Advertisement

Journal of Arid Land

, Volume 11, Issue 2, pp 292–305 | Cite as

Exogenously applied glycinebetaine induced alteration in some key physio-biochemical attributes and plant anatomical features in water stressed oat (Avena sativa L.) plants

  • Anum Shehzadi
  • Nudrat A. AkramEmail author
  • Ayaz Ali
  • Muhammad Ashraf
Article
  • 6 Downloads

Abstract

Although exogenous application of glycinebetaine (GB) is widely reported to regulate a myriad of physio-biochemical attributes in plants under stressful environments including drought stress, there is little information available in the literature on how and up to what extent GB can induce changes in anatomical features in water starved plants. Thus, the present research work was conducted to assess the GB-induced changes in growth, physio-biochemical, and anatomical characteristics in two cultivars (CK-1 and F-411) of oat (Avena sativa L.) under limited water supply. After exposure to water stress, a considerable reduction was observed in plant growth in terms of lengths and weights of shoot and roots, leaf mesophyll thickness, leaf midrib thickness, root cortex thickness, root diameter, stem diameter, stem phloem area, and stem vascular bundle area in both oat cultivars. However, water stress resulted in a significant increase in leaf total phenolics, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), ascorbic acid (AsA), GB contents, activities of enzymes (CAT, SOD and POD), total soluble proteins, leaf epidermis (abaxial and adaxial) thickness, bulliform cell area, sclerenchyma thickness, root endodermis and epidermis thickness, root metaxylem area, stem metaxylem area and stem sclerenchyma thickness in both oat cultivars. Foliar-applied 100 mM GB suppressed H2O2 contents, while improved growth attributes, free proline and GB contents, activity of SOD enzyme, leaf abaxial epidermis thickness, leaf bulliform cell area, leaf midrib thickness, leaf sclerenchyma thickness, root cortex thickness, root endodermis, epidermis thickness, root stele diameter, stem diameter, stem epidermis thickness, stem metaxylem area, and stem phloem and vascular bundle area in both oat cultivars. For both oat cultivars, CK-1 was superior to F-411 in leaf abaxial epidermis thickness, leaf mesophyll, leaf sclerenchyma, root metaxylem area, stem diameter, stem epidermis, sclerenchyma thickness, stem metaxylem area, and stem vascular bundle area. Overall, both oat cultivars showed inconsistent behavior to water stress and foliar-applied GB in terms of different physio-biochemical attributes, however, CK-1 was superior to F-411 in a number of anatomical features of leaf, root, and stem.

Keywords

drought tolerance anatomical features oat glycinebetaine antioxidants 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The research work presented in this manuscript was financially supported by the Department of Botany, Government College University, Faisalabad, Pakistan.

References

  1. Abdel C G, Al-Rawi I M T. 2011. Anatomical alteration in response to irrigation and water stress in some legume crops. American Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 1(4): 231–264.Google Scholar
  2. Ahmad P, Rasool S, Gul A, et al. 2016. Jasmonates: Multifunctional roles in stress tolerance. Frontiers in Plant Science, 7: 813.Google Scholar
  3. Ahmed M F E M, Mac D M, Bashir A A G. 2011. Effect of water stress at different periods on seed yield and water use efficiency of guar under Shambat conditions. Agricultural Sciences, 2(3): 262–266.Google Scholar
  4. Akram N A, Shahbaz M, Ashraf M. 2007. Relationship of photosynthetic capacity and proline accumulation with the growth of differently adapted populations of two potential grasses (Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers. and Cenchrus ciliaris L.) to drought stress. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 39(3): 777–786.Google Scholar
  5. Akram N A, Noreen S, Noreen T, et al. 2015. Exogenous application of trehalose alters growth, physiology and nutrient composition in radish (Raphanus sativus L.) plants under water deficit conditions. Brazilian Journal of Botany, 38(3): 431–439.Google Scholar
  6. Akram N A, Shafiq S, Ashraf M, et al. 2016. Drought-induced anatomical changes in radish (Raphanus sativus L.) leaves supplied with trehalose through different modes. Arid Land Research and Management, 30(4): 412–420.Google Scholar
  7. Aldesuquy H S, Abbas M A, Abo-Hamed S A, et al. 2013. Does glycine betaine and salicylic acid ameliorate the negative effect of drought on wheat by regulating osmotic adjustment through solutes accumulation? Journal of Stress Physiology and Biochemistry, 9(3): 5–22.Google Scholar
  8. Arnon D I. 1949. Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplast, polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris L. Journal of Plant Physiology, 24(1): 1–15.Google Scholar
  9. Ashikari M, Feng-Ma J. 2015. Exploring the power of plants to overcome environmental stresses. Rice (NY), 8: 10.Google Scholar
  10. Ashraf M, Foolad M R. 2007. Roles of glycine betaine and proline in improving plant abiotic stress resistance. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 59(2): 206–216.Google Scholar
  11. Ashraf M, Athar H R, Harris P J C, et al. 2008. Some prospective strategies for improving crop salt tolerance. Advances in Agronomy, 97: 45–110.Google Scholar
  12. Ashraf M. 2010. Inducing drought tolerance in plants: recent advances. Biotechnology Advances, 28(1): 169–183.Google Scholar
  13. Ashraf M, Akram N A, Al-Qurainy F, et al. 2011. Drought tolerance: Roles of organic osmolytes, growth regulators, and mineral nutrients. Advances in Agronomy, 111: 249–296.Google Scholar
  14. Ashraf M, Harris P J C. 2013. Photosynthesis under stressful environments: An overview. Photosynthetica, 51(2): 163–190.Google Scholar
  15. Balsamo R A, Willigen C V, Baue A M, et al. 2006. Drought tolerance of selected Eragrostis species correlates with leaf tensile properties. Annals of Botany, 97(6): 985–991.Google Scholar
  16. Bates L S, Waldren R P, Teare I D. 1973. Rapid determination of free proline for water stress studies. Plant and Soil, 39(1): 205–207.Google Scholar
  17. Behnamnia M, Kalantari K M, Rezanejad F. 2009. Exogenous application of brassinosteroid alleviates drought-induced oxidative stress in Lycopersicon esculentum L. General and Applied Plant Physiology, 35(1–2): 22–34.Google Scholar
  18. Bloch D, Hoffmann C M, Märander B. 2006. Impact of water supply on photosynthesis, water use and carbon isotope discrimination of sugar beet genotypes. European Journal of Agronomy, 24(3): 218–225.Google Scholar
  19. Boughalleb F, Abdellaoui R, Brahim N, et al. 2014. Anatomical adaptations of Astragalus gombiformis Pomel. under drought stress. Central European Journal of Biology, 9(12): 1215–1225.Google Scholar
  20. Bradford M M. 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Annual Biochemistry, 72(1–2): 248–254.Google Scholar
  21. Carmak I, Horst W J. 1991. Effects of aluminum on lipid peroxidation, superoxide dismutase, catalase, and peroxidase activities in root tips of soybean (Glycine max). Physiologia Plantarum, 83(3): 463–468.Google Scholar
  22. Chance B, Maehly A C. 1955. Assay of catalases and peroxidases. Methods in Enzymology, 2: 764–775.Google Scholar
  23. Cha-um S, Kirdmanee C. 2010. Effect of glycinebetaine on proline, water use, and photosynthetic efficiencies, and growth of rice seedlings under salt stress. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 34: 517–527.Google Scholar
  24. Chaves M M, Oliveira M M. 2004. Mechanisms underlying plant resilience to water deficits: Prospects for water-saving agriculture. Journal of Experimental Botany, 55(407): 2365–2384.Google Scholar
  25. Chen T H H, Murata N. 2008. Glycinebetaine: an effective protectant against abiotic stress in plants. Trends in Plant Science, 13(9): 499–505.Google Scholar
  26. Farooq M, Basra S M A, Wahid A, et al. 2008. Physiological role of exogenously applied glycinebetaine to improve drought tolerance in fine grain aromatic rice (Oryza sativa L.). Journal of Agronomy and Crop Sciences, 194(5): 325–333.Google Scholar
  27. Ghorbanli M, Gafarabad M, Amirkian T, et al. 2013. Investigation of proline, total protein, chlorophyll, ascorbate and dehydroascorbate changes under drought stress in Akria and Mobil tomato cultivars. Iranian Journal of Plant Physiology, 3(2): 651–658.Google Scholar
  28. Giannopolitis C N, Ries S K. 1977. Superoxide dismutase. I. Occurrence in higher plants. Plant Physiology, 59(2): 309–314.Google Scholar
  29. Giri J. 2011. Glycinebetaine and biotic stress tolerance in plants. Plant Signaling & Behavior, 6(11): 1746–1751.Google Scholar
  30. Grieve C M, Grattan S R. 1983. Rapid assay for determination of water soluble quaternary ammonium compounds. Plant and Soil, 70(2): 303–307.Google Scholar
  31. Hameed A, Goher M, Iqbal N. 2013. Drought induced programmed cell death and associated changes in antioxidants, proteases, and lipid peroxidation in wheat leaves. Biologia Plantarum, 57(2): 370–374.Google Scholar
  32. Hamidou F, Zombre G, Diouf O, et al. 2007. Physiological, biochemical and agro-morphological responses of five cowpea genotypes (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) to water deficit under glasshouse conditions. Biotechnology, Agronomie, Societie and Environment, 11(3): 225–234.Google Scholar
  33. Hasheminasab H, Assad M T, Aliakbari A, et al. 2012. Influence of drought stress on oxidative damage and antioxidant defense systems in tolerant and susceptible wheat genotypes. Journal of Agricultural Science, 4(8): 20–30.Google Scholar
  34. Hossain M A, Fujita M. 2010. Evidence for a role of exogenous glycinebetaine and proline in antioxidant defense and methylglyoxal detoxification systems in mung bean seedlings under salt stress. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants, 16(1): 19–29.Google Scholar
  35. Hussain M, Malik M A, Farooq M, et al. 2008. Improving drought tolerance by exogenous application of glycinebetaine and salicylic acid in sunflower. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 194(3): 193–199.Google Scholar
  36. Iqbal N, Ashraf M, Ashraf M Y. 2009. Influence of exogenous glycine betaine on gas exchange and biomass production in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) under water limited conditions. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 195(6): 420–426.Google Scholar
  37. Jatoi W A, Baloch M J, Kumbhar M B, et al. 2011. Effect of water stress on physiological and yield parameters at anthesis stage in elite spring wheat cultivars. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture, 27: 59–65.Google Scholar
  38. Julkunen-Tiitto R. 1985. Phenolic constituents in the leaves of north willows: methods for the analysis of certain phenolics. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 33(2): 213–217.Google Scholar
  39. Khan M A, Shirazi M U, Khan M A, et al. 2009. Role of proline, K/Na ratio and chlorophyll content in salt tolerance of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Pakistan Journal of Botany, 41(2): 633–638.Google Scholar
  40. Kumar R R, Karajol K, Naik G R. 2011. Effect of polyethylene glycol induced water stress on physiological and biochemical responses in pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L. Mill sp.). Recent Research in Science & Technology, 3: 148–152.Google Scholar
  41. Lum M S, Hanafi M M, Rafii Y M, et al. 2014. Effect of drought stress on growth, proline and antioxidant enzyme activities of upland rice. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences, 24(5): 1487–1493.Google Scholar
  42. Ma Q Q, Wang W, Li Y H, et al. 2006. Alleviation of photoinhibition in drought-stressed wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) by foliar-applied glycinebetaine. Journal of Plant Physiology, 163(2): 165–175.Google Scholar
  43. Ma X L, Wang Y J, Xie S L, et al. 2007. Glycinebetaine application ameliorates negative effects of drought stress in tobacco. Russian Journal of Plant Physiology, 54: 472–479.Google Scholar
  44. Mafakheri A, Siosemardeh A, Bahramnejad B, et al. 2010. Effect of drought stress on yield, proline and chlorophyll contents in three chickpea cultivars. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 4(8): 580–585.Google Scholar
  45. Mahmood T, Ashraf M, Shahbaz M. 2009. Does exogenous application of glycinebetaine as a pre-sowing seed treatment improve growth and regulate some key physiological attributes in wheat plants grown under water deficit conditions? Pakistan Journal of Botany, 41(3): 1291–1302.Google Scholar
  46. Makbul S, Coskuncelebi K, Turkmen Z, et al. 2006. Morphology and anatomy of Scrophularia L. (Scrophulariaceae) taxa from NE anatolia. Acta Biologica Cracoviensia Series Botanica, 48(1): 33–43.Google Scholar
  47. Makbul S, Türkmen Z, Coskuncelebi K, et al. 2008. Anatomical and pollen characters in the genus Epilobium L. (Onagraceae) from northeast anatolia. Acta Biologica Cracoviensia Series Botanica, 50(1): 51–62.Google Scholar
  48. Makbul S, Guler N S, Durmus N, et al. 2011. Changes in anatomical and physiological parameters of soybean under drought stress. Turkish Journal of Botany, 35: 369–377.Google Scholar
  49. Mukherjee S P, Chouduri M A. 1983. Implications of water stress induced changes in the levels of endogenous ascorbic acid and hydrogen peroxide in Vigna seedlings. Physiologia Plantarum, 58(2): 166–170.Google Scholar
  50. Mwenye O J, van Rensburg L, van Biljon A, et al. 2016. The role of proline and root traits on selection for drought-stress tolerance in soybeans: A review. South African Journal of Plant and Soil, 33(4): 245–256.Google Scholar
  51. Nawaz K, Ashraf M. 2010. Exogenous application of glycinebetaine modulates activities of antioxidants in maize plants subjected to salt stress. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 196(1): 28–37.Google Scholar
  52. Nawaz T, Hameed M, Ashraf M, et al. 2013. Modifications in root and stem anatomy for water conservation in some diverse blue panic (Panicum antidotale Retz.) ecotypes under drought stress. Arid Land Research and Management, 27(3): 286–297.Google Scholar
  53. Nemeskéri E, Sárdi É, Remenyik J, et al. 2010. Study of the defensive mechanism against drought in French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) varieties. Acta Physiologia Plantarum, 32(6): 1125–1134.Google Scholar
  54. Omar A A. 2012. Impact of drought stress on germination and seedling growth parameters of some wheat cultivars. Life Science Journal, 9(1): 590–598.Google Scholar
  55. Ozorgucu B, Gemici Y, Turkan I. 1991. Comparative Plant Anatomy. İzmir: Ege University Faculty of Science Publication No: 129. (in Turkish)Google Scholar
  56. Pratap V, Sharma Y K. 2010. Impact of osmotic stress on seed germination and seedling growth in black gram (Phaseolus mungo). Journal of Environmental Biology, 31(5): 721–726.Google Scholar
  57. Raza M A S, Saleem M F, Khan I H, et al. 2012. Evaluating the drought stress tolerance efficiency of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars. Russian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Science, 12(12): 41–46.Google Scholar
  58. Rezaei M A, Kaviani B, Masouleh A K. 2012. The effect of exogenous glycine betaine on yield of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) in two contrasting cultivars Pershing and DPX under soil salinity stress. Plant Omics Journal, 5(2): 87–93.Google Scholar
  59. Ruzin S E. 1999. Plant Microtechnique and Microscopy. New York: Oxford University Press, 322.Google Scholar
  60. Sadiq M, Akram N A, Ashraf M. 2017. Foliar applications of alpha-tocopherol improve the composition of fresh pods of Vigna radiata subjected to water deficiency. Turkish Journal of Botany, 41: 244–252.Google Scholar
  61. Saeed N, Maqbool N, Haseeb M, et al. 2016. Morpho-anatomical changes in roots of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under drought stress condition. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 6: 1–9.Google Scholar
  62. Seki M, Kamei A, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, et al. 2003. Molecular responses to drought, salinity and frost: common and different paths for plant protection. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 14(2): 194–199.Google Scholar
  63. Shafiq S, Akram N A, Ashraf M. 2015. Does exogenously-applied trehalose alter oxidative defense system in the edible part of radish (Raphanus sativus L.) under water-deficit conditions? Scientia Horticulturae, 185: 68–75.Google Scholar
  64. Shahbaz M, Masood Y, Ashraf M. 2011. Is foliar-applied glycinebetaine effective in mitigating the adverse effects of drought stress on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)? Journal of Applied Botany and Food Quality, 84(2): 192–199.Google Scholar
  65. Snedecor G W, Cochran W G. 1980. Statistical Methods (7th ed.). Ames: Iowa State University Press, 97.Google Scholar
  66. Subbarao G V, Wheeler R M, Levine L H, et al. 2001. Glycine betaine accumulation, ionic and water relations of red-beet at contrasting levels of sodium supply. Journal of Plant Physiology, 158(6): 767–776.Google Scholar
  67. Vasellati V, Oesterheld M, Medan D, et al. 2001. Effects of flooding and drought on the anatomy of Paspalum dilatatum. Annals of Botany, 88(3): 355–360.Google Scholar
  68. Velikova V, Yordanov I, Edreva A. 2000. Oxidative stress and some antioxidant systems in acid rain-treated bean plants: Protective role of exogenous polyamines. Plant Science, 151(1): 59–66.Google Scholar
  69. Wang W, Vinocur B, Altman A. 2003. Plant responses to drought, salinity and extreme temperatures: towards genetic engineering for stress tolerance. Planta, 218(1): 1–14.Google Scholar
  70. Zhang L, Gao M, Hu J, et al. 2012. Modulation role of abscisic acid (ABA) on growth, water relations and glycinebetaine metabolism in two maize (Zea mays L.) cultivars under drought stress. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 13: 3189–3202.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Science Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anum Shehzadi
    • 1
  • Nudrat A. Akram
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ayaz Ali
    • 1
  • Muhammad Ashraf
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of BotanyGovernment College UniversityFaisalabadPakistan
  2. 2.Pakistan Science FoundationIslamabadPakistan
  3. 3.Department of BotanyKing Saud UniversityRiyadhSaudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations