Journal of Arid Land

, Volume 10, Issue 2, pp 316–333 | Cite as

Regional difference and dynamic mechanism of locality of the Chinese farming-pastoral ecotone based on geotagged photos from Panoramio

Article
  • 6 Downloads

Abstract

Cross-regional locality research reflects the influences of natural environment and the human activities due to the abundant land types and the multiple landscape combinations in related regions. The Chinese farming-pastoral ecotone is a typical large-scale region but few studies were conducted. This research contributed to the understanding of cross-regional locality of the Chinese farming-pastoral ecotone from different scales, including national, sectional, and provincial administrative units by utilizing geotagged photos (GTPs) obtained from the Panoramio website. The major results were as follows: (1) the locality elements of the Chinese farming-pastoral ecotone included 52 free nodes classified into 8 types of scene attributes; (2) there were huge differences between locality elements of different regions, and there was a negative correlation between the similarity degree of elements of different provinces and their spatial distances; (3) the Chinese farming-pastoral ecotone could be divided into the northern, central and southern sections, whose localities had differences in element constitution, association structure and the strength of elements, system stability and the anti-interference capability; and (4) the evolution of the localities of the northern and central sections was mainly influenced by human activities, while the locality of southern section retained more natural features. On a theoretical level, this research aimed to establish the research methodology of locality from the perspective of open data on the web with strong operability and replicability. On a practical level, this research could enrich the structuring recognition of the locality of the Chinese farming-pastoral ecotone and the comprehension of its dynamic mechanism. The results provide a reference for locality differentiation protection and the development of a cross-regional scale.

Keywords

administrative units geotagged photos landscape locality networks regional differences 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Sino-German Center (the National Natural Science Foundation of China and the German Science Foundation; GZ1201), and the Postgraduate Courses Project of Peking University (2014-40).

References

  1. Deng H. 2005. From the Natural Landscape to the Cultural Landscape: A Historical Geography Perspective on the Evolution of Man-land Relationship in the Farming-pastoral Ecotone in the North Yanshan. Beijing: The Commercial Press, 41–106. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  2. Du M H, Yan P J, Wang P T. 2015. The drought disaster and its response to the warming-dry climate in the farming-pastoral ecotones in the northern China. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 29(1): 124–128. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  3. Feick R, Robertson C. 2015. A multi-scale approach to exploring urban places in geotagged photographs. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 53: 96–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Frias-Martinez V, Frias-Martinez E. 2014. Spectral clustering for sensing urban land use using Twitter activity. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 35: 237–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Han Y, Hou X Y. 2011. Change, classification and management of agro-pastoral ecotone in north China. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 32(5): 31–35. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  6. Hou X H, Niu Z, Gao S, et al. 2013. Monitoring vegetation phenology in farming-pastoral zone using SPOT-VGT NDVI data. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 29(1): 142–150. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  7. Hu Y J, Gao S, Janowicz K, et al. 2015. Extracting and understanding urban areas of interest using geotagged photos. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 54: 240–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jankowski P, Andrienko N, Andrienko G, et al. 2010. Discovering landmark preferences and movement patterns from photo postings. Transactions in GIS, 14(6): 833–852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kisilevich S, Keim D, Rokach L. 2010. A novel approach to mining travel sequences using collections of geotagged photos. In: Painho M, Santos M Y, Pundt H. Geospatial Thinking. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 163–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Li M M, Yan J P. 2013. The characteristics and response of climate change in farming-pastoral ecotone of North China. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 27(5): 100–106. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  11. Li X, Stepchenkova S. 2012. Chinese outbound tourists’ destination image of America: part I. Journal of Travel Research, 51(3): 250–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ma W Y, Wang X M, Zhou N, et al. 2017. Relative importance of climate factors and human activities in impacting vegetation dynamics during 2000-2015 in the Otindag Sandy Land, northern China. Journal of Arid Land, 9(4): 558–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Meng J J, Zhang Y R, Zhou P. 2010. Ecological vulnerability assessment of the farming-pastoral transitional zone in northern China: A case study of Ordos City. Journal of Desert Research, 30(4): 850–856. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  14. Salton G, Buckley C. 1988. Term-weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval. Information Processing & Management, 24(5): 513–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Sha Z Y, Xie Y C, Tan X C, et al. 2017. Assessing the impacts of human activities and climate variations on grassland productivity by partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Journal of Arid Land, 9(4): 473–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Spyrou E, Mylonas P. 2016. Analyzing Flickr metadata to extract location-based information and semantically organize its photo content. Neurocomputing, 172: 114–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Steiger E, Westerholt R, Resch B, et al. 2015. Twitter as an indicator for whereabouts of people? Correlating Twitter with UK census data. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 54: 255–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Stepchenkova S, Zhan F Z. 2013. Visual destination images of Peru: Comparative content analysis of DMO and user-generated photography. Tourism Management, 36: 590–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Stephens M, Poorthuis A. 2015. Follow thy neighbor: Connecting the social and the spatial networks on Twitter. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 53: 87–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wang F, Li W, Prominski M. 2014a. The new conflicts, strategies and explorations of urbanization and locality: Overview on the Sino-German Symposium. Geographical Research, 33(11): 2205–2014. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  21. Wang J S, Jin X B, Cao X, et al. 2015. Changes of the northern limit of cultivation in northern agro-pastoral ecotone in Qing Dynasty. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 29(3): 20–25. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  22. Wang X J, Zhou L H, Shi M J. 2014b. Sustainable development of a rural economy under grazing prohibition in a desertification control region and agro-pastoral transitional zone. Resources Science, 36(10): 2166–2173. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  23. Weiss S M, Indurkhya N, Zhang T, et al. 2005. Text Mining: Predictive Methods for Analyzing Unstructured Information. New York: Springer, 25–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Xu J Y, Liu W H, Chang J, et al. 2010. Exploring strategies about ecological improvement based on local responses in northern agro-pastoral ecotone. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 30(22): 6126–6134. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  25. Xu L, Luo W, Zhou B B. 2015. Landscape ecological risk assessment of farming-pastoral ecozone based on land use change: A case study of the Yanghe Watershed, China. Journal of Natural Resources, 30(4): 580–590. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  26. Yu S X, Zhao M, Chen F Z, et al. 2010. Dynamic remote sensing monitoring and analysis on desertification in the northern farming-pastoral zone based on GIS: A case of Tongliao, Inner Mongolia. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 24(4): 107–111. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  27. Zhao H L, Zhao X Y, Zhang T H, et al. 2002. Boundary line on agro-pasture zig zag zone in north China and its problems on eco-environment. Advance in Earth Sciences, 17(5): 739–747. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  28. Zhao S Q. 1953. An economic geographical survey of a farming-pastoral ecozone: Caibei, Caimeng and Ximeng. Acta Geographica Sinica, 19(1): 43–60. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  29. Zheng Y Y, Guo S T, Su J. 2014. The climate boundary and its change in farming-pastoral ecotone of northern China. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 35(3): 6–13. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  30. Zhou B L, Liu L, Oliva A, et al. 2014. Recognizing city identity via attribute analysis of geo-tagged images. In: Fleet D, Pajdla T, Schiele B, et al. Computer Vision-ECCV 2014. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 519–534.Google Scholar
  31. Zhou X L, Xu C, Kimmons B. 2015. Detecting tourism destinations using scalable geospatial analysis based on cloud computing platform. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 54: 144–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, the Chinese Academy of Sciences and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sino-German Joint Laboratory on Urbanization and Locality Research (UAL), College of Architecture and Landscape ArchitecturePeking UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.Key Laboratory for Earth Surface Processes, Ministry of EducationPeking UniversityBeijingChina
  3. 3.College of Urban and Environmental SciencesPeking UniversityBeijingChina
  4. 4.Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources ResearchChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations