Journal of Arid Land

, Volume 8, Issue 1, pp 36–46 | Cite as

Responses of gross primary productivity to different sizes of precipitation events in a temperate grassland ecosystem in Inner Mongolia, China

  • Qun Guo
  • Shenggong Li
  • Zhongmin Hu
  • Wei Zhao
  • Guirui Yu
  • Xiaomin Sun
  • Linghao Li
  • Naishen Liang
  • Wenming Bai


Changes in the sizes of precipitation events in the context of global climate change may have profound impacts on ecosystem productivity in arid and semiarid grasslands. However, we still have little knowledge about to what extent grassland productivity will respond to an individual precipitation event. In this study, we quantified the duration, the maximum, and the time-integrated amount of the response of daily gross primary productivity (GPP) to an individual precipitation event and their variations with different sizes of precipitation events in a typical temperate steppe in Inner Mongolia, China. Results showed that the duration of GPP-response (τ R) and the maximum absolute GPP-response (GPPmax) increased linearly with the sizes of precipitation events (P es), driving a corresponding increase in time-integrated amount of the GPP-response (GPPtotal) because variations of GPPtotal were largely explained by τ R and GPPmax. The relative contributions of these two parameters to GPPtotal were strongly P es-dependent. The GPPmax contributed more to the variations of GPPtotal when P es was relatively small (<20 mm), whereas τ R was the main driver to the variations of GPPtotal when P es was relatively large. In addition, a threshold size of at least 5 mm of precipitation was required to induce a GPP-response for the temperate steppe in this study. Our work has important implications for the modeling community to obtain an advanced understanding of productivity-response of grassland ecosystems to altered precipitation regimes.


precipitation event grassland gross primary productivity global climate change precipitation regime 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Austin A T, Yahdjian L, Stark J M, et al. 2004. Water pulses and biogeochemical cycles in arid and semiarid ecosystems. Oecologia, 141(2): 221–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bai Y F, Wu J G, Xing Q, et al. 2008. Primary production and rain use efficiency across a precipitation gradient on the Mongolia Plateau. Ecology, 89(8): 2140–2153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beier C, Beierkuhnlein C, Wohlgemuth T, et al. 2012. Precipitation manipulation experiments—challenges and recommendations for the future. Ecology Letters, 15(8): 899–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen S P, Lin G H, Huang J H, et al. 2009. Dependence of carbon sequestration on the differential responses of ecosystem photosynthesis and respiration to rain pulses in a semiarid steppe. Global Change Biology, 15(10): 2450–2461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cherwin K, Knapp A. 2012. Unexpected patterns of sensitivity to drought in three semi-arid grasslands. Oecologia, 169(3): 845–852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Easterling D R, Meehl G A, Parmesan C, et al. 2000. Climate extremes: Observations, modeling, and impacts. Science, 289(5487): 2068–2074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. FAO. 1974). Soil Map of the World 1:5,000,000. Volumes 1–10. Paris: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and UNESCO.Google Scholar
  8. Fay P A, Carlisle J D, Knapp A K, et al. 2003. Productivity responses to altered rainfall patterns in a C4-dominated grassland. Oecologia, 137(2): 245–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hao Y B, Wang Y F, Mei X R, et al. 2010. The response of ecosystem CO2 exchange to small precipitation pulses over a temperate steppe. Plant Ecology, 209(2): 335–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hao Y B, Kang X M, Cui X Y, et al. 2012. Verification of a threshold concept of ecologically effective precipitation pulse: From plant individuals to ecosystem. Ecological Informatics, 12: 23–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Harper C W, Blair J M, Fay P A, et al. 2005. Increased rainfall variability and reduced rainfall amount decreases soil CO2 flux in a grassland ecosystem. Global Change Biology, 11(2): 322–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. He Z B, Zhao W Z, Liu H, et al. 2012. The response of soil moisture to rainfall event size in subalpine grassland and meadows in a semi-arid mountain range: A case study in northwestern China’s Qilian Mountains. Journal of Hydrology, 420–421: 183–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Heisler-White J L, Knapp A K, Kelly E F. 2008. Increasing precipitation event size increases aboveground net primary productivity in a semi-arid grassland. Oecologia, 158(1): 129–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Heisler-White J L, Blair J M, Kelly E F, et al. 2009. Contingent productivity responses to more extreme rainfall regimes across a grassland biome. Global Change Biology, 15(12): 2894–2904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hu Z M, Fan J W, Zhong H P, et al. 2007. Spatiotemporal dynamics of aboveground primary productivity along a precipitation gradient in Chinese temperate grassland. Science in China Series D: Earth Sciences, 50(5): 754–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hu Z M, Yu G R, Fu Y L, et al. 2008. Effects of vegetation control on ecosystem water use efficiency within and among four grassland ecosystems in China. Global Change Biology, 14(7): 1609–1619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hu Z M, Yu G R, Zhou Y L, et al. 2009. Partitioning of evapotranspiration and its controls in four grassland ecosystems: Application of a two-source model. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 149(9): 1410–1420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hu Z M, Yu G R, Fan J W, et al. 2010. Precipitation-use efficiency along a 4500-km grassland transect. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 19(6): 842–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Huang G, Li Y, Padilla F M. 2015. Ephemeral plants mediate responses of ecosystem carbon exchange to increased precipitation in a temperate desert. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 201: 141–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Huxman T E, Snyder K A, Tissue D, et al. 2004a. Precipitation pulses and carbon fluxes in semiarid and arid ecosystems. Oecologia, 141(2): 254–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Huxman T E, Cable J M, Ignace D D, et al. 2004b. Response of net ecosystem gas exchange to a simulated precipitation pulse in a semi-arid grassland: the role of native versus non-native grasses and soil texture. Oecologia, 141(2): 295–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2013. Long-term Climate Change: Projections, Commitments and Irreversibility. In: Climate Chang. 2013. The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, USA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Jobbágy E G, Sala O E. 2000. Controls of grass and shrub aboveground production in the Patagonian steppe. Ecological Applications, 10(2): 541–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Knapp A K, Fay P A, Blair J M, et al. 2002. Rainfall variability, carbon cycling, and plant species diversity in a mesic grassland. Science, 298(5601): 2202–2205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Knapp A K, Beier C, Briske D D, et al. 2008. Consequences of more extreme precipitation regimes for terrestrial ecosystems. BioScience, 58(9): 811–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kurc S A, Small E E. 2007. Soil moisture variations and ecosystem-scale fluxes of water and carbon in semiarid grassland and shrubland. Water Resources Research, 43(6): W06416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lauenroth W K, Bradford J B. 2012. Ecohydrology of dry regions of the United States: water balance consequences of small precipitation events. Ecohydrology, 5(1): 46–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Li F, Zhao W Z, Liu H. 2013. The response of aboveground aboveground net primary productivity of desert vegetation to rainfall pulse in the temperate desert region of northwest China. PLoS ONE, 8(9): e73003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Li X J, Li X R, Song W M, et al. 2008. Effects of crust and shrub patches on runoff, sedimentation, and related nutrient (C, N) redistribution in the desertified steppe zone of the Tengger Desert, Northern China. Geomorphology, 96(1–3): 221–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Li X R, Ma F Y, Long L Q, et al. 2001. Soil water dynamics under sand-fixing vegetation in shapotou area. Journal of Desert Research, 21(3): 217–222. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  31. Liang N S, Inoue G, Fujinuma Y. 2003. A multichannel automated chamber system for continuous measurement of forest soil CO2 efflux. Tree Physiology, 23(12): 825–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Liu B, Zhao W Z, Wen Z J. 2012. Photosynthetic response of two shrubs to rainfall pulses in desert regions of northwestern China. Photosynthetica, 50(1): 109–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lloyd J, Taylor J A. 1994. On the temperature dependence of soil respiration. Functional Ecology, 8(3): 315–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Loik M E, Breshears D D, Lauenroth W K, et al. 2004. A multi-scale perspective of water pulses in dryland ecosystems: climatology and ecohydrology of the western USA. Oecologia, 141(2): 269–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Parton W, Morgan J, Smith D, et al. 2012. Impact of precipitation dynamics on net ecosystem productivity. Global Change Biology, 18(3): 915–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Reichstein M, Tenhunen J D, Roupsard O, et al. 2002. Ecosystem respiration in two Mediterranean evergreen Holm Oak forests: drought effects and decomposition dynamics. Functional Ecology, 16(1): 27–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ross I, Misson L, Rambal S, et al. 2012. How do variations in the temporal distribution of rainfall events affect ecosystem fluxes in seasonally water-limited Northern Hemisphere shrublands and forests? Biogeosciences, 9: 1007–1024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Swemmer A M, Knapp A K, Snyman H A. 2007. Intra-seasonal precipitation patterns and above-ground productivity in three perennial grasslands. Journal of Ecology, 95(4): 780–788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tan Z H, Zhang Y P, Liang N S, et al. 2013. Soil respiration in an old-growth subtropical forest: Patterns, components, and controls. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 118(7): 2981–2990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Thomey M L, Collins S L, Vargas R, et al. 2011. Effect of precipitation variability on net primary production and soil respiration in a Chihuahuan Desert grassland. Global Change Biology, 17(4): 1505–1515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Walter J, Grant K, Beierkuhnlein C, et al. 2012. Increased rainfall variability reduces biomass and forage quality of temperate grassland largely independent of mowing frequency. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 148: 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Xia J Y, Niu S L, Ciais P, et al. 2015. Joint control of terrestrial gross primary productivity by plant phenology and physiology. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112(9): 2788–2793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Yandjian L, Gherardi L, Sala O E. 2011. Nitrogen limitation in arid-subhumid ecosystems: A meta-analysis of fertilization studies. Journal of Arid Environments, 75(8): 675–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Yepez E A, Huxman T E, Ignace D D, et al. 2005. Dynamics of transpiration and evaporation following a moisture pulse in semiarid grassland: A chamber-based isotope method for partitioning flux components. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 132(3–3): 359–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zeppel M J B, Wilks J V, Lewis J D. 2014. Impacts of extreme precipitation and seasonal changes in precipitation on plants. Biogeosciences, 11: 3083–3093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Zhang B C, Cao J J, Bai Y F, et al. 2013. Effects of rainfall amount and frequency on vegetation growth in a Tibetan alpine meadow. Climatic Change, 118(2): 197–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zhang Y G, Moran M S, Nearing M A, et al. 2013. Extreme precipitation patterns and reductions of terrestrial ecosystem production across biomes. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 118(1): 148–157.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, the Chinese Academy of Sciences and Springer - Verlag GmbH 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Qun Guo
    • 1
  • Shenggong Li
    • 1
  • Zhongmin Hu
    • 1
  • Wei Zhao
    • 1
    • 2
  • Guirui Yu
    • 1
  • Xiaomin Sun
    • 1
  • Linghao Li
    • 3
  • Naishen Liang
    • 4
  • Wenming Bai
    • 3
  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources ResearchChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  2. 2.University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  3. 3.State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of BotanyChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  4. 4.Global Carbon Cycle Research Section Center for Global Environmental ResearchNational Institute for Environmental StudiesTsukubaJapan

Personalised recommendations