Advertisement

Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica

, Volume 53, Issue 1, pp 157–170 | Cite as

Possible mechanisms of co-seismic electromagnetic effect

  • V. V. Surkov
  • V. A. Pilipenko
  • A. K. Sinha
Original Study
  • 83 Downloads

Abstract

We analyze theoretically two possible sources of co-seismic electromagnetic response to the propagation of various types of seismic waves caused either by the electrokinetic phenomena or geomagnetic inductive effect. The differences between these two generation mechanisms have been examined for different types of seismic waves (P, S, and Rayleigh-Love). Theoretical relationships describing the dependence of the co-seismic signal amplitude, polarization and apparent impedance on the earthquake seismic moment and magnitude have been derived as a function of distance. We indicate an observational possibility to discriminate seismo-electrokinetic and seismo-magnetic effects and to estimate their contribution into a recorded co-seismic electromagnetic signal. Magnitudes and polarization of these signals are shown to depend strongly on the type of seismic wave and local crust parameters, such as streaming potential coupling coefficient, conductivity, inhomogeneity, etc. Co-seismic electromagnetic signals, though not directly applied for earthquake prediction, contain a useful information on local crustal phenomena, and can be used to identify “sensitive” zones perspective for the monitoring of precursory electromagnetic disturbances.

Keywords

Co-seismic effect Electrokinetic phenomena Geomagnetic inductive effect Earthquake Geophysical prospecting 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study is supported by the Grant No 15-55-45064 from the Russian Foundation for Basic Sciences (VAP, AKS) and by the Competitiveness Program of NRNU MEPhI (VVS). We appreciate useful comments of both reviewers.

References

  1. Aki K, Richards P (2002) Quantitative Seismology, 2nd edn. University Science Books, Sausalito, p 932Google Scholar
  2. Anisimov SV, Gokhberg MB, Ivanov EA et al (1985) Short period vibrations of the Earth’s electromagnetic field due to industrial explosion. Rep USSR Acad Sci 281(3):556–559Google Scholar
  3. Bockris JOM, Reddy AKN (1970) Modern electrochemistry. Plenum, New York, pp 623–843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dobrovolsky IP, Gershenzon NI, Gokhberg MB (1989) Theory of electrokinetic effects occurring at the final state in the preparation of a tectonic earthquake. Phys Earth Planet Inter 57:144–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Eleman F (1965) The response of magnetic instruments to earthquake waves. J Geomagn Geoelectr 18:43–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fedorov E, Pilipenko V, Uyeda S (2001) Electric and magnetic fields generated by electrokinetic processes in a conductive crust. Phys Chem Earth 26:793–799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fitterman DV (1978) Electrokinetic and magnetic anomalies associated with dilatant regions in a layered earth. J Geophys Res 83:5923–5928CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fitterman DV (1979a) Theory of electrokinetic-magnetic anomalies in a faulted half-space. J Geophys Res 84:6031–6040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fitterman DV (1979b) Calculations of self-potential anomalies near vertical contacts. Geophysics 44:195–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Frenkel YAI (1944) On the theory of seismic and seismoelectric phenomena in a moist soil. J Phys (USSR) 8:230–241Google Scholar
  11. Gershenzon NI, Bambakidis G, Ternovskiy I (2014) Coseismic electromagnetic field due to the electrokinetic effect. Geophysics 79:E217–E229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gorbachev LP, Surkov VV (1987) Perturbation of an external magnetic field by a Rayleigh surface wave. Magnetohydrodynamics 23:117–125Google Scholar
  13. Guglielmi AV (1986) Excitation of electromagnetic field oscillations by elastic waves in conducting body. Geomagn Aeron 27:467–470Google Scholar
  14. Guglielmi AV (1991) Magnetic structure of the elastic wave front in conductive media. Izv Akad Nauk SSSR Ser Fiz Zemli 4:753–758Google Scholar
  15. Guglielmi AV, Ruban VF (1990) On the theory of the seismomagnetic induction effect. Izv Akad Nauk SSSR Ser Fiz Zemli N5:47–54Google Scholar
  16. Guglielmi A, Hayakawa M, Potapov A, Tsegmed B (2006) Polarization method to detect the co-seismic magnetic oscillations. Phys Chem Earth 31:299–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Honkura Y, Matsushima M, Oshiman N et al (2002) Small electric and magnetic signals observed before the arrival of seismic wave. Earth Planets Space 54:e9–e12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Huang Q, Ren H, Zhang D, Chen YJ (2015) Medium effect on the characteristics of the coupled seismic and electromagnetic signals. Proc Jpn Acad Ser B Phys Biol Sci 91:17–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ivanov AG (1939) Effect of electrization of earth layers by elastic waves passing through them. Proc USSR Acad Sci 24:42–45Google Scholar
  20. Ivanov AG (1940) Seismoelectric effect of the second kind. Proc USSR Acad Sci Ser Geogr Geophys 4:699–726Google Scholar
  21. Iyemori T, Kamei T, Tanaka Y et al (1996) Co-seismic geomagnetic variations observed at the 1995 Hyogoken–Nanbu earthquake. J Geomagn Geoelectr 48:1059–1070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Johnston MJS (1978) Tectonomagnetic effects. Earthq Inf Bull (USGS) 10:82–87Google Scholar
  23. Jouniaux L, Bernard ML, Zamora M, Pozzi JP (2000) Streaming potential in volcanic rocks from Mount Pelée. J Geophys Res 105:8391–8401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kaliski S (1960) Solution of the equation of motion in a magnetic field for an isotropic body in an infinite space assuming perfect electric conductivity. Proc Vibr Probl 1(3):53–67Google Scholar
  25. Kanamori H, Anderson DL (1975) Theoretical basis of some empirical relations in seismology. Bull Seism Soc Am 65:1073–1095Google Scholar
  26. Knopoff EL (1955) The interaction between elastic waves motion and a magnetic field in electrical conductors. J Geophys Res 60:617–629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Landau LD, Lifshitz EM (1960) Electrodynamics of continuous media. In: Course of theoretical physics, vol 8. Pergamon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  28. Landau LD, Lifshitz EM (1970) Theory of elasticity. In: Course of theoretical physics, vol 7. Pergamon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  29. Martner ST, Sparks NR (1959) The electroseismic effect. Geophysics 24:297–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mavko G, Mukerji T, Dvorkin T (2014) The rock physics handbook: tools for seismic analysis of porous media, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  31. Molchanov OA, Hayakawa M (2008) Seismo-electromagnetics and related phenomena: history and latest results. TERRAPUB, Tokyo, p 189Google Scholar
  32. Molchanov O, Kulchitsky A, Hayakawa M (2001) Inductive seismo-electromagnetic effect in relation to seismogenic ULF emission. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 1:61–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Molchanov O, Kulchitsky A, Hayakawa M (2002) ULF emission due to inductive seismo-electromagnetic effect. In: Hayakawa M, Molchanov OA (eds) Seismo-electromagnetics: lithosphere-atmosphere-ionosphere coupling. TERRARUB, Tokyo, pp 153–162Google Scholar
  34. Morgan FD, Williams ER, Madden TR (1989) Streaming potential properties of Westerly granite with applications. J Geophys Res 94:12449–12461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nagao T, Orihara Y, Yamaguchi T et al (2000) Co-seismic geoelectric potential changes observed in Japan. Geophys Res Lett 27:1535–1538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pilipenko V, Fedorov E (2014) Coupling mechanism between geoacoustic emission and electromagnetic anomalies prior to earthquakes. Res Geophys 4:5008.  https://doi.org/10.4081/rg.2014.5008 Google Scholar
  37. Pilipenko V, Nenovski P, Tanaka H (2003) Detection and discrimination of VLF/ULF seismic-related electromagnetic emissions. Bulg Geophys J 29:13–30Google Scholar
  38. Pride SR (1994) Governing equations for the coupled electromagnetics and acoustics of porous media. Phys Rev B 50:15678–15696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pride SR, Garambois S (2005) Electroseismic wave theory of Frenkel and more recent developments. J Eng Mech 131:898–907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Shaidurov GYA, Potylitsyn VS, Kudinov DS (2016) Phase-induced polarization method based on processing noise signals of the natural electromagnetic field of the earth. Rus Geol Geophys 57:1371–1376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sparnaay MJ (1972) The electrical double layer. Pergamon Press, New York, p 415Google Scholar
  42. Surkov VV (1989) Perturbation of an external magnetic field by a longitudinal acoustic wave. Magnetohydrodynamics 25:145–148Google Scholar
  43. Surkov VV (1997) The electromagnetic precursor of a seismic wave. Geomagn Aeron 37:792–796Google Scholar
  44. Surkov V, Hayakawa M (2014) Ultra and extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields, springer geophysics series, vol XVI. Springer, Berlin, p 486Google Scholar
  45. Surkov VV, Pilipenko VA (1997) Magnetic effects due to earthquakes and underground explosions: a review. Ann Geophys 40(2):227–239.  https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-3904 Google Scholar
  46. Surkov VV, Pilipenko VA (2015) Estimate of ULF electromagnetic noise caused by a fluid flow during seismic or volcano activity. Ann Geophys 58(6):S0655.  https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-6767 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Research Nuclear University MEPhIMoscowRussia
  2. 2.Institute of Physics of the EarthRussian Academy of ScienceMoscowRussia
  3. 3.Indian Institute of GeomagnetismNavi MumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations