Advertisement

Journal of Arid Land

, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp 1–12 | Cite as

Effects of sand-fixing and windbreak forests on wind flow: a synthesis of results from field experiments and numerical simulations

  • Kejie Zhan
  • Shizeng Liu
  • Zihui Yang
  • Etian Fang
  • Lanping Zhou
  • Ning HuangEmail author
Article

Abstract

Sand-fixing and windbreak forests are widely used to protect or/and improve the ecological environments in arid and semi-arid regions. A full understanding of wind flow characteristics is essential to arranging the patterns of these protective forests for enhancing the effectiveness. In this study, the wind velocity over the underlying surface with sand-fixing forests and windbreak forests at the heights of 1–49 m was monitored from two 50-m high observation towers in an oasis of Minqin, Gansu Province of China. The wind velocities were simulated at different locations over these protective forests between those two towers by a two-dimensional Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) model. The results showed that at the heights of 1–49 m, the wind velocity profiles followed a classical logarithm law at the edge of the oasis and a multilayer structure inside the oasis. With increasing number of sand-fixing forest and windbreak forest arrays, the wind velocity at the heights of 1–49 m generally decreased along the downstream direction of the prevailing wind. Specifically, below the height of windbreak forests, the wind velocity decelerates as the airflow approaches to the windbreak forests and then accelerates as the airflow passes over the windbreak forests. In contrast, above the height of windbreak forests, the wind velocity accelerates as the airflow approaches to the windbreak forests and then generally decelerates as the airflow passes over the windbreak forests. Both the array number and array spacing of sand-fixing and windbreak forests could influence the wind velocity. The wind protection effects of sand-fixing forests were closely related to the array spacing of windbreak forests and increased with the addition of sand-fixing forests when the array of the forests was adequately spaced. However, if the array spacing of windbreak forests was smaller than seven times of the heights of windbreak forests, the effects were reduced or completely masked by the effects of windbreak forests. The results could offer theoretical guidelines on how to systematically arrange the patterns of sand-fixing and windbreak forests for preventing wind erosion in the most convenient and the cheapest ways.

Keywords

wind velocity sand-fixing forest windbreak forest computational simulation Minqin 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Forestry Industry Research Special Funds for Public Welfare Projects (201404306), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41371034, 41361001, 31560235), the National Key Technologies R & D Program of China (2013BAC07B01) and the Gansu Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars (145RJDA327). The authors would like to give special thanks to the editors who contributed greatly to improving the English of this paper.

References

  1. Alinot C, Masson C. 2005. K-ε model for the atmospheric boundary layer under various thermal stratifications. Journal of Solar Energy Engineering, 127(4): 438–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amichev B Y, Bentham M J, Cerkowniak D, et al. 2015. Mapping and quantification of planted tree and shrub shelterbelts in Saskatchewan, Canada. Agroforestry Systems, 89(1): 49–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beaucage P, Brower M, Tensen J. 2014. Evaluation of four numerical wind flow models for wind resource mapping. Wind Energy, 17(2): 197–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blocken B, Stathopoulos T, Carmeliet J. 2007. CFD simulation of the atmospheric boundary layer: wall function problems. Atmospheric Environment, 41(2): 238–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bradley E F, Mulhearn P J. 1983. Development of velocity and shear stress distribution in the wake of a porous shelter fence. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 15(1–3): 145–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brandle J R, Hodges L, Zhou X H. 2004. Windbreaks in North American agricultural systems. Agroforestry Systems, 61–62: 65–78.Google Scholar
  7. Chan T L, Dong G, Leung C W, et al. 2002. Validation of a two-dimensional pollutant dispersion model in an isolated street canyon. Atmospheric Environment, 36(5): 861–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cleugh H A. 1998. Effects of windbreaks on airflow, microclimates and crop yields. Agroforestry Systems, 41(1): 55–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cleugh H A, Hughes D E. 2002. Impact of shelter on crop microclimates: a synthesis of results from wind tunnel and field experiments. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 42(6): 679–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dalpé B, Masson C. 2009. Numerical simulation of wind flow near a forest edge. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 97(5–6): 228–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fluent. 1996. FlowLab 1.2 User’s Guide. Lebanon: Centerra Resource Park, 7–148.Google Scholar
  12. Guo L J, Li H Q, Sun H Q. 2014. The strategic research on green space system planning of small towns in cold region. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 641–642: 502–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hoffmana C A, Linn R, Parsons R, et al. Modeling spatial and temporal dynamics of wind flow and potential fire behavior following a mountain pine beetle outbreak in a lodgepole pine forest. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 204: 79–93.Google Scholar
  14. Huang C H, Lee C I, Tsai C J. 2005. Reduction of particle reentrainment using porous fence in front of dust samples. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 131(12): 1644–1648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Judd M J, Raupach M R, Finnigan J J. 1996. A wind tunnel study of turbulent flow around single and multiple windbreaks, part I: velocity fields. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 80(1–2): 127–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Katul G G, Mahrt L, Poggi D, et al. 2004. ONE-and TWO-equation models for canopy turbulence. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 113(1): 81–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kobayashi M H, Pereira J C F, Siqueira M B B. 1994. Numerical study of the turbulent flow over and in a model forest on a 2D hill. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 53(3): 357–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lecrivain G, Slaouti A, Payton C, et al. 2008. Using reverse engineering and computational fluid dynamics to investigate a lower arm amputee swimmer’s performance. Journal of Biomechanics, 41(13): 2855–2859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lee S J, Lim H C. 2001. A numerical study on flow around a triangular prism located behind a porous fence. Fluid Dynamics Research, 28(3): 209–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lee S J, Park K C, Park C W. 2002. Wind tunnel observations about the shelter effect of porous fences on the sand particle movements. Atmospheric Environment, 36(9): 1453–1463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Li F R, Liu J L, Sun T S, et al. 2016. Impact of established shrub shelterbelts around oases on the diversity of ground beetles in arid ecosystems of northwestern China. Insect Conservation & Diversity, 9(2): 135–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Li L, Li X F, Lin B R, et al. 2006. Improved k–e two-equation turbulence model for canopy flow. Atmospheric Environment, 40(4): 762–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Li W, Wang F, Bell S. 2007. Simulating the sheltering effects of windbreaks in urban outdoor open space. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 95(7): 533–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Liu J, Chen J M, Black T A, et al. 1996. E-e modelling of turbulent air flow downwind of a model forest edge. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 77(1): 21–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mohammed A E, Stigter C J, Adam H S. 1996. On shelterbelt design for combating sand invasion. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 57(2–3): 81–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nelmes S, Belcher R E, Wood C J. 2001. A method for routine characterisation of shelterbelts. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 106(4): 303–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Patton E G, Shaw R H, Judd M J, et al. 1998. Large-eddy simulation of windbreak flow. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 87(2): 275–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Santiago J L, Martín F, Cuerva A, et al. 2007. Experimental and numerical study of wind flow behind windbreaks. Atmospheric Environment, 41(30): 6406–6420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sanz C. 2003. A note on k-e modelling of vegetation canopy air-flows. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 108(1): 191–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schwartz R C, Fryrear D W, Harris B L, et al. 1995. Mean flow and shear stress distributions as influenced by vegetative windbreak structure. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 75(1–3): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Shih T H, Liou W W, Shabbir A, et al. 1995. A new k eddy viscosity model for high reynolds number turbulent flows. Computers & Fluids, 24(3): 227–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Takahashi S, Du M Y, Wu P M, et al. 1998. Three dimensional numerical simulation of the flow over complex terrain with windbreak hedge. Environmental Modelling & Software, 13(3–4): 257–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Torita H, Satou H. 2007. Relationship between shelterbelt structure and mean wind reduction. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 145(3–4): 186–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tuzet A, Wilson J D. 2007. Measured winds about a thick hedge. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 145(3–4): 195–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ucar T, Hall F R. 2001. Windbreaks as a pesticide drift mitigation strategy: a review. Pest Management Science, 57(8): 663–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wang H, Takle E S. 1995. A numerical simulation of boundary-layer flows near shelterbelts. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 75(1–2): 141–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wang H J, Zhou H. 2003. A simulation study on the eco-environmental effects of 3N Shelterbelt in North China. Global and Planetary Change, 37(3–4): 231–246.Google Scholar
  38. Wilson J D. 1985. Numerical studies of flow through a windbreak. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 21(2): 119–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wilson J D. 2004. Oblique, stratified winds about a shelter fence. Part I: Measurements. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 43(8): 1149–1167.Google Scholar
  40. Wolfe S A, Nickling W G. 1993. The protective role of sparse vegetation in wind erosion. Progress in Physical Geography, 17(1): 50–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zhu T Y, Zhou G S. 1993. Reduction pattern of wind-speed in farmland windbreak network region. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 4(2): 136–140. (in Chinese)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, the Chinese Academy of Sciences and Springer - Verlag GmbH 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kejie Zhan
    • 1
    • 2
  • Shizeng Liu
    • 2
  • Zihui Yang
    • 2
  • Etian Fang
    • 2
  • Lanping Zhou
    • 2
  • Ning Huang
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Mechanics on Western Disaster and Environment in China (Ministry of Education), Department of MechanicsLanzhou UniversityLanzhouChina
  2. 2.Minqin National Station for Desert Steppe Ecosystem StudiesMinqinChina

Personalised recommendations