Upper mantle xenoliths as sources of geophysical information: the Perşani Mts. area as a case study
The aim is to give an overview on how geochemical and petrological data, obtained from upper mantle xenoliths, could be utilized to provide information on the geophysical properties of the upper mantle at their origin. First we demonstrate how a tentative lithospheric column may be constructed based on the equilibrium temperature of upper mantle xenoliths and the area specific depth-temperature curves. Then it is described how the speed of seismic waves at the given pressure and temperature conditions could be calculated from the modal composition and geochemistry of major rock forming minerals of upper mantle xenoliths (e.g. olivine and orthopyroxene). It is also discussed how the lattice preferred orientation of minerals in upper mantle xenoliths provides information on the seismic anisotropy of the upper mantle, and how this information could be used to calculate the orientation and thickness of the anisotropic layer in the upper mantle if one anisotropic layer is assumed. Structural hydroxyl (or most commonly referred to as ‘water’) incorporated in nominally anhydrous minerals plays a critical role in determining the electrical conductivity and rheology of the upper mantle. Finally, it is presented how electrical conductivity and effective viscosity of the upper mantle could be approximated based on the structural hydroxyl content in olivine, the most abundant mineral constituent of the upper mantle. Our study area, the Perşani Mountains is situated in the Carpathian Bend area (Romania) which is geologically one of the most active areas in Europe. Abundant upper mantle xenoliths from the Perşani Mountains (Eastern Carpathians) will serve as examples how meaningful geophysical information can be obtained for the upper mantle. Furthermore, it is shown how these pieces of information may be utilized in interpreting geophysical and geodynamic challenges of this area.
KeywordsUpper mantle Xenoliths Geophysics Rheology Perşani Mts
We thank the Topo-Transylvania community for the motivation overs the past years, especially Viktor Wesztergom, Eszter Szűcs and Sierd Cloetingh for their continuous support and motivation. We are grateful to Anna Maria Fioretti and Raúl Carampin for their help with EMPA analyses in Padua, Italy, and also to Bernardo Cesare for facilitation. Luca Fedele is thanked for helping with geochemical analyses at Virginia Tech. We also owe thanks to Robert J. Bodnar, who facilitated the measurements at Virginia Tech. This study was financially supported by a Bolyai Postdoctoral Fellowship program to IK, and a Lendület Research Grant to the Pannon LitH2Oscope Research group and an NKFIH K128122 grant of the Innovation, Research and Development Office. This work was completed in the ELTE Excellence Program (783-3/2018/FEKUTSRAT) supported by the Hungarian Ministry of Human Capacities. This research was supported by the Hungarian Science Foundation (OTKA, 78425) to Cs. Szabó. This is the 93d publication of the Lithosphere Fluid Research Lab (Eötvös University, Hungary).
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the present manuscript.
- Berkesi M, Guzmics T, Szabó C, Dubessy J, Bodnar RJ, Hidas K, Ratter K (2012) The role of CO2-rich fluids in trace element transport and metasomatism in the lithospheric mantle beneath the Central Pannonian Basin, Hungary, based on fluid inclusions in mantle xenoliths. Earth Planet Sci Lett 331:8–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Chalot-Prat F, Gîrbacea R (2000) Partial delamination of continental mantle lithosphere, uplift-related crust–mantle decoupling, volcanism and basin formation: a new model for the Pliocene-Quaternary evolution of the southern East-Carpathians, Romania. Tectonophysics 327(1–2):83–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ciulavu D, Dinu C, Szakács A, Dordea D (2000) Neogene kinematics of the Transylvanian basin (Romania). AAPG Bull 84(10):1589–1615Google Scholar
- Downes H (1997) Shallow continental lithospheric mantle heterogeneity—petrological constraints. In: Upper mantle heterogeneities from active and passive seismology. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 295–308Google Scholar
- Downes H, Bodinier J, Thirlwall M, Lorand J-P, Fabries J (1991) REE and Sr–Nd isotopic geochemistry of eastern Pyrenean peridotite massifs: sub-continental lithospheric mantle modified by continental magmatism. J Petrol Volume Special_Volume(2):97–115Google Scholar
- Falus G (2004) Microstructural analysis of upper mantle peridotites: their application in understanding mantle processes during the formation of the Intra-Carpathian Basin System. Doctoral dissertation, SZTE, pp 165Google Scholar
- Hidas K, Guzmics T, Szabó C, Kovács I, Bodnar RJ, Zajacz Z, Nédli Z, Vaccari L, Perucchi A (2010) Coexisting silicate melt inclusions and H2O-bearing, CO2-rich fluid inclusions in mantle peridotite xenoliths from the Carpathian–Pannonian region (central Hungary). Chem Geol 274(1):1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Karátson D, Wulf S, Veres D, Magyari EK, Gertisser R, Timar-Gabor A, Novothny A, Telbisz T, Szalai Z, Anechitei-Deacu A, Appelt O, Bormann M, Jánosi Cs, Hubay K, Schäbitz F (2016) The latest explosive eruptions of Ciomadul (Csomád) volcano, East Carpathians—a tephrostratigraphic approach for the 51–29 ka BP time interval. J Volcanol Geoth Res 319:29–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Klébesz R, Gráczer Z, Szanyi Gy, Liptai N, Kovács I, Patkó L, Pintér Zs, Falus Gy, Wesztergom V, Szabó Cs (2015) Constraints on the thickness and seismic properties of the lithosphere in an extensional setting (Nógrád-Gömör Volcanic Field, Northern Pannonian Basin). Acta Geod Geoph 50(2):133–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kovács I, Falus G, Stuart G, Hidas K, Szabó C, Flower MJ, Hegedűs E, Posgay K, Zilahi-Sebess L (2012) Seismic anisotropy and deformation patterns in upper mantle xenoliths from the central Carpathian–Pannonian region: asthenospheric flow as a driving force for Cenozoic extension and extrusion? Tectonophysics 514–517:168–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Li ZXA, Lee CTA, Peslier AH, Lenardic A, Mackwell SJ (2008) Water contents in mantle xenoliths from the Colorado Plateau and vicinity: Implications for the mantle rheology and hydration-induced thinning of continental lithosphere. J Geophys Res Solid Earth. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JB005540 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Liptai N, Patkó L, Kovács IJ, Hidas K, Pintér Z, Jeffries T, Zajacz Z, O’Reilly SY, Griffin WL, Pearson NJ, Szabó C (2017) Multiple metasomatism beneath the Nógrád-Gömör Volcanic Field (Northern Pannonian Basin) revealed by upper mantle peridotite xenoliths. J Petrol 58(6):1107–1144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mutchler SR, Fedele L, Bodnar RJ (2008) Analysis management system (AMS) for reduction of laser ablation ICPMS data. In: Laser-ablation-ICPMS in the earth sciences: current practices and outstanding issues Mineralogical Association of Canada Quebec, vol 40, pp 318–327Google Scholar
- Pécskay Z, Lexa J, Szakács A, Balogh Kad, Seghedi I, Konečný V, Kovács M, Márton M, Kaličiak M, Széky-Fux V, Póka T, Gyarmati P, Edelstein O, Rosu E, Žec B (1995) Space and time distribution of Neogene-Queternary volcanism in the Carpatho-Pannonian Region. Acta Vulcanol 7:15–28Google Scholar
- Pouchou JL, Pichoir F (1991) Quantitative analysis of homogeneous or stratified microvolumes applying the model “PAP”. In: Electron probe quantitation. Springer US, pp 31–75Google Scholar
- Seghedi I, Szakacs A (1994) Upper pliocene to quaternary basaltic volcanism in the Persani Mountains. Rom J Petrol 76:101–107Google Scholar
- Taylor WR (1998) An experimental test of some geothermometer and geobaro-meter formulations for upper mantle peridotites with application to the thermobarometry of fertile lherzolite and garnet websterite. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie-Abhandlungen 172(2):381–408Google Scholar
- Wenzel F, Lorenz FP, Sperner B, Oncescu MC (1999) Seismotectonics of the Romanian Vrancea area. In: Vrancea earthquakes: tectonics, hazard and risk mitigation. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 15–25Google Scholar