suppresses precipitation. These patterns can be used to forecast drought over Zambia and aid in strategic planning to limit the potential damage of drought.

Keywords

standardized precipitation index patterns of drought consecutive dry days vertical velocity gamma distribution rainfall 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their gratitude to the National Centers for Environmental Prediction/National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCEP/NCAR) and the Joint Institute for the Study of the Atmosphere and Oceans (JISAO) for the data used in this study. The first author carried out this work while on a PhD scholarship sponsored by the University of Edinburgh; the university is hereby acknowledged. The useful and pertinent comments received from the anonymous reviewers and editors are much appreciated.

References

  1. Bordi I, Fraedrich K, Petitta M, et al. 2005. Large-scale analysis of drought in Europe using NCEP/NCAR and ERA-40 re-analysis data sets. European Water, 9(10): 35–42.Google Scholar
  2. Burke E J. 2011. Understanding the sensitivity of different drought metrics to the drivers of drought under increased atmospheric CO2. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 12(6): 1378–1394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dai A. 2011. Drought under global warming: a review. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 2(1): 45–65.Google Scholar
  4. Dee D P, Uppala S M, Simmons A J, et al. 2011. The ERA-interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 137(656): 553–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dogan S, Berktay A, Singh V. 2012. Comparison of multi-monthly rainfall-based drought severity indices, with application to semi-arid Konya closed basin, Turkey. Journal of Hydrology, 470–471: 255–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Duan Y, Ma Z, Yang Q. 2016. Characteristics of consecutive dry days variations in China. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 130(1–2): 701–709.Google Scholar
  7. Field C B, Barros V, Stocker T F, et al. 2012. IPCC-Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation. A special report of working groups I and II of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 65–108.Google Scholar
  8. Fotso-Nguemo T, Chamani R, Yepdo Z D, et al. 2018. Projected trends of extreme rainfall events from CMIP5 models over Central Africa. Atmospheric Science Letters, 19(2): e803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Frich P, Alexander L V, Della-Marta P, et al. 2002. Observed coherent changes in climatic extremes during the second half of the twentieth century. Climate Research, 19(3): 193–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Grinn-Gofron A, Bosiacka B. 2015. Effects of meteorological factors on the composition of selected fungal spores in the air. Aerobiologia, 31(1): 63–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hachigonta S, Reason C J C. 2006. Interannual variability in dry and wet spell characteristics over Zambia. Climate Research, 32: 49–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hayes M J, Svoboda M D, Wall N, et al. 2011. The Lincoln declaration on drought indices: universal meteorological drought index recommended. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 92(4): 485–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hill M. 2016. World’s Biggest Dam Has ‘Extremely Dangerous’ Low Water Levels. [2017-11-24]. https://doi.org/www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-01-08/world-s-biggest-dam-has-extremely-dangerous-low-water-levels.Google Scholar
  14. Holton J R. 1992. An Introduction to Dynamic Meteorology. San Diego: Academic Press, 166–175.Google Scholar
  15. Hottenstein J, Ponce-Campos G, Moguel-Yanes J, et al. 2015. Impact of varying storm intensity and consecutive dry days on grassland soil moisture. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 16(1): 106–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Karl T R, Nicholls N, Ghazi A. 1999. CLIVAR/GCOS/WMO workshop on indices and indicators for climate extremes workshop summary. Climate Change, 42(1): 3–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Libanda B, Barbara N, Bathsheba M. 2015. Rainfall variability over northern Zambia. Journal of Scientific Research and Reports, 6(6): 416–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Libanda B, Ogwang B, Ongoma V, et al. 2016. Diagnosis of the 2010 DJF flood over Zambia. Natural Hazards, 81(1): 189–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Libanda B, Zheng M, Banda N. 2017a. Variability of extreme rainfall over Malawi. Geographical Pannonica, 4(21): 212–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Libanda B, Allan D, Noel B, et al. 2017b. Predictor selection associated with statistical downscaling of precipitation over Zambia. Asian Journal of Physical and Chemical Sciences, 1(2): 1–9.Google Scholar
  21. Libanda B, Ngonga C. 2018. Projection of frequency and intensity of extreme precipitation in Zambia: a CMIP5 study. Climate Research, 76(1): 59–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Loomis R S. 1999. Feeding a world population of more than eight billion people: A challenge to science. Crop Science, 39(4): 1250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McKee T B, Doesken N J, Kleist J. 1993. The relationship of drought frequency and duration to time scales. In: Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Applied Climatology. Anaheim: American Meteorological Society, 179–184.Google Scholar
  24. Monacelli G. 2005. Drought assessment and forecasting. Geneva: World Meteorological Organization (WMO). https://doi.org/www.wmo.int/pages/prog/hwrp/documents/regions/DOC8.pdf Google Scholar
  25. Muchuru S, Landman W, DeWitt D, et al. 2014. Seasonal rainfall predictability over the Lake Kariba catchment area. Water SA, 40(3): 461, doi: https://doi.org/10.4314/wsa.v40i3.9. New Yorker. 2016. One of Africa’s biggest dams is falling apart. [2017-10-11]. https://doi.org/www.newyorker.com/tech/elements/one-of-africas-biggest-dams-is-falling-apart.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ngarukiyimana J P, Fu Y, Yang Y, et al. 2017. Dominant atmospheric circulation patterns associated with abnormal rainfall events over Rwanda, East Africa. International Journal of Climatology, 38(1): 187–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nicholson S E, Grist J P. 2003. The seasonal evolution of the atmospheric circulation over West Africa and equatorial Africa. Journal of Climate, 16(7): 1013–1030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Novella N S, Thiaw W M. 2013. African Rainfall Climatology Version 2 for Famine Early Warning Systems. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 52(3): 588–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ogwang B A, Tan G, Haishan C. 2012. Diagnosis of September–November drought and the associated circulation anomalies over Uganda. Pakistan Journal of Meteorology, 9(17): 11–24.Google Scholar
  30. Okoola R E. 1999. A diagnostic study of the Eastern Africa monsoon circulation during the northern hemisphere spring season. International Journal of Climatology, 19(2): 143–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ongoma V, Guirong T, Ogwang B A, et al. 2015. Diagnosis of seasonal rainfall variability over East Africa: A case study of 2010–2011 drought over Kenya. Pakistan Journal of Meteorology, 11(22): 13–21.Google Scholar
  32. Ongoma V, Chen H, Gao C, et al. 2017. Future changes in climate extremes over Equatorial East Africa based on CMIP5 multimodel ensemble. Natural Hazards, 90(2): 901–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ongoma V, Chen H, Gao C. 2018. Evaluation of CMIP5 twentieth century rainfall simulation over the equatorial East Africa. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-018-2392-x.Google Scholar
  34. Salehnia N, Alizadeh A, Sanaeinejad H, et al. 2017. Estimation of meteorological drought indices based on AgMERRA precipitation data and station-observed precipitation data. Journal of Arid Land, 9(6): 797–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Santos J F, Pulido-Calvo I, Portela M M. 2010. Spatial and temporal variability of droughts in Portugal. Water Resources Research, 46, W03503, doi: 10.1029/2009WR008071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Scheff J, Frierson D M W. 2012. Robust future precipitation declines in CMIP5 largely reflect the poleward expansion of model subtropical dry zones. Geophysical Research Letters, 39(18): L18704, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL052910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schneider U, Ziese M, Meyer-Christoffer A, et al. 2016. The new portfolio of global precipitation data products of the Global Precipitation Climatology Centre suitable to assess and quantify the global water cycle and resources. Proceedings of the International Association of Hydrological Sciences, 374: 29–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Singh U S, Rathor H S. 1974. Reduction of the complete omega equation to the simplest form. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 112(1): 219–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Taylor K E. 2001. Summarizing multiple aspects of model performance in a single diagram. Journal of Geophysical Research, 106(D7): 7183–7192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Taylor K E, Stouffer R J, Meehl G A. 2012. An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 93(4): 485–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tiffen M, Mulele M R. 1994. The environmental impact of the 1991–92 drought on Zambia. A report for IUCN–The world conservation union. [2018-03-06]. https://doi.org/portals.iucn.org/library/sites/library/files/documents/1994-017.pdf.Google Scholar
  42. Trenberth K E, Fasullo J T. 2009. Global warming due to increasing absorbed solar radiation. Geophysical Research Letters, 36(7): L07706, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL037527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Udmale P, Ichikawa Y S, Kiem A, et al. 2014. Drought Impacts and Adaptation Strategies for Agriculture and Rural Livelihood in the Maharashtra State of India. The Open Agriculture Journal, 8(1): 41–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Uhe P, Philip S, Kew S, et al. 2017. Attributing drivers of the 2016 Kenyan drought. International Journal of Climatology, 38(S1): e554–e568.Google Scholar
  45. Zargar A, Sadiq R, Naser B, et al. 2011. A review of drought indices. Environmental Reviews, 19(1): 333–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Zhao T, Dai A. 2015. The magnitude and causes of global drought changes in the twenty-first century under a low–moderate emissions scenario. Journal of Climate, 28(11): 4490–4512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Science Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brigadier Libanda
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mie Zheng
    • 2
  • Chilekana Ngonga
    • 3
  1. 1.School of GeosciencesThe University of EdinburghEdinburghUK
  2. 2.School of Civil Engineering and GeosciencesNewcastle UniversityNewcastleUK
  3. 3.Ministry of Energy and Water DevelopmentLusakaZambia

Personalised recommendations