Wind tunnel experiments on dust emissions from different landform types
The measurement and assessment of dust emissions from different landforms are important to understand the atmospheric loading of PM10 (particulate matter ≤10 μm aerodynamic diameter) and to assess natural sources of dust; however, the methodology and technique for determining the dust still present significant research challenges. In the past, specialized field observation and field wind tunnel studies have been used to understand the dust emission. A series of wind tunnel tests were carried out to identify natural sources of dust and measure the magnitudes of dust emissions from different landforms. The method used in this study allowed the measurement of the PM10 emission rate using a laboratory based environmental boundary layer wind tunnel. Results indicated that PM10 emissions demonstrated strong temporal variation and were primarily driven by aerodynamic entrainment. Sand dunes, playa, and alluvial fans had the largest dust emission rates (0.8–5.4 mg/(m2•s)) while sandy gravel, Gobi desert and abandoned lands had the lowest emission rates (0.003–0.126 mg/(m2•s)). Dust emissions were heavily dependent on the surface conditions, especially the availability of loose surface dust. High dust emissions were a result of the availability of dustparticle materials for entrainment while low dust emissions were a result of surface crusts and gravel cover. Soil surface property (surface crusts and gravel cover) plays an important role in controlling the availability of dust-sized particles for entrainment. The dust emission rate depended not only on the surface conditions but also on the friction velocity. The emission rate of PM10 varies as a power function of the friction velocity. Although dynamic abrasion processes have a strong influence on the amount of dust entrainment, aerodynamic entrainment may provide an important mechanism for dust emissions. Large volumes of dust entrained by aerodynamic entrainment cannot only occur at low shear velocity without saltation, but may dominate the entrainment process in many arid and semi-arid environments. So it may also be responsible for large magnitude dust storms. Playa and alluvial fan landforms, prior to developing a surface crust, may be the main sources of dust storms in Qinghai Province.
Keywordsemission rates PM10 fugitive dust landforms wind tunnel dust dynamics
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
This study was supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (2016YFA0601901, 2013CB956001).
- Biamah E K. 2005. Coping with Drought: Options for Soil and Water Management in Semi-Arid Kenya. Wageningen: Wageningen University and Research, 159–164.Google Scholar
- Bullard J E, Harrison S P, Baddock M C, et al. 2011. Preferential dust sources: A geomorphological classification designed for use in global dust-cycle models. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 116(F4): 4034.Google Scholar
- Goudie A, Middleton N J. 2006. Desert Dust in the Global System. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, 156–164.Google Scholar
- Koven C D, Fung I. 2008. Identifying global dust source areas using high-resolution land surface form. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 113(D22): 1971–1976.Google Scholar
- Leys J F, McTainsh G H. 1999. Dust and nutrient deposition to riverine environments of south-eastern Australia. Sairaanhoitaja, 46: 59–76.Google Scholar
- Loosmore G A, Hunt J R. 2000. Dust resuspension without saltation. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 105(D16): 20663–20671.Google Scholar
- Lu H, Shao Y P. 1999. A new model for dust emission by saltation bombardment. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 104(D14): 16827–16842.Google Scholar
- Macpherson T, Nickling W G, Gillies J A, et al. 2008. Dust emissions from undisturbed and disturbed supply-limited desert surfaces. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 113(F2): 205–208.Google Scholar
- Marticorena B, Bergametti G. 1995. Modeling the atmospheric dust cycle: 1. Design of a soil-derived dust emission scheme. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 100(D8): 16415–16430.Google Scholar
- Miller R L, Tegen I, Perlwitz J. 2004. Surface radiative forcing by soil dust aerosols and the hydrologic cycle. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 109(D4): 361–375.Google Scholar
- Milton S F, Greed G, Brooks M E, et al. 2008. Modeled and observed atmospheric radiation balance during the West African dry season: Role of mineral dust, biomass burning aerosol, and surface albedo. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, 113(D23): 3614.Google Scholar
- Neff J C, Reynolds R L, Farmer G L, et al. 2007. The changing role of dust in biogeochemical cycling. In: AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. Washington: AGU. V13F-01Google Scholar
- Prospero J M. 1999. Long-term measurements of the transport of African mineral dust to the southeastern United States: Implications for regional air quality. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 104(D13): 15917–15927.Google Scholar
- Roney J A, White B R. 2004. Definition and measurement of dust Aeolian thresholds. Journal of Geophysical Research Earth Surface, 109(F1): 165–282.Google Scholar
- Shao Y, Raupach M R, Findlater P A. 1993. Effect of saltation bombardment on the entrainment of dust by wind. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 98(D7): 12719–12726.Google Scholar
- Shao Y P. 2001. A model for mineral dust emission. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 106(D17): 20239–20254.Google Scholar
- Tegen I, Lacis A A. 1996. Modeling of particle size distribution and its influence on the radiative properties of mineral dust aerosol. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 101(D14): 19237–19244.Google Scholar