An analytical model for estimating soil temperature profiles on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau of China
- 255 Downloads
Soil temperature is a key variable in the control of underground hydro-thermal processes. To estimate soil temperature more accurately, this study proposed a solution method of the heat conduction equation of soil temperature (improved heat conduction model) by applying boundary conditions that incorporate the annual and diurnal variations of soil surface temperature and the temporal variation of daily temperature amplitude, as well as the temperature difference between two soil layers in the Tanggula observation site of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau of China. We employed both the improved heat conduction model and the classical heat conduction model to fit soil temperature by using the 5 cm soil layer as the upper boundary for soil depth. The results indicated that the daily soil temperature amplitude can be better described by the sinusoidal function in the improved model, which then yielded more accurate soil temperature simulating effect at the depth of 5 cm. The simulated soil temperature values generated by the improved model and classical heat conduction model were then compared to the observed soil temperature values at different soil depths. Statistical analyses of the root mean square error (RMSE), the normalized standard error (NSEE) and the bias demonstrated that the improved model showed higher accuracy, and the average values of RMSE, bias and NSEE at the soil depth of 10–105 cm were 1.41°C, 1.15°C and 22.40%, respectively. These results indicated that the improved heat conduction model can better estimate soil temperature profiles compared to the traditional model.
Keywordssoil temperature heat conduction equation daily amplitude boundary condition
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Canadell J G, Le Quéré C, Raupach M R, et al. 2007. Contributions to accelerating atmospheric CO2 growth from economic activity, carbon intensity, and efficiency of natural sinks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(47): 18866–18870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hillel D. 1982. Introduction to Soil Physics. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Hopmans J W, Šimunek J, Bristow K L. 2002. Indirect estimation of soil thermal properties and water flux using heat pulse probe measurements: Geometry and dispersion effects. Water Resources Research, 38(1), doi: 10.1029/2000WR000071.Google Scholar
- Kusuda T. 1975. The effect of ground cover on earth temperature. In: Proceedings of Conference on Alternatives in Energy Conservation: The Use of Earth-covered Buildings. Texas: Forth Worth, 9–12.Google Scholar
- Liu H Z, Tu G, Dong W J, et al. 2006. Seasonal and diurnal variations of the exchange of water vapor and CO2 between the land surface and atmosphere in the semi-arid area. Chinese Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 30(1): 108–118. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Niu G Y, Sun S F, Hong Z X. 1997. Numerical simulation on water and heat transport in the desert soil and atmospheric boundary layer. Acta Meteorologica Sinica, 55(4): 398–407. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Núñez C M, Varas E A, Meza F J. 1983. Modelling soil heat flux. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 100(3): 251–260.Google Scholar
- van Wijk W R. 1963. Periodic temperature variations in a homogeneous soil. In: van Wijk W R. Physics of Plant Environment. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing.Google Scholar
- Yang K, Bai D, Hao X Q, et al. 2009. Identification of soil hydraulic properties based on genetic algorithm. Transactions of the CSAE, 25(9): 32–35. (in Chinese)Google Scholar