Advertisement

Paintings from Photographs: A Copyright Conundrum

  • Richard Arnold
Article
  • 6 Downloads

Abstract

There has been a series of decisions of national courts in Europe concerning claims of infringement of copyright in photographs by paintings based on those photographs. These cases have had a diversity of outcomes. In part, this is due to a failure by national courts in recent cases properly to apply the guidance of the Court of Justice of the European Union. More fundamentally, it reflects a lack of agreement as to what the copyright in a photograph is supposed to protect. This article proposes a solution to the problem through a careful application of the principles laid down by the CJEU.

Keywords

European copyright law Paintings based on photographs Originality of photographs Scope of protection Infringement 

Notes

References

  1. Allan R (2007) After Bridgeman: copyright, museums, and public domain works of art. 155 U Pa L Rev 960Google Scholar
  2. Arnold R (2011) Content copyrights and signal copyrights: the case for a rational scheme of protection. QMJIP 272Google Scholar
  3. Bently L, Aplin A (2018a) Displacing the dominance of the three-step test: the role of global, mandatory fair use. University of Cambridge Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 33/2018Google Scholar
  4. Bently L, Aplin A (2018b) Whatever became of global mandatory fair use? A case study in dysfunctional pluralism. University of Cambridge Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 34/2018Google Scholar
  5. Bruce T (2012) In the language of pictures: how copyright law fails to adequately account for photography. 115 W Va L Rev 93Google Scholar
  6. Butler KC (1998) Keeping the world safe from naked-chicks-in-art refrigerator magnets: the plot to control art images in the public domain through copyrights in photographic and reproductions. 21 Hastings Comm & Ent L J 55Google Scholar
  7. Cartier-Bresson H (1952) The decisive moment. Simon & Schuster, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Cooper E (2018) Art and modern copyright: the contested image. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Davies G et al (2016) Copinger and Skone James on copyright, 17th edn. Sweet & Maxwell, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Farley C H (2004) The lingering effects of copyright’s response to the invention of photography. 65 U Pitt L Rev 385Google Scholar
  11. Ficsor M (2003) Guide to the copyright and related rights treaties administered by WIPO (WIPO)Google Scholar
  12. Gendreau Y et al (1999) Copyright and photographs: an international survey. Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  13. Goldstein P, Hugenholtz B (2013) International copyright: principles, law and practice, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  14. Hughes J (2012) The photographer’s copyright – photograph as art, photograph as database. 25 Harv J Law & Tech 327Google Scholar
  15. Kogan T (2015) The enigma of photograph, depiction and copyright originality. 25 Fordham Intell Prop Media & Ent LJ 869Google Scholar
  16. Laddie H et al (2018) The modern law of copyright, 5th edn. LexisNexis, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Landes W, Posner P (2003) The economic structure of intellectual property law. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Madison M (2010) Beyond creativity: copyright as knowledge law. 12 Vand J Ent & Tech L 817Google Scholar
  19. Mazurek C (2017) Through the looking glass: photography and the idea/expression dichotomy. 6 NYU J Intell Prop & Ent Law 278Google Scholar
  20. Miller J S (2009) Hoisting originality. 31 Cardozo L RevGoogle Scholar
  21. Ricketson S, Ginsburg R (2007) International copyright and neighbouring rights: the Berne convention and beyond, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  22. Rosati E (2013) Originality in EU copyright: full harmonization through case law. Edward Elgar, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rosati E (2019) Copyright and the court of justice of the European Union. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Scharf A (1990) Art and photography. Penguin, HarmondsworthGoogle Scholar
  25. Searle A (2015) Why Belgium’s plagiarism verdict on Luc Tuymans is beyond parody. The Guardian, 21 Jan 2015Google Scholar
  26. Subotnik E (2011) Originality proxies: toward a theory of copyright and creativity. 76 Brook L Rev 1487Google Scholar
  27. van den Eede E, Trevisan L (2010) The case of the copied photograph. 197 Copyright World 12-13Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition, Munich 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard Arnold
    • 1
  1. 1.Judge of the High Court of England and WalesLondonUK

Personalised recommendations